World Bank Group

Search Index Feedback Help 

Independent Evaluation Group
Home > Independent Evaluation > Building Government M&E Systems
Search IEG Evaluations
Advanced Search
Building Government M&E Systems Home
What is M&E?
M&E Tools, Methods and Approaches
Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations Under Budget, Time and Data Constraints
Influential Evaluations
Why is it Important to Institutionalize M&E Systems?
Diagnostic Guides
Developing Action Plans
Lessons from Experience
Country Case Studies
Evaluation of Efforts to Institutionalize M&E
All Publications
Related Web sites
Toolkit
Order a Report
Receive IEG alerts
Contact us

 

 
 
Building Government Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Systems
also known as "Evaluation Capacity Development"
Priority for Government M&E Systems

Annual Report on Operations EvaluationAn M&E system can provide a regular flow of information on the performance of government policies, programs and activities. This information can provide invaluable support for policy-making, budget decision-making, ongoing management of government activities, and to underpin accountability relationships.... more »


Featured Publications

How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government

Governments in a number of developing countries are devoting considerable efforts to strengthen their monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems and capacities. They are doing this to improve their performance ― by establishing evidence-based policy-making and budget decision-making, evidence-based management, and evidence-based accountability. This publication is a synthesis of IEG's considerable experience on this topic. learn more »

NEW
View the site in French


(Download: English | Spanish |NEW French | NEW Bahasa)

Institutionalization of M&E Systems to Improve Public Sector Management


Featured Video

The United States Government’s method for rating the performance of all programs ― the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)

A growing number of developing countries are pursuing efforts to introduce performance budgeting. At the same time, they are keen to develop a broader performance culture within their governments. There is thus a strong interest in the experience of countries that have successfully used monitoring information and evaluation findings to strengthen government performance. The U.S. Government's Performance Assessment Rating Tool (PART) provides a standardized methodology for rating all 1,000 government programs, and for identifying needed improvements to these programs. The PART also provides an information base to assist government decisions on program budgets. learn more »
 
Latest Publications
How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government
A Diagnosis of Colombia's National M&E System, SINERGIA
Impact Evaluation - The Experience of the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank
Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems to Improve Public Sector Management
Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations Under Budget, Time and Data Constraints

Video Presentations

NEW The United States Government’s method for rating the performance of all programs ― the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)

NEW How to Increase the Utilization of Evaluation

NEW Questions and Answers about Government M&E
Answers to your most commonly-asked questions about government M&E

Most Popular Publications
Monitoring & Evaluation: Tools, Methods and Approaches
Influential Evaluations
Influential Evaluations: Detailed Case Studies
Evaluation Capacity Development: OED Self-Evaluation


The Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is an independent unit within the World Bank; it reports directly to the Bank's Board of Executive Directors. The goals of IEG 's evaluations are to draw lessons from Bank experience, and to provide an objective basis for assessing the results of the Bank's work.

Search | Index | Feedback | Help | WB Home
© 2006 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions