Well-designed subsidies can correct market failures, attract investment, foster innovation, boost growth, reduce poverty, and spur job creation. Yet they can also be costly, inefficient, and unfair. In many emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs), reported subsidies often fall short of their goals, worsen inequality, and unlevel the playing field.
Today, these countries spend nearly 6.9% of GDP on subsidies—more than they spend on health and education combined. And that doesn’t consider unreported subsidies, which could be even more costly.
Even modest subsidy reform could unlock up to 1.9% of their GDP—fiscal savings that could be reinvested in health, education, and infrastructure, and to stimulate job creation.
This report examines how subsidies are used across EMDEs, assessing their fiscal costs, economic impact, and distributional effects. It provides a practical framework to account for, evaluate, and redesign subsidies so they deliver stronger, fairer outcomes.
The analysis is presented in two parts: