col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
videoType
dynamic-media
videoDmUrl
https://delivery-p136806-e1377785.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:23e347d7-5b43-4982-8861-98224f767599/play?assetname=20231212-BEOFD-Seminar-Part02.mp4
keyFrameImage
videoDescription
Experts from international organizations, government, and civil society discussed how recently concluded research on these flashpoints can improve policymaking.
timestamp

00:05 Uh,

00:05 we have 2 more presentations.

00:07 They will be short,

00:07 uh,

00:08 but,

00:08 uh,

00:08 compelling.

00:10 Uh,

00:10 the first will be given by Stephen Winkler.

00:12 He's a social development specialist in the World Bank,

00:15 and he will be followed by,

00:16 uh,

00:16 Jan van der Goolz,

00:18 who is a,

00:18 a senior economist in the World Bank.

00:21 Over to you,

00:21 Steven.

00:24 Thank you so much,

00:25 Paula,

00:25 and I hope everyone can hear me OK.

00:27 Uh,

00:27 before I begin,

00:28 I also just want to echo,

00:30 uh,

00:30 what others have said in,

00:31 in highlighting the partnership between the World Bank,

00:34 the UK government,

00:35 and UNHCR.

00:36 I think it's produced,

00:37 um,

00:38 uh,

00:39 especially in this case,

00:40 research that is not only,

00:41 uh,

00:42 very interesting,

00:42 but also I think,

00:44 uh,

00:44 has made a difference and will continue to make a difference,

00:46 which is,

00:47 of course,

00:48 uh,

00:48 like Teresa said,

00:49 what,

00:49 what really matters here.

00:50 So.

00:51 Next side,

00:52 please.

00:53 So I'm gonna share a little bit about the uh research program on social cohesion.

00:58 And

00:59 What we tried to do with this research program is

01:02 uh build evidence on how uh development investments but also policies

01:07 can reduce inequalities and promote social cohesion

01:11 in forced displacement contexts.

01:14 And the way that we did this is we,

01:15 we,

01:16 um,

01:16 had a competitive call for proposals

01:19 where we received about I think 250 submissions and then from there

01:24 we had a committee select about 26

01:26 uh background papers,

01:28 um.

01:29 And those research teams uh that were selected then produced

01:33 uh background papers that covered um countries across Africa,

01:37 Asia,

01:37 Central and South America,

01:39 and also Europe.

01:40 And they used uh several different research designs.

01:43 Including both quantitative

01:45 and qualitative methods

01:47 and then once those 26 papers were

01:50 produced and went through various review processes,

01:52 many of them,

01:53 uh,

01:53 were published as Paulo highlighted in,

01:55 in,

01:56 um,

01:57 in top journals,

01:58 uh,

01:59 then what we did is we

02:00 produced one kind of global report where we attempted

02:03 to synthesize what we were seeing across these 26 papers

02:07 into,

02:07 um,

02:08 uh,

02:09 uh,

02:09 one report,

02:10 uh,

02:10 on this new evidence on.

02:12 Force displacement

02:14 and social cohesion.

02:16 Next slide,

02:16 please.

02:18 So this just gives you a snapshot of the countries that were covered

02:22 by the 26

02:24 background papers.

02:25 I also want to note,

02:26 we had a couple of papers that were um large cross-national studies.

02:30 Uh,

02:30 so for example,

02:31 there was a paper that covered,

02:33 uh,

02:33 pretty much all of sub-Saharan Africa.

02:34 So there are a few countries

02:36 not highlighted here that were covered by

02:38 the research.

02:40 Next slide.

02:41 So what I want to do in my um very limited time today is just on this slide,

02:45 give.

02:46 A really quick overview of only 4 of those 26 background papers,

02:51 uh,

02:51 just to give you an idea of the types of,

02:53 uh,

02:54 research questions,

02:55 but also the findings that were coming out of this,

02:57 this,

02:57 uh,

02:58 research program.

02:59 And then on the next slide,

03:00 I'll cover kind of some of the key takeaways from that,

03:02 that global report.

03:04 The first paper I want to talk about is a paper by Axaway and Jen.

03:07 And if I'm not wrong,

03:08 I think I saw,

03:09 uh,

03:09 one of these authors in the room.

03:11 So,

03:11 uh,

03:12 you can correct me if I misspeak on any of this,

03:14 but

03:15 Uh,

03:16 what,

03:16 what these authors looked at is they looked at,

03:18 I think,

03:18 34,

03:19 uh,

03:20 low and middle income countries across a time frame of I think 14 years.

03:24 And what they found is that,

03:25 um,

03:26 in those countries,

03:28 large refugee arrivals

03:29 do not negatively affect host community attitudes towards

03:33 uh towards refugees.

03:35 Uh,

03:35 they also found that.

03:37 Uh,

03:38 countries that adopted more inclusive policies.

03:40 So

03:41 things like access to the labor market,

03:44 uh,

03:45 those,

03:45 those inclusive policies did not lead to,

03:48 uh,

03:48 more negative attitudes towards refugees.

03:50 And I think,

03:51 uh,

03:51 this is

03:53 really important one,

03:54 because,

03:54 uh,

03:55 as Sukina highlighted and others have mentioned,

03:57 there's,

03:57 there's in the past been a lack of

04:00 focus on low and middle-income countries.

04:02 And so I think.

04:03 Building this evidence across 34 low and middle income countries is,

04:07 is

04:07 super helpful.

04:09 Uh,

04:09 but also,

04:10 um,

04:10 the result here is a little bit different

04:12 than what we've seen in some high-income countries,

04:14 uh,

04:14 in terms of,

04:15 uh,

04:16 uh,

04:16 refugee arrivals and sentiment towards those refugees.

04:19 So then a second paper I'll mention is on Uganda,

04:21 and this paper,

04:22 uh,

04:23 found that host communities

04:25 with more exposure to refugee settlements actually experienced,

04:28 um,

04:29 significant increases in the provision of public goods and services.

04:33 Uh,

04:34 things like access to healthcare,

04:36 access to education,

04:38 uh,

04:38 density of roads,

04:39 and at the same time,

04:40 uh,

04:42 uh,

04:42 those same communities,

04:43 uh,

04:44 did not see any,

04:45 um,

04:46 uh.

04:47 Uh,

04:48 negative increase in attitude towards

04:50 migrants or migration policy,

04:52 um,

04:52 and this aligns with kind of what we just

04:54 heard from Teresa in terms of the importance of,

04:56 uh,

04:57 directing resources also to,

04:59 um,

04:59 uh,

05:00 to host communities,

05:02 uh,

05:02 and what,

05:02 what the authors in this paper argue is that.

05:05 Uh,

05:06 because those host communities can experience

05:08 those public service benefits,

05:10 it actually helps to mitigate any of the potential backlash,

05:13 or at least some of the backlash that could otherwise occur,

05:16 uh,

05:17 uh,

05:17 in response to refugee settlement.

05:20 Third,

05:20 I'll,

05:20 I'll talk about this paper from Greece.

05:22 Um,

05:23 this paper is interesting.

05:24 It's one of the few that we had in the 26 that looked,

05:27 uh,

05:27 over a super long time period.

05:29 So they looked at,

05:30 um,

05:30 Greece's response to.

05:32 Uh,

05:33 the arrival of Greek Orthodox,

05:35 uh,

05:36 refugees in the early 1920s

05:38 and what they found is that,

05:40 uh,

05:42 early investment in policies,

05:44 uh,

05:44 such as granting farmland,

05:46 um,

05:47 building new houses and schools,

05:49 granting citizenship,

05:51 uh,

05:52 those early,

05:53 early policies helped to promote.

05:56 Uh,

05:57 uh,

05:57 integration of refugees into the community

05:59 and promoted long-term social cohesion.

06:01 So they looked at

06:03 survey data and census data

06:05 from the 1920s all the way up to,

06:07 uh,

06:07 I think 2001,

06:09 and we're able to track kind of the,

06:11 the integration and the long-term social cohesion,

06:14 uh,

06:14 tied to those policies.

06:17 And then the final paper I'll mention is a paper

06:19 uh in Colombia and here the authors used a

06:23 uh conjoint survey experiment

06:25 and they found that um

06:28 Colombians who reported higher levels of meaningful social interaction

06:32 with Venezuelan migrants

06:34 tend to favor more open migratory policies,

06:36 so things like.

06:38 Labor market access,

06:39 um,

06:40 and

06:41 allowing Venezuelan migrants to

06:43 have their families join them in Colombia,

06:45 those types of

06:46 family reunification policies.

06:48 Uh,

06:49 so again,

06:50 here,

06:50 uh,

06:51 highlighting the,

06:52 uh,

06:53 impact of what Paula mentioned in terms of,

06:54 of meaningful interactions and what impact that can have,

06:58 uh,

06:59 on the relationship between,

07:00 uh,

07:01 refugees and host communities.

07:04 So that gives you,

07:05 like I said,

07:05 a very,

07:05 very quick overview of just some of the,

07:08 some of the um

07:10 findings from the background papers.

07:12 And then as I mentioned,

07:13 what we did is we tried to

07:15 take all of that new evidence and put it in one report,

07:17 which is of course challenging,

07:19 um,

07:19 but

07:20 I'll try and highlight some of the key takeaways from that report.

07:23 And the first takeaway is just to acknowledge that,

07:26 you know,

07:26 displacement

07:27 can

07:28 make things worse.

07:29 Displacement can,

07:31 uh,

07:31 exacerbate existing inequalities.

07:33 It can create new tensions,

07:35 uh,

07:36 create the potential for new conflicts,

07:38 um,

07:38 especially in the short term

07:40 and especially in areas with,

07:42 uh,

07:43 already strained and limited,

07:45 uh,

07:45 uh,

07:46 services and resources.

07:47 Um,

07:48 but what,

07:49 you know,

07:49 many,

07:50 many of the papers,

07:51 uh,

07:51 pulled out is that.

07:52 Uh,

07:53 inclusive policies and development investments can really help to mitigate

07:57 some of these negative effects,

07:59 uh,

07:59 that would otherwise occur from.

08:01 The displacement experience

08:04 And in the report,

08:05 we have um

08:06 several different kind of policy and operational recommendations.

08:09 So I encourage you to,

08:10 to check out our report.

08:11 Um,

08:12 we go into a much richer discussion there on all of these,

08:15 but

08:15 I'll highlight,

08:16 highlight just a few,

08:17 um.

08:19 The first,

08:20 uh,

08:20 which might be quite obvious,

08:21 but,

08:22 uh,

08:22 aligns with the UN Global Compact in terms of providing refugees

08:26 the right to work,

08:27 uh,

08:28 and freedom of movement

08:29 and access to services and other basic rights.

08:33 The second is the importance of investing in infrastructure and services.

08:38 Uh,

08:39 and the third is ensuring that those investments.

08:42 Uh,

08:42 and also humanitarian aid targets both

08:45 the displaced persons and the host communities,

08:48 uh,

08:49 and that it does so,

08:50 um,

08:51 and considers both

08:52 the needs in the near term,

08:54 uh,

08:54 but also in the long term,

08:56 but also the unique needs of,

08:58 uh,

08:58 urban and rural areas.

09:00 This is something that was

09:01 coming out in a few of the papers that just the,

09:03 the variation and needs and impact,

09:06 uh,

09:07 in urban and rural areas.

09:10 Also,

09:10 uh,

09:11 some of the research suggested that using participatory approaches,

09:14 so,

09:15 uh,

09:15 approaches that engage

09:17 both displaced persons and host communities to kind of collectively,

09:21 uh,

09:22 use their voice to determine how to allocate resources

09:24 can help mitigate some tensions in the communities.

09:28 Fourth is providing

09:30 services such as mental health services,

09:33 social assistance,

09:34 and legal assistance

09:36 that are most needed by displaced persons.

09:39 And then 5th is this idea of promoting positive interaction.

09:44 And we talk in the paper about some of the different mechanisms and interventions.

09:49 Uh,

09:49 that can

09:50 be used for this,

09:51 um,

09:52 but I just want to highlight that there is.

09:54 Kind of growing research,

09:55 not just from

09:56 this research program,

09:57 but a few other

09:58 recent studies that um

10:00 this idea of really

10:02 promoting meaningful interactions between displaced persons

10:05 and host communities can help to

10:08 build empathy across those two groups and promote

10:11 uh long-term

10:12 social cohesion.

10:14 So I will end there.

10:14 I think hopefully these sites will be shared,

10:16 um,

10:16 and so you'll be able to access these links where you can see um

10:20 the full report,

10:21 the 26 papers,

10:22 some recordings of other events that we've held,

10:25 um,

10:25 and also this video,

10:27 uh,

10:27 that summarizes the results from the,

10:29 the full report.

10:31 So I'll end there.

10:32 Thank you so much.

10:39 Thank you very much,

10:39 Steven,

10:40 and uh it's your turn,

10:41 Yan.

10:42 Over to you.

10:44 Thank you very much,

10:44 Paula,

10:45 and it's a pleasure to be with you,

10:46 uh,

10:46 this afternoon.

10:47 My name is Jan van der Goltz,

10:48 um,

10:48 and I'm here to present,

10:50 uh,

10:51 a study that we've done on the impacts of hosting refugees on jobs for hosts.

10:56 Um,

10:57 you know,

10:57 it's,

10:58 it's part of the larger suite of work that we've done on jobs,

11:01 um,

11:01 it's available for you online on the World Bank's website.

11:04 Uh,

11:04 next page,

11:05 please.

11:07 So the,

11:08 the study we're talking about today

11:10 reviews the global evidence,

11:11 but then,

11:12 uh,

11:12 focuses in on 4 case study countries.

11:15 So you see them here,

11:16 it's Colombia,

11:17 Ethiopia,

11:18 Jordan,

11:18 and Uganda,

11:19 uh,

11:20 2 middle-income countries,

11:21 2 low-income countries,

11:22 and within each group,

11:23 one country that has

11:25 for some time had a very open,

11:27 um,

11:27 stance toward labor market integration of refugees,

11:30 and one country that has been more cautious in opening up.

11:34 Um,

11:35 we,

11:35 we try to ask

11:37 two primary questions.

11:38 One is,

11:38 how do the impacts on jobs for hosts

11:41 differ across these different settings that have such,

11:44 uh,

11:45 such a variety of economic context,

11:47 and also such a variety of policies?

11:50 And secondly,

11:51 what drives these differences?

11:52 How do refugees and hosts interact in the labor market?

11:55 Uh,

11:55 in ways that then ultimately,

11:57 uh,

11:57 create these jobs impacts.

11:59 Um,

11:59 as additional work,

12:00 we,

12:00 uh,

12:01 evaluated three work permit schemes,

12:03 uh,

12:04 in these countries,

12:05 and we conducted an experiment

12:07 on hosts' attitudes,

12:09 uh,

12:09 towards refugees and how competition in

12:11 the labor market influences these attitudes.

12:14 Uh,

12:14 next slide,

12:15 please.

12:16 So I'll just show you two brief slides that summarize the results.

12:20 What you see here

12:21 are the comparative results across these four

12:23 countries on the effect of hosting refugees

12:26 on consumption in the lowland countries or

12:28 on earnings in the middle-income countries,

12:31 as well as on,

12:32 on the employment rate among hosts.

12:34 And the shading really tells the story.

12:36 So the blue boxes

12:38 are positive effects.

12:39 So for instance,

12:40 an increase in consumption or an increase in the employment rate.

12:43 The red boxes

12:45 or orange boxes are negative effects,

12:47 and the beige boxes are no effect.

12:49 And as you can see,

12:51 the first finding really of this exercise was

12:54 that across these four very different settings,

12:56 the overall effect

12:57 of hosting refugees on these very important labor market outcomes

13:01 were modest or even positive in some countries.

13:06 The,

13:06 uh,

13:06 twin finding to that is that once you

13:08 look at different groups within the labor market,

13:11 uh,

13:11 you do find differences.

13:12 You find some groups that are negatively affected,

13:14 you find some groups that are positively affected.

13:18 And,

13:18 uh,

13:18 the findings from the work permit analysis really mirrors these pictures.

13:22 The overall impact of um allowing greater access through work,

13:26 work permit schemes,

13:27 uh,

13:27 is mild or positive in the cases that we studied in Colombia and Jordan.

13:32 Uh,

13:32 but there are differences in how,

13:34 uh,

13:34 various groups within the labor market are affected.

13:36 And of course,

13:37 we discussed that,

13:38 uh,

13:38 in detail in the report.

13:41 We then collected primary data in 3 out of

13:44 these 4 countries to really focus on some labor

13:46 markets both in the urban and in the rural

13:48 sphere and try to understand how hosts and refugees

13:52 interact there.

13:53 And I'll just

13:54 give you a little flavor of that here.

13:56 One thing that,

13:57 that's really quite important,

13:58 we think to emphasize is that even in those

14:01 labor markets where access to work is fairly restricted,

14:04 refugees will find ways to participate

14:07 out of economic necessity.

14:09 But conversely,

14:10 even in the pretty open labor markets,

14:12 a lot of refugees do not participate and are mainly consumers in the local market.

14:17 So it's important

14:18 to think both about the labor market competition that comes out of that,

14:21 but also the market opportunities

14:24 that come through this influx

14:26 of additional consumers.

14:28 The second

14:30 key point is that both the policy environment and the loss of assets,

14:35 uh,

14:35 through displacement really pushes refugees toward vulnerable employment,

14:39 and that creates certain patterns of competition for hosts.

14:42 It tends to be hosts

14:43 who work in some of the more vulnerable jobs,

14:46 uh,

14:46 that see more competition,

14:48 especially if there's less support for refugees,

14:50 and especially if there's less openness to refugees on the labor market.

14:53 And the final point,

14:55 um,

14:56 Is that while from the high-income countries,

14:58 we are quite used to thinking about skill matches.

15:01 Um,

15:02 skills may matter in the lower-income countries,

15:04 but maybe not in the obvious ways.

15:06 It can be more about

15:07 soft skills,

15:08 as we've heard,

15:09 uh,

15:09 from Stephen.

15:10 Uh,

15:10 it can be about,

15:11 um,

15:12 language,

15:12 it can be about the ability to network.

15:15 Um,

15:15 but the technical skills and some of these labor markets don't come out,

15:18 uh,

15:19 as strongly as a factor of integration.

15:21 On the other hand,

15:22 Assets are incredibly important

15:24 in labor markets where most everybody is self-employed.

15:28 Of course,

15:28 the ability to start your own business activity,

15:31 uh,

15:31 is critical for refugees,

15:33 and it's also very decisive for hosts who are trying to

15:35 seize some of these opportunities that come in the market,

15:38 uh,

15:39 through the new,

15:40 uh,

15:40 market participants,

15:41 new consumers that arise.

15:43 Final slide,

15:43 please.

15:45 Well,

15:46 there should be a,

15:46 a slide on policy messages,

15:48 you know,

15:48 I'm,

15:48 I'm just gonna talk about it,

15:50 um,

15:50 while we,

15:51 while we see this slide.

15:53 Um.

15:54 Just a few points to emphasize,

15:56 um,

15:57 we show,

15:57 I think that it's really quite critical to look very

16:01 closely and in a very realistic and grounded way

16:04 at the labor markets that we are talking about.

16:06 We try to give some guidance for trying to

16:08 understand how competition is likely to play out,

16:11 uh,

16:11 in these labor markets.

16:12 Secondly,

16:13 as we've said,

16:14 it's important to think about opportunities.

16:16 We tend to think about competition in the labor markets,

16:19 but there are new consumers,

16:20 there are workers,

16:21 there are people with skills and assets,

16:23 uh,

16:23 who arrive in these markets,

16:25 and opportunities will come.

16:26 We explained that,

16:27 for instance,

16:27 in the case of agriculture,

16:29 uh,

16:29 where there can be significant opportunities for,

16:31 for local producers.

16:33 Um,

16:34 And finally,

16:35 just to emphasize again,

16:37 uh,

16:37 the importance of access to capital in low-income labor markets

16:40 where much employment is and self-employment and household activities,

16:44 and the need to think really carefully

16:46 about the kind of,

16:47 um,

16:47 skill support

16:49 that would be of use to,

16:50 to refugees and to their hosts.

16:52 Um,

16:53 I'll stop there.

16:54 Uh,

16:55 we expect to,

16:56 uh,

16:56 formally launch this report in the coming year,

16:59 but,

16:59 uh,

17:00 the executive summary

17:01 is available both in the room.

17:03 I hope you'll take a copy as well as also online.

17:06 And I'd be remiss,

17:07 uh,

17:07 if I didn't mention,

17:08 given Paulo's remarks on cost effectiveness and how

17:11 important it is to try to track cost,

17:13 that there is a companion piece that looks

17:15 at the cost of job support and refugee settings

17:18 that is also available on the World Bank's website.

17:20 Thank you very much.

17:23 Thank you,

17:23 Yan.

17:24 Thank you,

17:24 Steven.

17:25 Uh,

17:26 we're ready now to switch over to our panel discussion.

17:29 So I'll invite all the panelists to come up,

17:31 uh,

17:31 take a seat at the table,

17:33 and I'll introduce our moderator.

17:35 Um,

17:36 he is uh Ricardo Morel.

17:37 He's the director of the Peace and Recovery Initiative at Innovations for

17:41 Poverty Action IPA.

17:43 Uh,

17:43 welcome to everyone

17:46 and as well as other,

17:47 uh,

17:48 uh,

17:48 services that you can provide for refugees.

17:50 This is what is doing,

17:51 OK.

17:53 Um,

17:54 it's an honor to be here and

17:56 thanks for the presentations to

17:59 the speakers,

18:00 uh,

18:00 Teresa,

18:01 Steven,

18:02 Jan,

18:03 and Paulo.

18:04 And right now we're going to,

18:06 to start a panel discussion

18:08 for about 30 minutes

18:11 and

18:12 then we'll open

18:13 for questions from the audience as well for about 15 minutes or so.

18:17 Um,

18:18 so we,

18:18 let me introduce the,

18:19 the panelist.

