2150. Who Wants to Redistribute? Russia's Tunnel Effect in the 1990s

Martin Ravallion and Michael Lokshin
(July 1999)
Attitudes toward redistribution of wealth in Russia tend to reflect expectations of future mobility, in both directions. Few Russians expected rising living standards in the 1990s, and most expected a decline in living standards, so there was strong demand for redistribution, even among those currently well off but fearful of the future.

It seems natural to expect the rich to oppose policies to redistribute income from the rich to the poor, and the poor to favor such policies. But this may be too simple a model, say Ravallion and Lokshin. Expectations of future welfare may come into play. Well-off people on a downward trajectory may well favor such policies and poor people on a rising trajectory may not.

This resistance of upwardly mobile poor people to lasting redistribution is analogous to Hirshman's "tunnel effect," as applied to traffic stuck on a congested two-lane road in a tunnel: People's spirits lift when traffic starts moving again; but when another lane starts moving and theirs doesn't, they might grow furious and want to correct things by crossing the double line separating the two lanes.

Using Russia in the 1990s as the setting, Ravallion and Lokshin analyze why some people favor governmental redistribution and others do not and whether there is a "tunnel effect." They find that:

This paper - a product Poverty and Human Resources, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to understand the political economy of redistributive policies. Copies of the paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Patricia Sader, telephone 202-473-3902, fax 202-522-1153, Internet address psader@worldbank.org. Martin Ravallion may be contacted at mravallion@worldbank.org. (26 pages)


The full report is available in PDF format.