00:04 Any World Bank project can result in sanctions proceedings.
00:08 For example,
00:09 when a country receives a loan from the bank,
00:12 all actors within the resulting project
00:14 are bound by an obligation
00:16 to work ethically.
00:18 This means that all contractors,
00:20 suppliers,
00:21 and bidders must avoid misconduct,
00:24 including bribes,
00:26 misrepresentation,
00:27 and collusion.
00:29 When the bank's investigators find evidence of misconduct,
00:33 the case goes through a multi-step review
00:36 within the World Bank's quasi-adjudicative system known as the sanction system.
00:41 This system is designed to respond
00:43 to possible sanctionable misconduct by non-bank entities
00:48 like bidders
00:49 and contractors.
00:51 The conduct of bank staff is of course
00:54 governed by our staff rules and other processes.
00:57 The Independent Integrity Vice Presidency
01:00 investigates suspected sanctionable practices.
01:04 If it believes there is sufficient evidence of misconduct.
01:07 INT submits the case to an impartial first tier evaluation and suspension officer.
01:14 For cases involving IBRD or IDA projects,
01:18 this position is titled the Chief suspension and debarment Officer.
01:23 The officer makes a determination
01:25 and recommends a sanction if he or she finds that it is more likely than not
01:30 that the accused company or individual
01:32 or the respondent
01:34 engaged in misconduct.
01:36 The evaluation officer also has authority to temporarily
01:40 suspend the respondent from contracting with the bank
01:44 until the sanctions proceedings conclude.
01:46 Many respondents do not move past this stage.
01:49 They accept the recommended sanction and work to improve
01:52 their internal integrity standards to avoid future misconduct.
01:57 However,
01:57 about 1/3 of all respondents contest the decision at the 1st tier
02:02 and move to the 2nd and final tier of the sanctions proceedings
02:05 known as the sanctions board.
02:08 The sanctions board provides INT and the respondent an opportunity
02:13 to explain their arguments and submit additional evidence both in writing
02:17 and at an optional hearing.
02:19 The sanctions board then reviews the case from an impartial perspective.
02:24 Without deference to the first tier's recommendation and issues
02:28 a final public decision that cannot be appealed further.
02:32 This decision takes into account the entire expanded record,
02:36 including statements made at the hearing.
02:38 As such,
02:39 it may apply a sanction against the respondent proportionate to the misconduct.
02:44 However,
02:45 it may also find that the evidence is not sufficient
02:48 to support some of or all of the allegations and
02:52 may terminate the proceedings,
02:53 releasing the respondent without sanction.
02:56 This happens rarely but is a possibility under the sanctions process.
03:01 Any resulting sanction is tailored to each case
03:04 and often includes a debarment with conditional release.
03:08 This means that the company or individual cannot
03:11 bid on or benefit from World Bank projects
03:15 and can only be released from this
03:17 debarment if it complies with specific conditions.
03:20 The sanctions board works to select conditions
03:23 that will reduce the risk of future misconduct
03:26 while ensuring that this company or individual
03:28 can be a good partner in development.
03:31 Once the conditions are satisfied as assessed by
03:34 the independent integrity compliance officer at the bank,
03:38 the company's sanction is terminated,
03:40 and they can again work on bank group projects.
03:43 This completes the sanctions case life cycle.
03:47 For more information,
03:48 please visit the sanction system web portal at the following address.
- add-style
- lp-body-content