BRIEF

Pandemic Emergency Facility: Frequently Asked Questions

May 3, 2016



What is the Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF) and why is it needed?

Pandemics pose a serious threat not only to global health security, but also to economic security and to our ability to end extreme poverty and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. While outbreaks are inevitable, pandemics, if addressed early, are for the most part preventable. Money and support delivered at the right time can save lives and economies. 

Yet as we saw in the recent Ebola crisis in West Africa, there is currently no fast-disbursing financial mechanism to make available significant funds to resource-constrained countries early enough to help them fight an epidemic outbreak that is escalating. Time and again, the world continues to follow the same pattern: money isn’t brought to the table until a major outbreak hits an explosive point.  Without a strong system in place, the world will simply continue to move from crisis to crisis. Four expert panels convened over the past year in the wake of the Ebola crisis concluded that the world must urgently step up our capacity for swifter, more effective pandemic response.

A critical financing gap exists between the limited funds available at the early stages of an outbreak and the assistance that is mobilized once an outbreak has reached   crisis proportions. The Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF), developed by the World Bank Group in collaboration with the World Health Organization and other public and private sector partners, seeks to fill this gap by providing the much-needed surge funding for response efforts to help prevent rare, high-severity disease outbreaks from becoming more deadly and costly pandemics.

What is the potential economic impact of a pandemic?

Pandemics are one of the most certain uninsured risks in the world today. There’s a high probability that the world will experience a severe outbreak in the next 10 to 15 years that could destabilize societies and economies. Recent economic work suggests that the annual global cost of moderately severe to severe pandemics is roughly $570 billion, or 0.7 percent of global income. The cost of a severe pandemic like the 1918 Spanish flu could total as much as 5 percent of global GDP. 

Who is covered under the PEF, for what, and how much funding will it provide?

While every country in the world is susceptible to disease outbreaks, low-income countries with relatively weaker health systems tend to be more vulnerable and less capable of mobilizing the financial resources to effectively respond to major outbreaks. Accordingly, the PEF will offer coverage to all countries eligible for financing from IDA, the World Bank Group’s fund for the poorest countries; those countries in turn would be eligible to receive funding in the event of an outbreak that meets the activation criteria for PEF financing. In addition, PEF can provide funding to qualified international agencies involved in the response to a major outbreak in affected countries.

The PEF covers outbreaks of infectious diseases most likely to cause major epidemics, including new Orthomyxoviruses (new influenza pandemic virus A, B and C), Coronaviridae (SARS, MERS), Filoviridae (Ebola, Marburg) and other zoonotic diseases (Crimean Congo, Rift Valley, Lassa fever).

Maximum coverage under the PEF’s insurance window is US$500 million for three years. In addition, the PEF includes a replenishable cash window, targeted at US$50-100 million.

How is the PEF financed?

The PEF is financed through two windows, insurance and cash. Funding under the insurance window will be provided by resources from the reinsurance market combined with the proceeds of catastrophe bonds (capital-at-risk notes) issued by IBRD, and will provide a maximum coverage of US$ 500 million for an initial period of three years. Development partner contributions will cover the cost of the premia and bond coupons for the insurance window. To complement the insurance window, a cash window will provide more flexible funding to address a larger set of emerging pathogens which may not meet the activation criteria for the insurance window.  

How will the PEF help bolster the response to a potential pandemic?

By providing resources swiftly to countries and international responders to stem an outbreak before it reaches pandemic proportions, the PEF will help save thousands of lives. It will also keep the cost of response in the millions rather than the billions that donors now spend on response and recovery efforts, and the billions -- or potentially trillions -- in lost GDP from a pandemic.

For example, if the PEF had existed in 2014 during the Ebola outbreak, the world could have mobilized $100 million as early as July to accelerate the emergency response.  Instead, relying on pass-the-hat financing meant that money at that scale did not begin to flow until three months later – during which Ebola cases increased tenfold. Donors ended up committing more than $7 billion for Ebola response and recovery and overall economic impact of the crisis on Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone reached $2.8 billion, according to the latest World Bank Group estimates.

What are the criteria for accessing funds from the PEF?

The PEF’s insurance window will rely on clear, parametric activation criteria designed with publicly available data. To “trigger” PEF financing under the insurance window, an outbreak must meet specific criteria related to its severity. These criteria are based on outbreak size (i.e., number of cases or number of deaths), outbreak growth (i.e., the outbreak must be growing over a defined time period) and outbreak spread (i.e., two or more countries affected by the outbreak). If these criteria are met, then the affected countries and/or eligible international responders may then submit a request for funding from the PEF.  Payments will be guided by the principles of country ownership, speed, adequacy and flexibility.

What about severe outbreaks that do not meet the PEF activation criteria, or diseases that are not currently covered by the PEF insurance window?

Recognizing that severe outbreaks from unknown or newly emerging pathogens may occur that do not fit or have not yet met the activation criteria of the insurance window, the PEF is complemented by a cash window which gives it the needed flexibility that the insurance window cannot provide. The principles guiding the use of the cash window will be similar to those used for insurance, but with greater flexibility in terms of payment amounts, earlier payments and payments for diseases not covered by the insurance window.

The cash window has four purposes: (i) to provide supplemental financing for pathogens covered by insurance, but that clearly merit larger or earlier payouts than provided by the activation criteria and allocation arrangements; (ii) to provide financing to severe single-country outbreaks; (iii) to provide coverage for new or unknown pathogens not covered by insurance; and (iv) to serve as a conduit for efficient and effective surge financing for development partners to channel resources to affected countries in the event of a crisis.

How does the PEF complement the World Health Organization’s Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE)?

The World Bank Group has worked closely with the World Health Organization (WHO) to design the PEF. The PEF will complement WHO’s Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE) and fill a critical gap in the current global financing architecture.  PEF financing is activated once an outbreak reaches a significant level of severity, well after the CFE has disbursed to support early response efforts. The CFE is also designed to respond not only to outbreaks but also to any type of emergencies with health and humanitarian consequences, including natural disasters. In contrast, the PEF is designed specifically to respond to outbreaks from a defined set of viruses with pandemic potential.

What is the governance structure of the PEF?

The following entities will guide PEF funding decisions: 

  • A steering body is responsible for core decision making, with members comprised of development partner contributors plus non-voting members from relevant agencies (e.g. WHO, WBG, IDA country, CSO representatives) to be agreed by the voting members.
  • Experts’ roster vets and makes recommendation on Request-for-Funds applications.
  • Advisory committee meets annually on pandemic response issues and oversees simulations and drill exercises to facilitate response readiness.

Has the design of the PEF drawn on lessons from similar finance mechanisms?

Yes.  Using insurance to pre-finance sovereign risks is already a well-established tool for managing climate and disaster risks, and one that the World Bank Group has supported in the past. One example is the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF), designed to provide participating countries with access to affordable and effective coverage against natural disasters. Another example is the Pacific Catastrophic Risk Facility (PCRAFI), a risk insurance pool of five small Pacific islands that was also incubated by the Bank. A third example is the Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool (TCIP), a mandatory scheme for homeowners’ earthquake insurance, which was backed by WBG financing at inception. However, the PEF marks the first time in history that pandemic risk would be covered by an insurance instrument.

What are the key expected benefits of the PEF?

The PEF will accelerate and improve outbreak response, save lives, and reduce the costs of response.  Over time, the PEF is also expected to create a new market for pandemic insurance that will bring greater discipline and rigor to pandemic preparedness and incentivize better pandemic response planning.  The PEF will also stimulate efforts by countries and development partners to build better core public health capabilities for disease surveillance and health systems strengthening, toward universal health coverage.

How will the PEF help strengthen efforts toward pandemic preparedness?

The PEF is designed as an emergency response mechanism, and as such it will not be used to directly finance pandemic preparedness measures. Other WBG instruments can be drawn upon to finance preparedness. Preparedness will be a special focus of the IDA18 replenishment.

The PEF is not a substitute for investments on preparedness. As part of the PEF’s implementation, the WBG will further encourage IDA countries and other partners to prepare or update their outbreak response plans, which are an essential element of preparedness.  Countries need resilient health systems with quality universal primary care and strong public health capabilities, with regional networks that can take disease surveillance and detection to scale.  These investments are and will continue to be a priority for World Bank Group health financing through IDA and IBRD.   And together with WHO, USAID and other development partners, WBG is also developing a framework to map domestic and international public and private sector funds available for preparedness, and help decision-makers complement and reinforce which types of financing are best suited to specific uses and situations.

What is the timeline for launching the PEF?

The World Bank Group’s Board of Executive Directors approved the establishment of the PEF on May 3. Following receipt of financing commitments by development partners, we expect the PEF to be up and running before the end of 2016.

 

Last Updated: May 03, 2016