18:21 So we have Doctor Prosper

18:24 Ngandu,

18:25 who is the commissioner for refugees for the Republic of Zambia.

18:30 We have also Mr.

18:31 Mohulolo

18:32 Rerotoli,

18:34 who is the commissioner for Refugees for the Kingdom of Lesotho.

18:38 We have

18:39 Mr.

18:39 Paul Kitima.

18:41 Who is the executive director

18:43 of the refugee-led organization,

18:45 Bondeco Refugee Livelihood Center,

18:48 and we have Agnes Harrwitz,

18:50 who is senior Development Officer at UNHCR.

18:55 So,

18:55 I would like to

18:57 ask them two questions.

18:59 One

19:00 that is related to jobs

19:02 and the other one that is related to community or social cohesion as we've

19:06 seen from the presentations,

19:08 these are the two main topics

19:10 that we've discussed.

19:11 Um,

19:13 and I'll split the question.

19:14 So let me start with jobs,

19:16 um,

19:16 for Doctor Ngando

19:19 and for Mr.

19:20 Verratoli.

19:21 Uh,

19:22 so,

19:22 from the presentations,

19:24 uh,

19:24 especially I think from

19:25 Paulo Verme and from

19:27 Jan,

19:28 we've learned that

19:31 Well,

19:33 There are

19:34 important policies and programs trying to promote

19:37 inclusion of refugees in the labor markets,

19:40 and there seems,

19:41 the evidence seems to suggest that actually

19:44 they are positive on average

19:46 impacts

19:47 um

19:48 on host communities when there's presence of refugees.

19:52 The picture is,

19:53 is a bit complex,

19:54 you know,

19:54 when we disaggregate results,

19:56 we see that

19:57 some host community members can have more

20:00 opportunities while others will face some challenges.

20:03 So it's,

20:03 it's not like a very clear picture,

20:05 it's quite a complex one.

20:07 So the question is

20:10 whether

20:10 you can think of programs and policies in,

20:13 in your countries,

20:13 in your context

20:15 that are trying to foster the inclusion of refugees

20:19 and

20:20 If so,

20:21 then what are the,

20:22 the main challenges that you,

20:23 you have observed?

20:25 And lastly,

20:26 um,

20:26 so I'll,

20:27 I'll pack a couple of questions

20:29 and,

20:29 and you may choose,

20:30 hopefully you can answer them all.

20:32 Um,

20:33 since this is an evidence-driven

20:35 session,

20:36 if,

20:37 if you were to,

20:39 to think

20:40 what evidence,

20:41 what data,

20:42 what knowledge would you like to have

20:44 in order to inform your decisions regarding uh

20:47 integration of refugees in the labor market.

20:50 Thank you very much.

20:51 Yeah,

20:52 I simply say good afternoon,

20:53 everybody.

20:55 Well,

20:56 uh,

20:56 I'll start,

20:57 uh,

20:57 I know we have very few minutes given.

21:00 My introduction.

21:01 Yes,

21:01 I'm Doctor Ngandu,

21:02 but I'm now Ambassador Professor Ngandu.

21:07 Uh,

21:08 thank you for the topic.

21:10 Uh,

21:10 Zambia would want to announce that Zambia is the host of 93,000+ refugees.

21:18 So

21:20 The country as the current government realized the value of the refugee.

21:26 Refugees,

21:27 they are endowed with various skills.

21:29 And as we are talking about the economic turnaround of our country,

21:32 Zambia.

21:34 We came to realize that

21:36 the refugees should not be left behind.

21:39 They're a very,

21:40 very viable resource for economic development of the

21:42 country because they are endowed with various skills.

21:45 So in that vein,

21:47 The country took a paradigm shift towards

21:49 the management or the protection of refugees

21:52 so that the host the community

21:54 should appreciate the value of a refugee,

21:56 not to see the refugee as a burden

21:58 or as a criminal,

21:59 that these are foreigners

22:00 who have come to grab jobs or these are

22:02 foreigners who have come to grab our resources.

22:05 So we came up with a model which is called modernization

22:08 of refugees and also the community settlement approach.

22:12 What is this vehicle?

22:13 What is this?

22:14 We feel this is a game changer to the community as well as to the refugees.

22:18 They are refugees,

22:19 we are saying that first and foremost,

22:20 we need to

22:21 put them in the digitalization for the commission for refugees.

22:25 The refugees are fatigued in terms of documentation.

22:28 There are a number of documents that are asked when whenever

22:31 they want to access services.

22:32 So when we digitalize,

22:33 the refugees will be integrated into various departments.

22:38 They can go to the bank.

22:39 They can go to the police,

22:41 they can go anywhere.

22:42 They'll find that their data is there.

22:44 Second,

22:44 the most important thing for today's topic is about immunization laws.

22:49 We came to realize that the refugees are excluded in labor markets.

22:53 Why?

22:53 Because the the the laws that are in Zambia,

22:56 they don't allow refugees to work.

22:58 Unless they have a permit.

23:00 Now,

23:00 here's the situation.

23:01 The same government is giving refugees a free

23:03 education from early childhood to grade 12.

23:05 Why should you ask a refugee?

23:07 Why do you ask a former refugee or POC

23:10 a permit,

23:10 uh,

23:11 a study permit?

23:12 Why did you waste your resources to,

23:14 uh,

23:14 to,

23:14 to educate this child to go to up to grade 12?

23:17 So we are saying it's lay law.

23:19 This law must be scrapped off,

23:20 must be removed,

23:21 must be harmonized

23:23 so that the refugee has access to tertiary education.

23:26 Now,

23:26 if the refugee can have access to tertiary education,

23:28 what next?

23:29 It requires now to work.

23:32 So,

23:32 what do we do is,

23:33 in terms of now the Labor Act,

23:36 we are we are talking here,

23:37 we have already started to review the Labor Act

23:39 to ensure that the refugees are included in Labor Act

23:43 so that they are

23:44 allowed to work without permits.

23:47 Because a refugee is not,

23:48 not like you and I who can be uh economic migrant in Zambia.

23:52 And when you make money,

23:53 you make remittances to your country.

23:55 But the refugees,

23:56 they have no place to send money to the,

23:57 the,

23:57 the,

23:58 the,

23:58 the countries where they come from.

23:59 So why should they put in the same cluster with an economic migrant?

24:03 So we feel Zambia now is to reverse the laws,

24:06 harmonize the laws,

24:07 allow them to be working.

24:09 As we are talking here,

24:10 Some of the issues and matters have already been studied attended to.

24:15 The education in terms of study permits.

24:18 The vice president,

24:19 who is now,

24:20 he will be losing the,

24:21 the GRIF

24:23 instructed us

24:24 with the Minister of Foreign Affairs

24:25 and other patterns to ensure that the,

24:28 these who are gaining,

24:29 uh,

24:29 who are going to potential education,

24:31 they are excluded from study permits.

24:34 That it is not fair.

24:35 We are giving free education to these people.

24:37 Why should we ask them to study permits?

24:39 So,

24:40 this is one more instruction,

24:41 but we say

24:42 we need to harmonize the laws because tomorrow,

24:44 today,

24:44 there is this party in power,

24:46 tomorrow it will not be in power.

24:47 Then,

24:48 if we don't change the laws,

24:49 then again,

24:50 it will go back.

24:52 Then what we do also as the Zambia,

24:54 Zambia has been allowing refugees to go and ask for employment outside Zambia.

25:00 Using what we call the readable travel document.

25:04 The refugee can go to

25:06 Zimbabwe,

25:07 be employed.

