World Bank Group  
OED Banner  
  Home > Independent Evaluation >The World Bank Group's Response to the Global Economic Crisis  
Response to the Global Economic Crisis
Download the Report
Assessment of the WBG Response:
World Bank
Assessment of the WBG Response: IFC
Assessment of the WBG Response: MIGA
Early Lessons
Site Tools
Contact Us
 
 
Crisis Response
summary

The global economic crisis that began in 2008 threatened to erase years of progress in developing countries. In response, the World Bank Group (World Bank, International Finance Corporation, Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency) increased lending to unprecedented levels. But Increases in financing volume must be matched by quality to achieve sustained economic results. Quality-at-entry indicators have generally been positive. But certain areas—the financial sector specifically and results on the ground more generally—are a cause for concern, particularly given continued tight budgets.

This IEG study is a real- time assessment of ongoing activities. As such, it evaluates the immediate results and serves as an input to the WBG's continuing efforts to address the effects of the crisis. The evaluation of the development impact of WBG’s response will be taken up at a later stage.

Also See: Lessons from World Bank Group Responses to Past Financial Crises /WBG Management comment on IEG evaluation brief

cover

Related Info:

The World Bank Group's Response to the Global Crisis: Update on an Ongoing IEG Evaluation
Management Response | Chairperson's Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness

video
Global Financial Crisis: Impact & Consequences

An interview with
Vinod Thomas

Director General, Evaluation, IEG

assessment
wbWorld Bank ifcInternational Finance Corporation migaMultilateral Investment Guarantee Agency

early lessons
Click on a tab to browse early lessons specific to each Bank Group institution.

World Bank Group
A strategic approach to the Bank Group's crisis-response effort is needed, one in which the following elements are integrated:
1. Early warning, preparedness and timeliness, including an eye on long-term capital adequacy, are key attributes for the WB, IFC and MIGA 4. It is costly to let the Bank's expertise in key areas (in this case the financial sector) decline.
2. The benefits of the Bank's country focus go in step with the need for a cross-country strategy to ensure consistency with initiatives and effective use of resources. 5. There is a need to balance the value of innovations and new initiatives in the middle of a crisis with continuity of support using more established and proven approaches.
3. As it responds to crisis, the WBG needs to keep the requisites of sustainable long-term growth— fiscal and debt sustainability, structural reform, environmental and climate change agendas, among others—in focus. 6. Coordination is needed among the WB, IFC and MIGA (and with other partners) to capitalize on linkages across government and business and catalyze economic activity.

Next »

World Bank
box Continuing Bank involvement, policy dialogue, and analytic work are important prerequisites box The Bank should balance advocating global priorities with country ownership
box Greater clarity is needed in the use of instruments for crisis reponse box The Bank needs to anticipate crises and be ready to act quickly, taking into account quality trade-offs and considering benefits and costs across sectors
box IDA must remain the Bank's flagship resource-mobilization activity box Finally, its crucial to assess emerging impacts early to identify quality problems and risks and remedial action

« Previous | Next »

IFC
box IFC's development role is vital, and looking beyond portfolio protection is essential box A crisis response has to be found on partnerships, but cooperation needs the right incentives and support
box Responding to the crisis through existing platforms and partnerships has generally proved more effective than working through new ones box Finding the right level of adaptation to changing circumstances is fundamental for an effective crisis response
box The shift in IFC instruments toward trade finance guarantees was useful, but the instrumental mix will need to shift again box Monitoring and evalaution (M&E) for new programs will need to improve

« Previous | Next »

MIGA
box For MIGA, the crisis has amplified the need for product flexibility and business development

« Previous


issues

The crisis created an immediate need for countercyclical spending in developing countries, which the Bank Group and others have supported. To help sustain the recovery, contribute to longer-term growth, and improve the response capacity of the Bank Group, attention needs to be given to two areas: policy change and organizational effectiveness. Policy issues concern fiscal sustainability, public-private synergies, financial sector reform, poverty and unemployment alleviation, and greener growth. In terms of organizational effectiveness, preparedness, managing quality trade-offs, coordination, and a strong results focus will be crucial.

Search | Index | Feedback | Help | WB Home
© 2010 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions