col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
videoType
dynamic-media
videoDmUrl
https://delivery-p136806-e1377785.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:00057dbf-9c87-497f-9e41-a201488330c6/play?assetname=COP29+-+Climate+Solutions+in+Agrifood.mp4
keyFrameImage
timestamp

00:00 Good evening everyone.

00:01 A very warm welcome to the COP 29 side event titled Climate Solutions in Agri-Food

00:08 Building Tomorrow's Sustainable Food Economy.

00:11 My name is Shobha Shetty,

00:13 and I'm the global director for the agriculture

00:15 and Food department at the World Bank.

00:18 Let me first introduce my distinguished panel.

00:22 Uh,

00:23 starting with Mr.

00:24 Fernando Matos Costa,

00:26 Minister of Livestock,

00:27 Agriculture and Fisheries of,

00:29 uh,

00:29 Uruguay.

00:31 And then we have Mr.

00:32 Stuart Horn,

00:33 who's the New Zealand ambassador for climate change.

00:37 Mr.

00:38 Peter Kain Kaindae,

00:41 who's the technical advisor to the government of

00:43 Sierra Leone on renewable energy and food security,

00:47 welcome.

00:48 And Mr.

00:48 Moises Savian,

00:50 Secretary of Land Governance,

00:52 Territorial Development and socio-environmental Affairs

00:55 of Brazil's Ministry of Agrarian Development and Family Farming,

01:00 welcome to all of you gentlemen.

01:02 So

01:03 global food along with water demand is set to increase by 50 to 60%

01:09 in the coming decades as the world's population grows to 10 billion by 2050.

01:15 However,

01:15 food supplies will be severely threatened if little or

01:18 no action is taken to address climate change.

01:21 The numbers speak for themselves.

01:23 Over the past 30 years,

01:25 climate disasters such as floods and droughts have caused

01:29 $3.8 trillion in crop and livestock losses.

01:33 That's 5% of the value that agriculture generates annually.

01:38 Water shocks disproportionately affect the poor

01:41 and reduce the availability of a more inclusive agriculture and water system.

01:47 The global agri-food system is itself part of the problem,

01:50 being responsible for 1/3 of global greenhouse gas emissions.

01:55 That's more than the emissions from electricity and heating combined.

02:00 We know the hard facts.

02:02 Food systems are the

02:03 1 driver of deforestation

02:06 and the #1 cause of anthropogenic methane emissions.

02:11 However,

02:11 the good news is that agriculture can heal the planet.

02:15 It is a huge untapped source of climate change action,

02:20 not least by acting as a carbon sink for the world,

02:23 drawing carbon from the atmosphere through ecosystems and soils.

02:27 Cost effective solutions not only exist,

02:31 they are proven.

02:31 They include better fertilizer management,

02:34 enhanced agricultural water management that optimizes the use of both

02:39 green and blue water to achieve more crop per drop.

02:42 And the adoption of renewable energy from farm to table,

02:47 interventions like alternate wetting and drying for irrigated rice

02:51 and the use of nature-based solutions are also very promising options

02:56 for reducing the GHG footprint of agriculture

02:59 while ensuring food security.

03:02 But to reach momentum,

03:03 sufficient financing needs to flow into the agri-food system

03:07 that supports sustainable,

03:10 climate resilient agriculture practices,

03:12 including on irrigation,

03:15 instead of propping up

03:16 a failing food system.

03:18 Today,

03:19 the agriculture and food sector only receives 4%

03:23 of global climate finance,

03:25 but as my colleague Bill Sutton will show,

03:28 the benefits for people,

03:30 planet,

03:30 and economies could be game changing,

03:33 totaling as much as $4.3 trillion in 2030,

03:39 more than the value of the German economy and a 16 to 1% return on investment.

03:44 It is fitting that we are having this discussion here in Baku,

03:49 where one of the main priorities is to establish

03:52 a new

03:53 collective quantified goal on climate finance.

03:57 Before we head into our panel discussions,

04:00 I would like to welcome our keynote speaker.

04:03 William Sutton is the World Bank's global lead for climate and nature

04:07 in the agriculture and Food global department.

04:09 He will now open the floor with a keynote

04:12 speech on the World Bank's recently published flagship report,

04:15 Recipe for a livable Planet Achieving net zero emissions in the agri-food System.

04:21 Over to you,

04:21 Bill.

04:24 Thank you very much everyone.

04:25 Uh,

04:26 thanks for joining and uh hello to everyone who is

04:29 joining online as well.

04:31 Um,

04:32 I'm very excited to be here today and share with you

04:35 a selection of key findings and recommendations from our new

04:39 global flagship report Recipe for a livable Planet Achieving

04:43 net zero emissions in the Agri-Food System.

04:46 This is the first

04:47 comprehensive

04:48 global strategic framework on climate change

04:51 mitigation in the agri-food system.

04:54 And for those interested in the topic,

04:56 we've included the QR code.

04:57 We encourage you

04:58 to

04:59 download the,

05:00 the full report,

05:01 um,

05:02 which is freely available

05:04 online.

05:05 So,

05:06 um,

05:07 first off,

05:07 the,

05:08 the first question we often get when we talk about this topic is

05:11 why do we care

05:12 about climate change

05:14 mitigation in the agri-food system?

05:16 Shouldn't we just be focusing on adaptation?

05:18 Well,

05:19 the,

05:19 the reality is that

05:21 climate change adaptation and mitigation are

05:23 inextricably linked in the agri-food system.

05:27 And that the agri-food system is currently caught in a vicious climate circle,

05:32 and adaptation alone

05:34 is not sufficient to feed the world.

05:36 So

05:37 as this

05:38 diagram shows,

05:40 we're increasing agri-food activities to feed a growing global

05:44 population that's expected to grow by another 2 billion people

05:47 by the middle of the century.

05:49 That generates greenhouse gas emissions

05:52 which in turn.

05:53 Contribute to global heating.

05:55 That global heating

05:57 reduces agricultural yields in crop and livestock production.

06:02 So to compensate for that,

06:03 we further increase

06:04 agricultural activities which generate more greenhouse gas emissions.

06:09 So essentially we're trying to

06:11 hit a moving target that we're shifting

06:14 through our own actions.

06:16 Instead,

06:16 what we need to do is scale up action in both adaptation and mitigation

06:22 and create an agri-food system that's sustainable

06:26 and can help feed the world population

06:30 while also help.

06:31 Uh,

06:33 healed,

06:34 the planet.

06:38 One of the key findings of the report is that

06:42 greenhouse gas emissions from the agri-food system are actually

06:45 significantly higher than what was previously thought,

06:48 and

06:49 in this figure,

06:49 the bar on the left shows total annual global

06:53 greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide.

06:55 The yellow sheeted portion represents

06:58 the agri-food system emissions.

07:00 We estimate those

07:02 at about 16 gigatons or 16 billion tons

07:05 of CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas emissions per year.

07:09 To put that into perspective,

07:10 that's 1/6 more

07:12 than the greenhouse gas emissions from all of the electricity and heat production

07:16 globally every year.

07:19 Um,

07:20 the,

07:20 and,

07:20 and it's about nearly 1/3 of total

07:24 global greenhouse gas emissions.

07:25 The

07:26 pie chart to the right,

07:28 that's a

07:29 breakdown of those agri-food emissions by

07:32 categories and sources.

07:35 It shows that in orange,

07:37 the,

07:37 the farm gate emissions,

07:39 um,

07:40 that's what we normally think of as crop and livestock production.

07:43 That's the biggest category,

07:45 but

07:45 at 45%,

07:47 it's still less than half of the total.

07:49 The second biggest category in blue,

07:52 those are the pre and post-production emissions,

07:53 that's everything from the upstream

07:56 production of fertilizers and pesticides to the downstream

07:59 transportation,

08:01 processing,

08:01 retailing,

08:02 household consumption,

08:03 and on to food loss and waste.

08:06 Together those pre and post-productions

08:08 represent about a third of.

08:10 Agri-food system emissions

08:12 and finally in green land use change

08:15 directly linked

08:17 to

08:17 agricultural production,

08:20 the single biggest source of

08:22 agri-food emissions is still

08:24 net forest conversion linked to agriculture.

08:27 However,

08:27 if we were to combine the different livestock related categories,

08:31 uh,

08:31 enteric fermentation,

08:33 manure management and so on,

08:34 those would actually be bigger.

08:36 Taken together,

08:37 this

08:38 underscores the importance of taking a food systems approach

08:42 to this

08:43 challenge.

08:45 The next key point that

08:47 I'd like to emphasize from the report

08:49 is we find that without significant climate mitigation action

08:53 in the agri-food system,

08:55 the Paris Agreement goals cannot be reached.

08:58 So this figure

08:59 shows projected cumulative global emissions pathways between now

09:04 and the end of the century,

09:06 as well as our likelihood of achieving

09:08 the Paris Agreement targets of limiting warming

09:11 to 1.5

09:12 °C or 2

09:13 °C.

09:14 The

09:15 red line at the top,

09:16 and this is a simplified version of a figure that's in the report,

09:20 the red line at the top

09:22 that represents what is projected to happen

09:24 if we were to eliminate all non-food emissions

09:28 by 2075 but continue with the business as usual approach

09:32 to

09:33 agriculture and food.

09:35 The agri-food emissions alone would be enough to drive us past

09:39 the 1.5 degree target,

09:40 and even the 2 degree

09:42 target would be in serious jeopardy.

09:45 Instead,

09:45 what we need to try to do is achieve

09:47 what's represented by the green line at the bottom,

09:50 and

09:51 that means

09:52 achieving

09:53 net zero emissions in both

09:56 the non-food sectors as well as food sectors

10:00 by 2050 in order to have a better than 50% chance

10:05 of achieving the Paris Agreement targets and thus the

10:09 theme of our report.

10:13 One of the interesting features of this work is that we

10:16 carried out the analysis and we developed recommendations

10:20 based on World Bank country income categories to better understand the different

10:25 challenges and opportunities

10:26 for each of the different country types

10:29 and one of the

10:31 surprising I think findings is that

10:33 in fact middle income countries

10:35 generate.

10:37 About 2/3 of agri-food emissions,

10:41 and that's compared to about

10:43 21% of agri-food emissions from the high income countries

10:47 and 11% of emissions from low income countries.

10:51 This figure shows those

10:53 emissions for the different countries' income categories both today

10:57 and

10:58 30 years ago.

10:59 And based on this,

11:00 there are a number of important implications for climate action.

11:03 First of all,

11:04 in order to have a significant impact

11:07 on combating climate change in the agri-food system,

11:09 we have to focus efforts

11:11 in those middle income countries.

11:13 Second,

11:14 the fastest emissions growth is coming from those blue

11:18 pre and post-production processes.

11:20 And third,

11:22 we need to help.

11:23 Uh,

11:23 low,

11:24 uh,

11:24 sorry,

11:24 low income countries

11:26 to avoid those mistakes of the past and,

11:28 and get on a more

11:30 sustainable pathway.

11:33 In the report,

11:35 we

11:36 actually developed a recipe

11:38 for how we can achieve net zero emissions in the agri-food system

11:42 by 2050

11:43 using

11:44 cost-effective actions in land use,

11:47 in on-farm measures,

11:48 and pre and post-production processes,

11:51 as well as demand changes.

11:53 And these are all cost effective

11:56 measures

11:57 that can help us achieve net zero emissions in the agri-food system by 2050.

12:02 3 quarter of those opportunities are

12:05 in the middle income countries.

12:06 So as I mentioned,

12:07 2/3 of the emissions,

12:08 agri-food emissions are coming from middle income countries,

12:11 but 3/4

12:12 of the cost effective.

12:13 are also

12:15 in those countries.

12:17 These

12:18 measures are

12:19 primarily based on existing technologies,

12:22 so this recipe is doable.

12:24 Some of the actions are even cost savings,

12:27 such as using fertilizer and water

12:30 more efficiently and reducing

12:32 waste.

12:36 However,

12:37 we have a challenge which is that

12:39 finance for agri-food mitigation

12:42 is very low and needs to be scaled up significantly.

12:46 Um,

12:47 again,

12:47 a third of emissions coming from agri-food systems.

12:51 However,

12:52 sorry.

12:56 OK,

12:57 I guess the um.

12:59 Animation isn't working,

13:00 but

13:01 anyway,

13:02 the large blue circle represents total global annual climate finance.

13:08 The slightly smaller light blue circle is

13:11 the

13:13 total global mitigation financing,

13:16 and then you come to the

13:18 much smaller green circles that represents

13:20 the mitigation and total climate finance

13:22 for

13:24 agriculture and food.

13:26 Only about 4% of total climate finance

13:29 is going

13:31 towards the agri-food system and only 2%

13:34 of mitigation finance,

13:36 so

13:37 we estimate that

13:38 annual investments in mitigation in

13:40 and food need to increase by about 18 times

13:43 to $260 billion a year,

13:46 represented by the yellow circle

13:48 in order to put us on a pathway to net zero emissions by 2050.

13:54 That sounds like a lot of money,

13:55 I know,

13:56 but

13:57 in comparison,

13:58 the world spends about $660 billion every year

14:03 on

14:03 public support

14:04 to agriculture,

14:06 including subsidies,

14:08 so

14:08 we estimate that by repurposing

14:11 at least $70 billion of those subsidies,

14:15 we could

14:16 in fact

14:16 cover about 25 to 30% of the cost of climate smart action in and food.

14:29 So,

14:29 um,

14:30 again,

14:30 the,

14:30 the

14:31 The recipe for a livable planet is doable,

14:33 and every country can contribute.

14:36 In the report,

14:36 we come up with recommendations for how

14:39 each of the different country types can best contribute.

14:42 For high income countries,

14:43 they can lead the way by promoting renewable energy in agri-food,

14:48 providing more financial and technical support

14:51 to low and middle income countries,

14:53 and shifting their own subsidies towards lower emitting foods.

14:57 For middle income countries,

14:58 they have the greatest potential for mitigation.

15:01 They can reduce conversion of forests and plant trees,

15:05 cut methane in livestock and rice production,

15:08 and manage soils

15:09 more sustainably to store carbon

15:11 and use cleaner and more energy efficient

15:15 pre and post-production processes.

15:17 And finally,

15:17 low income countries can play a proactive role.

15:20 They can bypass the high emissions development pathways

15:23 by learning from the mistakes of the past,

15:26 preserve and restore their forests,

15:28 and finally improve agricultural practices

15:30 through climate smart agriculture techniques.

15:34 So

15:35 that's the kind of

15:37 Reader's Digest summary of the report.

15:39 Again,

15:39 if you're interested,

15:40 um,

15:41 I'd encourage you to,

15:42 to download the full report,

15:43 and I just wanted to mention that this work

15:45 is supported by the World Bank

15:47 Food Systems 2030 Trust Fund and many thanks to the,

15:51 the various donors who have contributed to the trust fund.

15:54 Thank you.

16:00 Thank you,

16:00 Bill,

16:01 for these uh highly relevant insights

16:04 and now let's explore how these challenges unfold in each country

16:08 and the solutions that our esteemed panelists are implementing.

16:12 So let me start with an opening question to all our panelists.

16:16 We have just seen an overview of the new

16:19 World Bank flagship report recipe for a livable planet.

16:22 Just as each country has its own unique cuisine,

16:26 different countries can have different approaches to developing

16:30 their own recipe for a livable planet.

16:32 So here we have 4 countries Uruguay,

16:35 New Zealand,

16:36 Sierra Leone,

16:37 and Brazil.

16:38 So maybe I can ask you,

16:40 starting with your,

16:41 uh,

16:41 with Minister Costa,

16:43 how are you scaling up climate action in your country's agri-food system?

16:48 Over to you,

16:48 Minister Costa.

16:50 Thank you very much.

16:51 Uh,

16:52 thank you for World Bank

16:54 and group for,

16:55 uh,

16:55 this space and they invite us

16:57 to share,

16:58 uh,

16:58 our opinions.

