col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
videoType
dynamic-media
videoDmUrl
https://delivery-p136806-e1377785.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:30d06f1e-4c11-4ca3-a9f9-718be43ed934/play?assetname=20231212-BEOFD-Seminar-Part01.mp4
keyFrameImage
videoDescription
Experts from international organizations, government, and civil society discussed how recently concluded research on these flashpoints can improve policymaking.
timestamp

00:00 Welcome to Geneva.

00:01 Welcome to um colleagues joining us online.

00:04 The event today is titled Policies to create Jobs

00:07 and Community Learning from the Evidence on Forced Displacement.

00:10 It is a linked event to the Global Refugee Forum,

00:13 and it is part of

00:15 uh building the Evidence on Forced Displacement,

00:18 uh,

00:18 a research partnership program between the UK government,

00:22 the UNHCR and the World Bank.

00:25 Today's event will be about the findings from a global partnership program,

00:29 um,

00:29 and also we're gonna zoom in into uh two of the core studies,

00:33 uh,

00:33 two of the core research studies,

00:35 one on social cohesion and,

00:36 and one on jobs.

00:38 We're going to have opening remarks.

00:39 We're then going to,

00:40 uh,

00:41 go into the presentations,

00:42 and then we're going to have a panel.

00:44 Discussion,

00:44 uh,

00:45 followed by Q&A.

00:47 And finally,

00:47 we'll have also,

00:48 uh,

00:49 some closing remarks.

00:51 Without further ado,

00:52 as you see,

00:52 we have a packed agenda.

00:53 It is my pleasure to invite our

00:55 fragility,

00:56 conflict and Violence,

00:57 uh,

00:57 uh,

00:57 director,

00:58 Sukenya,

00:59 Sukeya Khan.

01:00 She will be providing opening remarks.

01:04 Thank you very much.

01:06 Uh,

01:06 nice to see you all and to be here in,

01:09 uh,

01:09 uh,

01:10 this Global refugee,

01:11 uh,

01:12 forum.

01:13 Really thank you for joining us,

01:14 uh,

01:15 today,

01:16 um,

01:16 and,

01:17 uh,

01:17 we'll,

01:18 we'll reflect on a subject

01:20 that is important to us,

01:21 building evidence on the forced,

01:24 uh,

01:24 displacement.

01:25 And

01:26 importantly,

01:27 we would like as well to

01:29 discuss some of the recent findings of,

01:31 uh,

01:32 the important partnership.

01:34 And I'm very grateful to UNHCR

01:37 um for hosting the Global Refugee Forum

01:40 and for being

01:41 a very strong uh partner in the collective effort.

01:45 Uh,

01:46 to ease the challenges faced by refugees,

01:49 IDPs,

01:51 and the communities

01:52 that host them,

01:54 including

01:54 through this research that,

01:56 uh,

01:57 a program that we'll hear about.

01:59 Thank you,

02:00 uh,

02:00 as well to FCDO.

02:02 Thank you very much,

02:02 Greg,

02:03 to you and your team

02:04 for your partnership and support through these past 7 years.

02:09 Let me

02:09 take a few moments to explain this research partnership.

02:14 Uh,

02:14 it has been so important,

02:16 and this event,

02:17 this GRF is an opportunity

02:20 to renew our commitment,

02:22 uh,

02:23 to

02:23 addressing the growing challenge of forced displacement.

02:27 We do forget that only 7 years ago

02:31 when the program started.

02:33 We did not know much

02:35 about the impact of forced displacement

02:38 on the people displaced,

02:40 on their hosts,

02:42 especially in low

02:44 and middle

02:45 income countries

02:47 where more than 7 out of 10

02:50 displaced take refuge.

02:52 Let me repeat,

02:53 more than 7 out of 10

02:56 displaced people take refuge in low and middle-income countries.

03:00 And it's difficult to design policies without data and evidence,

03:06 and through this research,

03:07 uh,

03:08 partnership we have

03:09 in our view,

03:10 filled a critical knowledge gap.

03:13 Today our data libraries

03:15 at UNHCR and the World Bank host

03:18 thousands of data sets

03:20 to support our understanding of forced displacement and what programs,

03:25 policies

03:27 work.

03:29 Building this evidence supporting the supported the

03:32 publication of 3 special issues on forced displacement

03:36 in 3

03:37 top economics

03:38 and social science journals.

03:41 Building

03:42 this evidence pioneered research and innovation in research methods.

03:48 Many of the studies were the result

03:50 of collaboration with organizations and researchers worldwide,

03:55 including young fellows who joined the program

03:58 from low and middle-income countries.

04:01 So we have built

04:03 a community.

04:05 Dedicated to producing evidence on forced displacement that can improve

04:11 policies and programs for displaced population and their hosts,

04:15 and I'm

04:16 confident

04:17 that this generation of research and scientists will carry on

04:22 what

04:22 this group has started.

04:24 So the program in our view has already led to tangible results on program and policy.

04:31 Uh,

04:31 let me give you some examples,

04:33 um,

04:33 and,

04:34 uh,

04:34 in,

04:34 in our program.

04:36 We have an impact evaluation on AIDA funded graduation program in Afghanistan,

04:41 and the program found that women who had participated

04:44 in the program.

04:46 Were

04:47 much better

04:49 across

04:49 multiple outcomes than women

04:52 that who

04:53 had not participated.

04:55 This timely evidence,

04:57 uh,

04:57 in a context like Afghanistan

05:00 led to the allocation of more AIDA resources to the program

05:04 to support

05:04 its scale up

05:06 up to more provinces in Afghanistan.

05:09 To share another example,

05:11 uh,

05:12 concerning policy,

05:13 a series of,

05:14 uh,

05:14 studies funded by

05:16 the program on Venezuelan refugees and migrants in Brazil

05:20 provided three first pieces of evidence on

05:23 the challenges that Venezuelans face in Brazil,

05:27 but also

05:28 their positive contribution to the Brazilian economy we see.

05:33 Uh,

05:33 refugees as a burden,

05:35 we

05:36 have to balance that

05:37 view with what their contribution.

05:40 So

05:41 a study looked at the

05:43 Roraima state.

05:45 Uh,

05:46 the state most affected by the influx of,

05:48 uh,

05:48 Venezuelan,

05:49 and then they found that the net fiscal impact

05:53 was zero.

05:55 The net fiscal impact of the influx

05:58 in the short term was zero.

06:00 The increased government

06:02 spending

06:03 was offset

06:04 by.

06:06 The increased revenue in

06:08 through indirect collecting uh tax.

06:10 So

06:11 this evidence,

06:11 for instance,

06:12 for was key for UNHCR

06:14 and the World Bank to deepen their policy dialogue

06:17 with the host government.

06:19 So,

06:19 today we'll have uh the pleasure and the opportunity to hear

06:23 from colleagues who have led the research in the World Bank and the UNHCR

06:28 and a distinguished panel of speakers including colleagues

06:32 who lived displacement experience,

06:35 UNHCR and host governments.

06:38 The focus of today's event

06:41 is on the labor market impacts

06:44 of forced displacement and what

06:46 programs and policies may be effective

06:49 to improve opportunities

06:51 for displaced communities and host communities alike

06:55 while maintaining

06:56 and promoting social cohesion.

06:59 The multitude of voices in this panel is intentional.

07:03 Effective policymaking requires

07:06 learning from

07:08 diverse set of,

07:09 uh,

07:09 experience,

07:10 and we hope that this uh collaborative approach will continue

07:14 uh as research on forced displacement expands.

07:18 Indeed,

07:18 as factors affecting forced displacement evolve,

07:23 so must research on the issue.

07:25 So I'm very much looking forward to learning more,

07:29 for example,

07:29 about the macroeconomic impacts of forced displacement,

07:33 but also

07:34 promising programs for early childhood

07:37 education and intervention to prevent gender-based violence.

07:42 So let me end

07:43 my remarks

07:44 by reiterating the World Bank's

07:47 commitment.

