Skip to Main Navigation

Integrity Vice Presidency

Select a EDS Sub navigation page selecting option, leaving this page


External Investigations

Complaint Intake 

INT performs an initial assessment of every complaint that it receives at intake.  This assessment determines whether the complaint relates to a sanctionable practice in World Bank-financed projects and falls within INT’s jurisdiction.  Complaints outside of INT's jurisdiction are redirected to other areas of the World Bank or to external entities as appropriate.  

Complaints that fall under INT's jurisdiction undergo a preliminary assessment to determine if they are credible and of sufficient gravity to warrant opening an investigation. In determining whether to open an investigation, INT considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the seriousness of the allegations; the potential development impact of the alleged misconduct; the credibility of the complainant; the presence or availability of corroborating evidence; and the amount of project and contract funds involved. When a complaint does not reach the threshold for an investigation, INT works with World Bank operational staff to address the issues raised. 

Investigation of Cases

Through investigations, INT ascertains whether firms and/or individuals have engaged in one of the World Bank's five sanctionable practices.  An INT investigation is administrative in nature and the standard of proof used to substantiate an investigation is akin to a "balance of probabilities," rather than the criminal standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt."  If INT finds sufficient evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not that the alleged conduct, or other sanctionable conduct, occurred, then the matter is deemed substantiated. The allegation is considered unsubstantiated if there was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove it, and unfounded if the allegation has no basis in fact.

Investigation Reports

When INT substantiates an investigation, it produces a Final Investigation Report (FIR).  FIRs are sent to regional management and relevant operational staff for comment before being finalized. Final FIRs are submitted to the World Bank President. 

FIRs form the basis for two other INT outputs: referral reports and redacted reports. INT sends referral reports to relevant national authorities if evidence indicates that the laws of a World Bank member country may have been violated. Redacted reports are provided to the World Bank's Board of Executive Directors and, after the completion of any related sanctions proceedings, posted on INT’s website. These reports provide information about the allegations, methodology, and findings of an investigation, as well as any action taken by the WBG.

In rare cases, INT will produce a FIR even if there is not reasonably sufficient evidence to substantiate a complaint - for example, if INT believes that the investigation unearthed important lessons that should be shared with colleagues in the World Bank. 

Internal Investigations

To maintain its credibility in the global anti-corruption arena, the integrity of the World Bank's own operations is of the utmost importance.  In addition to investigating allegations of fraud and corruption involving Bank staff and corporate vendors, the Internal Investigations Unit mainstreams lessons learned through case studies, training and other activities and participates in outreach programs as a member of the Bank's Internal Justice System to promote the reporting, detection and prevention of fraud and corruption within the Bank's corporate arena.

Examples of allegations against staff within the Internal Investigations Unit's investigative mandate include abuse of position for personal gain, misuse of Bank  funds or trust funds, embezzlement, fraud, corruption and collusion, involving either Bank operations or in the administration of Bank business, and attendant conflicts of interest or lesser included acts of misconduct.

The Internal Investigations Unit is also responsible for investigating allegations against Bank corporate vendors involving fraud, corruption, collusion, coercion, or obstructive practices in support of "vendor eligibility reviews," leading to corporate debarment proceedings.