17:00 Uh,

17:01 first of all,

17:01 um.

17:03 I don't agree so much with the figures that we are responsible

17:09 for 30% of all the emissions from the agriculture.

17:13 So it's a point of metrics.

17:15 It's a point we have to discuss,

17:18 but

17:19 instead of this,

17:21 if we are responsible for 30%,

17:24 we are responsible also

17:27 for 100% of the sequestration

17:29 of carbon.

17:31 And also we are responsible

17:33 for 100% of the food security of the world,

17:36 so we can,

17:38 we have another point of view

17:40 from the agriculture.

17:42 No,

17:42 we are not

17:45 we face the problem

17:47 from this side,

17:48 we really are a problem.

17:51 We cannot discuss,

17:52 we can't improve.

17:53 We can't improve a lot.

17:55 But the fibers of the world,

17:57 the biofuel of the world.

18:00 And the and and to feed the world of an increasing population

18:04 is the responsibility

18:06 of agriculture.

18:09 So for answer to the question,

18:11 um,

18:12 Uruguay is an agro sporting country with

18:15 its economy heavily

18:17 reliant

18:18 on its natural resources.

18:20 For this reason,

18:21 our country has developed over several

18:25 decades

18:26 regulations and legislation for the protection of natural resources

18:31 and to promote efficient resource use

18:34 while also strongly committing to climate goals.

18:38 who are currently responsible

18:40 for

18:42 0.05% of the world's emissions,

18:46 with particularly

18:48 that we are a country that made its energy transition before

18:52 many other countries

18:53 and that has been protected by law.

18:57 98% of all electricity generation is from renewable resources.

19:03 Furthermore,

19:04 I want to emphasize that Uruguay is

19:06 highly vulnerable to increased climate variability.

19:10 Therefore,

19:10 the emphasis

19:12 of our climate policy is adaptation.

19:15 For our country,

19:16 many of the mitigation and adaptation co-benefits

19:20 efforts

19:21 lie

19:22 in implementing.

19:25 Improvements in the

19:28 efficiency

19:29 of production system based

19:31 on renewable energies protection of native forests

19:34 and livestock production mainly on native pastures.

19:38 The efforts proposals in our NDC

19:41 for the agriculture sector are based on science,

19:44 evidence,

19:45 and focused

19:46 in three aspects reducing methane emissions

19:49 intensity in meat and

19:51 dairy production

19:53 through.

19:54 The promotion of good herd and pasture management practices,

19:58 improvements in animal health,

20:00 and exploration of technologies to reduce emissions such as genetics,

20:06 metogenesis

20:07 inhibitors,

20:08 and biodisasters.

20:10 Reducing nitrous oxide

20:13 in agriculture through crop management

20:16 and innovation in fertilizer use.

20:19 And in promotion

20:21 of carbon conservation in soil and vegetation cover,

20:25 taking in account that the country protects soils by law

20:28 since 1980.

20:31 And

20:32 with our mandatory soil use and management plans.

20:36 In our 3rd NDC

20:38 we have worked.

20:40 Jointly with agricultural.

20:45 Private and public institutions to identify the actions

20:48 and means of implementation necessary to achieve

20:52 the proposed objectives

20:53 which resulted in sectoral roadmaps.

20:57 Thank you for.

20:58 Thank you Minister Costa,

20:59 and I couldn't agree more.

21:00 I think,

21:01 you know,

21:02 agriculture's blamed for a lot,

21:04 but we need to look at the metrics the other way too.

21:06 I think the potential to,

21:08 to address a lot of these issues is also in the agri-food sector.

21:12 But Ambassador Horn,

21:13 could you please

21:14 elaborate on how your country,

21:16 New Zealand,

21:17 is scaling up climate action in the agri-food system?

21:21 Thank you very much and,

21:22 and thanks,

21:23 um,

21:23 to Bill for a really informative presentation there,

21:26 um,

21:26 which,

21:27 um,

21:28 from our perspective,

21:29 um,

21:30 New Zealand,

21:31 it really hits home to us because as,

21:33 as a developed country,

21:34 um,

21:34 we are somewhat unusual in our emission system.

21:37 Um,

21:37 10% of our GDP is based on agriculture.

21:40 We export 85% of the food.

21:42 But 53% of our emissions are from agriculture.

21:45 So this is a clear and present danger to New

21:48 Zealand as we try and manage our own NDC system.

21:50 So,

21:50 thank you for that report.

21:52 That is very much what we focus on in our country.

21:55 So,

21:55 thank you first of all for an invitation to this important event.

21:58 My apologies,

21:59 our minister,

22:00 uh,

22:00 for Climate Change,

22:01 the Honorable Simon Watts,

22:02 was wanting to attend,

22:03 but he's also co-facilitating the Article 6

22:05 negotiations,

22:06 and that is,

22:07 um,

22:07 keeping him somewhat busy.

22:09 Um.

22:10 As highlighted in the recipe for a livable Planet report,

22:13 there,

22:13 there are many effective options for improving

22:16 agricultural food systems to reduce emissions,

22:18 but obviously,

22:19 the key element is reducing emissions

22:21 while improving productivity and food security.

22:24 Um,

22:25 I'm gonna focus on my remarks over

22:27 both questions on,

22:28 on,

22:28 on a few items from the menu of options

22:31 and the recipe of,

22:32 for a livable planet report,

22:33 which are based on our own experience in New Zealand.

22:36 Um,

22:36 so I'll focus,

22:37 um,

22:38 Subsidies,

22:39 innovation,

22:39 and global collaboration.

22:41 So if I look at subsidies,

22:43 um,

22:44 you know,

22:44 as I said,

22:44 it's been the backbone of New Zealand and our

22:47 agriculture sector's prided itself on innovation,

22:50 capability,

22:50 and efficiency.

22:52 Our food producers are mainly family farms,

22:54 um,

22:54 but they're business people and they consider themselves stewards,

22:57 stewards of the land.

22:58 Um,

22:59 40 years ago,

23:00 um,

23:01 New Zealand removed all our support for

23:02 agriculture as part of economy-wide reforms.

23:05 This was a huge shift in New Zealand.

23:08 Um,

23:08 supported made up of 40% for our sheep farmers.

23:11 Farmers had to adapt.

23:13 They had to search for new export markets,

23:15 but they were also able to produce more

23:17 with using less.

23:18 For example,

23:19 as a As a result of the reform,

23:20 we had 70 million sheep in our country in 1983.

23:23 By 2005,

23:25 we had 40 million,

23:26 and production removals remained largely the same.

23:28 If you think of that from an efficiency and a sustainability perspective,

23:31 that's quite significant.

23:33 Um,

23:34 export revenue doubled in 10 years following these reforms,

23:37 increased by over 60% in the subsequent decade.

23:40 But there,

23:41 I suppose the point that's relevant here is it's

23:42 the elimination of subsidies that's had the positive environmental benefits

23:47 because it spurs the uptake of better farm management practices.

23:50 It reduces the use of environmentally harmful inputs

23:53 and stopping farming on marginal land,

23:56 and emissions intensities have continued to fall.

23:59 And in terms of other steps we're taking is we

24:01 are committed in terms to measuring all farm emissions by 2025

24:06 and by introducing,

24:07 um,

24:08 emissions pricing systems by 2030.

24:11 So I'll,

24:11 I'll stop there now and I'll continue perhaps on the themes

24:14 of collaboration and innovation a wee bit later in this panel.

24:18 Thank you,

24:18 Ambassador Horn.

24:19 Very,

24:19 uh,

24:19 very interesting innovations,

24:21 um,

24:22 that you've talked about here.

24:23 Um,

24:24 uh,

24:24 Mr.,

24:25 Mr.

24:26 Kainane,

24:26 could you please elaborate how you are dealing

24:29 with climate action in the agri-food system in your country of Sierra Leone?

24:34 Thank you very much,

24:35 Madam Chair.

24:37 Uh,

24:37 first of all,

24:38 apologies,

24:39 uh,

24:39 from Doctor,

24:41 uh,

24:42 Kanda Yamkela who could not be here

24:44 and I'm filling in for him.

24:47 Uh,

24:47 in Sierra Leone.

24:50 Realizing the importance of

24:53 Soil health

24:56 to

24:58 everything,

24:59 the government has just suddenly undertaken a national

25:03 soil survey

25:05 so we are able to identify

25:08 particular

25:08 soil characteristics

25:10 for

25:12 growing specific crops.

25:14 So that's one thing we have done.

25:17 And

25:18 we have introduced

25:21 on a very large scale.

25:23 Agroforestry.

25:25 I mean here we are talking about

25:28 uh

25:30 mixing

25:31 crops,

25:33 food crops with tree crops

25:35 to the extent that um

25:37 um the uh

25:39 there's a symbiotic relationship between them

25:42 um some fixing nitrogen,

25:44 but also the fact that

25:45 you could have on the same

25:47 um soil,

25:48 uh,

25:49 the same land size

25:50 different uh activities going on.

25:54 And then,

25:54 uh,

25:57 recently

25:57 we are exploring,

25:59 uh,

26:00 the concept of agrivoltaics,

26:03 which is actually,

26:04 uh,

26:05 combining solar energy production

26:07 with,

26:07 uh,

26:08 agricultural,

26:09 uh,

26:10 production,

26:12 and this will ensure that,

26:13 uh,

26:14 we maximize land productivity

26:17 per

26:18 unit of,

26:19 uh,

26:20 the land,

26:21 unit of the land.

26:23 And then cover cropping is one thing

26:26 we are doing.

26:27 It is to ensure that um.

26:30 Um,

26:30 it protects soil

26:32 and also sequester carbon.

26:34 Our view is that all of these solutions

26:37 align with the global climate

26:40 goals

26:41 and can transform agri-food systems.

26:44 Into

26:45 drivers of resilience and sustainability.

26:49 Over.

26:51 Thank you very much,

26:52 uh,

26:52 Mr.

26:52 Savian,

26:53 could we hear from you about what Brazil is doing

26:56 to scale up climate action in the agri-food sector.

27:00 Thank you,

27:00 uh,

27:01 very much,

27:02 which is,

27:03 everyone

27:04 in 2023,

27:07 uh,

27:08 which in 2000.

27:11 23.

27:12 The minister of agrarian Development and

27:15 Family Farming returned the Brazilian institutions

27:20 after being shined by a coup

27:23 that overthrew President Dilma Rousseff.

27:27 Now

27:28 President Lula government understand that

27:31 family sustainable agricological farm.

27:34 is fundamental to face climate change

27:38 and also for the future of the world.

27:42 It is only which action

27:45 that we will achieve the sustainable transition

27:49 that our time demands.

27:51 Between

27:53 2023

27:55 and 2024,

27:57 Brazil had accept deforestation by more than

28:02 30% in the Amazon,

28:04 the biomeome that holds more than half of the planet's biodiversity.

28:10 Deforestation

28:12 was also reduced

28:14 by

28:14 25 in the Cerrado

28:17 Cejado biome,

28:19 which has more than 6000 different species of trees.

28:26 It is by understanding the importance of combining

28:31 the creation of opportunities,

28:34 food production

28:35 and environmental preservation.

28:38 That the government of Brazil

28:41 has launched the product Flores agreement.

28:45 The goal is to create a production

28:48 system

28:49 that combine family farming and the restoration in Brazilian biomes.

28:55 The program

28:56 is work to disseminate techno technical

29:01 knowledge

29:02 which is essential for each the need that climate change impose on us.

29:09 Seed banks,

29:11 seedling,

29:12 nurseries,

29:13 demonstration units,

29:15 and community centers for collective education

29:19 will also be encouraged.

29:22 President Lula's government

29:24 and your country

29:26 are committed to face climate change.

29:29 I feel privileged

29:31 of building a sustainable ecological transition

29:35 for Brazil.

29:37 In 2025

29:40 we want to meet everyone in Berlin

29:43 at Copy 30

29:46 and we also want to be

29:48 able to share

29:50 the policies and the results

29:52 of

29:53 your work.

29:54 Thank you very much.

29:56 Thank you very much Secretary Savian.

30:01 Yes,

30:01 I think we're all looking forward to being in Belem next year.

30:04 So thank you very much for that.

30:06 Um,

30:07 let me follow up with a few questions for our panelists.

30:11 Um,

30:11 maybe a question for,

30:12 for Minister Costa.

30:14 Um,

30:14 Uruguay recently secured a $350 million World Bank loan

30:20 with a unique mechanism that reduces interest payments

30:24 if the country meets targets

30:26 for lowering methane emissions in beef production.

30:30 So could you,

30:31 could you tell us about

30:35 How your ministry is approaching the

30:37 challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions

30:41 from livestock

30:42 while maintaining productivity.

30:46 OK,

30:47 thank you for the question.

30:48 Uruguay

30:49 made a significant step in its climate commitments

30:53 by linking mitigation targets to the country's finances.

30:58 The first to highlight

31:00 is the strong institutionality in our country.

31:03 In this case,

31:04 the Ministry

31:06 of Agriculture,

31:07 the Ministry of the Environment,

31:08 and the Ministry of Economy and Finance

31:11 worked together to design an intervention

31:15 at the field level financed by the interest rate savings generated.

31:20 Based on the evidence,

31:22 we generated a program for technical assistance

31:26 for livestock producers.

31:28 This program is based on working together with producers

31:33 on what we call the triple win

31:36 reduce methane emissions per kilogram of meat produced,

31:41 increase productivity

31:42 and income of producers,

31:44 and improve biodiversity indicators of the farm.

31:47 With previous similar programs we achieved

31:50 18% of reduction

31:53 in emissions intensity

31:55 per kilogram of meat produced,

31:57 80% increase in beef production,

32:01 and

32:02 17% increase in sheep meat production,

32:06 7% increase in plant biodiversity.

32:09 A particular feature

32:11 of this program.

32:13 Is that

32:14 it's being designed

32:16 and will be implemented jointly with academic institutions,

32:20 universities,

32:21 research institutes,

32:22 agricultural institutes,

32:24 and monitoring

32:25 of the main producers associations

32:28 with the aim

32:29 of the making in a country program

32:31 that we all support because there is a great responsibility

32:35 associated with the use of public funds.

32:41 Thank you very much Minister Costa.

32:43 Um,

32:44 question for you,

32:44 Ambassador Horn.

32:45 Uh,

32:45 New Zealand has recently become

32:47 the latest donor to support the World Bank's Food System 2030 Trust fund,

32:52 so we thank you for that.

32:53 Um,

32:54 which key policies do you think have

32:56 been effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions?

33:00 In New Zealand's agrifood sector,

33:02 specifically with regards to methane.

33:05 Well,

33:05 well,

33:05 thank you very much,

33:06 and,

33:06 and also thank you to Minister Costa.

33:08 I was listening very carefully there because obviously when we talk methane,

33:11 like yourself,

33:11 it's biogenic methane

33:13 very much related to,

33:14 to livestock.

33:15 So,

33:16 um,

33:17 and,

33:17 and I'll come back to that in a,

33:18 in a minute.

33:19 So,

33:19 obviously,

33:19 we don't do subsidies in New Zealand anymore,

33:21 but obviously,

33:22 the government still has a role in supporting the provision of,

33:25 of public goods.

33:27 Wow.

33:31 Is that all right?

33:32 Um,

33:32 shifting our focus,

33:33 um,

33:34 to supporting the,

33:35 the sector through levers like research and development,

33:38 we believe the best way to support our food producers

33:41 is to empower positive changes at the farm level,

33:43 incentivizing constant innovation that benefits sustainability,

33:47 basically.

33:48 Producing more with using less.

33:50 These are the areas we can make movements on.

33:52 New Zealand's had a long history of

33:54 actually having significant amounts of renewable energy.

33:56 We currently sit at over 90% of our energy production is renewable for our grid.

34:00 So the place that we can actually make a change is in the biogenic methane.

