This page in:

The New Role of Safety Nets in Africa

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • A new World Bank review of 22 countries finds that social safety nets are on the rise in Africa, and beginning to evolve from fragmented programs into safety net systems.
  • The use of safety nets to cushion the impact of the global economic crisis has shown that these programs are an affordable way of tackling persistent poverty in low-income countries in Africa.
  • As a result, safety nets are placed higher on governments’ agendas in Africa.

WASHINGTON, February 11, 2014 –When the recent global economic crisis threatened Africa’s progress in reducing poverty, safety nets emerged as a fundamental way to prevent a reversal of these gains. A new World Bank review of the use of these programs in 22 African countries shows that safety nets are critical instruments for reducing extreme poverty and increasing shared prosperity.

The review, entitled “Reducing Poverty and Investing in People: The New Role of Safety Nets in Africa”, notes that safety net programs in Africa are working to reduce poverty in a number of ways. Impact evaluations provide evidence that safety nets help households to meet basic consumption needs, protect assets such as livestock, and invest in their children’s health and education.

Research also suggests that safety nets could potentially boost future well-being and poverty reduction because they help poor households make productive investments today. They can also produce second round economic stimuli in poor areas.

From fragmented programs to systems

In most African countries reviewed, safety nets tend to be fragmented and too small to effectively protect the poorest. However, in some countries that are leading the way forward, such as Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda and Tanzania, safety nets are beginning to evolve from fragmented standalone programs into robust safety net systems.

Safety nets in Africa have evolved from emergency food aid programs that were often used during periods of drought or food insecurity to regular, predictable safety nets such as cash transfers or cash-for-work programs that are targeted to poor and vulnerable households.

Some of the main tasks that countries must tackle as they move in this direction include improving data collection and monitoring, targeting programs more effectively to make sure that the assistance reaches the households that need it the most, and scaling up existing programs that are already working well.

 

 

Open Quotes

Safety nets have evolved differently across Africa but are now taking hold as core poverty reduction instruments, Close Quotes

Victoria Monchuk
Author of the report and economist at the World Bank

“Safety nets have evolved differently across Africa but are now taking hold as core poverty reduction instruments,” says Victoria Monchuk, author of the report and economist at the World Bank. “As these programs are knit together into coherent systems, donor support for them needs to be better coordinated and well aligned with overarching social protection and poverty reduction strategies in each country.”

Affordable in low-income countries

Well-targeted safety nets are affordable in Af­rica, especially if inefficient public spending can be better targeted to the poorest and if programs can be better harmonized to reduce redundancies. However, donor funding remains important in low-income countries.

With the excep­tion of universal programs such as old-age bene­fits and general subsidies, donors finance a large share of safety nets in Africa‒–over 80 percent in Burkina Faso, Liberia, Mali, and Sierra Leone.

Going forward, the discovery and exploitation of natural resources such as oil, gas and minerals in many African countries could mean greater domestic support for safety nets.

In Tanzania, for example, where there have been major discoveries of natural gas, the government is scaling up its cash transfer program to benefit as many as 900,000 households. This is expected to sharply reduce poverty.

Middle income countries can already scale up safety nets largely with their own resources. For instance, in Cameroon, which is now investing more in social protection, it would cost only an estimated 0.5 percent of GDP to provide a strong safety net that reaches at least half those living in chronic poverty.

Sharing lessons learned

The study notes that impact evaluations of safety nets are underway in at least 20 countries in Africa, and that pioneering countries such as Ethiopia—which has operated the Productive Safety Net Program for over a decade—have valuable lessons to share.