col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-12
col-lg-12
videoType
dynamic-media
videoDmUrl
https://delivery-p136806-e1377785.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:fb34d354-a941-499d-a7f0-c67e93ebd4b1/play?assetname=WBGUNCTAD+Webinar+on+Circular+Economy+and+Textiles-20210126+1359-1.mp4
keyFrameImage
timestamp

00:56 Hello everyone,

00:57 my name is Z

00:59 and I'm a consultant with the Finance Competitiveness

01:02 and Innovation Global Practice at the World Bank.

01:05 Welcome to the 7th session of the World Bank's

01:08 learning series on circular economy and private sector development.

01:16 Jane,

01:16 uh,

01:17 in this session that is co-hosted with the

01:19 United Nations Conference for Trade and Development.

01:23 Typically chose the textiles and fashion

01:26 industry because it has a significant environmental footprint,

01:30 um,

01:31 contributing to 10% of global greenhouse gas and it

01:33 is the second biggest consumer of water among others,

01:36 but it also has the enormous potential to transform away

01:40 from the linear model across its entire value chain.

01:43 Throughout this webinar,

01:44 please feel free at any point to drop your questions in the Q&A

01:48 panel on this platform and we will address.

01:53 Uh,

01:53 this,

01:54 uh,

01:55 agenda,

01:56 uh,

01:56 we will have two panel sessions,

01:58 panel discussions,

01:59 uh,

02:00 a presentation,

02:01 and,

02:01 uh,

02:02 finally,

02:02 now,

02:03 without further ado,

02:04 let me introduce our open speaker.

02:07 This is about to end

02:08 the territory.

02:16 You are the foreign minister and

02:30 It's

02:35 OK,

02:36 so do you hear me?

02:36 It's OK?

02:39 OK.

02:40 So first of all,

02:41 uh,

02:41 um,

02:42 good morning,

02:43 good afternoon,

02:44 uh,

02:45 everyone.

02:46 And,

02:46 um,

02:47 first of all,

02:48 um,

02:49 I would like to,

02:50 to share with you some thoughts about,

02:52 uh,

02:52 textile

02:54 and circular economy.

02:56 As we strive to maintain and foster a healthy planet,

02:59 we need to change definitely

03:02 our business model and policies.

03:04 Therefore,

03:05 today's webinar is very timely and relevant.

03:08 The circular economy is on everyone's mind

03:12 when we talk about green recovery

03:14 and for good reasons.

03:16 If effectively implemented,

03:18 implemented,

03:18 circular economy contributed to several development objectives.

03:22 It can mitigate climate change,

03:25 open new opportunities for trade,

03:27 and create jobs,

03:29 help reduce the cost of waste disposal

03:31 in both developed and developing countries.

03:34 It is estimated that expanding the life cycle of materials in the economy

03:40 through reuse,

03:41 repurposing or recycling could reduce 33% of

03:45 the carbon dioxide emissions embedded in products.

03:49 So a circular economy approach in the textile industry are needed,

03:54 and they can have an immense impact

03:57 given the size of that industry.

04:00 The global textiles market is estimated at around $1 trillion US dollars,

04:05 and the clothing industry employs more than

04:07 300 million people along the value chain.

04:11 A key feature of the textile industry is that it's global.

04:16 Its supply chains are sourced from vast agriculture and petrochemical sectors,

04:21 and production stretches across the globe with

04:23 millions of jobs in developing countries,

04:26 most notably China,

04:27 India,

04:28 Bangladesh,

04:29 Pakistan,

04:30 Brazil,

04:30 and also Turkey.

04:33 All is just perfect?

04:35 Definitely not,

04:37 because so far the textile industry is not a good example

04:41 of how to make good use of circular economy approaches.

04:45 The fast fashion model is characterized by overproduction and overconsumption

04:51 of low cost clothes,

04:53 which are often produced under poor working conditions.

04:57 We all remember the tragedy of the Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh.

05:02 Also,

05:03 the fashion industry is a major source of pollution and waste.