34:04 Area.

34:05 One thing we've committed is 400 million over the next 4 years

34:08 to accelerate the availability of tools

34:10 and technology to reduce on-farm emissions,

34:14 including through our domestic agricultural greenhouse gas Research Center

34:18 and through AgriZero,

34:19 which is a 50/50,

34:21 um,

34:21 public-private joint venture

34:23 aimed at commercializing promising solutions.

34:26 Um,

34:26 these are different kinds of promising solutions.

34:28 These are ranging things from UV treatment of seeds to improve,

34:32 to improve,

34:32 um,

34:33 lower methane.

34:34 Genetics,

34:35 vaccines,

34:36 bolus.

34:37 It's,

34:37 it's basically,

34:38 there's not a silver bullet here.

34:39 It's going to be a whole range of different

34:41 initiatives that are going to bring down methane.

34:44 Um,

34:44 we are getting some very promising results in some of these areas.

34:47 We're investing not just in New Zealand,

34:49 but also offshore.

34:51 This is the one area we really are committed to,

34:53 to making a difference.

34:54 And obviously,

34:55 New Zealand has a pasture-based system which like many

34:57 developing countries and like our friends in Uruguay.

35:00 So that gets me to the second point,

35:02 which is about global collaboration.

35:04 Domestic's important,

35:05 but the scale of the challenges

35:06 for agrifood systems requires global collaboration.

35:10 New Zealand's a founding member of the Global Research Alliance for Greenhouse,

35:14 agricultural greenhouse gasses,

35:15 the GRA.

35:16 That's got 68 members now,

35:18 and that alliance has got a commitment

35:20 to working together

35:22 to find ways to grow more food

35:24 without growing greenhouse gas emissions,

35:26 and that is the magic solution we've got to aim for.

35:30 Through the Alliance,

35:31 our international development program,

35:33 and other initiatives,

35:34 New Zealand collaborates with and provides support to the Pacific

35:37 and to the rest of the world.

35:38 to improve food security,

35:40 improve access to irrigation,

35:42 and build the climate resilience of indigenous crops and plants,

35:45 and build sustainable food systems.

35:47 Um,

35:48 as you noted,

35:48 we are proud to partner with the World Bank through its Food Systems 2030 fund.

35:53 We're providing over $16.5 million New Zealand

35:55 dollars through this fund to support countries

35:57 in East and Southern Africa to develop food system climate action plans,

36:01 which highlight mitigation and adaptation

36:04 at each stage of the value chain.

36:06 And identify bankable investment strategies because it's getting that private

36:11 sector investment in here that will make the difference.

36:14 The aim is to enable countries to access climate

36:17 and gender-smart finance and make sustainable investment decisions,

36:21 including around options

36:22 to repurpose environmentally harmful agricultural subsidies.

36:27 We're also investing another 25 New Zealand

36:30 million.

36:30 That,

36:30 that's about.

36:31 About 15 US

36:32 um into our climate smart agriculture initiative,

36:34 um,

36:35 at our Ministry of Primary Industry

36:36 and that focuses on identifying opportunities to build

36:40 opportunities to build low emission production food systems

36:43 across Africa,

36:44 across ASEAN,

36:45 Latin America and the Caribbean.

36:48 This emission,

36:48 it supports emissions measurement

36:51 because

36:52 you can only manage what you mission,

36:53 and this gets back to your point,

36:54 Bill.

36:54 You only know what the problem is when you measure it,

36:57 um,

36:57 to meet international targets.

36:59 So,

36:59 um.

37:00 I think at that point I'll,

37:02 I'll wrap up.

37:03 I think my thanks to the speakers for your insightful words,

37:05 and I look forward to hearing a few more discussions from the other panelists.

37:08 Thank you.

37:09 Thank you,

37:09 Ambassador Horn.

37:10 So maybe let me,

37:11 I know we're running out of time,

37:12 but,

37:14 but,

37:14 um,

37:15 uh,

37:15 Mr.

37:15 uh,

37:15 Kainane,

37:16 Sierra Lee.

37:17 faces growing challenges to its food and nutrition security

37:20 as a result of climate change and other threats.

37:23 What measures is your government taking?

37:26 Is your government taking to enhance the climate resilience

37:29 of the food sector while reducing emissions where possible?

37:35 Yeah,

37:36 thank you very much,

37:37 uh,

37:37 Madam Chair.

37:39 Yeah,

37:39 uh,

37:39 Sierra Leone,

37:41 the,

37:41 the,

37:41 the president of the Republic of Sierra Leone is very,

37:44 very serious about,

37:45 uh,

37:46 uh,

37:46 reducing,

37:47 uh,

37:48 climate

37:49 challenges for,

37:50 for

37:51 initially for

37:53 the country,

37:54 but

37:55 globally for

37:56 the whole world.

37:57 Um,

37:59 with,

37:59 with this in mind,

38:01 there has been a lot of outreach to

38:05 smallholders

38:06 because they account for

38:08 75% of the producers in the country,

38:13 and

38:13 if you are able to target them

38:16 and ensure that they are aware of,

38:18 um,

38:19 that they are aware of the challenges,

38:22 because as I speak here.

38:23 Uh,

38:24 over 30% of

38:26 the rice

38:27 feeds

38:29 were devastated this year

38:30 because of the rains,

38:32 so

38:33 they are aware of that,

38:34 but how

38:37 What measures are they going to take to

38:40 to

38:41 ensure that this does not

38:43 affect them?

38:44 These are the things that the government of Sierra Leone is doing,

38:48 and we are working together

38:50 with colleagues from

38:53 other uh we are we are.

38:56 A member of

38:57 the Alliance of

38:59 champions for Food Systems transformation,

39:03 I mean

39:03 Sierra Leone,

39:04 Brazil,

39:06 uh,

39:06 Rwanda,

39:08 uh,

39:08 uh,

39:08 Norway,

39:09 and Cambodia,

39:11 we are

39:12 talking to each other on how we can mitigate some of these issues.

39:17 So

39:18 because of the,

39:18 the,

39:19 the importance of uh.

39:21 This,

39:22 how this will affect

39:23 the,

39:24 the,

39:25 the,

39:26 the smallholder farmers,

39:28 uh,

39:28 the country,

39:29 the the government is doing everything possible

39:31 to make sure we uh resolve these issues.

39:34 Thank you.

39:36 Thank you very much.

39:37 Um,

39:37 unfortunately we are going,

39:38 we have run out of time.

39:40 I would like to thank all the panelists

39:42 for this really energizing and interesting discussion.

39:45 We've heard about major challenges,

39:47 but also innovation,

39:49 successful policies,

39:51 and the critical role of global cooperation.

39:54 I think it's clear while each country faces unique challenges,

39:57 there's a lot that we can learn from

40:00 and achieve with each other.

40:02 As we move forward,

40:03 let us take inspiration from the examples shared today

40:06 and continue to foster collaboration,

40:09 innovation and inclusivity in our efforts to combat climate change.

40:13 Thank you all very much and maybe a big round of applause for our panelists.

