col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
videoType
dynamic-media
videoDmUrl
https://delivery-p136806-e1377785.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:ed8ce968-ddbb-4e11-9dd6-ddeda2be1c89/play?assetname=TOPIC+Toolbox+Tutorial+-+English.mp4
keyFrameImage
timestamp

00:01 Good day and welcome to this tutorial into the toolbox for assessing

00:05 available and suitable plastic waste management

00:07 solutions on small and remote islands.

00:11 My name is Tiller Fogler.

00:12 I am working for Osnabruck,

00:14 Germany-based waste management advisory and auditing firm Sugloss.

00:19 Together with our Malaysian partner LaSAU,

00:22 we elaborated this toolbox on behalf of the World Bank

00:26 and CASA,

00:27 the Malaysian Ministry for Environment and Water.

00:33 I'm presenting

00:34 an interactive and automated toolbox that suggests suitable

00:38 solutions and technologies for small and remote islands.

00:43 And its development has been based on the analysis undertaken

00:47 in Malaysia.

00:49 Nevertheless,

00:49 we deem it applicable also beyond the Malaysian context,

00:53 also covering small and remote islands or functional islands

00:58 in countries with

00:59 comparable characteristics,

01:01 as can be found in Malaysia.

01:04 Importantly,

01:05 this toolbox covers the quantitative aspects of a waste

01:09 management system on a small and remote islands.

01:12 It uses

01:13 these quantitative data points to make an assessment on the collection rate,

01:17 the seasonality of waste,

01:19 the plastic waste volume,

01:21 and the market access.

01:25 In the scheme

01:27 Visible right now,

01:28 we see the required quantitative data on the left in the form of the big blue arrow,

01:34 and then what the toolbox does.

01:36 It translates these quantitative data inputs into 3 recommendation clusters.

01:42 One is concerning general waste management practices.

01:45 One is concerning waste

01:48 market access,

01:49 and one is concerning

01:52 concrete technology

01:53 and solution applications on the islands.

01:57 These technology and solutions are described in details in the form of technology

02:02 fact sheets and then presented as an overview in a technology synthesis.

02:07 All these 3 recommendation clusters are then translated

02:11 into a conclusion sheet that can easily be printed.

02:16 As I said,

02:17 this toolbox is an interactive and automated

02:21 tool,

02:22 and I want to guide you through its functionality

02:25 and walk with you step by step on how it works,

02:28 what data is required,

02:29 and what it does.

02:34 So here we are on the introductory sheet

02:37 and we see the gray box which is more or less what I'm just,

02:42 what I've just told you orally,

02:44 and we can use this Excel sheet

02:48 through clicking onto different buttons.

02:51 This first sheet has one button which I click at right now.

02:55 This guides us to the data input sheet.

02:58 This data input sheet

03:01 requires

03:02 fundamental data

03:04 in order to then make an assessment on what technologies and solutions are suitable

03:09 and again also to guide on general waste management practices.

03:14 We already have a little bit of data given here,

03:17 something that we can of course modify.

03:19 So currently we talk about 1500

03:22 residents on the islands.

03:23 We can also take a different number,

03:25 for example,

03:26 1800.

03:29 To stay in the range,

03:30 we can modify the

03:32 volume of solid waste to

03:35 remain in a realistic range,

03:37 for example,

03:37 0.5 kg

03:40 per capita per day.

03:42 The waste collection rate currently at a rather high end.

03:45 We could also put a lower end,

03:47 and the estimated share of plastic,

03:49 14% is realistic,

03:51 as would

03:52 12% be.

03:55 Then as many

03:57 small and remote islands.

04:00 Rely

04:01 economically on tourism.

04:03 This also translates into seasonally higher

04:07 waste volumes from tourism.

04:09 Currently we have put this at a rather high amount of 60%.

04:13 We can also use an island that is less characterized by tourism,

04:17 for example,

04:18 at around 20%.

04:20 As you can see on the right,

04:22 depending on the exact data that is put in,

04:25 there's already

04:26 2 recommendations given concerning the general waste management practices.

04:34 As a next step within the toolbox.