07:48 To working with partners to address the needs

07:51 of forcibly displaced people and their host communities.

07:56 We

07:57 have made substantial progress on developing the knowledge,

08:01 policies,

08:02 and programming response

08:04 necessary

08:05 to address forced displacement together.

08:08 And

08:09 as the issue of forced displacement becomes

08:13 unfortunately more acute,

08:15 partnership in

08:17 building evidence will continue to be critical.

08:21 Let us continue to work

08:23 together

08:24 in pursuing

08:25 solutions.

08:27 Thank you again for joining this event and

08:30 I wish you all a fruitful discussion,

08:32 and it's my pleasure now to invite on stage,

08:35 Greg

08:36 Houston,

08:36 head of Migration Department,

08:38 FCDO

08:39 for his

08:40 own opening remarks.

08:42 Over to you,

08:42 Greg.

08:53 Hello,

08:53 everybody.

08:54 Thank you,

08:55 Shikenya.

08:55 Uh,

08:56 thank you,

08:56 Paula,

08:57 uh,

08:57 and thank you for inviting us to this,

08:58 um,

08:59 really,

08:59 uh,

09:00 important,

09:00 significant event and

09:02 indeed,

09:02 um,

09:03 one of the first events of,

09:04 uh,

09:05 the GRF.

09:06 Um,

09:07 so,

09:07 years ago,

09:08 um,

09:09 we had in government,

09:11 a research department.

09:13 And the research department

09:14 would have a little box

09:16 at the bottom

09:17 when they wrote papers,

09:18 and they would send them in to policy colleagues like myself.

09:21 And that was for feedback.

09:22 That was for us to write something to send back to the research analysts.

09:25 And I had a friend who was one of the research analysts,

09:28 and he said to me over a coffee,

09:31 please,

09:31 please

09:33 don't write.

09:34 That is quite interesting.

09:38 The reason,

09:38 of course,

09:39 is that that is quite interesting.

09:42 Does not equate to

09:43 interventions and change and the reason why we all do what we do.

09:48 And that's part of the reason why this is so important for us and why we have invested

09:54 in this initiative.

09:56 Um,

09:56 so as the FCDO,

09:57 um,

09:58 we have provided around 12 million

10:00 pounds over the last 7 years

10:02 in order for us

10:04 to move forward

10:05 with research that's designed towards policy,

10:08 towards interventions,

10:09 towards how can we do things differently.

10:13 As a donor,

10:14 but also

10:15 in uh host states as well.

10:18 So forced displacements has long been a policy and priority and for us,

10:22 and generating that strong evidence

10:25 is really a base

10:26 for making better policy.

10:28 And as Sukenya mentioned earlier,

10:30 it's really important to cut through

10:32 the.

10:33 Emotion and the political noise

10:36 with good,

10:37 solid evidence base that we can,

10:39 we can take forward.

10:40 So,

10:41 we're gonna hear some great,

10:42 quite interesting,

10:43 but some great uh presentations later on.

10:46 I wanted to just highlight a few of the

10:49 um.

10:50 Elements that we thought were really important from the research

10:53 over the last 7 years that we have used,

10:55 that we have taken forward.

10:58 So the first is around

10:59 the importance of refugees being able to access

11:03 national systems,

11:04 and this avoids setting up uh parallel systems.

11:08 It is more sustainable

11:09 and can reduce the perception of uh unequal treatment uh by

11:13 uh host communities.

11:14 We talk and deal a lot in perceptions,

11:17 and I think that's why this is really important.

11:19 And there's some practical toolkits,

11:21 there's some practical things that we can take forward and use to help us do that.

11:25 And this evidence has underlined that

11:28 these national systems require donor support,

11:31 um,

11:32 both refugee and host communities,

11:34 and the importance of linking in

11:37 development finance at the same time.

11:39 And that's something that we've learned and something that is really important,

11:42 and it will be a theme for us through the course of this week.

11:45 So,

11:45 the research has also highlighted,

11:47 um,

11:47 the barriers to accessing systems that refugees face when living in camps,

11:51 uh,

11:51 with.

11:52 freedom of movement.

11:53 And so unpicking and unpacking that freedom of movement and how critical that is

11:57 to access um basic services,

11:59 uh,

11:59 is key to,

12:00 to durable solutions as we move forward.

12:03 And again,

12:03 I think we're going to hear a little bit more about that

12:05 uh

12:05 during the course of this session.

12:08 The researchers also provide really important lessons on inclusion,

12:12 um,

12:12 and how inclusive policies can be implemented

12:15 and how we can support,

12:16 uh,

12:17 social cohesion.

12:18 Um,

12:19 we have,

12:20 um,

12:20 some,

12:20 uh,

12:21 quite recent experience of that with Ukraine,

12:24 um,

12:24 which we were learning as we were going last year,

12:27 um,

12:28 and that's something that again is going to be a bit of a theme for us over the course,

12:31 uh,

12:32 of,

12:32 of this week,

12:33 and there is a real body of emerging research on that as a,

12:35 as an area.

12:36 And,

12:37 finally,

12:37 and I think,

12:38 you know,

12:39 sometimes

12:40 we're not as open and honest about this as perhaps we should be,

12:43 but the evidence tells us what works and tells us what is not working.

12:47 And that allows us to scale up what's effective

12:50 and to stop what's perhaps less effective.

12:52 And I think that's also really important for us to be,

12:55 to be clear about.

12:56 So,

12:56 um

12:58 Just to finish,

12:58 thank you,

12:59 all of you for engaging with this and for working on this as we move forward,

13:04 and these kind of events are also an important part of disseminating

13:08 um what works and what doesn't work and what we're

13:10 working on and what we should be working on.

13:11 So,

13:12 um,

13:12 uh,

13:13 we hope that there is a,

13:13 you know,

13:14 continued,

13:14 um,

13:14 close engagement,

13:16 um,

13:16 with the policy teams,

13:17 with the program teams,

13:18 with the researchers,

13:19 um,

13:19 and I look forward to,

13:21 uh,

13:21 listening more and,

13:22 and learning more about,

13:23 uh,

13:23 about what you're all working on,

13:24 uh,

13:25 going forward,

13:25 which will be quite interesting,

13:27 but it's more than quite interesting.

13:28 Thank you.

13:30 Thank you,

13:31 Greg,

13:31 uh,

13:32 thank you,

13:32 Sukena.

13:33 Thank you for sharing your,

13:34 your reflection and getting us uh started uh today.

13:37 We're going to go now into the presentations.

13:39 Uh,

13:40 we're going to have Paulo Verme who's joining us online.

13:42 Uh,

13:42 he's a lead economist in the World Bank,

13:44 and he's going to be presenting jointly with Tesabel Trammo,

13:47 who is the senior economist in the UNHCR.

13:50 Over to you,

13:51 uh,

13:51 Paulo.

13:53 First,

13:53 let me join Sukena in uh thanking uh the UK

13:57 government for sustaining us for the whole period of the program

14:01 and providing funding for everything we proposed.

14:05 uh,

14:05 and also thank the UNHCR for being uh

14:09 an incredible partner uh during this food period.

14:13 So thanks again.

14:15 Uh,

14:15 next slide,

14:16 please.

14:17 Uh,

14:18 I wanted to start,

14:19 uh,

14:19 as,

14:20 uh,

14:20 Sokena also mentioned

14:22 from where we were in 2015.

14:25 Uh,

14:26 recall that,

14:27 uh,

14:27 2015,

14:28 uh,

14:29 was a turning point,

14:30 uh,

14:30 uh,

14:30 in terms of forced displacement.

14:32 The Syrian crisis,

14:34 had been going on for 4 years.

14:37 Uh,

14:37 we reached what was called the peak of the EU migration crisis.

14:43 There was a new resolve on the part of uh political leaders

14:46 uh who were willing to put financial means into forced displacement,

14:51 but then again,

14:52 we faced a very old problem,

14:53 which was a lack of microdata and quality research on forced displacement.

14:59 Uh,

14:59 if we go back to December 2015 and we

15:02 count the number of journal articles in economics,

15:06 since the beginning of recording,

15:08 beginning of time,

15:10 uh,

15:10 we could find only 618 articles on refugees

15:15 and only 28 on internally displaced.

15:19 Um,

15:21 it,

15:21 it was a time where,

15:22 uh,

15:23 refugee studies,

15:24 forced displacement studies were considered a minor,

15:27 uh,

15:28 subarea of migration studies.

15:30 There wasn't much interest,

15:32 uh,

15:32 uh,

15:32 into these topics,

15:34 particularly in economics.

15:36 In 2015,

15:37 we also had the conditions to create this first experiment,

15:41 a joint partnership between the World Bank and the UNHCR,

15:45 uh,

15:45 to study the poverty and welfare of,

15:48 uh,

15:48 Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon,

15:51 which resulted in a book.

15:52 And that was really the turning point for us to

15:56 uh start a real uh research partnership with the UNHCR

16:00 where the UNHCR had a large amount of

16:03 volume of data that were largely unused for research

16:07 and the World Bank had the Expertise to,

16:10 to do the kind of research but did not have the data to do that.

16:13 So this was a partnership really

16:15 uh that uh allowed the synergy to take place

16:20 and we decided to establish a formal multi-year research partnership

16:24 uh between the World Bank and the UNHCR

16:27 and uh with uh our partner,

16:30 the UK government.

16:31 Next slide,

16:32 please.

16:33 So,

16:33 these are the inputs.

16:35 Uh,

16:35 the UK government has mentioned before,

16:37 put in $16.5 million into this project.

16:40 Initially,

16:41 it was a lower budget for four years.

16:43 It was extended to seven years later on,

16:45 so the period is 2016,

16:47 2023.

16:49 We organized the work in seven pillars.

16:52 Uh,

16:52 we decided to have global studies that would be relevant across the globe

16:57 on the refugees and IDPs.

16:59 and host communities.

17:01 Uh,

17:02 we set up impact evaluations for specific programs run by the World Bank,

17:06 the UNHCR or governments.

17:08 We thought about focused studies and

17:10 compelling questions that required quick answers,

17:13 uh,

17:13 during the period.

17:15 We established a young Fellowship program,

17:17 um,

17:18 a microdata initiative that eventually became the Joint Data Center,

17:23 uh,

17:23 and,

17:24 uh,

17:24 a data portal for FCV data.

17:27 And also very importantly,

17:29 an uptake,

17:29 dissemination,

17:30 and training strategy that allows us to make

17:33 all the findings of this program uh available.

17:37 Next slide,

17:37 please.

17:38 So,

17:38 these are the outputs,

17:39 and numbers.

17:40 So,

17:41 6 global studies,

17:42 15 impact evaluations,

17:44 12 focused studies.

17:45 We hired

17:46 24 young fellows.

17:49 Uh,

17:49 we collaborated with 200+ researchers across the globe,

17:54 30+ partner organizations,

17:56 uh,

17:57 and we cover 36 countries.

18:00 As mentioned,

18:00 the microdata program,

18:02 uh,

18:02 that we started in 2016

18:05 eventually became the Joint Data Center in 2019.

18:09 And uh we had seminar series,

18:11 newsletters,

18:12 policy notes,

18:13 a website,

18:13 social media,

18:14 and a training program that uh re recently,

18:17 some of you may be familiar with.

18:20 Uh,

18:20 the total output,

18:21 the number,

18:22 uh,

18:22 we,

18:23 we have at the moment is 144 self-contained studies which,

18:27 uh,

18:28 we published.

18:29 Uh,

18:29 of these,

18:30 we have,

18:30 uh,

18:31 already 36 publications in journals,

18:33 including top economic journals.

18:36 So these are the numbers,

18:38 uh,

18:38 next slide,

18:39 please.

18:40 You can see that we covered the

18:42 somehow unevenly different areas.

18:45 Uh,

18:45 we did a lot of work on social cohesion.

18:48 Uh,

18:49 on gender,

18:50 on labor markets,

18:51 uh,

18:51 some of the results,

18:52 uh,

18:53 you will hear them today in later presentations,

18:56 and,

18:56 uh,

18:57 we very much covered the,

18:58 uh,

18:59 most,

19:00 uh,

19:00 all the relevant,

19:02 uh,

19:02 geographical areas where,

19:04 uh,

19:05 forced displacement is an issue.

19:07 So these are the numbers,

19:08 but,

19:09 um,

19:10 you know,

19:11 next slide,

19:11 please.

19:12 If uh we really look at the

19:15 general contribution that I think this program had overall

19:19 beyond these numbers is really how

19:22 uh we as a

19:24 community of people working on forced displacement

19:27 have been able to um

19:30 change

19:31 the landscape of research and data.

19:34 Uh,

19:34 look at these numbers here.

19:35 Uh,

19:36 again,

19:36 these are the same numbers of,

19:38 uh,

19:38 uh,

19:38 published papers in economics journals,

19:41 uh,

19:41 from 2000 to 2023.

19:45 And uh you can clearly see the kink in 2015,

19:48 uh,

19:49 where the research on forced

19:53 forced displacement really took off.

19:55 Uh,

19:55 an increase between 2015 and 2023 of 466%.

20:01 That's unheard of in the research,

20:04 uh,

20:04 uh,

20:05 circles.

20:06 Uh,

20:06 and even if IDPs remain a very small area of research,

20:11 still,

20:12 the growth has been tremendous,

20:13 389.

20:15 percent over the

20:17 uh seven-year period.

20:19 So,

20:19 we live in a very much different world today uh of what uh we looked at in 2015.

20:25 When I was asked uh should we continue with this particular program.

20:29 Uh,

20:29 I said no because,

20:30 uh,

20:30 essentially we fill the gap now.

20:32 All research,

20:33 uh,

20:33 uh,

20:33 major research institutions,

20:36 organizations,

20:36 uh,

20:37 international organizations are now working on refugees and IDPs,

20:41 host communities.

20:42 They have the data to do that.

20:44 So,

20:45 really,

20:45 I think.

20:45 Our contribution has been to

20:47 uh participate in this uh um

20:51 uh

20:52 process of growth in data and research

20:56 that has really changed the tide on,

20:57 on forced displacement,

20:59 uh,

21:00 over the past 7 years.

21:01 Next slide,

21:02 please.

21:03 So,

21:03 some key general findings

21:05 and,

21:06 uh,

21:06 things that perhaps we knew in 2015 but we did not have the numbers to,

21:11 uh,

21:11 uh,

21:11 sustain.

21:13 Uh,

21:13 displacement crises have on average and in the long run,

21:16 positive economic outcomes.

21:18 We saw that,

21:19 uh,

21:19 in terms of improved well-being and also improved

21:22 labor conditions for many of the hosts,

21:25 uh,

21:26 although these average and long-term effects hide a much more complex pictures

21:31 with adverse effects being short-term,

21:34 localized,

21:34 and concentrated among vulnerable groups.

21:38 So,

21:38 this is really where the focus of our action should be.

21:42 There is nothing inevitable among negative externalities.

21:45 We know that where we intervene,

21:47 uh,

21:47 as international actors and governments,

21:49 we can make a difference and alleviate or eliminate these negative

21:54 externalities,

21:56 and policies that foster freedom of movement and freedom of

21:58 work reduce the range and duration of negative effects.

22:02 So,

22:02 we know that that works now.

22:04 We also know that graduation programs as

22:07 very popular programs promoting,

22:09 particularly by the UNHCR targeting the ultra-poor

22:12 households are effective in displacement context here.

22:16 So,

22:16 we have 3 areas of recommendations overall which we

22:19 put into these boxes.

22:21 One is continue collecting data and inform programs and policies.

22:25 2,

22:25 promote inclusive approaches while addressing host population's needs.

22:29 And 3,

22:30 close the gap between policy and practice.

22:32 Next slide,

22:33 please.

22:34 So,

22:34 very briefly,

22:35 let,

22:35 let me go through these,

22:37 uh,

22:37 these points.

22:39 We saw that progress has been made in,

22:41 uh,

22:42 data and research,

22:43 but there are a lot of different areas that still

22:46 require a lot of data and a lot of research.

22:49 Internally,

22:50 this place is one,

22:50 you've seen the numbers before,

22:52 but what about stateless people,

22:54 returnees?

22:54 There are a lot of pockets of people that we don't know much yet about.

23:00 Uh,

23:00 we need,

23:01 and the global studies have shown that very,

23:03 very well,

23:04 we need to systematically collect data and program costs.

23:07 Uh,

23:08 we,

23:08 we,

23:08 every time we go back to donors,

23:10 we are asked,

23:11 you know,

23:11 how much does it cost to provide this amount of services to,

23:14 to refugees.

23:16 Uh,

23:16 essentially we have very gross numbers.

23:18 We don't know exactly how much it costs and it's very complex analysis to do that.

23:23 We need to do much more of that.

23:26 Uh,

23:26 invest more in measuring impacts.

23:28 Uh,

23:28 so through impacts evaluations and other evaluation means.

23:32 A lot of progress has been made,

23:33 but when we look at the number of impact evaluations,

23:36 for example,

23:37 overall on the total number of impact evaluations worldwide,

23:40 we're still a niche

23:42 in this research.

23:43 We need to improve on that.

23:44 Next slide,

23:44 please.

23:45 Promote inclusion,

23:47 uh,

23:47 we are,

23:47 uh,

23:47 you have seen that we have done a lot of research on inclusions,

23:50 uh,

23:51 over 40 studies covered that topic only.

23:54 Uh,

23:54 we now know very well,

23:56 we have the numbers to show that freedom of movement,

23:59 right to work,

24:00 legal documents

24:01 are essential

24:03 elements

24:04 that should be put in place for refugees and IDPs to,

24:08 uh,

24:08 refugees in particular to thrive.

24:11 Mitigate negative impact on hosts.

24:13 We know that there are winners and losers,

24:15 as I said before,

24:17 we know we can mitigate that and we know how to do that.

24:20 And encourage interaction.

24:22 Uh,

24:23 the more we see interaction,

24:25 the more information flowing between these different groups,

24:28 better levels of social cohesion,

24:31 uh,

24:31 more alignment between perceptions and reality.

24:34 Next slide,

24:35 please.

24:36 And then close the gap between policy and practice.

24:39 Uh,

24:39 we have seen lots of policies,

24:41 uh,

24:41 positive policies by governments that then,

24:44 uh,

24:45 stumble on daily

24:47 issues,

24:48 problems that,

24:49 uh,

24:49 uh,

24:49 are solvable,

24:50 but they're not solved,

24:52 and this constrained the whole

24:54 policy and government policies.

24:56 We have to address the barriers one by one.

24:59 Improve communication about policies again we have to

25:03 uh have perceived an actual level of assistance uh to uh come closer to each other.

25:10 And to do that,

25:11 we have to improve on our communications capacity

25:14 and focus on key access constraints because we said that it's a major barrier,

25:19 for example,

25:21 uh,

25:21 to access health and educational services,

25:24 even when these services exist and are theoretically available to refugees,

25:28 host communities,

25:29 and other people of concern.

25:32 So,

25:32 these are the three areas of,

25:33 of uh

25:34 um

25:35 policy recommendations that uh

25:37 we were able to come up with and you can

25:40 read more in our executive summary of the final report.

25:43 Next slide,

25:44 please.

25:45 And let me conclude with some important areas for future research.

25:49 Uh,

25:49 macroeconomics was mentioned by Sokenya at the outset

25:53 of forced displacement,

25:54 things like inflation,

25:56 um,

25:57 you know,

25:57 GDP growth.

25:58 What,

25:58 what is the impact on GDP growth of a massive inflow of people.

26:02 We still have very little data on this,

26:04 on this,

26:05 uh,

26:05 um,

26:06 Uh,

26:07 statistics.

26:08 The impact on forced displacement on infrastructure and utilities.

26:11 I'm thinking about water,

26:13 uh,

26:13 uh,

26:13 sewage,

26:13 uh,

26:14 uh,

26:14 electricity,

26:16 uh,

26:16 all these,

26:17 uh,

26:17 uh,

26:18 very important utilities that,

26:20 uh,

26:20 particularly host communities use are impacted,

26:23 uh,

26:23 uh,

26:24 from,

26:24 uh,

26:24 for suspensement

26:25 crisis,

26:26 we still have very little data on these kind of things.

26:29 Environmental assessments,

26:30 climate change,

26:31 uh,

26:32 uh,

26:32 we do have a lot and there is a lot going on,

26:35 but still very little understanding on how

26:38 forced displacement crises interact with these factors.

26:42 Uh,

26:42 poverty and well-being,

26:43 we're in a much better position at 2015,

26:46 but still very little when we compare the

26:48 research that is done overall on poverty globally

26:52 on other types of populations.

26:54 Uh,

26:55 the long-term and secondary effects are very difficult to measure,

26:58 but they need to be measures.

26:59 We mentioned the cost of programs,

27:01 early child development in force disployment context,

27:04 psychological and mental health.

27:06 Uh,

27:06 there is now a,

27:07 a,

27:07 a very

27:08 Uh,

27:09 thrive in literature that is working on that,

27:11 but still small in terms of size,

27:14 gender-based violence,

27:15 and how to mitigate it,

27:16 and returns,

27:17 again,

27:18 uh,

27:18 an area,

27:19 uh,

27:19 where we could do much more for future research.

27:22 So,

27:22 thank you very much and thanks again to all of you for joining us today.

27:27 Hello,

27:28 colleagues.

27:28 Thank you for joining us today.

27:29 Thanks to participants online,

27:31 uh,

27:31 colleagues in the room.

27:33 And on behalf of UNHCR I'm,

27:35 I'm really,

27:35 uh,

27:35 glad to welcome you to this linked event for the GRF,

27:38 one of the first,

27:39 as,

27:39 uh,

27:39 Greg said.

27:40 And also to,

27:41 of course,

27:41 thank our,

27:42 our partners,

27:42 uh,

27:43 the FCDO and,

27:44 and the World Bank.

27:45 Uh,

27:45 this has been a tremendous partnership,

27:46 so

27:47 it's really,

27:48 uh,

27:49 our pleasure to be here today.

27:51 You know,

27:51 the challenge of,

27:52 um,

27:53 adopting evidence-based approaches in humanitarian settings

27:57 is,

27:57 is not new,

27:58 and we're familiar with,

27:59 uh,

27:59 many of the barriers.

28:01 There's institutional barriers,

28:03 uh,

28:03 short funding and program cycles.

28:05 There's contextual barriers,

28:07 rapidly changing,

28:08 uh,

28:08 circumstances,

28:09 and,

28:09 and the delicacy of working with governments in,

28:11 in crisis situations.

28:13 Um,

28:14 there's cultural barriers,

28:15 the challenge,

28:16 uh,

28:16 in the humanitarian sector of balancing the emergency response with the long term.

28:20 Uh,

28:20 solutions,

28:21 uh,

28:21 approach.

28:23 Long term planning for solutions.

28:25 But we're also in a moment of change,

28:27 which brings new urgency and timeliness,

28:29 uh,

28:30 to this work,

28:30 as well as new questions.

28:32 Uh,

28:32 first,

28:33 we're,

28:33 I think we're all aware of the global trends,

28:35 these growing humanitarian needs,

28:37 increasing food insecurity,

28:39 uh,

28:39 increasing anthropometric climate change.

28:42 Uh,

28:43 you know,

28:43 increasing the,

28:44 which increases the frequency of natural disasters,

28:47 and the majority of refugees who continue to,

28:49 uh,

28:50 you know,

28:50 live without the,

28:51 you know,

28:52 uh,

28:52 access to basic services and,

28:54 uh,

28:54 you know,

28:54 without the right to work.

28:56 You know,

28:57 these,

28:57 we,

28:57 we,

28:57 we know from,

28:58 uh,

28:58 slide,

28:59 next slide,

28:59 please,

28:59 Dina,

29:00 thanks.

29:00 Um,

29:00 we benefit from new opportunities.

29:02 So,

29:03 UNHCR and others in the sector

29:05 have made,

29:05 you know,

29:06 recognizable advances in our approach to development partnerships.

29:10 There's the global compact on refugees,

29:12 um,

29:13 there's UNHCRR strategy on,

29:15 uh,

29:15 engagement with development actors,

29:17 uh,

29:18 there's UNHCR's data transformation strategy,

29:20 uh,

29:21 of course,

29:21 there's the creation of the World Bank,

29:22 UNHCR Joint Data Center,

29:24 and,

29:25 uh,

29:25 the UNHCR micro Data Library,

29:27 to name a few.

29:28 And this has been accompanied by significant investments on data and evidence.

29:33 As you've seen,

29:33 research on forced displacement has made huge progress in the last 10 years.

29:37 Um,

29:37 a key element of this development has been the

29:40 partnership established between the World Bank and UNHCR,

29:44 uh,

29:44 first formalized in 2016,

29:46 uh,

29:46 with the creation of the FCDO funded Building

29:48 the Evidence on Forced Displacement Research Program,

29:51 which we're,

29:52 uh,

29:52 here to talk about today.

29:54 And more recently with the creation of the multi-dor funded World

29:56 Bank UN UNHCR Joint Data Center in Copenhagen in 2019.

30:01 At the same time,

30:02 uh,

30:03 you know,

30:03 we know that data and evidence alone are not an end in themselves,

30:06 and these investments must lead to better conditions for forced to be displaced,

30:11 uh,

30:12 persons and,

30:12 and the communities that host them.

30:15 And to do so,

30:15 evidence must inform

30:18 33 areas.

30:19 One is communications and advocacy.

30:22 Uh,

30:22 messages based on substance inspire trust.

30:26 Uh,

30:26 on policy decisions that weigh the cost of

30:28 action versus inaction and substantiate the trade-offs,

30:32 uh,

30:32 faced by hosting governments.

30:34 And third,

30:35 on programming,

30:36 where,

30:36 uh,

30:36 evidence can inform

30:38 better planning and targeting,

30:40 uh,

30:40 to allow limited resources to stretch further and

30:43 innovative approaches to be optimized and expanded.

30:47 So,

30:47 let me just speak very briefly about one

30:49 example of how UNHCR is using evidence in action

30:52 in our,

30:52 uh,

30:53 programming,

30:54 uh,

30:54 and that's in,

30:55 uh,

30:55 the advancement of targeted employment interventions,

30:58 uh,

30:58 to the ultra poor using the graduation model,

31:01 which has been mentioned a bit here today.

31:03 Um,

31:03 the graduation model approach,

31:04 as you'll know,

31:05 is now applied in many settings,

31:07 having been approved by,

31:09 you know,

31:09 scientific research,

31:10 all but,

31:11 uh,

31:12 that in refugee settings.

31:13 So,

31:14 to fill that gap,

31:15 as you've seen,

31:15 you know,

31:16 this trust fund has been used towards that,

31:17 and UNHCR ourselves together with the London School of Economics,

31:22 uh,

31:22 we,

31:23 uh,

31:23 got together to measure the impact of the graduation program in Mozambique

31:27 for refugees and host communities.

31:29 Um.

31:30 We also specifically wanted to explore how the program could,

31:33 uh,

31:33 improve or,

31:34 or

31:34 to see if there was improvements in social cohesion,

31:37 uh,

31:37 in addition to the sort of standard

31:39 employment savings,

31:40 uh,

31:41 you know,

31:41 uh,

31:41 financial inclusion aspects.

31:43 Um,

31:44 and we find the program achieves,

31:45 uh,

31:45 the,

31:45 the goals of improving financial security through employment

31:49 and promoting,

31:49 uh,

31:50 social cohesion.

31:51 And we're using this evidence to,

31:53 uh,

31:53 expand on the global refugee forum pledges that

31:55 are linked to the poverty alleviation coalition.

31:58 That was founded in 2019 by UNHCR,

32:01 the World Bank,

32:01 and a coalition of NGOs,

32:03 uh,

32:04 with an aim to expand programs using the graduation approach

32:07 for refugees and host communities.

32:09 And this evidence is being used to inform,

32:11 uh,

32:12 the design and,

32:13 uh,

32:13 you know,

32:13 the targeting and,

32:14 and,

32:14 and reaching beneficiaries,

32:16 uh,

32:17 and to help meet the target of the 500,

32:19 500,000 households in 35 countries

32:22 to be participating in the graduation program by the end of 2025.

32:27 So,

32:27 enough talking for me.

32:28 Let me,

32:29 uh,

32:29 actually,

32:30 uh,

32:30 show you,

32:31 uh,

32:31 the impact of the program,

32:32 and you can hear from refugees and host communities themselves in this short video.

32:36 Thank you very much.

32:40 Kemara nosakaza

32:42 logu

32:43 noshkoassa muja pensar

32:45 prukewa mjumorera kekwandu muntpaekipode nu ole

32:50 yagente continarikwaavida.

33:20 Mozambique is hosting close to 29,000

33:25 refugees and asylum seekers.

33:27 Out of that,

33:29 approximately 9000 call

33:31 Maratani

33:33 Settlement

33:34 their home.

33:37 It is a place that is quite dynamic.

33:41 We

33:41 envisage together with the government

33:44 to provide the needed basic essential services.

33:49 So there's a school providing education from the

33:53 basic level all the way to high school.

33:56 There is a clinic

33:58 that is providing needed healthcare services.

34:02 We have electricity

34:05 connected to the camp.

34:06 And uh we have uh many uh both young people

34:10 and elderly people who are involved in very many different uh

34:15 vocational and uh livelihood activities

34:19 so that they can be able to also support themselves.

34:28 While refugees normally account for a very

34:30 small part of the host country's population,

34:32 less than 1%,

34:34 since they receive humanitarian aid,

34:36 their presence is highly salient to their host,

34:38 particularly in poor rural areas.

34:40 Host communities

34:42 often perceive this as being unfair,

34:44 which prevents them from fully accepting refugees.

34:50 Elias.

34:57 This is the problem of social cohesion that translates into

34:59 refugees not being fully integrated into the host community.

35:02 So in,

35:03 in Mauritan,

35:03 UNHCR has been implemented,

35:05 the graduation approach,

35:07 which is a set of interventions

35:09 aimed at bringing people out of extreme poverty.

35:14 The program benefited both refugees and nationals and consisted

35:17 of providing a cash transfer of $1000 US dollars,

35:21 which is an equivalent to about 30 months of the average salary in the area.

35:25 The program further provided individual coaching on life skills,

35:29 skills trainings on language and financial literacy,

35:32 helped participants open a bank account,

35:35 and it helped participants find an apprenticeship

35:37 in the nearby town or start their own business in the refugee camp.

35:44 Two years after the beginning of the program,

35:46 participating refugees and host

35:48 increased their monthly savings by 600%,

35:51 their household income by 94%.

35:54 And overall financial security by 54%.

35:58 Overall,

35:58 we observed food security increase by 9%.

36:01 The program also increased trust in others by 21%,

36:05 and those Mozambicans benefiting from the program

36:08 indicate that they were 20% more willing to

36:10 share jobs and government support with refugees.

36:17 The muntas pesole Maratani kissabimuntashkweiza kika pastad the

36:22 the fazagu makoza boa it is involveroa agency

36:26 eotenakel medu zen porta indeed.

36:31 uh.

36:55 Noma

36:56 differentodanos a part.

showAllTimestamps
no
transcript
Welcome to Geneva. Welcome to um colleagues joining us online. The event today is titled Policies to create Jobs and Community Learning from the Evidence on Forced Displacement. It is a linked event to the Global Refugee Forum, and it is part of uh building the Evidence on Forced Displacement, uh, a research partnership program between the UK government, the UNHCR and the World Bank. Today's event will be about the findings from a global partnership program, um, and also we're gonna zoom in into uh two of the core studies, uh, two of the core research studies, one on social cohesion and, and one on jobs. We're going to have opening remarks. We're then going to, uh, go into the presentations, and then we're going to have a panel. Discussion, uh, followed by Q&A. And finally, we'll have also, uh, some closing remarks. Without further ado, as you see, we have a packed agenda. It is my pleasure to invite our fragility, conflict and Violence, uh, uh, director, Sukenya, Sukeya Khan. She will be providing opening remarks. Thank you very much. Uh, nice to see you all and to be here in, uh, uh, this Global refugee, uh, forum. Really thank you for joining us, uh, today, um, and, uh, we'll, we'll reflect on a subject that is important to us, building evidence on the forced, uh, displacement. And importantly, we would like as well to discuss some of the recent findings of, uh, the important partnership. And I'm very grateful to UNHCR um for hosting the Global Refugee Forum and for being a very strong uh partner in the collective effort. Uh, to ease the challenges faced by refugees, IDPs, and the communities that host them, including through this research that, uh, a program that we'll hear about. Thank you, uh, as well to FCDO. Thank you very much, Greg, to you and your team for your partnership and support through these past 7 years. Let me take a few moments to explain this research partnership. Uh, it has been so important, and this event, this GRF is an opportunity to renew our commitment, uh, to addressing the growing challenge of forced displacement. We do forget that only 7 years ago when the program started. We did not know much about the impact of forced displacement on the people displaced, on their hosts, especially in low and middle income countries where more than 7 out of 10 displaced take refuge. Let me repeat, more than 7 out of 10 displaced people take refuge in low and middle-income countries. And it's difficult to design policies without data and evidence, and through this research, uh, partnership we have in our view, filled a critical knowledge gap. Today our data libraries at UNHCR and the World Bank host thousands of data sets to support our understanding of forced displacement and what programs, policies work. Building this evidence supporting the supported the publication of 3 special issues on forced displacement in 3 top economics and social science journals. Building this evidence pioneered research and innovation in research methods. Many of the studies were the result of collaboration with organizations and researchers worldwide, including young fellows who joined the program from low and middle-income countries. So we have built a community. Dedicated to producing evidence on forced displacement that can improve policies and programs for displaced population and their hosts, and I'm confident that this generation of research and scientists will carry on what this group has started. So the program in our view has already led to tangible results on program and policy. Uh, let me give you some examples, um, and, uh, in, in our program. We have an impact evaluation on AIDA funded graduation program in Afghanistan, and the program found that women who had participated in the program. Were much better across multiple outcomes than women that who had not participated. This timely evidence, uh, in a context like Afghanistan led to the allocation of more AIDA resources to the program to support its scale up up to more provinces in Afghanistan. To share another example, uh, concerning policy, a series of, uh, studies funded by the program on Venezuelan refugees and migrants in Brazil provided three first pieces of evidence on the challenges that Venezuelans face in Brazil, but also their positive contribution to the Brazilian economy we see. Uh, refugees as a burden, we have to balance that view with what their contribution. So a study looked at the Roraima state. Uh, the state most affected by the influx of, uh, Venezuelan, and then they found that the net fiscal impact was zero. The net fiscal impact of the influx in the short term was zero. The increased government spending was offset by. The increased revenue in through indirect collecting uh tax. So this evidence, for instance, for was key for UNHCR and the World Bank to deepen their policy dialogue with the host government. So, today we'll have uh the pleasure and the opportunity to hear from colleagues who have led the research in the World Bank and the UNHCR and a distinguished panel of speakers including colleagues who lived displacement experience, UNHCR and host governments. The focus of today's event is on the labor market impacts of forced displacement and what programs and policies may be effective to improve opportunities for displaced communities and host communities alike while maintaining and promoting social cohesion. The multitude of voices in this panel is intentional. Effective policymaking requires learning from diverse set of, uh, experience, and we hope that this uh collaborative approach will continue uh as research on forced displacement expands. Indeed, as factors affecting forced displacement evolve, so must research on the issue. So I'm very much looking forward to learning more, for example, about the macroeconomic impacts of forced displacement, but also promising programs for early childhood education and intervention to prevent gender-based violence. So let me end my remarks by reiterating the World Bank's commitment. To working with partners to address the needs of forcibly displaced people and their host communities. We have made substantial progress on developing the knowledge, policies, and programming response necessary to address forced displacement together. And as the issue of forced displacement becomes unfortunately more acute, partnership in building evidence will continue to be critical. Let us continue to work together in pursuing solutions. Thank you again for joining this event and I wish you all a fruitful discussion, and it's my pleasure now to invite on stage, Greg Houston, head of Migration Department, FCDO for his own opening remarks. Over to you, Greg. Hello, everybody. Thank you, Shikenya. Uh, thank you, Paula, uh, and thank you for inviting us to this, um, really, uh, important, significant event and indeed, um, one of the first events of, uh, the GRF. Um, so, years ago, um, we had in government, a research department. And the research department would have a little box at the bottom when they wrote papers, and they would send them in to policy colleagues like myself. And that was for feedback. That was for us to write something to send back to the research analysts. And I had a friend who was one of the research analysts, and he said to me over a coffee, please, please don't write. That is quite interesting. The reason, of course, is that that is quite interesting. Does not equate to interventions and change and the reason why we all do what we do. And that's part of the reason why this is so important for us and why we have invested in this initiative. Um, so as the FCDO, um, we have provided around 12 million pounds over the last 7 years in order for us to move forward with research that's designed towards policy, towards interventions, towards how can we do things differently. As a donor, but also in uh host states as well. So forced displacements has long been a policy and priority and for us, and generating that strong evidence is really a base for making better policy. And as Sukenya mentioned earlier, it's really important to cut through the. Emotion and the political noise with good, solid evidence base that we can, we can take forward. So, we're gonna hear some great, quite interesting, but some great uh presentations later on. I wanted to just highlight a few of the um. Elements that we thought were really important from the research over the last 7 years that we have used, that we have taken forward. So the first is around the importance of refugees being able to access national systems, and this avoids setting up uh parallel systems. It is more sustainable and can reduce the perception of uh unequal treatment uh by uh host communities. We talk and deal a lot in perceptions, and I think that's why this is really important. And there's some practical toolkits, there's some practical things that we can take forward and use to help us do that. And this evidence has underlined that these national systems require donor support, um, both refugee and host communities, and the importance of linking in development finance at the same time. And that's something that we've learned and something that is really important, and it will be a theme for us through the course of this week. So, the research has also highlighted, um, the barriers to accessing systems that refugees face when living in camps, uh, with. freedom of movement. And so unpicking and unpacking that freedom of movement and how critical that is to access um basic services, uh, is key to, to durable solutions as we move forward. And again, I think we're going to hear a little bit more about that uh during the course of this session. The researchers also provide really important lessons on inclusion, um, and how inclusive policies can be implemented and how we can support, uh, social cohesion. Um, we have, um, some, uh, quite recent experience of that with Ukraine, um, which we were learning as we were going last year, um, and that's something that again is going to be a bit of a theme for us over the course, uh, of, of this week, and there is a real body of emerging research on that as a, as an area. And, finally, and I think, you know, sometimes we're not as open and honest about this as perhaps we should be, but the evidence tells us what works and tells us what is not working. And that allows us to scale up what's effective and to stop what's perhaps less effective. And I think that's also really important for us to be, to be clear about. So, um Just to finish, thank you, all of you for engaging with this and for working on this as we move forward, and these kind of events are also an important part of disseminating um what works and what doesn't work and what we're working on and what we should be working on. So, um, uh, we hope that there is a, you know, continued, um, close engagement, um, with the policy teams, with the program teams, with the researchers, um, and I look forward to, uh, listening more and, and learning more about, uh, about what you're all working on, uh, going forward, which will be quite interesting, but it's more than quite interesting. Thank you. Thank you, Greg, uh, thank you, Sukena. Thank you for sharing your, your reflection and getting us uh started uh today. We're going to go now into the presentations. Uh, we're going to have Paulo Verme who's joining us online. Uh, he's a lead economist in the World Bank, and he's going to be presenting jointly with Tesabel Trammo, who is the senior economist in the UNHCR. Over to you, uh, Paulo. First, let me join Sukena in uh thanking uh the UK government for sustaining us for the whole period of the program and providing funding for everything we proposed. uh, and also thank the UNHCR for being uh an incredible partner uh during this food period. So thanks again. Uh, next slide, please. Uh, I wanted to start, uh, as, uh, Sokena also mentioned from where we were in 2015. Uh, recall that, uh, 2015, uh, was a turning point, uh, uh, in terms of forced displacement. The Syrian crisis, had been going on for 4 years. Uh, we reached what was called the peak of the EU migration crisis. There was a new resolve on the part of uh political leaders uh who were willing to put financial means into forced displacement, but then again, we faced a very old problem, which was a lack of microdata and quality research on forced displacement. Uh, if we go back to December 2015 and we count the number of journal articles in economics, since the beginning of recording, beginning of time, uh, we could find only 618 articles on refugees and only 28 on internally displaced. Um, it, it was a time where, uh, refugee studies, forced displacement studies were considered a minor, uh, subarea of migration studies. There wasn't much interest, uh, uh, into these topics, particularly in economics. In 2015, we also had the conditions to create this first experiment, a joint partnership between the World Bank and the UNHCR, uh, to study the poverty and welfare of, uh, Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon, which resulted in a book. And that was really the turning point for us to uh start a real uh research partnership with the UNHCR where the UNHCR had a large amount of volume of data that were largely unused for research and the World Bank had the Expertise to, to do the kind of research but did not have the data to do that. So this was a partnership really uh that uh allowed the synergy to take place and we decided to establish a formal multi-year research partnership uh between the World Bank and the UNHCR and uh with uh our partner, the UK government. Next slide, please. So, these are the inputs. Uh, the UK government has mentioned before, put in $16.5 million into this project. Initially, it was a lower budget for four years. It was extended to seven years later on, so the period is 2016, 2023. We organized the work in seven pillars. Uh, we decided to have global studies that would be relevant across the globe on the refugees and IDPs. and host communities. Uh, we set up impact evaluations for specific programs run by the World Bank, the UNHCR or governments. We thought about focused studies and compelling questions that required quick answers, uh, during the period. We established a young Fellowship program, um, a microdata initiative that eventually became the Joint Data Center, uh, and, uh, a data portal for FCV data. And also very importantly, an uptake, dissemination, and training strategy that allows us to make all the findings of this program uh available. Next slide, please. So, these are the outputs, and numbers. So, 6 global studies, 15 impact evaluations, 12 focused studies. We hired 24 young fellows. Uh, we collaborated with 200+ researchers across the globe, 30+ partner organizations, uh, and we cover 36 countries. As mentioned, the microdata program, uh, that we started in 2016 eventually became the Joint Data Center in 2019. And uh we had seminar series, newsletters, policy notes, a website, social media, and a training program that uh re recently, some of you may be familiar with. Uh, the total output, the number, uh, we, we have at the moment is 144 self-contained studies which, uh, we published. Uh, of these, we have, uh, already 36 publications in journals, including top economic journals. So these are the numbers, uh, next slide, please. You can see that we covered the somehow unevenly different areas. Uh, we did a lot of work on social cohesion. Uh, on gender, on labor markets, uh, some of the results, uh, you will hear them today in later presentations, and, uh, we very much covered the, uh, most, uh, all the relevant, uh, geographical areas where, uh, forced displacement is an issue. So these are the numbers, but, um, you know, next slide, please. If uh we really look at the general contribution that I think this program had overall beyond these numbers is really how uh we as a community of people working on forced displacement have been able to um change the landscape of research and data. Uh, look at these numbers here. Uh, again, these are the same numbers of, uh, uh, published papers in economics journals, uh, from 2000 to 2023. And uh you can clearly see the kink in 2015, uh, where the research on forced forced displacement really took off. Uh, an increase between 2015 and 2023 of 466%. That's unheard of in the research, uh, uh, circles. Uh, and even if IDPs remain a very small area of research, still, the growth has been tremendous, 389. percent over the uh seven-year period. So, we live in a very much different world today uh of what uh we looked at in 2015. When I was asked uh should we continue with this particular program. Uh, I said no because, uh, essentially we fill the gap now. All research, uh, uh, major research institutions, organizations, uh, international organizations are now working on refugees and IDPs, host communities. They have the data to do that. So, really, I think. Our contribution has been to uh participate in this uh um uh process of growth in data and research that has really changed the tide on, on forced displacement, uh, over the past 7 years. Next slide, please. So, some key general findings and, uh, things that perhaps we knew in 2015 but we did not have the numbers to, uh, uh, sustain. Uh, displacement crises have on average and in the long run, positive economic outcomes. We saw that, uh, in terms of improved well-being and also improved labor conditions for many of the hosts, uh, although these average and long-term effects hide a much more complex pictures with adverse effects being short-term, localized, and concentrated among vulnerable groups. So, this is really where the focus of our action should be. There is nothing inevitable among negative externalities. We know that where we intervene, uh, as international actors and governments, we can make a difference and alleviate or eliminate these negative externalities, and policies that foster freedom of movement and freedom of work reduce the range and duration of negative effects. So, we know that that works now. We also know that graduation programs as very popular programs promoting, particularly by the UNHCR targeting the ultra-poor households are effective in displacement context here. So, we have 3 areas of recommendations overall which we put into these boxes. One is continue collecting data and inform programs and policies. 2, promote inclusive approaches while addressing host population's needs. And 3, close the gap between policy and practice. Next slide, please. So, very briefly, let, let me go through these, uh, these points. We saw that progress has been made in, uh, data and research, but there are a lot of different areas that still require a lot of data and a lot of research. Internally, this place is one, you've seen the numbers before, but what about stateless people, returnees? There are a lot of pockets of people that we don't know much yet about. Uh, we need, and the global studies have shown that very, very well, we need to systematically collect data and program costs. Uh, we, we, every time we go back to donors, we are asked, you know, how much does it cost to provide this amount of services to, to refugees. Uh, essentially we have very gross numbers. We don't know exactly how much it costs and it's very complex analysis to do that. We need to do much more of that. Uh, invest more in measuring impacts. Uh, so through impacts evaluations and other evaluation means. A lot of progress has been made, but when we look at the number of impact evaluations, for example, overall on the total number of impact evaluations worldwide, we're still a niche in this research. We need to improve on that. Next slide, please. Promote inclusion, uh, we are, uh, you have seen that we have done a lot of research on inclusions, uh, over 40 studies covered that topic only. Uh, we now know very well, we have the numbers to show that freedom of movement, right to work, legal documents are essential elements that should be put in place for refugees and IDPs to, uh, refugees in particular to thrive. Mitigate negative impact on hosts. We know that there are winners and losers, as I said before, we know we can mitigate that and we know how to do that. And encourage interaction. Uh, the more we see interaction, the more information flowing between these different groups, better levels of social cohesion, uh, more alignment between perceptions and reality. Next slide, please. And then close the gap between policy and practice. Uh, we have seen lots of policies, uh, positive policies by governments that then, uh, stumble on daily issues, problems that, uh, uh, are solvable, but they're not solved, and this constrained the whole policy and government policies. We have to address the barriers one by one. Improve communication about policies again we have to uh have perceived an actual level of assistance uh to uh come closer to each other. And to do that, we have to improve on our communications capacity and focus on key access constraints because we said that it's a major barrier, for example, uh, to access health and educational services, even when these services exist and are theoretically available to refugees, host communities, and other people of concern. So, these are the three areas of, of uh um policy recommendations that uh we were able to come up with and you can read more in our executive summary of the final report. Next slide, please. And let me conclude with some important areas for future research. Uh, macroeconomics was mentioned by Sokenya at the outset of forced displacement, things like inflation, um, you know, GDP growth. What, what is the impact on GDP growth of a massive inflow of people. We still have very little data on this, on this, uh, um, Uh, statistics. The impact on forced displacement on infrastructure and utilities. I'm thinking about water, uh, uh, sewage, uh, uh, electricity, uh, all these, uh, uh, very important utilities that, uh, particularly host communities use are impacted, uh, uh, from, uh, for suspensement crisis, we still have very little data on these kind of things. Environmental assessments, climate change, uh, uh, we do have a lot and there is a lot going on, but still very little understanding on how forced displacement crises interact with these factors. Uh, poverty and well-being, we're in a much better position at 2015, but still very little when we compare the research that is done overall on poverty globally on other types of populations. Uh, the long-term and secondary effects are very difficult to measure, but they need to be measures. We mentioned the cost of programs, early child development in force disployment context, psychological and mental health. Uh, there is now a, a, a very Uh, thrive in literature that is working on that, but still small in terms of size, gender-based violence, and how to mitigate it, and returns, again, uh, an area, uh, where we could do much more for future research. So, thank you very much and thanks again to all of you for joining us today. Hello, colleagues. Thank you for joining us today. Thanks to participants online, uh, colleagues in the room. And on behalf of UNHCR I'm, I'm really, uh, glad to welcome you to this linked event for the GRF, one of the first, as, uh, Greg said. And also to, of course, thank our, our partners, uh, the FCDO and, and the World Bank. Uh, this has been a tremendous partnership, so it's really, uh, our pleasure to be here today. You know, the challenge of, um, adopting evidence-based approaches in humanitarian settings is, is not new, and we're familiar with, uh, many of the barriers. There's institutional barriers, uh, short funding and program cycles. There's contextual barriers, rapidly changing, uh, circumstances, and, and the delicacy of working with governments in, in crisis situations. Um, there's cultural barriers, the challenge, uh, in the humanitarian sector of balancing the emergency response with the long term. Uh, solutions, uh, approach. Long term planning for solutions. But we're also in a moment of change, which brings new urgency and timeliness, uh, to this work, as well as new questions. Uh, first, we're, I think we're all aware of the global trends, these growing humanitarian needs, increasing food insecurity, uh, increasing anthropometric climate change. Uh, you know, increasing the, which increases the frequency of natural disasters, and the majority of refugees who continue to, uh, you know, live without the, you know, uh, access to basic services and, uh, you know, without the right to work. You know, these, we, we, we know from, uh, slide, next slide, please, Dina, thanks. Um, we benefit from new opportunities. So, UNHCR and others in the sector have made, you know, recognizable advances in our approach to development partnerships. There's the global compact on refugees, um, there's UNHCRR strategy on, uh, engagement with development actors, uh, there's UNHCR's data transformation strategy, uh, of course, there's the creation of the World Bank, UNHCR Joint Data Center, and, uh, the UNHCR micro Data Library, to name a few. And this has been accompanied by significant investments on data and evidence. As you've seen, research on forced displacement has made huge progress in the last 10 years. Um, a key element of this development has been the partnership established between the World Bank and UNHCR, uh, first formalized in 2016, uh, with the creation of the FCDO funded Building the Evidence on Forced Displacement Research Program, which we're, uh, here to talk about today. And more recently with the creation of the multi-dor funded World Bank UN UNHCR Joint Data Center in Copenhagen in 2019. At the same time, uh, you know, we know that data and evidence alone are not an end in themselves, and these investments must lead to better conditions for forced to be displaced, uh, persons and, and the communities that host them. And to do so, evidence must inform 33 areas. One is communications and advocacy. Uh, messages based on substance inspire trust. Uh, on policy decisions that weigh the cost of action versus inaction and substantiate the trade-offs, uh, faced by hosting governments. And third, on programming, where, uh, evidence can inform better planning and targeting, uh, to allow limited resources to stretch further and innovative approaches to be optimized and expanded. So, let me just speak very briefly about one example of how UNHCR is using evidence in action in our, uh, programming, uh, and that's in, uh, the advancement of targeted employment interventions, uh, to the ultra poor using the graduation model, which has been mentioned a bit here today. Um, the graduation model approach, as you'll know, is now applied in many settings, having been approved by, you know, scientific research, all but, uh, that in refugee settings. So, to fill that gap, as you've seen, you know, this trust fund has been used towards that, and UNHCR ourselves together with the London School of Economics, uh, we, uh, got together to measure the impact of the graduation program in Mozambique for refugees and host communities. Um. We also specifically wanted to explore how the program could, uh, improve or, or to see if there was improvements in social cohesion, uh, in addition to the sort of standard employment savings, uh, you know, uh, financial inclusion aspects. Um, and we find the program achieves, uh, the, the goals of improving financial security through employment and promoting, uh, social cohesion. And we're using this evidence to, uh, expand on the global refugee forum pledges that are linked to the poverty alleviation coalition. That was founded in 2019 by UNHCR, the World Bank, and a coalition of NGOs, uh, with an aim to expand programs using the graduation approach for refugees and host communities. And this evidence is being used to inform, uh, the design and, uh, you know, the targeting and, and, and reaching beneficiaries, uh, and to help meet the target of the 500, 500,000 households in 35 countries to be participating in the graduation program by the end of 2025. So, enough talking for me. Let me, uh, actually, uh, show you, uh, the impact of the program, and you can hear from refugees and host communities themselves in this short video. Thank you very much. Kemara nosakaza logu noshkoassa muja pensar prukewa mjumorera kekwandu muntpaekipode nu ole yagente continarikwaavida. Mozambique is hosting close to 29,000 refugees and asylum seekers. Out of that, approximately 9000 call Maratani Settlement their home. It is a place that is quite dynamic. We envisage together with the government to provide the needed basic essential services. So there's a school providing education from the basic level all the way to high school. There is a clinic that is providing needed healthcare services. We have electricity connected to the camp. And uh we have uh many uh both young people and elderly people who are involved in very many different uh vocational and uh livelihood activities so that they can be able to also support themselves. While refugees normally account for a very small part of the host country's population, less than 1%, since they receive humanitarian aid, their presence is highly salient to their host, particularly in poor rural areas. Host communities often perceive this as being unfair, which prevents them from fully accepting refugees. Elias. This is the problem of social cohesion that translates into refugees not being fully integrated into the host community. So in, in Mauritan, UNHCR has been implemented, the graduation approach, which is a set of interventions aimed at bringing people out of extreme poverty. The program benefited both refugees and nationals and consisted of providing a cash transfer of $1000 US dollars, which is an equivalent to about 30 months of the average salary in the area. The program further provided individual coaching on life skills, skills trainings on language and financial literacy, helped participants open a bank account, and it helped participants find an apprenticeship in the nearby town or start their own business in the refugee camp. Two years after the beginning of the program, participating refugees and host increased their monthly savings by 600%, their household income by 94%. And overall financial security by 54%. Overall, we observed food security increase by 9%. The program also increased trust in others by 21%, and those Mozambicans benefiting from the program indicate that they were 20% more willing to share jobs and government support with refugees. The muntas pesole Maratani kissabimuntashkweiza kika pastad the the fazagu makoza boa it is involveroa agency eotenakel medu zen porta indeed. uh. Noma differentodanos a part.
showAllTranscripts
no
duration
PT37M19S
scene7File
worldbank/20231212-BEOFD-Seminar-Part01
scene7Domain
https://worldbank.scene7.com/
scene7FileAvs
worldbank/20231212-BEOFD-Seminar-Part01-AVS
title
20231212 BEOFD Seminar Part01
description
20231212 BEOFD Seminar Part01
showTimestampAndTranscript
yes
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-3
col-lg-3
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-7
col-lg-7
  • add-style
  • lp-body-content
lp-heading-top-medium
lp-heading-bottom-medium
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-2
col-lg-2