col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
videoType
dynamic-media
videoDmUrl
https://delivery-p136806-e1377785.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:9568eee3-3338-445d-b1a6-eb110e758da9/play?assetname=India+Women+in+the+Spotlight+SeriesSMALL.mp4
keyFrameImage
timestamp

00:09 Um,

00:10 to everyone who's joining us for this extremely exciting conversation,

00:14 uh,

00:14 the India office of the World Bank is partnering with the

00:18 World Bank South Asia regions Women in the Workforce Week.

00:23 Uh,

00:23 we've been having a series of exciting in the spotlight conversations with

00:27 South Asia region country.

00:29 Directors and prominent experts on

00:31 women's economic empowerment

00:33 and today,

00:34 uh,

00:34 it's my privilege to be in conversation with,

00:37 uh,

00:37 Doctor Janet Emad,

00:38 the Indian country director for the World Bank,

00:41 and Doctor Deepa Narayan,

00:42 acclaimed

00:43 author,

00:43 thinker,

00:44 and activist.

00:45 Um,

00:45 let me actually start before we,

00:47 you,

00:47 you know,

00:47 initiate the conversation with just a short round of introductions for both.

00:51 Uh,

00:51 Doctor Narayan is trained in anthropology and psychology.

00:56 Uh,

00:57 she's worked over the past 25 years in the field of development with various NGOs and

01:02 the World Bank as well.

01:03 I believe,

01:04 uh,

01:04 you were also the senior adviser

01:06 in the poverty group while you were in the World Bank.

01:09 Um,

01:10 she,

01:10 I think if one were to characterize a lot of Deepa's work,

01:13 it's to try and illuminate

01:15 the data with people's voices,

01:17 and you see this in works such as Voices of the Poor,

01:19 a seminal book on poverty,

01:21 um,

01:21 her recent book,

01:22 which has really helped frame the conversation on gender in India,

01:25 which is Chk

01:26 Breaking the silence about India's women.

01:29 Um,

01:29 and she's also of course named by Foreign Policy magazine as one of,

01:33 uh,

01:33 the world's 100 most influential thinkers

01:36 and India Today magazine as

01:38 one of India's 35 greatest thinkers.

01:40 So thank you so much,

01:41 Doctor Narayan Deepa,

01:42 for joining us.

01:43 We have,

01:44 uh,

01:44 Doctor Junaid Ahmad,

01:45 who of course has had a long and storied career in development practice

01:50 as well.

01:50 As thought leadership,

01:51 uh,

01:52 before being the India country director,

01:53 he was the senior director for the global water practice,

01:57 also the resident representative,

01:58 uh,

01:58 of the World Bank in Johannesburg.

02:00 Um,

02:01 Janaev is no stranger to issues around social inclusion,

02:05 uh,

02:06 having been sector manager for the social development group,

02:09 uh,

02:09 very much based,

02:10 uh,

02:10 for South Asia.

02:11 So with that short introduction and thanking both of

02:14 you for being part of this conversation with us,

02:16 let me start

02:18 with you,

02:18 Junaid

02:19 to maybe perhaps make my life a bit easier

02:21 and and set the context for this conversation.

02:24 Why are we here today having this conversation with the both of you

02:28 on gender equality?

02:30 Uh,

02:30 Shana,

02:31 before I,

02:32 before I,

02:32 uh,

02:32 try and answer your question,

02:34 I think I have to remind all of you who are listening today that,

02:38 uh,

02:39 Please don't take the coronavirus issue lightly.

02:42 uh I think the world has

02:44 not been hit with this kind of a shock uh

02:47 uh in terms of health in a long time

02:49 and we don't quite know how this will evolve over time.

02:53 Uh,

02:53 I think the message is very clear and I think the prime minister said it very well.

02:57 This is not about panicking,

02:59 it's about taking action and taking responsibility

03:02 which begins at our individual level

03:04 with simple.

03:06 Good hygiene of washing your hands,

03:08 being careful if you're not feeling well,

03:11 of not going into public,

03:13 avoiding public events that uh

03:15 you don't really need to be part of,

03:17 uh,

03:17 and I think that uh government is also

03:20 beginning to take actions around the world

03:22 you're seeing governments,

03:23 uh,

03:24 really focusing on social distancing

03:26 uh and and addressing some of the uh

03:29 uh some of the public events so uh

03:31 I wanna begin today.

03:33 Just uh by reminding uh everyone

03:36 that life goes on,

03:37 yes,

03:38 but life must adjust to the fact that we are facing a health crisis,

03:42 uh,

03:42 and it's a crisis where each one of us has a has a role to play

03:46 um,

03:47 Shana,

03:47 you ask a very important question usually.

03:50 I like to uh answer

03:53 questions based on good economics,

03:55 right?

03:55 uh access to finance,

03:57 access to

03:58 land,

03:58 uh,

03:59 jobs,

03:59 and,

03:59 and we'll get to that

04:01 but I think uh

04:03 when it comes to the issue of gender,

04:05 if we don't recognize

04:07 that

04:08 our culture,

04:10 our upbringing,

04:11 what happens inside our households,

04:14 uh,

04:15 how we interact in our families,

04:17 in our communities.

04:18 And the norms

04:20 that all of these interactions creates

04:23 ultimately drives

04:24 the conscious or the unconscious bias we have

04:28 when we deal

04:29 with the with the issue of gender equality,

04:32 uh,

04:32 and I think that,

04:33 uh,

04:33 you know,

04:34 I was reading,

04:34 uh,

04:35 uh,

04:36 uh,

04:36 the other day,

04:37 uh,

04:38 a book,

04:38 uh,

04:39 uh,

04:39 of poems by Casinos rule,

04:42 and I came back to the poem,

04:44 uh,

04:44 on,

04:45 uh,

04:45 women.

04:46 And it's a beautiful poem.

04:47 It says Jagunarijago bonnishika,

04:50 and it's saying,

04:51 Awake,

04:51 women folk,

04:52 awake,

04:53 for you are the flicker,

04:54 the fire,

04:55 uh,

04:56 and I don't think he was actually talking about

04:58 job search and labor force participation.

05:01 He was making an appeal to society,

05:04 uh,

05:05 that if you do not understand the role

05:07 of

05:08 women and girls in society,

05:11 you're not gonna be able to change society.

05:13 And I think the language that we have to enter

05:16 into this is a language of understanding our own biases,

05:19 and I think that's why,

05:21 at least that that's why I hope,

05:23 uh,

05:23 that,

05:23 uh,

05:24 uh,

05:24 uh,

05:24 that

05:25 we're here together instead of just

05:27 simply voicing an economics perspective.

05:30 Thanks Jenny.

05:31 Deepa Juni talks about

05:33 the importance of language when we start to think about these issues.

05:38 I mean,

05:38 your book,

05:38 which has been seminal,

05:39 CHP,

05:40 um,

05:41 in just documenting the lives and perspectives of women,

05:45 I mean 8000,

05:46 I believe,

05:46 pages of research notes,

05:48 uh,

05:48 following several women over 20 cities.

05:51 I wanted to ask you why were you compelled to actually pursue these stories

05:56 and provide language and,

05:58 and shape to some of what women's experiences are.

06:01 I was,

06:02 uh,

06:02 I hadn't intended to do this book,

06:04 so it was totally accidental.

06:06 I hadn't intended to do more research.

06:08 It was really a curiosity and wanting to make

06:11 a difference after the after the Nimbhaya rape.

06:15 And I think we don't understand what the cultural roots of violence.

06:20 Clearly just economics,

06:23 education,

06:24 uh,

06:24 income is not enough,

06:25 otherwise

06:26 there would be a huge difference between violence rates in the West and in India.

06:32 The point is that 1 in 3 women around the world

06:36 is sexually and physically abused

06:40 and mostly by.

06:41 Intimate partners,

06:43 so that was the question

06:44 that I wanted to understand

06:46 and it took me very far away from the violence

06:50 and I think one of the most important lessons for me personally is

06:54 that the value of putting your assumptions aside

06:58 and going on an exploratory journey to find out what's happening

07:02 is that you come out in unexpected places.

07:05 So

07:06 I in the book I actually focus on the middle class,

07:09 the educated middle class,

07:10 although I talked about 2000 rural women in poverty

07:15 because it's the middle class,

07:16 it's people like us who are the most in denial

07:19 when we talk about gender equality,

07:21 when we talk about women's empowerment,

07:23 it's always out there with poor people.

07:25 But in our own families,

07:27 in our own homes,

07:28 in our own institutions,

07:30 there's huge

07:32 and deep cultural conditioning,

07:34 which is what you spoke about,

07:35 which makes all of us bias.

07:37 And since we are

07:39 human beings,

07:40 we take our cultural biases into our institutions,

07:44 so every institution is also biased from the bottom to the top,

07:48 and that's what

07:49 was striking

07:50 to me

07:51 was that both women and men are extremely prejudiced against women.

07:58 I think the second thing that was striking is that

08:01 since I got away from shoulds,

08:04 the everyday behavioral patterns

08:06 which discount women,

08:08 which again go into why women behave this way,

08:11 is because the foundation of society is

08:14 what it means to be a good woman or a good man.

08:17 And so then I organized the findings into

08:19 7 behavioral patterns including asking girls to shut up

08:23 and then expecting women

08:25 as soon as you reach adulthood or you enter the workforce

08:28 suddenly you're supposed to be speaking up without

08:31 without any fear

08:33 and what's interesting is that the more educated you are,

08:36 the more you feel compelled to hide the fear

08:39 because you shouldn't be fearful,

08:41 right?

08:41 So then it gets very convoluted.

08:43 I think basically what my study's done

08:46 is pulled out these behavioral patterns

08:48 and because I didn't presume to know the answers

08:51 it resonates with women as well as with men,

08:55 not just in India and this is important but across the world.

08:58 Janine,

08:59 if I could bring you in,

09:00 you know,

09:00 Deepa highlights the fact that

09:02 this the problem of gender equality,

09:04 and I think you started with this as well is about

09:06 the really tough question of norms of behavioral patterns.

09:10 And then there are large institutions,

09:12 be it state civil society that are trying to address this problem.

09:16 Could you reflect on some innovative approaches

09:19 that the World Bank has been supporting,

09:21 say,

09:21 Indian government or state governments with

09:23 to try and

09:24 tackle some of these really difficult problems of norms and

09:28 how do you equalize behavioral patterns at home?

09:31 Sure,

09:31 you know,

09:32 I think

09:33 first,

09:33 uh,

09:34 we have to be honest and say that we,

09:37 the World Bank as an institution,

09:39 took a long time.

09:41 To realize that within our own system

09:43 we have biases,

09:44 you know,

09:45 the bank,

09:46 uh,

09:46 has gone through

09:48 significant cultural shifts over the last several decades.

09:52 uh,

09:52 we started off

09:53 basically

09:55 as a

09:56 male dominated and I would say white male dominated,

10:00 uh,

10:00 society,

10:01 uh,

10:02 coming out of colonial,

10:03 uh,

10:03 uh,

10:04 colonialism.

10:05 Uh,

10:05 the end of colonialism,

10:06 the rise of,

10:07 uh,

10:08 the independent third world,

10:10 and the World Bank to help the Third world

10:12 was mostly staff from the previous colonial administration,

10:16 so they were the white men that dominated.

10:19 Our society and the view was a very technical one.

10:21 The development was about

10:23 technical issues.

10:24 There was no sense of institutions,

10:26 no sense of markets,

10:27 no sense of behaviors,

10:28 uh,

10:29 in society,

10:30 so we had to go through our own

10:32 change

10:33 and that was not easy.

10:34 There was

10:34 intervention

10:36 by leadership to say.

10:37 That we will make a difference in terms of how many women

10:41 uh are in leadership position

10:43 where they come from

10:45 because it couldn't just be

10:46 those educated in the West in the

10:49 Ivy League schools that we actually needed to reach out

10:52 into the universities around the world and so

10:54 we had to go through our own transformation

10:57 and it wasn't easy and it's still ongoing but we're very proud

11:00 that at the top leadership

11:02 50% of our leadership are women.

11:05 Uh,

11:05 and that makes a,

11:06 makes a big difference.

11:07 Uh,

11:08 could I say comfortably that gender,

11:10 uh,

11:11 equality in pay

11:12 has been achieved at the bank?

11:14 No,

11:15 but I know,

11:16 and as a manager in the bank that each year when we go through our,

11:19 uh,

11:20 our own reviews,

11:21 uh,

11:22 I am asked by the institution to look at the staff profile,

11:26 to look at

11:27 the salary base of women,

11:29 and see

11:29 are they different

11:31 and why are they different?

11:32 So I wanted to start off by saying that that that's extremely important

11:35 uh for for us and we went through our own uh own discovery

11:40 I think in the way we work

11:42 we're we've gone through the similar similar shifts

11:45 uh I think for example

11:47 Deepa's work on voices of the poor

11:50 right

11:50 uh

11:51 that would have never

11:53 uh.

11:53 If you will surfaced a couple of decades ago

11:57 and by bringing voices of the poor

11:59 we actually learned

12:00 how the poor are facing day to day life

12:03 and where markets and institutions and governments

12:06 uh are either a part of the solution or not

12:09 so

12:10 being participatory engaging with communities was a big shift in the way we we work

12:16 um

12:16 in engaging with communities.

12:19 The role of women became extremely,

12:21 extremely important,

12:22 very visible,

12:23 uh,

12:24 and the very different ways,

12:25 uh,

12:25 that I think we're,

12:26 we're beginning to make a difference.

12:28 First,

12:29 uh,

12:30 I'll take you to a project that we're doing,

12:32 uh,

12:33 the Tejewai,

12:34 which is

12:35 about,

12:36 uh,

12:36 uh,

12:37 getting

12:38 adolescent girls networks formed.

12:41 Now you can say why just form network

12:43 it's what Deepa refers to in her work

12:46 if you don't give agency and voice

12:49 right,

12:49 how are you going to get them to speak of their challenges?

12:52 so

12:53 a World Bank program

12:54 which is about creating networks of women and girls,

12:58 uh,

12:59 is,

12:59 is,

12:59 is quite innovative and and very different and we bring to it

13:03 not just simply economists.

13:05 But the anthropologist,

13:06 the sociologist,

13:07 the behavior

13:08 side,

13:09 that's,

13:09 that's one example,

13:11 uh,

13:11 another,

13:12 uh,

13:12 uh,

13:12 uh important example for us

13:15 is

13:16 understanding

13:18 how.

13:19 Intra household within the household

13:22 uh

13:22 power lies

13:24 so for example

13:25 you can uh uh

13:27 support a family in terms of nutrition programs

13:30 but if you don't understand who's making decisions inside the household

13:35 your.

13:35 Pact is gonna be very limited so a lot of our programs reach out to

13:40 girls

13:41 and women inside the household

13:43 direct cash transfers to women because

13:46 money in the hands of uh of women,

13:48 the expenditure pattern is extremely,

13:51 extremely different.

13:52 Another area which is uh which is important for us is

13:56 how do you support

13:57 women in political leadership.

13:59 Uh,

14:00 and our work with panchayats and panchayat leaders

14:03 and in fact supporting networks of women

14:06 panchayat leaders has been extremely important and we've documented

14:11 that wherever women are in leadership in panchayats,

14:14 the nature of expenditure

14:16 of the budgets are very different.

14:18 Suddenly

14:19 money towards water

14:21 becomes very important because who bears the burden

14:24 of lack of water in the household?

14:26 It's the women and girls who,

14:27 who bear the bear the burden.

14:29 Uh,

14:30 another area that I think,

14:31 uh,

14:31 has been very important for us is intervening

14:35 early on.

14:36 We recognize

14:37 that

14:38 if you don't intervene

14:40 at the early childhood,

14:42 uh,

14:42 in terms of nutrition

14:44 and linking

14:45 mothers and child,

14:47 you

14:48 in fact in the 1st 5 years

14:50 are already losing.

14:52 Your future generation in terms of their ability to grow the human human capital

14:57 so

14:58 engaging programs that go directly

15:00 uh

15:01 towards uh uh women

15:03 mothers and child has been another set of uh innovations now

15:08 today they're almost like normal projects

15:10 right?

15:11 but the path.

15:12 To which which the path which led to these

15:15 were quite revolutionary

15:16 and continue uh uh continue to be uh uh revolutionary

15:20 I think the the last example,

15:22 uh,

15:23 I would take which has been extraordinary is

15:25 the whole approach of supporting self-help groups of women,

15:29 uh,

15:29 and getting

15:30 women collectives

15:31 to take on challenges of

15:34 s.

15:34 Sanitation,

15:35 uh,

15:35 challenges of jobs,

15:37 uh,

15:37 challenge of getting access to,

15:39 uh,

15:39 uh,

15:40 to,

15:40 to credit,

15:41 uh,

15:42 and when you go and meet,

15:43 uh,

15:43 with these self-help groups of women,

15:45 you find,

15:46 uh,

15:46 uh,

15:47 extraordinary changes.

15:49 Uh,

15:49 first of all

15:50 we talk about non-performing assets in the banking

15:53 sector 10-11% crisis in the corporate world.

15:56 Non-performing

15:57 assets of self-help groups of women who have borrowed in the last decade plus

16:03 close to $30 if not $40 billion

16:06 is

16:07 less than 1%.

16:09 So if you think

16:10 investing in women is not uh the smart thing to do,

16:13 you've not looked at the at the data,

16:15 but

16:16 that too was an innovation.

16:17 But an innovation that didn't come from within the bank,

16:19 it came from

16:20 countries like mine,

16:22 Bangladesh,

16:23 uh,

16:23 BRAC,

16:23 and Grameen,

16:25 knowing the power of,

16:26 of bringing women into the forefront of development.

16:30 Thank you,

16:30 Jeanne.

16:31 Deepa.

16:31 In fact,

16:31 we have a question from the audience which I'll combine with a question I had.

16:36 There's a question,

16:36 uh,

16:36 from Kabir,

16:37 and he asks about

16:39 how one expects the workplace to change

16:42 over the next 5 years to encourage more women and.

16:45 Work now

16:46 you hear Janay talk about these different tactical strategies

16:49 applied operationally by government NGOs to try and interrupt norms.