05:07 Moreover,

05:08 under the guise of characterative purposes,

05:12 we are collecting old clothes for donation,

05:16 creating an illusion of solidarity and circularity,

05:19 but the reality is more complex.

05:21 A very small percentage of clothes collected are

05:25 provided as charity to people in need.

05:28 The vast majority is used for business,

05:30 and this business is big and growing.

05:34 According to some estimators,

05:35 it is worth around

05:37 $25 billion US dollars.

05:40 And most of the time this trade is unregulated.

05:44 Actually,

05:44 it is a huge business.

05:47 A key concern for many developing countries is that trade

05:50 in secondhand clothing affects the textile industry to prosper.

05:55 Several countries in East Africa have denounced this trade

05:59 as being detrimental to their national development efforts.

06:04 So ladies and gentlemen,

06:05 the linear fast fashion model,

06:07 the make,

06:07 use,

06:08 dispose,

06:09 are totally unsustainable.

06:11 The good news is that consumers,

06:14 businesses,

06:15 and regulators are starting to identify

06:19 ways to make textiles and appeal into a more efficient and less

06:24 polluting sector.

06:26 Their growing interest and application of

06:28 circular economy approaches in the textile industry

06:32 covers a broad range of aspects such as renewable and safe inputs,

06:36 increasing clothing use,

06:38 or turning used clothes into new to prolong their life cycle.

06:44 This calls for greater reuse and repair business model

06:48 to be mainstreamed and made easily accessible to consumers.

06:53 It also depends on the adoption of innovative

06:55 materials that can make textiles fulfill their purpose

06:59 without straining the environment and society in

07:01 the way the linear production systems do.

07:05 Textis are made of a variety of natural and synthetic fibers

07:10 as well as various blends

07:12 whose life cycles bring environmental and social

07:15 consequences for both producing and consuming countries.

07:19 Those include CO2 emissions embedded in materials,

07:22 health impacts from synthetic dyes,

07:25 and toxic metal

07:27 used in their production,

07:28 as well as ocean plastics pollution,

07:31 especially linked to polyester and other plastic fibers.

07:35 UNCTAD is active,

07:37 active in this area through the

07:39 Sustainable Manufacturing and Environmental Pollution Program,

07:42 which is supported by the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office.

07:48 This program focuses on ways to

07:50 reduce manufacturing pollution in developing countries,

07:53 including in the textile industry.

07:56 In our work on the circular economy,

07:58 we take an encompassing approach.

08:02 We facilitate discussion and activities seeking to add value from

08:06 waste streams.

08:08 We foster collaborative economy sectors.

08:11 We examine innovate business models.

08:13 We raise consumer awareness and encourage behavioral shifts.

08:18 In today's session on circular economy and private sector development,

08:23 I really encourage the presenters to enlighten

08:27 the audience with practical examples on how circularity

08:31 can be upscaled in the various dimensions.

08:34 the textile business

08:36 and also how policymakers can help

08:39 promote and support concretely

08:42 this necessary transformation.

08:44 So I wish you and I wish us

08:46 fruitful discussion and exchanges,

08:48 and I thank you for your attention.

08:52 Thank you so much,

08:52 Ms.

08:52 Duran,

08:53 for your remarks.

08:55 And for now we are going to transition to uh our first presentation of this webinar,

09:01 uh,

09:01 and I would like to introduce our presenter,

09:04 Mr.

09:07 To make program,

09:09 Alan McCar Foundation,

09:11 uh,

09:13 it is a program seems to be a truly disruptive force within the industry

09:16 to redesign the fashion industry based on circular economy principles.

09:20 So,

09:20 uh,

09:21 very excited to hear from Francois.

09:25 To you,

09:25 Francois,

09:26 thanks.

09:33 Thank you very much.

09:35 I hope um

09:36 you can hear me OK,

09:38 um,

09:39 and thank you very much for having me today.

09:41 So

09:42 I'm just going to share some thoughts

09:45 on

09:46 circular fashion and why it's relevant and

09:49 as Ms.