25:09 When he decide or she decides to leave that employment,

25:11 she will come back to Zambia as a refugee.

25:14 We don't say that when you go,

25:15 that's the end of the refugee,

25:16 no.

25:18 Zambia allows children or refugees to go and

25:21 access tertiary education as we are talking about 88

25:25 under that scholarship.

25:26 They are in the US and Italy.

25:28 They are studying.

25:29 Before coming,

25:30 they were asking for letters to come back for

25:32 holidays because of the others they have closed,

25:34 and we have allowed them today.

25:35 They have allowed,

25:36 they have arrived in Zambia to see their parents.

25:38 They are still refugees.

25:40 So,

25:40 in terms of the labor market,

25:42 starting from education,

25:43 these are the policies Zambia is doing.

25:46 So we are trying to harmonize the laws in Zambia,

25:48 ensure that there's a permanent solution

25:50 to the labor market for refugees

25:52 and as well as to other uh uh services that are required for refugees.

25:56 This is what Zambia is doing.

25:57 Thank you.

25:59 Well,

25:59 thank you very much,

26:00 uh,

26:00 everybody.

26:01 Let me start by also introducing myself.

26:05 Uh,

26:05 my name is Mohlolo Logoturi.

26:08 I'm the commissioner for refugees.

26:11 In the Minister of Local Government Chieftainship.

26:15 O my person and police in the Kingdom of Lesotho.

26:18 Yes,

26:19 uh,

26:19 like,

26:19 um,

26:20 Zambia,

26:21 uh,

26:21 the Kingdom of Lesotho

26:23 has always been accommodating to,

26:25 to,

26:25 to refugees.

26:27 In fact,

26:27 uh,

26:28 uh,

26:28 concept of refugees in Lesotho is part and parcel of who we are as a nation.

26:33 It's actually in our DNA.

26:34 We are a country of

26:35 refugees ourselves.

26:38 So,

26:38 in Lesotho,

26:39 um,

26:40 refugees are allowed to work.

26:43 Without any work permit.

26:46 Children

26:46 are allowed to go to school.

26:47 In fact,

26:48 they're even part of the,

26:49 our free primary education.

26:52 They were also allowed to even uh engage some,

26:55 in some smaller businesses just like Basotho.

26:58 Whenever they go to the Ministry of Trade to apply for a license to trade,

27:02 they are not uh told they are refugees because we treat them the same as,

27:06 as our Basotho.

27:07 So,

27:07 there is no problem uh for them to work.

27:09 In fact,

27:10 uh,

27:11 The country has,

27:12 has,

27:12 has for a long time benefited from the skills that refugees possess.

27:17 Especially in the medical profession.

27:19 Most of our doctors

27:21 are refugees from the DRC,

27:23 Democratic Republic of the Congo,

27:25 and they're all over uh the country,

27:27 uh,

27:27 doing some work,

27:28 even the remotest part of our,

27:30 parts of our country

27:31 where the locals are reluctant to go,

27:33 you'll find refugees

27:35 operating in those remote areas.

27:38 And also the,

27:40 the refugees.

27:42 As you,

27:42 you,

27:42 you can see,

27:43 there've been uh doctors.

27:44 I mean,

27:45 they've been also teachers in,

27:46 in our country

27:48 from a long time ago during even the,

27:50 the,

27:50 the,

27:50 the fights uh for,

27:51 for struggle when,

27:52 uh,

27:52 you know,

27:52 Africa was fighting for,

27:54 for,

27:54 for,

27:54 for,

27:54 for liberation.

27:56 Uh,

27:56 refugees

27:57 have always been there.

27:58 So,

27:58 we don't have a problem of refugees not,

28:00 uh,

28:01 you know,

28:01 having any access to,

28:02 to,

28:02 to,

28:02 to,

28:03 to,

28:03 to,

28:03 you know,

28:04 labor market.

28:05 And then also go to the policies that the government of Lesotho has.

28:09 We,

28:10 we can talk of 1983 FG Act.

28:13 Which is very,

28:14 very liberal in terms of the rights of refugees because uh

28:17 those rights that are envisaged in the conventions,

28:20 our laws are saying refugees will enjoy those uh

28:23 uh uh rights

28:24 that are envisaged in,

28:26 you know,

28:27 international conventions being 1951 as well as

28:30 OEU convention,

28:31 those rights,

28:31 we took them as they are.

28:33 We don't have any,

28:34 any reservations as far as the refugees are concerned.

28:38 We also have uh uh our own uh national uh migration and development policy.

28:44 Which,

28:44 uh,

28:44 also has some refugee issues in them.

28:48 So that,

28:48 uh,

28:49 because the government feels that uh in order

28:51 for us to maximize the benefits of migration,

28:54 we should uh include these issues,

28:56 uh,

28:56 on our national migration development policy while at the same time,

28:59 the government tries to minimize the negatives thereof.

29:03 We also have our own uh uh policy,

29:05 which is a big one,

29:06 national strategy.

29:08 Uh,

29:08 uh,

29:08 and development,

29:09 uh,

29:09 uh,

29:09 uh,

29:10 policy.

29:12 Which,

29:12 uh,

29:12 uh,

29:12 has also integrated refugee issues in,

29:15 and it is a big,

29:15 uh,

29:16 uh,

29:16 uh,

29:17 a big,

29:17 uh,

29:17 policy for our government.

29:19 And as long as the,

29:20 the issues are in that,

29:21 uh,

29:21 big,

29:22 uh,

29:22 strategic framework for the government,

29:24 then it attracts the pool,

29:26 I mean,

29:26 the,

29:26 the funding from government because once it is there,

29:28 then the government can easily fund

29:30 because they're it's part of the,

29:31 uh,

29:32 government,

29:32 uh,

29:32 uh,

29:32 budget.

29:34 We also have uh our own national identity and civil registry.

29:38 Which also allows for refugees to be registered.

29:41 Children are registered

29:43 and then all referees are part and parcel of our national population register.

29:47 And they're issued with the ID and this ID allows them to,

29:50 to,

29:50 to actually work.

29:51 The kids can go to school,

29:52 but those below 16 years,

29:54 we,

29:54 we issue them with a,

29:56 a,

29:56 a,

29:56 a,

29:57 a,

29:57 a specialized identity number

29:59 which can also allow such a child to,

30:02 to,

30:02 to actually uh have a,

30:04 what do you call a

30:05 And 1,

30:06 I mean,

30:07 the UN travel document for them if they wish to travel.

30:09 So we don't have an incumbent policy.

30:11 Refugees can go

30:12 wherever they want in our country.

30:14 As long as,

30:15 uh,

30:16 uh,

30:16 uh,

30:16 you know,

30:16 they have something to do.

30:17 They are,

30:18 they are,

30:18 they are free to,

30:19 to travel.

30:19 No incumbent policy,

30:20 even when they die.

30:22 The government pays for them.

30:24 They do a free medical uh uh uh,

30:25 you know,

30:26 bills or those that work.

30:29 Uh,

30:29 minimal fees like Basotho because in government hospitals,

30:31 for example,

30:32 there is a minimal fee that they pay,

30:34 but those that are destitute,

30:35 the government takes care of them.

30:37 I think that is in as far as,

30:38 you know,

30:39 labor market is concerned.

30:40 Thank you very much,

30:41 and I submit.

30:43 Thank you.

showAllTimestamps
no
transcript
Uh, we have 2 more presentations. They will be short, uh, but, uh, compelling. Uh, the first will be given by Stephen Winkler. He's a social development specialist in the World Bank, and he will be followed by, uh, Jan van der Goolz, who is a, a senior economist in the World Bank. Over to you, Steven. Thank you so much, Paula, and I hope everyone can hear me OK. Uh, before I begin, I also just want to echo, uh, what others have said in, in highlighting the partnership between the World Bank, the UK government, and UNHCR. I think it's produced, um, uh, especially in this case, research that is not only, uh, very interesting, but also I think, uh, has made a difference and will continue to make a difference, which is, of course, uh, like Teresa said, what, what really matters here. So. Next side, please. So I'm gonna share a little bit about the uh research program on social cohesion. And What we tried to do with this research program is uh build evidence on how uh development investments but also policies can reduce inequalities and promote social cohesion in forced displacement contexts. And the way that we did this is we, we, um, had a competitive call for proposals where we received about I think 250 submissions and then from there we had a committee select about 26 uh background papers, um. And those research teams uh that were selected then produced uh background papers that covered um countries across Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and also Europe. And they used uh several different research designs. Including both quantitative and qualitative methods and then once those 26 papers were produced and went through various review processes, many of them, uh, were published as Paulo highlighted in, in, um, in top journals, uh, then what we did is we produced one kind of global report where we attempted to synthesize what we were seeing across these 26 papers into, um, uh, uh, one report, uh, on this new evidence on. Force displacement and social cohesion. Next slide, please. So this just gives you a snapshot of the countries that were covered by the 26 background papers. I also want to note, we had a couple of papers that were um large cross-national studies. Uh, so for example, there was a paper that covered, uh, pretty much all of sub-Saharan Africa. So there are a few countries not highlighted here that were covered by the research. Next slide. So what I want to do in my um very limited time today is just on this slide, give. A really quick overview of only 4 of those 26 background papers, uh, just to give you an idea of the types of, uh, research questions, but also the findings that were coming out of this, this, uh, research program. And then on the next slide, I'll cover kind of some of the key takeaways from that, that global report. The first paper I want to talk about is a paper by Axaway and Jen. And if I'm not wrong, I think I saw, uh, one of these authors in the room. So, uh, you can correct me if I misspeak on any of this, but Uh, what, what these authors looked at is they looked at, I think, 34, uh, low and middle income countries across a time frame of I think 14 years. And what they found is that, um, in those countries, large refugee arrivals do not negatively affect host community attitudes towards uh towards refugees. Uh, they also found that. Uh, countries that adopted more inclusive policies. So things like access to the labor market, uh, those, those inclusive policies did not lead to, uh, more negative attitudes towards refugees. And I think, uh, this is really important one, because, uh, as Sukina highlighted and others have mentioned, there's, there's in the past been a lack of focus on low and middle-income countries. And so I think. Building this evidence across 34 low and middle income countries is, is super helpful. Uh, but also, um, the result here is a little bit different than what we've seen in some high-income countries, uh, in terms of, uh, uh, refugee arrivals and sentiment towards those refugees. So then a second paper I'll mention is on Uganda, and this paper, uh, found that host communities with more exposure to refugee settlements actually experienced, um, significant increases in the provision of public goods and services. Uh, things like access to healthcare, access to education, uh, density of roads, and at the same time, uh, uh, those same communities, uh, did not see any, um, uh. Uh, negative increase in attitude towards migrants or migration policy, um, and this aligns with kind of what we just heard from Teresa in terms of the importance of, uh, directing resources also to, um, uh, to host communities, uh, and what, what the authors in this paper argue is that. Uh, because those host communities can experience those public service benefits, it actually helps to mitigate any of the potential backlash, or at least some of the backlash that could otherwise occur, uh, uh, in response to refugee settlement. Third, I'll, I'll talk about this paper from Greece. Um, this paper is interesting. It's one of the few that we had in the 26 that looked, uh, over a super long time period. So they looked at, um, Greece's response to. Uh, the arrival of Greek Orthodox, uh, refugees in the early 1920s and what they found is that, uh, early investment in policies, uh, such as granting farmland, um, building new houses and schools, granting citizenship, uh, those early, early policies helped to promote. Uh, uh, integration of refugees into the community and promoted long-term social cohesion. So they looked at survey data and census data from the 1920s all the way up to, uh, I think 2001, and we're able to track kind of the, the integration and the long-term social cohesion, uh, tied to those policies. And then the final paper I'll mention is a paper uh in Colombia and here the authors used a uh conjoint survey experiment and they found that um Colombians who reported higher levels of meaningful social interaction with Venezuelan migrants tend to favor more open migratory policies, so things like. Labor market access, um, and allowing Venezuelan migrants to have their families join them in Colombia, those types of family reunification policies. Uh, so again, here, uh, highlighting the, uh, impact of what Paula mentioned in terms of, of meaningful interactions and what impact that can have, uh, on the relationship between, uh, refugees and host communities. So that gives you, like I said, a very, very quick overview of just some of the, some of the um findings from the background papers. And then as I mentioned, what we did is we tried to take all of that new evidence and put it in one report, which is of course challenging, um, but I'll try and highlight some of the key takeaways from that report. And the first takeaway is just to acknowledge that, you know, displacement can make things worse. Displacement can, uh, exacerbate existing inequalities. It can create new tensions, uh, create the potential for new conflicts, um, especially in the short term and especially in areas with, uh, already strained and limited, uh, uh, services and resources. Um, but what, you know, many, many of the papers, uh, pulled out is that. Uh, inclusive policies and development investments can really help to mitigate some of these negative effects, uh, that would otherwise occur from. The displacement experience And in the report, we have um several different kind of policy and operational recommendations. So I encourage you to, to check out our report. Um, we go into a much richer discussion there on all of these, but I'll highlight, highlight just a few, um. The first, uh, which might be quite obvious, but, uh, aligns with the UN Global Compact in terms of providing refugees the right to work, uh, and freedom of movement and access to services and other basic rights. The second is the importance of investing in infrastructure and services. Uh, and the third is ensuring that those investments. Uh, and also humanitarian aid targets both the displaced persons and the host communities, uh, and that it does so, um, and considers both the needs in the near term, uh, but also in the long term, but also the unique needs of, uh, urban and rural areas. This is something that was coming out in a few of the papers that just the, the variation and needs and impact, uh, in urban and rural areas. Also, uh, some of the research suggested that using participatory approaches, so, uh, approaches that engage both displaced persons and host communities to kind of collectively, uh, use their voice to determine how to allocate resources can help mitigate some tensions in the communities. Fourth is providing services such as mental health services, social assistance, and legal assistance that are most needed by displaced persons. And then 5th is this idea of promoting positive interaction. And we talk in the paper about some of the different mechanisms and interventions. Uh, that can be used for this, um, but I just want to highlight that there is. Kind of growing research, not just from this research program, but a few other recent studies that um this idea of really promoting meaningful interactions between displaced persons and host communities can help to build empathy across those two groups and promote uh long-term social cohesion. So I will end there. I think hopefully these sites will be shared, um, and so you'll be able to access these links where you can see um the full report, the 26 papers, some recordings of other events that we've held, um, and also this video, uh, that summarizes the results from the, the full report. So I'll end there. Thank you so much. Thank you very much, Steven, and uh it's your turn, Yan. Over to you. Thank you very much, Paula, and it's a pleasure to be with you, uh, this afternoon. My name is Jan van der Goltz, um, and I'm here to present, uh, a study that we've done on the impacts of hosting refugees on jobs for hosts. Um, you know, it's, it's part of the larger suite of work that we've done on jobs, um, it's available for you online on the World Bank's website. Uh, next page, please. So the, the study we're talking about today reviews the global evidence, but then, uh, focuses in on 4 case study countries. So you see them here, it's Colombia, Ethiopia, Jordan, and Uganda, uh, 2 middle-income countries, 2 low-income countries, and within each group, one country that has for some time had a very open, um, stance toward labor market integration of refugees, and one country that has been more cautious in opening up. Um, we, we try to ask two primary questions. One is, how do the impacts on jobs for hosts differ across these different settings that have such, uh, such a variety of economic context, and also such a variety of policies? And secondly, what drives these differences? How do refugees and hosts interact in the labor market? Uh, in ways that then ultimately, uh, create these jobs impacts. Um, as additional work, we, uh, evaluated three work permit schemes, uh, in these countries, and we conducted an experiment on hosts' attitudes, uh, towards refugees and how competition in the labor market influences these attitudes. Uh, next slide, please. So I'll just show you two brief slides that summarize the results. What you see here are the comparative results across these four countries on the effect of hosting refugees on consumption in the lowland countries or on earnings in the middle-income countries, as well as on, on the employment rate among hosts. And the shading really tells the story. So the blue boxes are positive effects. So for instance, an increase in consumption or an increase in the employment rate. The red boxes or orange boxes are negative effects, and the beige boxes are no effect. And as you can see, the first finding really of this exercise was that across these four very different settings, the overall effect of hosting refugees on these very important labor market outcomes were modest or even positive in some countries. The, uh, twin finding to that is that once you look at different groups within the labor market, uh, you do find differences. You find some groups that are negatively affected, you find some groups that are positively affected. And, uh, the findings from the work permit analysis really mirrors these pictures. The overall impact of um allowing greater access through work, work permit schemes, uh, is mild or positive in the cases that we studied in Colombia and Jordan. Uh, but there are differences in how, uh, various groups within the labor market are affected. And of course, we discussed that, uh, in detail in the report. We then collected primary data in 3 out of these 4 countries to really focus on some labor markets both in the urban and in the rural sphere and try to understand how hosts and refugees interact there. And I'll just give you a little flavor of that here. One thing that, that's really quite important, we think to emphasize is that even in those labor markets where access to work is fairly restricted, refugees will find ways to participate out of economic necessity. But conversely, even in the pretty open labor markets, a lot of refugees do not participate and are mainly consumers in the local market. So it's important to think both about the labor market competition that comes out of that, but also the market opportunities that come through this influx of additional consumers. The second key point is that both the policy environment and the loss of assets, uh, through displacement really pushes refugees toward vulnerable employment, and that creates certain patterns of competition for hosts. It tends to be hosts who work in some of the more vulnerable jobs, uh, that see more competition, especially if there's less support for refugees, and especially if there's less openness to refugees on the labor market. And the final point, um, Is that while from the high-income countries, we are quite used to thinking about skill matches. Um, skills may matter in the lower-income countries, but maybe not in the obvious ways. It can be more about soft skills, as we've heard, uh, from Stephen. Uh, it can be about, um, language, it can be about the ability to network. Um, but the technical skills and some of these labor markets don't come out, uh, as strongly as a factor of integration. On the other hand, Assets are incredibly important in labor markets where most everybody is self-employed. Of course, the ability to start your own business activity, uh, is critical for refugees, and it's also very decisive for hosts who are trying to seize some of these opportunities that come in the market, uh, through the new, uh, market participants, new consumers that arise. Final slide, please. Well, there should be a, a slide on policy messages, you know, I'm, I'm just gonna talk about it, um, while we, while we see this slide. Um. Just a few points to emphasize, um, we show, I think that it's really quite critical to look very closely and in a very realistic and grounded way at the labor markets that we are talking about. We try to give some guidance for trying to understand how competition is likely to play out, uh, in these labor markets. Secondly, as we've said, it's important to think about opportunities. We tend to think about competition in the labor markets, but there are new consumers, there are workers, there are people with skills and assets, uh, who arrive in these markets, and opportunities will come. We explained that, for instance, in the case of agriculture, uh, where there can be significant opportunities for, for local producers. Um, And finally, just to emphasize again, uh, the importance of access to capital in low-income labor markets where much employment is and self-employment and household activities, and the need to think really carefully about the kind of, um, skill support that would be of use to, to refugees and to their hosts. Um, I'll stop there. Uh, we expect to, uh, formally launch this report in the coming year, but, uh, the executive summary is available both in the room. I hope you'll take a copy as well as also online. And I'd be remiss, uh, if I didn't mention, given Paulo's remarks on cost effectiveness and how important it is to try to track cost, that there is a companion piece that looks at the cost of job support and refugee settings that is also available on the World Bank's website. Thank you very much. Thank you, Yan. Thank you, Steven. Uh, we're ready now to switch over to our panel discussion. So I'll invite all the panelists to come up, uh, take a seat at the table, and I'll introduce our moderator. Um, he is uh Ricardo Morel. He's the director of the Peace and Recovery Initiative at Innovations for Poverty Action IPA. Uh, welcome to everyone and as well as other, uh, uh, services that you can provide for refugees. This is what is doing, OK. Um, it's an honor to be here and thanks for the presentations to the speakers, uh, Teresa, Steven, Jan, and Paulo. And right now we're going to, to start a panel discussion for about 30 minutes and then we'll open for questions from the audience as well for about 15 minutes or so. Um, so we, let me introduce the, the panelist. So we have Doctor Prosper Ngandu, who is the commissioner for refugees for the Republic of Zambia. We have also Mr. Mohulolo Rerotoli, who is the commissioner for Refugees for the Kingdom of Lesotho. We have Mr. Paul Kitima. Who is the executive director of the refugee-led organization, Bondeco Refugee Livelihood Center, and we have Agnes Harrwitz, who is senior Development Officer at UNHCR. So, I would like to ask them two questions. One that is related to jobs and the other one that is related to community or social cohesion as we've seen from the presentations, these are the two main topics that we've discussed. Um, and I'll split the question. So let me start with jobs, um, for Doctor Ngando and for Mr. Verratoli. Uh, so, from the presentations, uh, especially I think from Paulo Verme and from Jan, we've learned that Well, There are important policies and programs trying to promote inclusion of refugees in the labor markets, and there seems, the evidence seems to suggest that actually they are positive on average impacts um on host communities when there's presence of refugees. The picture is, is a bit complex, you know, when we disaggregate results, we see that some host community members can have more opportunities while others will face some challenges. So it's, it's not like a very clear picture, it's quite a complex one. So the question is whether you can think of programs and policies in, in your countries, in your context that are trying to foster the inclusion of refugees and If so, then what are the, the main challenges that you, you have observed? And lastly, um, so I'll, I'll pack a couple of questions and, and you may choose, hopefully you can answer them all. Um, since this is an evidence-driven session, if, if you were to, to think what evidence, what data, what knowledge would you like to have in order to inform your decisions regarding uh integration of refugees in the labor market. Thank you very much. Yeah, I simply say good afternoon, everybody. Well, uh, I'll start, uh, I know we have very few minutes given. My introduction. Yes, I'm Doctor Ngandu, but I'm now Ambassador Professor Ngandu. Uh, thank you for the topic. Uh, Zambia would want to announce that Zambia is the host of 93,000+ refugees. So The country as the current government realized the value of the refugee. Refugees, they are endowed with various skills. And as we are talking about the economic turnaround of our country, Zambia. We came to realize that the refugees should not be left behind. They're a very, very viable resource for economic development of the country because they are endowed with various skills. So in that vein, The country took a paradigm shift towards the management or the protection of refugees so that the host the community should appreciate the value of a refugee, not to see the refugee as a burden or as a criminal, that these are foreigners who have come to grab jobs or these are foreigners who have come to grab our resources. So we came up with a model which is called modernization of refugees and also the community settlement approach. What is this vehicle? What is this? We feel this is a game changer to the community as well as to the refugees. They are refugees, we are saying that first and foremost, we need to put them in the digitalization for the commission for refugees. The refugees are fatigued in terms of documentation. There are a number of documents that are asked when whenever they want to access services. So when we digitalize, the refugees will be integrated into various departments. They can go to the bank. They can go to the police, they can go anywhere. They'll find that their data is there. Second, the most important thing for today's topic is about immunization laws. We came to realize that the refugees are excluded in labor markets. Why? Because the the the laws that are in Zambia, they don't allow refugees to work. Unless they have a permit. Now, here's the situation. The same government is giving refugees a free education from early childhood to grade 12. Why should you ask a refugee? Why do you ask a former refugee or POC a permit, uh, a study permit? Why did you waste your resources to, uh, to, to educate this child to go to up to grade 12? So we are saying it's lay law. This law must be scrapped off, must be removed, must be harmonized so that the refugee has access to tertiary education. Now, if the refugee can have access to tertiary education, what next? It requires now to work. So, what do we do is, in terms of now the Labor Act, we are we are talking here, we have already started to review the Labor Act to ensure that the refugees are included in Labor Act so that they are allowed to work without permits. Because a refugee is not, not like you and I who can be uh economic migrant in Zambia. And when you make money, you make remittances to your country. But the refugees, they have no place to send money to the, the, the, the, the countries where they come from. So why should they put in the same cluster with an economic migrant? So we feel Zambia now is to reverse the laws, harmonize the laws, allow them to be working. As we are talking here, Some of the issues and matters have already been studied attended to. The education in terms of study permits. The vice president, who is now, he will be losing the, the GRIF instructed us with the Minister of Foreign Affairs and other patterns to ensure that the, these who are gaining, uh, who are going to potential education, they are excluded from study permits. That it is not fair. We are giving free education to these people. Why should we ask them to study permits? So, this is one more instruction, but we say we need to harmonize the laws because tomorrow, today, there is this party in power, tomorrow it will not be in power. Then, if we don't change the laws, then again, it will go back. Then what we do also as the Zambia, Zambia has been allowing refugees to go and ask for employment outside Zambia. Using what we call the readable travel document. The refugee can go to Zimbabwe, be employed. When he decide or she decides to leave that employment, she will come back to Zambia as a refugee. We don't say that when you go, that's the end of the refugee, no. Zambia allows children or refugees to go and access tertiary education as we are talking about 88 under that scholarship. They are in the US and Italy. They are studying. Before coming, they were asking for letters to come back for holidays because of the others they have closed, and we have allowed them today. They have allowed, they have arrived in Zambia to see their parents. They are still refugees. So, in terms of the labor market, starting from education, these are the policies Zambia is doing. So we are trying to harmonize the laws in Zambia, ensure that there's a permanent solution to the labor market for refugees and as well as to other uh uh services that are required for refugees. This is what Zambia is doing. Thank you. Well, thank you very much, uh, everybody. Let me start by also introducing myself. Uh, my name is Mohlolo Logoturi. I'm the commissioner for refugees. In the Minister of Local Government Chieftainship. O my person and police in the Kingdom of Lesotho. Yes, uh, like, um, Zambia, uh, the Kingdom of Lesotho has always been accommodating to, to, to refugees. In fact, uh, uh, concept of refugees in Lesotho is part and parcel of who we are as a nation. It's actually in our DNA. We are a country of refugees ourselves. So, in Lesotho, um, refugees are allowed to work. Without any work permit. Children are allowed to go to school. In fact, they're even part of the, our free primary education. They were also allowed to even uh engage some, in some smaller businesses just like Basotho. Whenever they go to the Ministry of Trade to apply for a license to trade, they are not uh told they are refugees because we treat them the same as, as our Basotho. So, there is no problem uh for them to work. In fact, uh, The country has, has, has for a long time benefited from the skills that refugees possess. Especially in the medical profession. Most of our doctors are refugees from the DRC, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and they're all over uh the country, uh, doing some work, even the remotest part of our, parts of our country where the locals are reluctant to go, you'll find refugees operating in those remote areas. And also the, the refugees. As you, you, you can see, there've been uh doctors. I mean, they've been also teachers in, in our country from a long time ago during even the, the, the, the fights uh for, for struggle when, uh, you know, Africa was fighting for, for, for, for, for liberation. Uh, refugees have always been there. So, we don't have a problem of refugees not, uh, you know, having any access to, to, to, to, to, to, you know, labor market. And then also go to the policies that the government of Lesotho has. We, we can talk of 1983 FG Act. Which is very, very liberal in terms of the rights of refugees because uh those rights that are envisaged in the conventions, our laws are saying refugees will enjoy those uh uh uh rights that are envisaged in, you know, international conventions being 1951 as well as OEU convention, those rights, we took them as they are. We don't have any, any reservations as far as the refugees are concerned. We also have uh uh our own uh national uh migration and development policy. Which, uh, also has some refugee issues in them. So that, uh, because the government feels that uh in order for us to maximize the benefits of migration, we should uh include these issues, uh, on our national migration development policy while at the same time, the government tries to minimize the negatives thereof. We also have our own uh uh policy, which is a big one, national strategy. Uh, uh, and development, uh, uh, uh, policy. Which, uh, uh, has also integrated refugee issues in, and it is a big, uh, uh, uh, a big, uh, policy for our government. And as long as the, the issues are in that, uh, big, uh, strategic framework for the government, then it attracts the pool, I mean, the, the funding from government because once it is there, then the government can easily fund because they're it's part of the, uh, government, uh, uh, budget. We also have uh our own national identity and civil registry. Which also allows for refugees to be registered. Children are registered and then all referees are part and parcel of our national population register. And they're issued with the ID and this ID allows them to, to, to actually work. The kids can go to school, but those below 16 years, we, we issue them with a, a, a, a, a, a specialized identity number which can also allow such a child to, to, to actually uh have a, what do you call a And 1, I mean, the UN travel document for them if they wish to travel. So we don't have an incumbent policy. Refugees can go wherever they want in our country. As long as, uh, uh, uh, you know, they have something to do. They are, they are, they are free to, to travel. No incumbent policy, even when they die. The government pays for them. They do a free medical uh uh uh, you know, bills or those that work. Uh, minimal fees like Basotho because in government hospitals, for example, there is a minimal fee that they pay, but those that are destitute, the government takes care of them. I think that is in as far as, you know, labor market is concerned. Thank you very much, and I submit. Thank you.
showAllTranscripts
no
duration
PT30M49S
scene7File
worldbank/20231212-BEOFD-Seminar-Part02
scene7Domain
https://worldbank.scene7.com/
scene7FileAvs
worldbank/20231212-BEOFD-Seminar-Part02-AVS
title
20231212 BEOFD Seminar Part02
description
20231212 BEOFD Seminar Part02
showTimestampAndTranscript
yes
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-3
col-lg-3
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-7
col-lg-7
  • add-style
  • lp-body-content
lp-heading-top-medium
lp-heading-bottom-medium
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-2
col-lg-2