04:37 We have 3 more buttons that guide into different

04:41 sheets.

04:42 I want to start with the market access analysis.

04:48 The rationale behind this market access calculation is that

04:53 if recyclables collected from the islands can be fed into

04:58 the mainland.

05:00 Markets,

05:01 this is a preferable option as

05:04 these markets at scale work economically efficient.

05:09 Therefore,

05:10 we have used common materials that can be found

05:13 on Malaysian islands

05:15 and already put some prices.

05:17 Of course these differ

05:19 depending on the offtake point,

05:21 for example,

05:21 rather

05:23 at more distance from the actual processors,

05:27 a bit lower because transport costs need to be accounted for

05:30 or higher if they can be fed

05:32 indirectly to the converters.

05:36 So as I said,

05:37 we have common fractions,

05:39 aluminum cans,

05:40 other metals,

05:41 old corrugated cotton buoy,

05:43 or plastic as rigid monomaterials.

05:46 We can also add another category,

05:48 for example,

05:49 PET bottles.

05:51 Which are also quite common

05:53 and give a price that could be maybe slightly

05:57 below the one for plastic rigid monomaterials.

06:02 I will now put in a common share of percentage of the collected waste.

06:08 Let's say

06:10 aluminum could be 6%.

06:12 Other

06:13 metals could be around 12%,

06:16 of the sea could be at around 36%.

06:20 And then we can have maybe 35% of plastic,

06:24 and the remaining 11% would be PET bottles.

06:28 Here it is important that the percentage comes to 100%.

06:36 If we then look at the cost per trip

06:38 and the capacity per trip,

06:40 we come

06:41 to

06:42 a conclusion if the market access is viable.

06:45 Just as an example,

06:47 if

06:47 the cost per trip would be much higher,

06:50 this is just an example here,

06:52 so say 1500 Malaysian ringgits or dollars,

06:56 the market access would be highly unrealistic,

06:59 and the recommendation would also be very different.

07:07 I will now go back into the more general data sheet

07:12 and look into the overview of treatment technologies and solutions

07:17 based on the data that we have filled in here,

07:19 we will

07:21 come to a range of technologies and solutions that are within thisiLENS range.

07:26 The island's range,

07:28 the island's range is

07:31 displayed by the blue bar.

07:33 I also want to make just

07:35 one

07:36 change here in order for you to see how this can change.

07:40 For example,

07:41 if we double the number of people on the island to 3600

07:46 and then look into

07:49 The technologies

07:50 the blue bar has moved.

07:55 Yeah,

07:56 and then we see a range of technologies

07:59 suggested.

08:01 We follow

08:03 general waste handling technologies such as

08:06 separation or handling and logistics,

08:08 as well as treatment technologies.

08:11 The color scheme here is oriented at the waste hierarchy.

08:14 Recovery processes are

08:17 rated higher than disposal options that do not allow to

08:21 recover any of the material's value.

08:24 So therefore in general on the left we see material and mechanical recycling

08:29 ranked high,

08:30 feedstock or chemical recycling with the opportunity

08:33 to only recover less of the material's value

08:36 a little bit lower,

08:37 and then incineration and landfill

08:40 as some disposal generally disposal options.

08:45 We then have,

08:46 and the color scheme is a little bit different,

08:48 we then have

08:50 solutions and technologies displayed

08:53 that are applicable

08:55 in the respective island.

08:57 And

08:58 that are rated according to their potential

09:01 to contribute to plastic waste management practices.

09:05 So if we have a green colored solution or technology,

09:09 that means we see significant potential

09:11 to contribute to an island's plastic waste management.

09:16 If it's yellow,

09:18 we could say.

09:20 Colloquially said it can't hurt,

09:22 but it also

09:23 cannot really help in advancing the waste management practices on the island,

09:28 whereas we do not see any tangible value from those solutions that are marked

09:34 with a red color.

09:37 This is giving a very rough overview and for example

09:41 shows which technologies and solutions are in range.

09:44 In our

09:45 light blue bar,

09:47 for example,

09:48 sanitary landfill would be out of range,

09:51 commercial scale extrusion would also be out of range,

09:54 whereas artisanal recycling or microp pyrolysis

09:57 would generally

09:58 be

09:59 within range.