40:17 Thank you.

showAllTimestamps
no
transcript
Good evening everyone. A very warm welcome to the COP 29 side event titled Climate Solutions in Agri-Food Building Tomorrow's Sustainable Food Economy. My name is Shobha Shetty, and I'm the global director for the agriculture and Food department at the World Bank. Let me first introduce my distinguished panel. Uh, starting with Mr. Fernando Matos Costa, Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries of, uh, Uruguay. And then we have Mr. Stuart Horn, who's the New Zealand ambassador for climate change. Mr. Peter Kain Kaindae, who's the technical advisor to the government of Sierra Leone on renewable energy and food security, welcome. And Mr. Moises Savian, Secretary of Land Governance, Territorial Development and socio-environmental Affairs of Brazil's Ministry of Agrarian Development and Family Farming, welcome to all of you gentlemen. So global food along with water demand is set to increase by 50 to 60% in the coming decades as the world's population grows to 10 billion by 2050. However, food supplies will be severely threatened if little or no action is taken to address climate change. The numbers speak for themselves. Over the past 30 years, climate disasters such as floods and droughts have caused $3.8 trillion in crop and livestock losses. That's 5% of the value that agriculture generates annually. Water shocks disproportionately affect the poor and reduce the availability of a more inclusive agriculture and water system. The global agri-food system is itself part of the problem, being responsible for 1/3 of global greenhouse gas emissions. That's more than the emissions from electricity and heating combined. We know the hard facts. Food systems are the 1 driver of deforestation and the #1 cause of anthropogenic methane emissions. However, the good news is that agriculture can heal the planet. It is a huge untapped source of climate change action, not least by acting as a carbon sink for the world, drawing carbon from the atmosphere through ecosystems and soils. Cost effective solutions not only exist, they are proven. They include better fertilizer management, enhanced agricultural water management that optimizes the use of both green and blue water to achieve more crop per drop. And the adoption of renewable energy from farm to table, interventions like alternate wetting and drying for irrigated rice and the use of nature-based solutions are also very promising options for reducing the GHG footprint of agriculture while ensuring food security. But to reach momentum, sufficient financing needs to flow into the agri-food system that supports sustainable, climate resilient agriculture practices, including on irrigation, instead of propping up a failing food system. Today, the agriculture and food sector only receives 4% of global climate finance, but as my colleague Bill Sutton will show, the benefits for people, planet, and economies could be game changing, totaling as much as $4.3 trillion in 2030, more than the value of the German economy and a 16 to 1% return on investment. It is fitting that we are having this discussion here in Baku, where one of the main priorities is to establish a new collective quantified goal on climate finance. Before we head into our panel discussions, I would like to welcome our keynote speaker. William Sutton is the World Bank's global lead for climate and nature in the agriculture and Food global department. He will now open the floor with a keynote speech on the World Bank's recently published flagship report, Recipe for a livable Planet Achieving net zero emissions in the agri-food System. Over to you, Bill. Thank you very much everyone. Uh, thanks for joining and uh hello to everyone who is joining online as well. Um, I'm very excited to be here today and share with you a selection of key findings and recommendations from our new global flagship report Recipe for a livable Planet Achieving net zero emissions in the Agri-Food System. This is the first comprehensive global strategic framework on climate change mitigation in the agri-food system. And for those interested in the topic, we've included the QR code. We encourage you to download the, the full report, um, which is freely available online. So, um, first off, the, the first question we often get when we talk about this topic is why do we care about climate change mitigation in the agri-food system? Shouldn't we just be focusing on adaptation? Well, the, the reality is that climate change adaptation and mitigation are inextricably linked in the agri-food system. And that the agri-food system is currently caught in a vicious climate circle, and adaptation alone is not sufficient to feed the world. So as this diagram shows, we're increasing agri-food activities to feed a growing global population that's expected to grow by another 2 billion people by the middle of the century. That generates greenhouse gas emissions which in turn. Contribute to global heating. That global heating reduces agricultural yields in crop and livestock production. So to compensate for that, we further increase agricultural activities which generate more greenhouse gas emissions. So essentially we're trying to hit a moving target that we're shifting through our own actions. Instead, what we need to do is scale up action in both adaptation and mitigation and create an agri-food system that's sustainable and can help feed the world population while also help. Uh, healed, the planet. One of the key findings of the report is that greenhouse gas emissions from the agri-food system are actually significantly higher than what was previously thought, and in this figure, the bar on the left shows total annual global greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide. The yellow sheeted portion represents the agri-food system emissions. We estimate those at about 16 gigatons or 16 billion tons of CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas emissions per year. To put that into perspective, that's 1/6 more than the greenhouse gas emissions from all of the electricity and heat production globally every year. Um, the, and, and it's about nearly 1/3 of total global greenhouse gas emissions. The pie chart to the right, that's a breakdown of those agri-food emissions by categories and sources. It shows that in orange, the, the farm gate emissions, um, that's what we normally think of as crop and livestock production. That's the biggest category, but at 45%, it's still less than half of the total. The second biggest category in blue, those are the pre and post-production emissions, that's everything from the upstream production of fertilizers and pesticides to the downstream transportation, processing, retailing, household consumption, and on to food loss and waste. Together those pre and post-productions represent about a third of. Agri-food system emissions and finally in green land use change directly linked to agricultural production, the single biggest source of agri-food emissions is still net forest conversion linked to agriculture. However, if we were to combine the different livestock related categories, uh, enteric fermentation, manure management and so on, those would actually be bigger. Taken together, this underscores the importance of taking a food systems approach to this challenge. The next key point that I'd like to emphasize from the report is we find that without significant climate mitigation action in the agri-food system, the Paris Agreement goals cannot be reached. So this figure shows projected cumulative global emissions pathways between now and the end of the century, as well as our likelihood of achieving the Paris Agreement targets of limiting warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C. The red line at the top, and this is a simplified version of a figure that's in the report, the red line at the top that represents what is projected to happen if we were to eliminate all non-food emissions by 2075 but continue with the business as usual approach to agriculture and food. The agri-food emissions alone would be enough to drive us past the 1.5 degree target, and even the 2 degree target would be in serious jeopardy. Instead, what we need to try to do is achieve what's represented by the green line at the bottom, and that means achieving net zero emissions in both the non-food sectors as well as food sectors by 2050 in order to have a better than 50% chance of achieving the Paris Agreement targets and thus the theme of our report. One of the interesting features of this work is that we carried out the analysis and we developed recommendations based on World Bank country income categories to better understand the different challenges and opportunities for each of the different country types and one of the surprising I think findings is that in fact middle income countries generate. About 2/3 of agri-food emissions, and that's compared to about 21% of agri-food emissions from the high income countries and 11% of emissions from low income countries. This figure shows those emissions for the different countries' income categories both today and 30 years ago. And based on this, there are a number of important implications for climate action. First of all, in order to have a significant impact on combating climate change in the agri-food system, we have to focus efforts in those middle income countries. Second, the fastest emissions growth is coming from those blue pre and post-production processes. And third, we need to help. Uh, low, uh, sorry, low income countries to avoid those mistakes of the past and, and get on a more sustainable pathway. In the report, we actually developed a recipe for how we can achieve net zero emissions in the agri-food system by 2050 using cost-effective actions in land use, in on-farm measures, and pre and post-production processes, as well as demand changes. And these are all cost effective measures that can help us achieve net zero emissions in the agri-food system by 2050. 