16:53 Is that possible?

16:54 And if we suppose reflected on Kabir's question as well,

16:57 looking at the workplace in particular,

16:59 how do you think that can be done?

17:01 I think,

17:01 uh,

17:01 I could give you a whole list of things that need to be done.

17:04 I think what's important is framing the question

17:07 what's the fundamental problem?

17:09 I think the fundamental problem is that the world has been designed.

17:14 By men for men.

17:16 And that's not to attack men,

17:18 but just like you said,

17:19 it's a postcolonial

17:20 phenomenon.

17:21 So the fact that you have hours from 9 to 5

17:25 is designed for men.

17:27 So and why does it persist that way?

17:29 And that's because of the power gap.

17:32 So

17:33 if men are still in the decision making primarily

17:35 even though the World Bank has made a difference.

17:38 Men see it through men's eyes.

17:40 It's very simple.

17:41 So if women were in charge,

17:43 perhaps the work hours would be 10 to 4,

17:46 and everyone would be happier,

17:48 men too,

17:49 because women can take care of the care of the home,

17:52 the children as good men.

17:55 And be happier and more productive

17:57 at work.

17:58 It's a fallacy to think that the longer you're at work,

18:01 the more productive you are.

18:02 The evidence for that is very weak.

18:05 So,

18:06 uh,

18:07 you spoke about uh

18:09 women,

18:09 poor women.

18:10 So if we take this question

18:11 and look it through a power lens at work.

18:14 The two things,

18:15 uh,

18:15 that would make a real difference.

18:17 One is

18:18 how do women get to work

18:19 and so that gets us into all the barriers in transport.

18:23 I think we've really,

18:24 really

18:25 misunderstood and not understood

18:27 the importance of safety,

18:30 safety for women to get to work.

18:32 So

18:33 being rational.

18:34 Creatures,

18:35 parents and women and men

18:37 make decisions on is it worth

18:40 what's the cost benefit of a woman going to work

18:43 if salaries are low and every time you step

18:45 out of the house is guerrilla warfare in terms of

18:49 sexual harassment or being looked at or being pinched

18:52 it's not worth doing it.

18:54 Second,

18:55 you see,

18:55 in terms of the data,

18:56 more recent data is what's being called the commute gap,

19:00 right?

19:00 Women,

19:00 30% of women work of those who work work within 1 kilometer of their homes.

19:05 Why is that?

19:06 Because it's against the calculation to minimize the risks.

19:11 So then you get to work,

19:12 right?

19:13 and then what happens there is all the biases that both women and men have

19:18 come into play.

19:21 And this does not mean that either women or men are bad,

19:24 but we are unconscious of these biases so that the system

19:28 continues even though you may have formal rules in play.

19:31 So if we assume that there's a power difference and an influence difference,

19:36 the more you equalize that,

19:38 the more you will get very different perspectives,

19:41 and we need to redesign the workspace so that it fits women as well as men.

19:46 So even very simply,

19:47 air conditioning,

19:48 temperatures when I was coming in my car.

19:50 Uh,

19:51 in my taxi,

19:52 the driver had just a shirt

19:54 and I had a huge jacket and I was still cold,

19:57 right,

19:58 so there are differences between men and women,

20:00 those should not be,

20:02 it shouldn't be the case that women's,

20:04 uh,

20:04 differences are discounted women's,

20:07 uh.

20:08 Biology is discounted

20:11 or devalued

20:12 and men's is elevated so we're talking

20:14 about making equalizing that is what's important

20:18 and this will take different forms and different cultures,

20:22 right?

20:22 so it's,

20:23 it's

20:23 redesigning and being really creative

20:26 of how we can get the most,

20:28 the greatest potential of women as well as men.

20:31 Thanks Deepa.

20:32 Jane,

20:32 this is my last question,

20:33 and I'll again combine it with a question from Additi,

20:36 um,

20:37 who's joining us.

20:38 um,

20:39 you know what she says is there are lots of rules and programs in play,

20:42 but they're not very well enforced,

20:44 so she talks about harassment guidelines and she uses that example

20:48 going forward,

20:49 where do you think this conversation around gender equality,

20:53 be it through the.

20:54 Design of programs or giving language as you started with,

20:58 where is it going to go in the future and where would you like it to

21:01 to go using your famous,

21:03 you know,

21:03 where is the puck going to be?

21:04 I've heard you say that

21:06 where do you,

21:06 what,

21:06 what are your reflections on the future of this conversation?

21:10 So

21:11 and I look at

21:13 uh

21:13 the evolution of gender equality in different

21:16 parts of the world.

21:19 I unfortunately.

21:21 Can't

21:22 identify

21:25 enough,

21:25 uh,

21:25 if you will,

21:27 drivers that I could say

21:28 this is the way we go.

21:30 You look at the United States,

21:32 one of the biggest drivers

21:33 uh was World War 2

21:35 or or the World Wars where the men went to war

21:38 and suddenly women had to be brought into the workforce.

21:41 I look at Bangladesh.

21:43 The fascinating thing,

21:44 uh,

21:45 was,

21:45 uh,

21:46 the.

21:47 OPEC

21:48 oil crisis of the 70s

21:51 and

21:52 all the men folk of villages in Bangladesh went to the Middle East to work.

21:57 Well,

21:57 guess who came into the uh uh into the market?

22:00 Women

22:00 and all the remittances.

22:02 Guess where that went?

22:03 It went in the hands of women

22:05 and that changed the nature

22:07 uh of the dialogue in Bangladesh rural

22:10 of the role of women in uh uh in society

22:14 but.

22:15 It's hard for me

22:17 to understand

22:19 where these shocks will come from and where these openings will be,

22:22 so

22:23 my own personal view

22:24 is you have to work.

22:27 In on several platforms,

22:28 I think one platform is service delivery

22:30 and to look at where service delivery

22:32 can be shaped

22:33 to engage women

22:35 clearly

22:36 when you come to transport,

22:37 public safety,

22:39 if you don't engage there you're not gonna

22:40 get women into the into into the workforce.

22:43 So

22:43 how does service delivery change

22:45 is one area we need to look at.

22:47 A second area

22:49 has to be,

22:50 uh,

22:50 the political advocacy,

22:52 the politics.

22:53 How do you get more women into politics,

22:56 into panchayats,

22:57 into local governments?

22:58 Uh,

22:59 I think that'll change the nature

23:01 of,

23:01 uh,

23:01 uh,

23:02 of the whole debate about,

23:04 about women.

23:04 The third area

23:06 is the labor force participation of women.

23:08 We know that in South Asia

23:09 and in India in particular,

23:11 the fall has been quite,

23:12 uh,

23:12 dramatic,

23:13 um.

23:15 What are the barriers and how do you reengage women into the

23:19 into the labor force,

23:20 uh,

23:21 this becomes very important

23:22 it's very clear

23:23 that

23:24 the nature of the job,

23:26 uh,

23:26 how far is it from the home,

23:28 uh,

23:28 can,

23:29 uh,

23:29 women get access to child care which gives them a very different,

23:33 uh,

23:33 uh,

23:33 different

23:34 setting but all of these areas service delivery,

23:37 uh,

23:38 political role of women,

23:39 labor force participation requires

23:42 active

23:43 uh intervention.

23:44 Uh,

23:45 and so when you ask me

23:47 what is it that I would like to look at,

23:49 I would like to look for,

23:50 I would look like to look at

23:53 leadership in public policy

23:55 that actively looks at this,

23:57 doesn't look at it passively,

23:58 right?

23:59 That's the,

23:59 that's where we have to have to focus,

24:02 but there is something that's happening today that I think gives us an opening

24:06 it's this whole

24:08 technology

24:09 changing

24:10 nature of work,

24:11 the future of work.

24:13 I think technology

24:14 is opening up work

24:16 in a gender neutral way

24:19 that's the opportunity

24:21 to truly push women into the into the labor force

24:24 the informal market

24:26 is now the new normal

24:28 informal is the new normal if that's true,

24:31 how do we engage in the informal sector because I think that's where

24:34 women can play a bigger role because of

24:37 their relationship in terms of the of the household

24:40 uh

24:41 so.

24:42 The answer that I give is perhaps uh

24:46 uh how shall I say not satisfactory enough that here are the three lessons,

24:50 but I think the opportunities out there

24:53 for us to consciously

24:55 uh shift the game

24:56 uh towards getting women into the workforce,

24:58 uh,

24:59 and I think that language

25:00 uh today and the opportunity today

25:03 is very different,

25:04 uh,

25:04 different,

25:05 uh,

25:05 from before.

25:06 Thanks Janil Deepa.

25:07 I,

25:07 I,

25:08 we're already a bit over time but.

25:09 I'm going to turn to you maybe in 2 to 3 minutes

25:13 given what Junaid is talking about

25:15 that women in the workforce are,

25:17 you know,

25:17 the future of that change,

25:19 be it in policy making,

25:20 political roles,

25:21 or in,

25:22 in new forms of jobs,

25:23 what message would you give to young working women entering the workforce now?

25:29 I'm going to respond a bit to Janaid's question and then answer that.

25:33 I think,

25:34 uh,

25:34 I agree with everything that you've said.

25:36 I think in the economic sphere what's been missing.

25:39 Is the integration or looking at the economic

25:43 issues through a lens of the

25:46 prejudiced

25:47 or biased social norms

25:49 when I travel in the rural areas,

25:51 women who've been part of self help groups

25:54 are happy and the men are happy because they're producing money

25:57 so there's a danger that women become

26:00 ATMs.

26:01 Without the cultural

26:03 foundation changing,

26:05 so the moment the money stops coming,

26:08 then you're back to

26:09 your only Lakshmi,

26:11 your own,

26:12 you,

26:12 you're,

26:12 you're the goddess,

26:13 but during the day we beat you up.

26:16 That's sort of the danger that I see.

26:19 I think the message to young women is that

26:22 it's your time

26:23 go out there,

26:25 fight for change,

26:26 don't be quiet

26:28 and form alliances form networks with other women,

26:31 with other men,

26:32 because if

26:33 one woman

26:34 challenges the system,

26:36 it's you have to be very,

26:38 very strong so you don't collapse because the

26:40 whole system comes down on the single woman.

26:43 But if women form alliances,

26:45 then a lot of change is possible

26:48 and the young women today are smart,

26:50 they're talented,

26:51 they're ready to go out and take on the world.

26:54 Thanks Deepa.

26:55 So I think we've

26:57 two big messages,

26:58 I think from both of you.

26:59 One is on

27:00 alliance building and networks,

27:03 and the other is of course the role of

27:05 redesigning how the workplace itself is organized increasingly.

27:09 Uh,

27:09 be it within institutions,

27:10 I think Janeida,

27:11 thank you for your honest comments.

27:13 In fact,

27:13 even on the World Bank as an institution on some of these issues,

27:16 be it outside,

27:17 and

27:17 men have a huge role to play.

27:20 Without inclusion of men,

27:21 we're not going to see the changes we want to see.

27:23 No,

27:23 I think that's a,

27:24 that's a very important point.

27:25 This is,

27:26 this is about a joint effort.

27:28 Yes,

27:29 yeah,

27:29 absolutely.

27:31 Thank you both so much for this extremely useful conversation.

27:35 Um,

27:35 this was live streamed.

27:37 Please do share,

27:38 um,

27:39 using the hashtag equal at Work,

27:41 uh,

27:41 on multiple social media platforms and look forward to another panel later today

27:46 which is on social norms,

27:47 uh,

27:48 much more focused on,

27:49 on those issues.

27:50 Thanks so much for everyone who joined us and thank you both.