10:01 If we then

10:03 choose one technology or solution that is within range,

10:08 say

10:09 a bayer,

10:10 we can click on the respective technology or solution

10:13 and we come to a very detailed fact sheet

10:16 that gives

10:17 a very brief assessment in the beginning,

10:20 a little bit more detail in the second.

10:23 Row here,

10:24 2nd,

10:24 2nd column,

10:26 and then we come to a detailed assessment of the description,

10:30 uh,

10:30 description of the type of ways that this

10:34 solution or technology can process,

10:35 its capacity,

10:37 its costs,

10:38 it's

10:40 Output,

10:41 the requirements for operation,

10:43 the mode of operation,

10:44 environmental and social implications,

10:47 and the conclusion.

10:49 Also,

10:50 we use examples.

10:52 As I said in the beginning,

10:54 we base the assessment on Malaysia.

10:56 So these are examples that are usually available within Malaysia,

11:00 often procured locally,

11:02 but in general these principles on the left apply to all islands also

11:07 outside Malaysia.

11:10 If we,

11:10 we have again these buttons so we can go back to our matrix

11:15 and also click on a different solution or technology that might be in range,

11:20 I will

11:21 now click on controlled incineration,

11:23 and here we see the different,

11:25 the same scheme,

11:26 also description type of waste,

11:28 and so on.

11:29 And here we have

11:31 two examples given.

11:35 Maybe a solution that is

11:38 yellow colored would be ecobricks.

11:42 As a way of downcycling

11:44 and also here we see a very brief assessment

11:48 what it can be used for in this case rather for awareness building

11:52 than to actually contribute to effective waste management practices.

12:01 As you can see,

12:03 the

12:04 Technologies and solutions that are presented here,

12:07 there's a lot of detail given,

12:09 and we deem it quite a lot of text to read.

12:12 That is why we also wanted to give a

12:15 briefer assessment in the form of a synthesis sheet

12:19 which can be accessed by clicking on the synthesis button.

12:23 So here in the synthesis sheet,

12:25 I will make it smaller in order for you to see.

12:28 We also have the solutions that are in range,

12:31 um,

12:31 given the quantitative data marked by a blue frame.

12:35 Uh,

12:36 I will,

12:36 uh,

12:37 make a small amendment to the data for you to also see how this can change later on.

12:42 So all these technologies that are shown and that

12:45 are on the matrix are also shown here,

12:48 and the ones that are in range are marked by a

12:51 blue frame

12:52 and here the same assessment or let's say an abbreviated

12:57 version of the assessment that is given in the detailed sheets

12:59 is now in a very

13:01 easy to access and very

13:03 condensed manner

13:05 available.

13:08 The color code follows the same logic,

13:10 um.

13:12 The more green,

13:13 the more suitable concerning this point,

13:16 and the more red,

13:18 the less suitable,

13:19 and yellow

13:21 is somewhere in between.

13:25 Going back to the Matrix,

13:26 and as I said before,

13:28 uh,

13:31 Making a bit of an amendment in

13:33 the data,

13:34 for example,

13:35 changing the number of inhabitants to 1500,

13:39 maybe changing the

13:42 waste volume to a bit higher,

13:44 and maybe also

13:46 increasing the collection volume.

13:49 And maybe a bit lower

13:51 share of plastic

13:53 will

13:56 Result

13:59 will result in a different bar and a different set of solutions

14:04 that is

14:05 available.

14:06 So going back to the synthesis sheet,

14:08 I don't know if you still remember the one that was shown before,

14:11 but the blue bars have slightly changed.

14:14 And as an additional functionality also from here

14:18 by clicking on these buttons you can access

14:21 the more detailed descriptions.

14:30 Yeah.

14:31 I do believe we can come to an end.

14:34 There is a lot more functionality given,

14:36 a lot more information given

14:38 within this toolbox.

14:40 We do hope that it is helpful for you to assess

14:43 the solutions and technologies that are actually suitable for your island.

14:48 And as an additional aspect,

14:50 if you found a solution or technology that maybe has been offered to you

14:54 under a different name,

14:56 usually it should be included.

14:58 We designed the categories given,

15:01 for example,

15:02 technical incineration or artisanal recycling.

15:06 for them to be kind of umbrella categories that sometimes

15:11 include

15:11 other solutions.

15:12 I just want to give you one more example on that.

15:15 For example,

15:15 if we click on Artiana recycling,

15:17 we have the Schroder here,

15:19 which is a technology that is actually available in

15:23 Malaysia and of course sold as a Schroder.

15:26 It is nevertheless

15:27 Part it can be categorized as artisanal recycling process,

15:33 and the same goes for certain technology applications,

15:37 for example,

15:38 for

15:39 controlled incineration.

15:45 To come to the end

15:47 And

15:47 maybe also go to the very beginning

15:50 to our scheme,

15:52 what it does.

15:53 So we looked at the toolbox and how it uses different kinds of data

15:58 to then make recommendations.

15:59 We have the recommendations concerning waste management practices.

16:02 We have the recommendations concerning market access.

16:05 We have the assessment of plastic waste technology and solutions,

16:08 and all these

16:09 are

16:10 then taken up again in the conclusion sheet.

16:14 I will go to the conclusion sheet right now.

16:18 Which is this one,

16:20 if we wouldn't have put data in,

16:22 it would be

16:23 emptier.

16:25 By now we have

16:27 quite a bit of information,

16:29 and this

16:30 takes up

16:31 the findings that are also to be found throughout the toolbox.

16:35 It

16:35 gives

16:36 recommendations concerning the waste management practices,

16:40 concerning the market access.

16:41 And

16:43 the separation

16:44 and other technologies and solutions like handling and logistics,

16:48 material mechanical recycling,

16:51 chemical or feedstock recycling,

16:54 disposal,

16:55 landfill,

16:55 and incineration.

16:57 So this sheet is

16:59 not giving any new information,

17:00 but it allows to

17:03 Get everything at one glimpse and also is easily printable,

17:07 so if we would use the print function within Xel now,

17:10 we would have

17:13 a

17:13 printable file that can be put onto around 5 pages.