3 quarter of those opportunities are in the middle income countries. So as I mentioned, 2/3 of the emissions, agri-food emissions are coming from middle income countries, but 3/4 of the cost effective. are also in those countries. These measures are primarily based on existing technologies, so this recipe is doable. Some of the actions are even cost savings, such as using fertilizer and water more efficiently and reducing waste. However, we have a challenge which is that finance for agri-food mitigation is very low and needs to be scaled up significantly. Um, again, a third of emissions coming from agri-food systems. However, sorry. OK, I guess the um. Animation isn't working, but anyway, the large blue circle represents total global annual climate finance. The slightly smaller light blue circle is the total global mitigation financing, and then you come to the much smaller green circles that represents the mitigation and total climate finance for agriculture and food. Only about 4% of total climate finance is going towards the agri-food system and only 2% of mitigation finance, so we estimate that annual investments in mitigation in and food need to increase by about 18 times to $260 billion a year, represented by the yellow circle in order to put us on a pathway to net zero emissions by 2050. That sounds like a lot of money, I know, but in comparison, the world spends about $660 billion every year on public support to agriculture, including subsidies, so we estimate that by repurposing at least $70 billion of those subsidies, we could in fact cover about 25 to 30% of the cost of climate smart action in and food. So, um, again, the, the The recipe for a livable planet is doable, and every country can contribute. In the report, we come up with recommendations for how each of the different country types can best contribute. For high income countries, they can lead the way by promoting renewable energy in agri-food, providing more financial and technical support to low and middle income countries, and shifting their own subsidies towards lower emitting foods. For middle income countries, they have the greatest potential for mitigation. They can reduce conversion of forests and plant trees, cut methane in livestock and rice production, and manage soils more sustainably to store carbon and use cleaner and more energy efficient pre and post-production processes. And finally, low income countries can play a proactive role. They can bypass the high emissions development pathways by learning from the mistakes of the past, preserve and restore their forests, and finally improve agricultural practices through climate smart agriculture techniques. So that's the kind of Reader's Digest summary of the report. Again, if you're interested, um, I'd encourage you to, to download the full report, and I just wanted to mention that this work is supported by the World Bank Food Systems 2030 Trust Fund and many thanks to the, the various donors who have contributed to the trust fund. Thank you. Thank you, Bill, for these uh highly relevant insights and now let's explore how these challenges unfold in each country and the solutions that our esteemed panelists are implementing. So let me start with an opening question to all our panelists. We have just seen an overview of the new World Bank flagship report recipe for a livable planet. Just as each country has its own unique cuisine, different countries can have different approaches to developing their own recipe for a livable planet. So here we have 4 countries Uruguay, New Zealand, Sierra Leone, and Brazil. So maybe I can ask you, starting with your, uh, with Minister Costa, how are you scaling up climate action in your country's agri-food system? Over to you, Minister Costa. Thank you very much. Uh, thank you for World Bank and group for, uh, this space and they invite us to share, uh, our opinions. Uh, first of all, um. I don't agree so much with the figures that we are responsible for 30% of all the emissions from the agriculture. So it's a point of metrics. It's a point we have to discuss, but instead of this, if we are responsible for 30%, we are responsible also for 100% of the sequestration of carbon. And also we are responsible for 100% of the food security of the world, so we can, we have another point of view from the agriculture. No, we are not we face the problem from this side, we really are a problem. We cannot discuss, we can't improve. We can't improve a lot. But the fibers of the world, the biofuel of the world. And the and and to feed the world of an increasing population is the responsibility of agriculture. So for answer to the question, um, Uruguay is an agro sporting country with its economy heavily reliant on its natural resources. For this reason, our country has developed over several decades regulations and legislation for the protection of natural resources and to promote efficient resource use while also strongly committing to climate goals. who are currently responsible for 0.05% of the world's emissions, with particularly that we are a country that made its energy transition before many other countries and that has been protected by law. 98% of all electricity generation is from renewable resources. Furthermore, I want to emphasize that Uruguay is highly vulnerable to increased climate variability. Therefore, the emphasis of our climate policy is adaptation. For our country, many of the mitigation and adaptation co-benefits efforts lie in implementing. Improvements in the efficiency of production system based on renewable energies protection of native forests and livestock production mainly on native pastures. The efforts proposals in our NDC for the agriculture sector are based on science, evidence, and focused in three aspects reducing methane emissions intensity in meat and dairy production through. The promotion of good herd and pasture management practices, improvements in animal health, and exploration of technologies to reduce emissions such as genetics, metogenesis inhibitors, and biodisasters. Reducing nitrous oxide in agriculture through crop management and innovation in fertilizer use. And in promotion of carbon conservation in soil and vegetation cover, taking in account that the country protects soils by law since 1980. And with our mandatory soil use and management plans. In our 3rd NDC we have worked. Jointly with agricultural. Private and public institutions to identify the actions and means of implementation necessary to achieve the proposed objectives which resulted in sectoral roadmaps. Thank you for. Thank you Minister Costa, and I couldn't agree more. I think, you know, agriculture's blamed for a lot, but we need to look at the metrics the other way too. I think the potential to, to address a lot of these issues is also in the agri-food sector. But Ambassador Horn, could you please elaborate on how your country, New Zealand, is scaling up climate action in the agri-food system? Thank you very much and, and thanks, um, to Bill for a really informative presentation there, um, which, um, from our perspective, um, New Zealand, it really hits home to us because as, as a developed country, um, we are somewhat unusual in our emission system. Um, 10% of our GDP is based on agriculture. We export 85% of the food. But 53% of our emissions are from agriculture. So this is a clear and present danger to New Zealand as we try and manage our own NDC system. So, thank you for that report. That is very much what we focus on in our country. So, thank you first of all for an invitation to this important event. My apologies, our minister, uh, for Climate Change, the Honorable Simon Watts, was wanting to attend, but he's also co-facilitating the Article 6 negotiations, and that is, um, keeping him somewhat busy. Um. As highlighted in the recipe for a livable Planet report, there, there are many effective options for improving agricultural food systems to reduce emissions, but obviously, the key element is reducing emissions while improving productivity and food security. Um, I'm gonna focus on my remarks over both questions on, on, on a few items from the menu of options and the recipe of, for a livable planet report, which are based on our own experience in New Zealand. Um, so I'll focus, um, Subsidies, innovation, and global collaboration. So if I look at subsidies, um, you know, as I said, it's been the backbone of New Zealand and our agriculture sector's prided itself on innovation, capability, and efficiency. Our food producers are mainly family farms, um, but they're business people and they consider themselves stewards, stewards of the land. Um, 40 years ago, um, New Zealand removed all our support for agriculture as part of economy-wide reforms. This was a huge shift in New Zealand. Um, supported made up of 40% for our sheep farmers. Farmers had to adapt. They had to search for new export markets, but they were also able to produce more with using less. For example, as a As a result of the reform, we had 70 million sheep in our country in 1983. By 2005, we had 40 million, and production removals remained largely the same. If you think of that from an efficiency and a sustainability perspective, that's quite significant. Um, export revenue doubled in 10 years following these reforms, increased by over 60% in the subsequent decade. But there, I suppose the point that's relevant here is it's the elimination of subsidies that's had the positive environmental benefits because it spurs the uptake of better farm management practices. It reduces the use of environmentally harmful inputs and stopping farming on marginal land, and emissions intensities have continued to fall. And in terms of other steps we're taking is we are committed in terms to measuring all farm emissions by 2025 and by introducing, um, emissions pricing systems by 2030. So I'll, I'll stop there now and I'll continue perhaps on the themes of collaboration and innovation a wee bit later in this panel. Thank you, Ambassador Horn. Very, uh, very interesting innovations, um, that you've talked about here. Um, uh, Mr., Mr. Kainane, could you please elaborate how you are dealing with climate action in the agri-food system in your country of Sierra Leone? Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Uh, first of all, apologies, uh, from Doctor, uh, Kanda Yamkela who could not be here and I'm filling in for him. Uh, in Sierra Leone. Realizing the importance of Soil health to everything, the government has just suddenly undertaken a national soil survey so we are able to identify particular soil characteristics for growing specific crops. So that's one thing we have done. And we have introduced on a very large scale. Agroforestry. I mean here we are talking about uh mixing crops, food crops with tree crops to the extent that um um the uh there's a symbiotic relationship between them um some fixing nitrogen, but also the fact that you could have on the same um soil, uh, the same land size different uh activities going on. And then, uh, recently we are exploring, uh, the concept of agrivoltaics, which is actually, uh, combining solar energy production with, uh, agricultural, uh, production, and this will ensure that, uh, we maximize land productivity per unit of, uh, the land, unit of the land. And then cover cropping is one thing we are doing. It is to ensure that um. Um, it protects soil and also sequester carbon. Our view is that all of these solutions align with the global climate goals and can transform agri-food systems. Into drivers of resilience and sustainability. Over. Thank you very much, uh, Mr. Savian, could we hear from you about what Brazil is doing to scale up climate action in the agri-food sector. Thank you, uh, very much, which is, everyone in 2023, uh, which in 2000. 23. The minister of agrarian Development and Family Farming returned the Brazilian institutions after being shined by a coup that overthrew President Dilma Rousseff. Now President Lula government understand that family sustainable agricological farm. is fundamental to face climate change and also for the future of the world. It is only which action that we will achieve the sustainable transition that our time demands. Between 2023 and 2024, Brazil had accept deforestation by more than 30% in the Amazon, the biomeome that holds more than half of the planet's biodiversity. Deforestation was also reduced by 25 in the Cerrado Cejado biome, which has more than 6000 different species of trees. It is by understanding the importance of combining the creation of opportunities, food production and environmental preservation. That the government of Brazil has launched the product Flores agreement. The goal is to create a production system that combine family farming and the restoration in Brazilian biomes. The program is work to disseminate techno technical knowledge which is essential for each the need that climate change impose on us. Seed banks, seedling, nurseries, demonstration units, and community centers for collective education will also be encouraged. President Lula's government and your country are committed to face climate change. I feel privileged of building a sustainable ecological transition for Brazil. In 2025 we want to meet everyone in Berlin at Copy 30 and we also want to be able to share the policies and the results of your work. Thank you very much. Thank you very much Secretary Savian. Yes, I think we're all looking forward to being in Belem next year. So thank you very much for that. Um, let me follow up with a few questions for our panelists. Um, maybe a question for, for Minister Costa. Um, Uruguay recently secured a $350 million World Bank loan with a unique mechanism that reduces interest payments if the country meets targets for lowering methane emissions in beef production. So could you, could you tell us about How your ministry is approaching the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from livestock while maintaining productivity. OK, thank you for the question. Uruguay made a significant step in its climate commitments by linking mitigation targets to the country's finances. The first to highlight is the strong institutionality in our country. In this case, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of the Environment, and the Ministry of Economy and Finance worked together to design an intervention at the field level financed by the interest rate savings generated. Based on the evidence, we generated a program for technical assistance for livestock producers. This program is based on working together with producers on what we call the triple win reduce methane emissions per kilogram of meat produced, increase productivity and income of producers, and improve biodiversity indicators of the farm. With previous similar programs we achieved 18% of reduction in emissions intensity per kilogram of meat produced, 80% increase in beef production, and 17% increase in sheep meat production, 7% increase in plant biodiversity. A particular feature of this program. Is that it's being designed and will be implemented jointly with academic institutions, universities, research institutes, agricultural institutes, and monitoring of the main producers associations with the aim of the making in a country program that we all support because there is a great responsibility associated with the use of public funds. Thank you very much Minister Costa. Um, question for you, Ambassador Horn. Uh, New Zealand has recently become the latest donor to support the World Bank's Food System 2030 Trust fund, so we thank you for that. Um, which key policies do you think have been effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions? In New Zealand's agrifood sector, specifically with regards to methane. Well, well, thank you very much, and, and also thank you to Minister Costa. I was listening very carefully there because obviously when we talk methane, like yourself, it's biogenic methane very much related to, to livestock. So, um, and, and I'll come back to that in a, in a minute. So, obviously, we don't do subsidies in New Zealand anymore, but obviously, the government still has a role in supporting the provision of, of public goods. Wow. Is that all right? Um, shifting our focus, um, to supporting the, the sector through levers like research and development, we believe the best way to support our food producers is to empower positive changes at the farm level, incentivizing constant innovation that benefits sustainability, basically. Producing more with using less. These are the areas we can make movements on. New Zealand's had a long history of actually having significant amounts of renewable energy. We currently sit at over 90% of our energy production is renewable for our grid. So the place that we can actually make a change is in the biogenic methane. Area. One thing we've committed is 400 million over the next 4 years to accelerate the availability of tools and technology to reduce on-farm emissions, including through our domestic agricultural greenhouse gas Research Center and through AgriZero, which is a 50/50, um, public-private joint venture aimed at commercializing promising solutions. Um, these are different kinds of promising solutions. These are ranging things from UV treatment of seeds to improve, to improve, um, lower methane. Genetics, vaccines, bolus. It's, it's basically, there's not a silver bullet here. It's going to be a whole range of different initiatives that are going to bring down methane. Um, we are getting some very promising results in some of these areas. We're investing not just in New Zealand, but also offshore. This is the one area we really are committed to, to making a difference. And obviously, New Zealand has a pasture-based system which like many developing countries and like our friends in Uruguay. So that gets me to the second point, which is about global collaboration. Domestic's important, but the scale of the challenges for agrifood systems requires global collaboration. New Zealand's a founding member of the Global Research Alliance for Greenhouse, agricultural greenhouse gasses, the GRA. That's got 68 members now, and that alliance has got a commitment to working together to find ways to grow more food without growing greenhouse gas emissions, and that is the magic solution we've got to aim for. Through the Alliance, our international development program, and other initiatives, New Zealand collaborates with and provides support to the Pacific and to the rest of the world. to improve food security, improve access to irrigation, and build the climate resilience of indigenous crops and plants, and build sustainable food systems. Um, as you noted, we are proud to partner with the World Bank through its Food Systems 2030 fund. We're providing over $16.5 million New Zealand dollars through this fund to support countries in East and Southern Africa to develop food system climate action plans, which highlight mitigation and adaptation at each stage of the value chain. And identify bankable investment strategies because it's getting that private sector investment in here that will make the difference. The aim is to enable countries to access climate and gender-smart finance and make sustainable investment decisions, including around options to repurpose environmentally harmful agricultural subsidies. We're also investing another 25 New Zealand million. That, that's about. About 15 US um into our climate smart agriculture initiative, um, at our Ministry of Primary Industry and that focuses on identifying opportunities to build opportunities to build low emission production food systems across Africa, across ASEAN, Latin America and the Caribbean. This emission, it supports emissions measurement because you can only manage what you mission, and this gets back to your point, Bill. You only know what the problem is when you measure it, um, to meet international targets. So, um. I think at that point I'll, I'll wrap up. I think my thanks to the speakers for your insightful words, and I look forward to hearing a few more discussions from the other panelists. Thank you. Thank you, Ambassador Horn. So maybe let me, I know we're running out of time, but, but, um, uh, Mr. uh, Kainane, Sierra Lee. faces growing challenges to its food and nutrition security as a result of climate change and other threats. What measures is your government taking? Is your government taking to enhance the climate resilience of the food sector while reducing emissions where possible? Yeah, thank you very much, uh, Madam Chair. Yeah, uh, Sierra Leone, the, the, the president of the Republic of Sierra Leone is very, very serious about, uh, uh, reducing, uh, climate challenges for, for initially for the country, but globally for the whole world. Um, with, with this in mind, there has been a lot of outreach to smallholders because they account for 75% of the producers in the country, and if you are able to target them and ensure that they are aware of, um, that they are aware of the challenges, because as I speak here. Uh, over 30% of the rice feeds were devastated this year because of the rains, so they are aware of that, but how What measures are they going to take to to ensure that this does not affect them? These are the things that the government of Sierra Leone is doing, and we are working together with colleagues from other uh we are we are. A member of the Alliance of champions for Food Systems transformation, I mean Sierra Leone, Brazil, uh, Rwanda, uh, uh, Norway, and Cambodia, we are talking to each other on how we can mitigate some of these issues. So because of the, the, the importance of uh. This, how this will affect the, the, the, the smallholder farmers, uh, the country, the the government is doing everything possible to make sure we uh resolve these issues. Thank you. Thank you very much. Um, unfortunately we are going, we have run out of time. I would like to thank all the panelists for this really energizing and interesting discussion. We've heard about major challenges, but also innovation, successful policies, and the critical role of global cooperation. I think it's clear while each country faces unique challenges, there's a lot that we can learn from and achieve with each other. As we move forward, let us take inspiration from the examples shared today and continue to foster collaboration, innovation and inclusivity in our efforts to combat climate change. Thank you all very much and maybe a big round of applause for our panelists. Thank you.
showAllTranscripts
no
duration
PT41M52S
scene7File
worldbank/COP29 - Climate Solutions in Agrifood
scene7Domain
https://worldbank.scene7.com/
scene7FileAvs
worldbank/COP29 - Climate Solutions in Agrifood-AVS
title
COP29 Climate Solutions in Agrifood
description
COP29 Climate Solutions in Agrifood
showTimestampAndTranscript
yes
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-3
col-lg-3
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-7
col-lg-7
  • add-style
  • lp-body-content
Building on the “Recipe for a Livable Planet” report, the event will explore how climate-smart agricultural practices along with improved irrigation and water management can reduce emissions, enhance productivity, and build resilience in a warming world with increasing water scarcity.
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-2
col-lg-2