Overview

  • Now into its seventh year, the violent conflict in Syria continues to take a heavy toll on the life of Syrian people and on the Syrian economy. The UN estimates that more than 250,000 people have died, while other sources place the death toll at almost 500,000 (470,000) with 1.2 million people injured. More than 6.3 million people are internally displaced and 4.9 million are officially registered as refugees.

    The social and economic impacts of the conflict are also large—and growing. The lack of sustained access to health care, education, housing, and food have exacerbated the impact of the conflict and pushed millions of people into unemployment and poverty.
    In addition, a severe decline in oil receipts and disruptions of trade has placed even more pressure on Syria’s external balances, resulting in the rapid depletion of its international reserves.

    Assessing the Impact of the Syrian Crisis

    Prior to the conflict, the World Bank Group provided support to Syria through technical assistance and advisory services on private sector development, human development, social protection and environmental sustainability.

    At the onset of the conflict in 2011, however, all Bank operational activity and missions to Syria were halted. However, the Bank monitors the impact of the conflict on the Syrian people and the economy. It also dialogues regularly with the international community working on Syria in an effort to make sure it is ready to support post-conflict recovery efforts. It has carried out two recent analyses on the impact of the Syrian conflict: (i) a Damage Assessment (DA) of Aleppo, Idlib, and Hama, and (ii) an Economic and Social Impact Analysis (ESIA) of the conflict on Syria, called the Toll of War.

    The first, the DA, used satellite imagery, social media analytics, and public and partner data to assess the amount of damage caused by the conflict across six public sectors in three urban centers. Building on lessons from other conflict-affected countries, it used an evidence-based approach to: quantify the amount of physical damage caused to key infrastructure; assess the impact of the conflict on service delivery in a representative set of Syrian cities; and to examine trends in local resilience patterns.
    The Toll of War report assessed the economic and social impact of the conflict Syria-wide, including its effects on physical and human capital, as well as its effects on the aggregate well-being of Syrians. The study examines the drivers of these impacts—physical destruction, losses in human lives, demographic mobility, and economic disorganization—to assess the relative importance of the impact on each. It found that:

    • The human toll of the conflict (casualties and forced displacement) and damage to productive factors and economic activity has been extensive, damaging capital stock (e.g. about one-third of housing stock and one half of health and education facilities damaged or destroyed), while disrupting economic activity. From 2011 to 2016, cumulative GDP loss is estimated at $226 billion.
    • Disruptions in economic organization are the most important driver of the economic impact, superseding physical damage. Conflict has disrupted economic activity by diminishing economic connectivity, reducing incentives to pursue productive work, and disconnecting networks and supply chains. Cumulative GDP loss due to disruptions in economic organization exceeds that of physical destruction by a factor of 20. This contrast is explained by how the economy reacts to different shocks. A “capital destruction only” is like some natural disasters: in a well-functioning economy, its effects on investment are limited (-22% in simulations) as capital can be rapidly rebuilt and repercussions contained. In comparison, economic disorganization reduces investments significantly (-80% in simulations); and effects propagated over time.
    • The longer the conflict lasts, the more difficult recovery will be, as effects of economic deterioration become more persistent over time. Should conflict end in its 6th year, GDP is estimated to recoup about 41% of the gap with its pre-conflict level within 4 years, with cumulated GDP losses 7.6 times 2010 GDP by the 20th year. In comparison, GDP recoups only 28% of the gap in 4 years if it ends in its 10th year, with cumulated GDP losses 13.2 times 2010 GDP by the 20th year. Simulations also show that outmigration could double between the 6th and 20th year of the conflict.

    The assessment and analysis together underscore the Bank’s ongoing dialogue with the UN, the EU, and other development partners, and provide an important understanding of Syria’s economy, infrastructure, service delivery, and institutions. The assessment and analysis do not provide, however, a picture of the reconstruction that will be needed once the conflicts in Syria stop.

    Supporting Syrian Refugees and Host Communities

    The impact of the Syrian crisis has been significant in Lebanon and Jordan, where conservative estimates put the proportion of Syrian refugees at 25% and 10% of the countries’ populations respectively. The Bank’s operational response in these countries has included: (i) analytical work on the social and economic impact of the influx; (ii) the rapid preparation of projects to assist hosting communities and refugees; and (iii) the mobilization of substantial grant funding from donor partners to support the host countries.

    In collaboration with a wide range of partners and international financial institutions, the Bank led the establishment of the Global Concessional Financing Facility (GCFF), a mechanism that offers middle-income countries affected by an influx of refugees more favorable financing for development needs by combining grants from donors with loans from Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs).

    The overall program and pipeline for Bank supported projects in Jordan and Lebanon directly addressing the impact of the refugee crisis is over US$2 billion, mostly on concessional terms. Such projects are addressing jobs and economic opportunities, health, education, and infrastructure.

    The Bank also manages the Lebanon Syria Crisis Trust Fund (LSCTF), established in 2014 to provide grant financing to projects that mitigate the impact of the Syrian crisis. The LCSTF is funded by the UK, France, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Denmark, and has supported emergency projects including education, health, and municipal services.

    It has also supported the National Poverty Targeting Program and Lebanese plans supporting refugees and their vulnerable host communities. In Jordan, the Bank and its development partners have used grant financing to support an Emergency Services and Social Resilience Program (ESSRP) to help Jordanian municipalities and Jordanian host communities address the immediate impact of Syrian refugee inflows since October 2013 on their public service delivery.

     

    Last Updated: Apr 16, 2018

  • As a result of Syria’s decline in Gross National Income per capita and its increases in poverty, in 2016 the World Bank Group reclassified Syria as an International Development Association-eligible country, a move which emphasizes the sheer scale of the damage the conflict has done to Syria’s economy.

    It is therefore critical for the Bank and its partners to continue to understand the impact of the conflict in order to be able to respond quickly when re-engagement becomes possible. Analytical products such as the ESIA and the DA (see above), as well as sustained support for the host countries most affected, provide inputs to the international discussion on the future of Syria.

    Last Updated: Apr 16, 2018

Api


MULTIMEDIA



PHOTO GALLERY

More Photos Arrow

In Depth

Jul 10, 2017

The Economic and Social Consequences of the Conflict in Syria

The report provides detailed picture of the conflict’s impact on Syria’s population, economy, infrastructure and consequences.

Additional Resources

Country Office Contacts

Beirut, +961-1-987800 Ext. 239
mziade@worldbank.org