Learn how the World Bank Group is helping countries with COVID-19 (coronavirus). Find Out

Skip to Main Navigation
Results Briefs November 10, 2020

Strengthening Recovery and Peacebuilding in North-East Nigeria

Image

25-Bed capacity Dalori Primary Health Care Centre constructed via the MCRP in Borno State, Nigeria

Photo: The Multi Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project


In response to the escalating Boko Haram crisis in North-East Nigeria in 2017, the Multi-Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project (MCRP)—a $200 million International Development Association (IDA) operation—works to rehabilitate and improve critical service delivery infrastructure, enhance livelihood opportunities for conflict-affected and displaced communities, and strengthen social cohesion in North-East. In May 2020, the project received $176 million of additional financing to scale-up its efforts in supporting these communities.

Challenge

Violent activities of Boko Haram and the armed conflict since 2009 have deeply affected North-East Nigeria and the lives of 15 million people across the region. Over 20,000 people were killed and 2.2 million were forcibly displaced. The North-East states of Borno, Adamawa and Yobe host 70 percent of those displaced, with regional spillovers around the Lake Chad. Affected communities have experienced severe damage to their social fabric, extensive destruction of infrastructure, and significant socio-economic basic needs that remain largely unmet. The 2016 Recovery and Peacebuilding Assessment (RPBA) estimated multi-sectoral recovery and resilience building needs at nearly $6.7 billion.

The Federal Government of Nigeria embraced the RPBA findings to form the core of its North-East response strategy—the Buhari Plan—and create the North-East Development Commission. The RPBA also informed $775 million of Bank recovery projects, including the Multi-Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project (MCRP).

Approach

The MCRP supports the government’s response to the acute humanitarian and forced-displacement crisis in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. Its approach includes: implementing a surge of high-impact, early recovery interventions (i.e. distribution of non-food items, agricultural and non-agricultural inputs) to address urgent needs and rebuild livelihoods while humanitarian operations continue; and transitioning into medium-term recovery and resilience building through investments in social cohesion, livelihoods, infrastructure and public services.

The additional financing to the project will:

  • Bring Nigeria into the regional program supported in parallel by the new Lake Chad Region Recovery and Development Project.
  • Focus on job creation and labor-intensive works programs.
  • Provide service delivery beyond infrastructure rehabilitation and improvement. For example, a stronger focus on basic services and their sustainability, with the addition of health and education service provision activities.
  • Mainstream climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts.

Results

Between 2017-2020, the MCRP’s implementation across the affected states has exceeded and met key progress on the ground, most notably under the main social cohesion and infrastructure rehabilitation components:

  • Distributions of non-food items, agricultural and non-agricultural kits and small ruminants have reached over 42,000 households (of which 51.4 percent have been led by women). This achievement is largely due to the deliberate efforts to prioritize and target female beneficiaries by the states.
  • 17 peace groups have been formed, of which 201 households have participated in a series of capacity building trainings in different aspects of crisis management and recovery skills.
  • Psychosocial support services interventions have reached 13,500 households.
  • 687 infrastructure rehabilitation projects have been initiated, of which 136 are in various stages of implementation and 551 projects have been completed. These include 295 hand-pump boreholes, 121 solar-powered boreholes, 76 Ventilated Improved Pit latrines, 31 public buildings, 12 schools and 15 hospitals.
  • 178 kilometers (km) of roads and reconstruction of three bridges are in various stages of implementation in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. 
  • Over 105,000 beneficiaries (of which 49 percent are women) have gained access to rehabilitated roads, hospitals, schools, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) facilities and public buildings).

Through the MCRP, the North-East Development Commission has also developed a sophisticated security information system and protocols for the benefit of the constituent North-East states to further identify hotspot areas where activities are being implemented, and to protect those who are working on project sites.

Image
Communities gather at the launch of the 25-Bed capacity Dalori Primary Health Care Centre constructed via the MCRP in Borno State, Nigeria. Photo: The Multi Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project
 

World Bank Group Contribution

The International Development Association (IDA) initially contributed $200 million in 2017 for the MCRP to support efforts in North-East Nigeria. In May 2020, an additional financing of $176 million was approved, bringing the total project amount to $376 million.

Partners

The MCRP has demonstrated a continued strong ownership by the Nigerian government, the North-East Development Commission and Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states. For the implementation, the project has a good Federal-State working relationship through a clear delineation of project roles and responsibilities.

The World Bank has worked in close contact with the United Nations Development Programme, the European Union, the African Development Bank and the Islamic Development Bank. The World Bank task team is also managing a $3 million trust fund from the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, focusing on institutional and capacity building in North-East Nigeria, and further demonstrating this ongoing collaboration.

The regional dimension of the project is linked to the World Bank’s engagement with Lake Chad Region Recovery and Development Project. These projects should be seen as a single program, aiming to strengthen regional stability.

Moving Forward

The additional financing moves the program from urgent needs, early recovery and reconstruction, toward long-term recovery and development of livelihoods.

Strategic shifts under the additional financing include: (a) a stronger focus on basic services and their sustainability, with the addition of health and education service provision activities; (b) a more strategic approach to livelihoods and employment generation, including through the inclusion of labor-intensive works; (c) the inclusion of support for agricultural investments as well as livelihoods; (d) a new lens for transport support on enhancing connectivity, within the Lake Chad as well as locally, linking farms to markets and people to sources of employment; (e) the inclusion of climate change adaptation and mitigation as a cross-cutting theme; and (f) the fostering of regional stabilization  as a main priority.

Moving forward, the project has built an important foundation to serve as a vehicle for the World Bank Group’s strategy for Fragility, Conflict and Violence (FCV) and the regional Lake Chad stabilization program.

Beneficiaries

Mr. Abubakar Abdullahi, a resident of Bama, Borno state:

“We escaped the attack by the mercy of God, only to be reconnected with my family by the International Committee of the Red Cross barely two years after separation. Living as an internally displaced person is not only traumatizing but makes you feel unwanted and imprisoned as well.”

Communities received transitional support towards stabilization and recovery, about 300 returnees and internally displaced persons have received essential livelihood support. Abubakar’s family received two ewes and a ram as a means of sustenance.

“It is a great means of livelihood which will help me improve my situation and will allow me to provide for my family,” Abubakar said, noting that, despite the insurgency and economic difficulties going on around the country, “the majority of us depend more on agriculture than on petroleum as a means of livelihood.”