27:53 Thank you.

showAllTimestamps
no
transcript
Um, to everyone who's joining us for this extremely exciting conversation, uh, the India office of the World Bank is partnering with the World Bank South Asia regions Women in the Workforce Week. Uh, we've been having a series of exciting in the spotlight conversations with South Asia region country. Directors and prominent experts on women's economic empowerment and today, uh, it's my privilege to be in conversation with, uh, Doctor Janet Emad, the Indian country director for the World Bank, and Doctor Deepa Narayan, acclaimed author, thinker, and activist. Um, let me actually start before we, you, you know, initiate the conversation with just a short round of introductions for both. Uh, Doctor Narayan is trained in anthropology and psychology. Uh, she's worked over the past 25 years in the field of development with various NGOs and the World Bank as well. I believe, uh, you were also the senior adviser in the poverty group while you were in the World Bank. Um, she, I think if one were to characterize a lot of Deepa's work, it's to try and illuminate the data with people's voices, and you see this in works such as Voices of the Poor, a seminal book on poverty, um, her recent book, which has really helped frame the conversation on gender in India, which is Chk Breaking the silence about India's women. Um, and she's also of course named by Foreign Policy magazine as one of, uh, the world's 100 most influential thinkers and India Today magazine as one of India's 35 greatest thinkers. So thank you so much, Doctor Narayan Deepa, for joining us. We have, uh, Doctor Junaid Ahmad, who of course has had a long and storied career in development practice as well. As thought leadership, uh, before being the India country director, he was the senior director for the global water practice, also the resident representative, uh, of the World Bank in Johannesburg. Um, Janaev is no stranger to issues around social inclusion, uh, having been sector manager for the social development group, uh, very much based, uh, for South Asia. So with that short introduction and thanking both of you for being part of this conversation with us, let me start with you, Junaid to maybe perhaps make my life a bit easier and and set the context for this conversation. Why are we here today having this conversation with the both of you on gender equality? Uh, Shana, before I, before I, uh, try and answer your question, I think I have to remind all of you who are listening today that, uh, Please don't take the coronavirus issue lightly. uh I think the world has not been hit with this kind of a shock uh uh in terms of health in a long time and we don't quite know how this will evolve over time. Uh, I think the message is very clear and I think the prime minister said it very well. This is not about panicking, it's about taking action and taking responsibility which begins at our individual level with simple. Good hygiene of washing your hands, being careful if you're not feeling well, of not going into public, avoiding public events that uh you don't really need to be part of, uh, and I think that uh government is also beginning to take actions around the world you're seeing governments, uh, really focusing on social distancing uh and and addressing some of the uh uh some of the public events so uh I wanna begin today. Just uh by reminding uh everyone that life goes on, yes, but life must adjust to the fact that we are facing a health crisis, uh, and it's a crisis where each one of us has a has a role to play um, Shana, you ask a very important question usually. I like to uh answer questions based on good economics, right? uh access to finance, access to land, uh, jobs, and, and we'll get to that but I think uh when it comes to the issue of gender, if we don't recognize that our culture, our upbringing, what happens inside our households, uh, how we interact in our families, in our communities. And the norms that all of these interactions creates ultimately drives the conscious or the unconscious bias we have when we deal with the with the issue of gender equality, uh, and I think that, uh, you know, I was reading, uh, uh, uh, the other day, uh, a book, uh, uh, of poems by Casinos rule, and I came back to the poem, uh, on, uh, women. And it's a beautiful poem. It says Jagunarijago bonnishika, and it's saying, Awake, women folk, awake, for you are the flicker, the fire, uh, and I don't think he was actually talking about job search and labor force participation. He was making an appeal to society, uh, that if you do not understand the role of women and girls in society, you're not gonna be able to change society. And I think the language that we have to enter into this is a language of understanding our own biases, and I think that's why, at least that that's why I hope, uh, that, uh, uh, uh, that we're here together instead of just simply voicing an economics perspective. Thanks Jenny. Deepa Juni talks about the importance of language when we start to think about these issues. I mean, your book, which has been seminal, CHP, um, in just documenting the lives and perspectives of women, I mean 8000, I believe, pages of research notes, uh, following several women over 20 cities. I wanted to ask you why were you compelled to actually pursue these stories and provide language and, and shape to some of what women's experiences are. I was, uh, I hadn't intended to do this book, so it was totally accidental. I hadn't intended to do more research. It was really a curiosity and wanting to make a difference after the after the Nimbhaya rape. And I think we don't understand what the cultural roots of violence. Clearly just economics, education, uh, income is not enough, otherwise there would be a huge difference between violence rates in the West and in India. The point is that 1 in 3 women around the world is sexually and physically abused and mostly by. Intimate partners, so that was the question that I wanted to understand and it took me very far away from the violence and I think one of the most important lessons for me personally is that the value of putting your assumptions aside and going on an exploratory journey to find out what's happening is that you come out in unexpected places. So I in the book I actually focus on the middle class, the educated middle class, although I talked about 2000 rural women in poverty because it's the middle class, it's people like us who are the most in denial when we talk about gender equality, when we talk about women's empowerment, it's always out there with poor people. But in our own families, in our own homes, in our own institutions, there's huge and deep cultural conditioning, which is what you spoke about, which makes all of us bias. And since we are human beings, we take our cultural biases into our institutions, so every institution is also biased from the bottom to the top, and that's what was striking to me was that both women and men are extremely prejudiced against women. I think the second thing that was striking is that since I got away from shoulds, the everyday behavioral patterns which discount women, which again go into why women behave this way, is because the foundation of society is what it means to be a good woman or a good man. And so then I organized the findings into 7 behavioral patterns including asking girls to shut up and then expecting women as soon as you reach adulthood or you enter the workforce suddenly you're supposed to be speaking up without without any fear and what's interesting is that the more educated you are, the more you feel compelled to hide the fear because you shouldn't be fearful, right? So then it gets very convoluted. I think basically what my study's done is pulled out these behavioral patterns and because I didn't presume to know the answers it resonates with women as well as with men, not just in India and this is important but across the world. Janine, if I could bring you in, you know, Deepa highlights the fact that this the problem of gender equality, and I think you started with this as well is about the really tough question of norms of behavioral patterns. And then there are large institutions, be it state civil society that are trying to address this problem. Could you reflect on some innovative approaches that the World Bank has been supporting, say, Indian government or state governments with to try and tackle some of these really