showAllTimestamps
no
transcript
Good day and welcome to this tutorial into the toolbox for assessing available and suitable plastic waste management solutions on small and remote islands. My name is Tiller Fogler. I am working for Osnabruck, Germany-based waste management advisory and auditing firm Sugloss. Together with our Malaysian partner LaSAU, we elaborated this toolbox on behalf of the World Bank and CASA, the Malaysian Ministry for Environment and Water. I'm presenting an interactive and automated toolbox that suggests suitable solutions and technologies for small and remote islands. And its development has been based on the analysis undertaken in Malaysia. Nevertheless, we deem it applicable also beyond the Malaysian context, also covering small and remote islands or functional islands in countries with comparable characteristics, as can be found in Malaysia. Importantly, this toolbox covers the quantitative aspects of a waste management system on a small and remote islands. It uses these quantitative data points to make an assessment on the collection rate, the seasonality of waste, the plastic waste volume, and the market access. In the scheme Visible right now, we see the required quantitative data on the left in the form of the big blue arrow, and then what the toolbox does. It translates these quantitative data inputs into 3 recommendation clusters. One is concerning general waste management practices. One is concerning waste market access, and one is concerning concrete technology and solution applications on the islands. These technology and solutions are described in details in the form of technology fact sheets and then presented as an overview in a technology synthesis. All these 3 recommendation clusters are then translated into a conclusion sheet that can easily be printed. As I said, this toolbox is an interactive and automated tool, and I want to guide you through its functionality and walk with you step by step on how it works, what data is required, and what it does. So here we are on the introductory sheet and we see the gray box which is more or less what I'm just, what I've just told you orally, and we can use this Excel sheet through clicking onto different buttons. This first sheet has one button which I click at right now. This guides us to the data input sheet. This data input sheet requires fundamental data in order to then make an assessment on what technologies and solutions are suitable and again also to guide on general waste management practices. We already have a little bit of data given here, something that we can of course modify. So currently we talk about 1500 residents on the islands. We can also take a different number, for example, 1800. To stay in the range, we can modify the volume of solid waste to remain in a realistic range, for example, 0.5 kg per capita per day. The waste collection rate currently at a rather high end. We could also put a lower end, and the estimated share of plastic, 14% is realistic, as would 12% be. Then as many small and remote islands. Rely economically on tourism. This also translates into seasonally higher waste volumes from tourism. Currently we have put this at a rather high amount of 60%. We can also use an island that is less characterized by tourism, for example, at around 20%. As you can see on the right, depending on the exact data that is put in, there's already 2 recommendations given concerning the general waste management practices. As a next step within the toolbox. We have 3 more buttons that guide into different sheets. I want to start with the market access analysis. The rationale behind this market access calculation is that if recyclables collected from the islands can be fed into the mainland. Markets, this is a preferable option as these markets at scale work economically efficient. Therefore, we have used common materials that can be found on Malaysian islands and already put some prices. Of course these differ depending on the offtake point, for example, rather at more distance from the actual processors, a bit lower because transport costs need to be accounted for or higher if they can be fed indirectly to the converters. So as I said, we have common fractions, aluminum cans, other metals, old corrugated cotton buoy, or plastic as rigid monomaterials. We can also add another category, for example, PET bottles. Which are also quite common and give a price that could be maybe slightly below the one for plastic rigid monomaterials. I will now put in a common share of percentage of the collected waste. Let's say aluminum could be 6%. Other metals could be around 12%, of the sea could be at around 36%. And then we can have maybe 35% of plastic, and the remaining 11% would be PET bottles. Here it is important that the percentage comes to 100%. If we then look at the cost per trip and the capacity per trip, we come to a conclusion if the market access is viable. Just as an example, if the cost per trip would be much higher, this is just an example here, so say 1500 Malaysian ringgits or dollars, the market access would be highly unrealistic, and the recommendation would also be very different. I will now go back into the more general data sheet and look into the overview of treatment technologies and solutions based on the data that we have filled in here, we will come to a range of technologies and solutions that are within thisiLENS range. The island's range, the island's range is displayed by the blue bar. I also want to make just one change here in order for you to see how this can change. For example, if we double the number of people on the island to 3600 and then look into The technologies the blue bar has moved. Yeah, and then we see a range of technologies suggested. We follow general waste handling technologies such as separation or handling and logistics, as well as treatment technologies. The color scheme here is oriented at the waste hierarchy. Recovery processes are rated higher than disposal options that do not allow to recover any of the material's value. So therefore in general on the left we see material and mechanical recycling ranked high, feedstock or chemical recycling with the opportunity to only recover less of the material's value a little bit lower, and then incineration and landfill as some disposal generally disposal options. We then have, and the color scheme is a little bit different, we then have solutions and technologies displayed that are applicable in the respective island. And that are rated according to their potential to contribute to plastic waste management practices. So if we have a green colored solution or technology, that means we see significant potential to contribute to an island's plastic waste management. If it's yellow, we could say. Colloquially said it can't hurt, but it also cannot really help in advancing the waste management practices on the island, whereas we do not see any tangible value from those solutions that are marked with a red color. This is giving a very rough overview and for example shows which technologies and solutions are in range. In our light blue bar, for example, sanitary landfill would be out of range, commercial scale extrusion would also be out of range, whereas artisanal recycling or microp pyrolysis would generally be within range. If we then choose one technology or solution that is within range, say a bayer, we can click on the respective technology or solution and we come to a very detailed fact sheet that gives a very brief assessment in the beginning, a little bit more detail in the second. Row here, 2nd, 2nd column, and then we come to a detailed assessment of the description, uh, description of the type of ways that this solution or technology can process, its capacity, its costs, it's Output, the requirements for operation, the mode of operation, environmental and social implications, and the conclusion. Also, we use examples. As I said in the beginning, we base the assessment on Malaysia. So these are examples that are usually available within Malaysia, often procured locally, but in general these principles on the left apply to all islands also outside Malaysia. If we, we have again these buttons so we can go back to our matrix and also click on a different solution or technology that might be in range, I will now click on controlled incineration, and here we see the different, the same scheme, also description type of waste, and so on. And here we have two examples given. Maybe a solution that is yellow colored would be ecobricks. As a way of downcycling and also here we see a very brief assessment what it can be used for in this case rather for awareness building than to actually contribute to effective waste management practices. As you can see, the Technologies and solutions that are presented here, there's a lot of detail given, and we deem it quite a lot of text to read. That is why we also wanted to give a briefer assessment in the form of a synthesis sheet which can be accessed by clicking on the synthesis button. So here in the synthesis sheet, I will make it smaller in order for you to see. We also have the solutions that are in range, um, given the quantitative data marked by a blue frame. Uh, I will, uh, make a small amendment to the data for you to also see how this can change later on. So all these technologies that are shown and that are on the matrix are also shown here, and the ones that are in range are marked by a blue frame and here the same assessment or let's say an abbreviated version of the assessment that is given in the detailed sheets is now in a very easy to access and very condensed manner available. The color code follows the same logic, um. The more green, the more suitable concerning this point, and the more red, the less suitable, and yellow is somewhere in between. Going back to the Matrix, and as I said before, uh, Making a bit of an amendment in the data, for example, changing the number of inhabitants to 1500, maybe changing the waste volume to a bit higher, and maybe also increasing the collection volume. And maybe a bit lower share of plastic will Result will result in a different bar and a different set of solutions that is available. So going back to the synthesis sheet, I don't know if you still remember the one that was shown before, but the blue bars have slightly changed. And as an additional functionality also from here by clicking on these buttons you can access the more detailed descriptions. Yeah. I do believe we can come to an end. There is a lot more functionality given, a lot more information given within this toolbox. We do hope that it is helpful for you to assess the solutions and technologies that are actually suitable for your island. And as an additional aspect, if you found a solution or technology that maybe has been offered to you under a different name, usually it should be included. We designed the categories given, for example, technical incineration or artisanal recycling. for them to be kind of umbrella categories that sometimes include other solutions. I just want to give you one more example on that. For example, if we click on Artiana recycling, we have the Schroder here, which is a technology that is actually available in Malaysia and of course sold as a Schroder. It is nevertheless Part it can be categorized as artisanal recycling process, and the same goes for certain technology applications, for example, for controlled incineration. To come to the end And maybe also go to the very beginning to our scheme, what it does. So we looked at the toolbox and how it uses different kinds of data to then make recommendations. We have the recommendations concerning waste management practices. We have the recommendations concerning market access. We have the assessment of plastic waste technology and solutions, and all these are then taken up again in the conclusion sheet. I will go to the conclusion sheet right now. Which is this one, if we wouldn't have put data in, it would be emptier. By now we have quite a bit of information, and this takes up the findings that are also to be found throughout the toolbox. It gives recommendations concerning the waste management practices, concerning the market access. And the separation and other technologies and solutions like handling and logistics, material mechanical recycling, chemical or feedstock recycling, disposal, landfill, and incineration. So this sheet is not giving any new information, but it allows to Get everything at one glimpse and also is easily printable, so if we would use the print function within Xel now, we would have a printable file that can be put onto around 5 pages.
showAllTranscripts
no
duration
PT17M24S
scene7File
worldbank/TOPIC Toolbox Tutorial - English
scene7Domain
https://worldbank.scene7.com/
scene7FileAvs
worldbank/TOPIC Toolbox Tutorial - English-AVS
title
TOPIC Toolbox Tutorial - English
description
TOPIC Toolbox Tutorial - English
showTimestampAndTranscript
yes
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-3
col-lg-3
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-7
col-lg-7
  • add-style
  • lp-body-content
Small and remote islands are especially vulnerable to plastic pollution. While there is no single solution to turn the tide on plastic pollution for these islands, a combination of technologies and other solutions to manage plastic waste can help. This study developed the Technology Options for Plastic waste for Island Contexts (TOPIC) Toolbox to support island decision-makers in identifying technologies and a potential mix of technologies and other solutions to treat plastic waste for their island
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-2
col-lg-2