Why food and nutrition security risk monitoring needs to evolve
When a food and nutrition crisis hits, timely data can make all the difference. Data sets face important limitations because they rely on infrequent and costly surveys that fail to reflect rapidly evolving risks on the ground. In turn, these constraints can delay crisis response efforts.
Today’s increasingly frequent and severe food and nutrition crises are driven by overlapping shocks such as conflict, displacement, climate change, and economic volatility. This shifting landscape demands a faster, more agile, data-driven approach to risk monitoring that delivers more reliable evidence.
Tools such as the Joint Monitoring Reports (JMRs), are central to this improved reporting and risk monitoring approach. As part of national Preparedness Plans for Food and Nutrition Security Crises, the reports help ensure evidence is consistently available to trigger rapid action. They also help build bridges between humanitarian and development efforts. By connecting immediate life-saving interventions with longer-term resilience building, these plans reduce the risk of recurrence and help guide sustained investments that strengthen institutions, reduce vulnerabilities, and prevent future crises.