difficult problems of norms and how do you equalize behavioral patterns at home? Sure, you know, I think first, uh, we have to be honest and say that we, the World Bank as an institution, took a long time. To realize that within our own system we have biases, you know, the bank, uh, has gone through significant cultural shifts over the last several decades. uh, we started off basically as a male dominated and I would say white male dominated, uh, society, uh, coming out of colonial, uh, uh, colonialism. Uh, the end of colonialism, the rise of, uh, the independent third world, and the World Bank to help the Third world was mostly staff from the previous colonial administration, so they were the white men that dominated. Our society and the view was a very technical one. The development was about technical issues. There was no sense of institutions, no sense of markets, no sense of behaviors, uh, in society, so we had to go through our own change and that was not easy. There was intervention by leadership to say. That we will make a difference in terms of how many women uh are in leadership position where they come from because it couldn't just be those educated in the West in the Ivy League schools that we actually needed to reach out into the universities around the world and so we had to go through our own transformation and it wasn't easy and it's still ongoing but we're very proud that at the top leadership 50% of our leadership are women. Uh, and that makes a, makes a big difference. Uh, could I say comfortably that gender, uh, equality in pay has been achieved at the bank? No, but I know, and as a manager in the bank that each year when we go through our, uh, our own reviews, uh, I am asked by the institution to look at the staff profile, to look at the salary base of women, and see are they different and why are they different? So I wanted to start off by saying that that that's extremely important uh for for us and we went through our own uh own discovery I think in the way we work we're we've gone through the similar similar shifts uh I think for example Deepa's work on voices of the poor right uh that would have never uh. If you will surfaced a couple of decades ago and by bringing voices of the poor we actually learned how the poor are facing day to day life and where markets and institutions and governments uh are either a part of the solution or not so being participatory engaging with communities was a big shift in the way we we work um in engaging with communities. The role of women became extremely, extremely important, very visible, uh, and the very different ways, uh, that I think we're, we're beginning to make a difference. First, uh, I'll take you to a project that we're doing, uh, the Tejewai, which is about, uh, uh, getting adolescent girls networks formed. Now you can say why just form network it's what Deepa refers to in her work if you don't give agency and voice right, how are you going to get them to speak of their challenges? so a World Bank program which is about creating networks of women and girls, uh, is, is, is quite innovative and and very different and we bring to it not just simply economists. But the anthropologist, the sociologist, the behavior side, that's, that's one example, uh, another, uh, uh, uh important example for us is understanding how. Intra household within the household uh power lies so for example you can uh uh support a family in terms of nutrition programs but if you don't understand who's making decisions inside the household your. Pact is gonna be very limited so a lot of our programs reach out to girls and women inside the household direct cash transfers to women because money in the hands of uh of women, the expenditure pattern is extremely, extremely different. Another area which is uh which is important for us is how do you support women in political leadership. Uh, and our work with panchayats and panchayat leaders and in fact supporting networks of women panchayat leaders has been extremely important and we've documented that wherever women are in leadership in panchayats, the nature of expenditure of the budgets are very different. Suddenly money towards water becomes very important because who bears the burden of lack of water in the household? It's the women and girls who, who bear the bear the burden. Uh, another area that I think, uh, has been very important for us is intervening early on. We recognize that if you don't intervene at the early childhood, uh, in terms of nutrition and linking mothers and child, you in fact in the 1st 5 years are already losing. Your future generation in terms of their ability to grow the human human capital so engaging programs that go directly uh towards uh uh women mothers and child has been another set of uh innovations now today they're almost like normal projects right? but the path. To which which the path which led to these were quite revolutionary and continue uh uh continue to be uh uh revolutionary I think the the last example, uh, I would take which has been extraordinary is the whole approach of supporting self-help groups of women, uh, and getting women collectives to take on challenges of s. Sanitation, uh, challenges of jobs, uh, challenge of getting access to, uh, uh, to, to credit, uh, and when you go and meet, uh, with these self-help groups of women, you find, uh, uh, extraordinary changes. Uh, first of all we talk about non-performing assets in the banking sector 10-11% crisis in the corporate world. Non-performing assets of self-help groups of women who have borrowed in the last decade plus close to $30 if not $40 billion is less than 1%. So if you think investing in women is not uh the smart thing to do, you've not looked at the at the data, but that too was an innovation. But an innovation that didn't come from within the bank, it came from countries like mine, Bangladesh, uh, BRAC, and Grameen, knowing the power of, of bringing women into the forefront of development. Thank you, Jeanne. Deepa. In fact, we have a question from the audience which I'll combine with a question I had. There's a question, uh, from Kabir, and he asks about how one expects the workplace to change over the next 5 years to encourage more women and. Work now you hear Janay talk about these different tactical strategies applied operationally by government NGOs to try and interrupt norms. Is that possible? And if we suppose reflected on Kabir's question as well, looking at the workplace in particular, how do you think that can be done? I think, uh, I could give you a whole list of things that need to be done. I think what's important is framing the question what's the fundamental problem? I think the fundamental problem is that the world has been designed. By men for men. And that's not to attack men, but just like you said, it's a postcolonial phenomenon. So the fact that you have hours from 9 to 5 is designed for men. So and why does it persist that way? And that's because of the power gap. So if men are still in the decision making primarily even though the World Bank has made a difference. Men see it through men's eyes. It's very simple. So if women were in charge, perhaps the work hours would be 10 to 4, and everyone would be happier, men too, because women can take care of the care of the home, the children as good men. And be happier and more productive at work. It's a fallacy to think that the longer you're at work, the more productive you are. The evidence for that is very weak. So, uh, you spoke about uh women, poor women. So if we take this question and look it through a power lens at work. The two things, uh, that would make a real difference. One is how do women get to work and so that gets us into all the barriers in transport. I think we've really, really misunderstood and not understood the importance of safety, safety for women to get to work. So being rational. Creatures, parents and women and men make decisions on is it worth what's the cost benefit of a woman going to work if salaries are low and every time you step out of the house is guerrilla warfare in terms of sexual harassment or being looked at or being pinched it's not worth doing it. Second, you see, in terms of the data, more recent data is what's being called the commute gap, right? Women, 30% of women work of those who work work within 1 kilometer of their homes. Why is that? Because it's against the calculation to minimize the risks. So then you get to work, right? and then what happens there is all the biases that both women and men have come into play. And this does not mean that either women or men are bad, but we are unconscious of these biases so that the system continues even though you may have formal rules in play. So if we assume that there's a power difference and an influence difference, the more you equalize that, the more you will get very different perspectives, and we need to redesign the workspace so that it fits women as well as men. So even very simply, air conditioning, temperatures when I was coming in my car. Uh, in my taxi, the driver had just a shirt and I had a huge jacket and I was still cold, right, so there are differences between men and women, those should not be, it shouldn't be the case that women's, uh, differences are discounted women's, uh. Biology is discounted or devalued and men's is elevated so we're talking about making equalizing that is what's important and this will take different forms and different cultures, right? so it's, it's redesigning and being really creative of how we can get the most, the greatest potential of women as well as men. Thanks Deepa. Jane, this is my last question, and I'll again combine it with a question from Additi, um, who's joining us. um, you know what she says is there are lots of rules and programs in play, but they're not very well enforced, so she talks about harassment guidelines and she uses that example going forward, where do you think this conversation around gender equality, be it through the. Design of programs or giving language as you started with, where is it going to go in the future and where would you like it to to go using your famous, you know, where is the puck going to be? I've heard you say that where do you, what, what are your reflections on the future of this conversation? So and I look at uh the evolution of gender equality in different parts of the world. I unfortunately. Can't identify enough, uh, if you will, drivers that I could say this is the way we go. You look at the United States, one of the biggest drivers uh was World War 2 or or the World Wars where the men went to war and suddenly women had to be brought into the workforce. I look at Bangladesh. The fascinating thing, uh, was, uh, the. OPEC oil crisis of the 70s and all the men folk of villages in Bangladesh went to the Middle East to work. Well, guess who came into the uh uh into the market? Women and all the remittances. Guess where that went? It went in the hands of women and that changed the nature uh of the dialogue in Bangladesh rural of the role of women in uh uh in society but. It's hard for me to understand where these shocks will come from and where these openings will be, so my own personal view is you have to work. In on several platforms, I think one platform is service delivery and to look at where service delivery can be shaped to engage women clearly when you come to transport, public safety, if you don't engage there you're not gonna get women into the into into the workforce. So how does service delivery change is one area we need to look at. A second area has to be, uh, the political advocacy, the politics. How do you get more women into politics, into panchayats, into local governments? Uh, I think that'll change the nature of, uh, uh, of the whole debate about, about women. The third area is the labor force participation of women. We know that in South Asia and in India in particular, the fall has been quite, uh, dramatic, um. What are the barriers and how do you reengage women into the into the labor force, uh, this becomes very important it's very clear that the nature of the job, uh, how far is it from the home, uh, can, uh, women get access to child care which gives them a very different, uh, uh, different setting but all of these areas service delivery, uh, political role of women, labor force participation requires active uh intervention. Uh, and so when you ask me what is it that I would like to look at, I would like to look for, I would look like to look at leadership in public policy that actively looks at this, doesn't look at it passively, right? That's the, that's where we have to have to focus, but there is something that's happening today that I think gives us an opening it's this whole technology changing nature of work, the future of work. I think technology is opening up work in a gender neutral way that's the opportunity to truly push women into the into the labor force the informal market is now the new normal informal is the new normal if that's true, how do we engage in the informal sector because I think that's where women can play a bigger role because of their relationship in terms of the of the household uh so. The answer that I give is perhaps uh uh how shall I say not satisfactory enough that here are the three lessons, but I think the opportunities out there for us to consciously uh shift the game uh towards getting women into the workforce, uh, and I think that language uh today and the opportunity today is very different, uh, different, uh, from before. Thanks Janil Deepa. I, I, we're already a bit over time but. I'm going to turn to you maybe in 2 to 3 minutes given what Junaid is talking about that women in the workforce are, you know, the future of that change, be it in policy making, political roles, or in, in new forms of jobs, what message would you give to young working women entering the workforce now? I'm going to respond a bit to Janaid's question and then answer that. I think, uh, I agree with everything that you've said. I think in the economic sphere what's been missing. Is the integration or looking at the economic issues through a lens of the prejudiced or biased social norms when I travel in the rural areas, women who've been part of self help groups are happy and the men are happy because they're producing money so there's a danger that women become ATMs. Without the cultural foundation changing, so the moment the money stops coming, then you're back to your only Lakshmi, your own, you, you're, you're the goddess, but during the day we beat you up. That's sort of the danger that I see. I think the message to young women is that it's your time go out there, fight for change, don't be quiet and form alliances form networks with other women, with other men, because if one woman challenges the system, it's you have to be very, very strong so you don't collapse because the whole system comes down on the single woman. But if women form alliances, then a lot of change is possible and the young women today are smart, they're talented, they're ready to go out and take on the world. Thanks Deepa. So I think we've two big messages, I think from both of you. One is on alliance building and networks, and the other is of course the role of redesigning how the workplace itself is organized increasingly. Uh, be it within institutions, I think Janeida, thank you for your honest comments. In fact, even on the World Bank as an institution on some of these issues, be it outside, and men have a huge role to play. Without inclusion of men, we're not going to see the changes we want to see. No, I think that's a, that's a very important point. This is, this is about a joint effort. Yes, yeah, absolutely. Thank you both so much for this extremely useful conversation. Um, this was live streamed. Please do share, um, using the hashtag equal at Work, uh, on multiple social media platforms and look forward to another panel later today which is on social norms, uh, much more focused on, on those issues. Thanks so much for everyone who joined us and thank you both. Thank you.
showAllTranscripts
no
duration
PT28M7S
scene7File
worldbank/India Women in the Spotlight SeriesSMALL
scene7Domain
https://worldbank.scene7.com/
scene7FileAvs
worldbank/India Women in the Spotlight SeriesSMALL-AVS
title
India Women in the Spotlight Series
description
India Women in the Spotlight Series
showTimestampAndTranscript
yes
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-3
col-lg-3
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-7
col-lg-7
  • add-style
  • lp-body-content
World Bank Country Director in India, Junaid Kamal Ahmad, joins author and social scientist, Deepa Narayan, to discuss overcoming barriers for women entering the workforce. Moderated by Shrayana Bhattacharya, Senior Social Protection Economist at the World Bank.
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-2
col-lg-2