09:50 Duran said,

09:52 the currently our economy is today extremely

09:55 wasteful,

09:56 polluting.

09:57 When we make new products,

09:58 it means we need new materials.

10:00 We often only think about recycling at the end of pipes,

10:04 so it's very much like a sort of cure for a problem that's already existing.

10:08 And waste is extremely high within

10:12 the economy.

10:14 And waste is not just what we throw away after using it,

10:17 but it's also what we fail to use at its full potential.

10:21 All the cars that are parked all the time,

10:24 office buildings that are empty most of the time,

10:26 it's all these materials that we mobilize

10:29 and fail to use at their full potential.

10:34 And so we believe with the McArthur that a circular economy is a

10:40 framework to find systemic solutions that help tackle some of the

10:46 global challenges,

10:47 as Ms.

10:47 Jones said,

10:48 like climate change,

10:49 like biodiversity loss,

10:51 like waste and pollution.

10:53 And a circular economy is

10:56 based on three principles

10:59 which are all driven by design,

11:01 which means that for each of them we need to think upstream.

11:04 We need to think

11:05 very early on about how to apply them.

11:08 But also what's important to know is that a circular economy to work needs to be

11:12 based on renewable energy and needs to increasingly

11:14 adopt renewable materials so that they can flow

11:17 over and over within the economy.

11:19 So those three principles are first,

11:21 to

11:21 eliminate waste and pollution.

11:24 And

11:25 which basically means thinking from the beginning

11:29 about how do we design businesses and products

11:32 so they won't end up as waste and so they won't cause pollution

11:36 in

11:37 the manufacturing process but also

11:39 when they are being used.

11:42 In fashion,

11:43 it's,

11:44 for example,

11:44 known that 80% of the emissions of a product are decided at

11:50 the design stage.

11:52 The second principle of a circular academy is to keep products and materials in use.

11:56 That basically means finding

11:59 new business models that help

12:01 and ensure that those products can be used as much as possible,

12:04 like reuse,

12:05 repair,

12:06 resale.

12:07 Like recycling.

12:10 And finally,

12:11 the third principle is to regenerate natural systems.

12:14 So if you take agricultural practices,

12:15 for example,

12:16 it's finding practices that

12:18 not only

12:19 limit

12:20 the depletion of soil health,

12:22 but actually rebuild it over time.

12:25 So the soil is

12:26 enriched every crop cycle.

12:31 Now what does that mean for fashion?

12:33 How can a circular economy be applied to fashion?

12:35 Well,

12:36 as

12:37 Ms.

12:37 Jerome just said,

12:37 the fashion industry is a very

12:39 traditional example of a linear industry.

12:43 It takes

12:44 a lot of virgin resources

12:46 to make into products that are used less and less,

12:49 linking to overproduction,

12:51 and most of those products will be discarded to go into landfill or incineration

12:56 because a lot of those products use synthetic fiber.

12:59 A lot of them will shed

13:00 microfibers that will end up contaminating

13:03 oceans,

13:04 freshwater sources,

13:05 and a tiny,

13:06 tiny fraction of all those materials will be able to be taken back

13:10 and put back into the system.

13:13 So very now.

13:15 And what we did at the foundation is work with

13:18 a vast number of organizations from across the industry to create a

13:22 vision for an industry that can thrive over the long term,

13:25 for a circular economy for fashion.

13:27 And what we brought it back to is to 3 key elements that need to change.

13:33 The first one is

13:34 clothing needs to be used more.

13:36 The second one is clothing needs to be made to be made again.

13:39 And the third one is it needs to be made from safe and recycled or renewable inputs.

13:46 So I'm showing you a few examples of

13:49 what that can mean in practice.

13:52 Use more as Duro said as an increased interest from customers

13:58 to actually adopt new business models that infinite increase clothing use

14:03 like resale,

14:04 so the real wheel is.

14:05 Example from the US,

14:06 we've got great examples in Europe with STR Collective,

14:09 all of those companies have global operation.

14:12 You've got,

14:13 you've got a multiplication of secondhand platforms at the moment.

14:17 A lot of brands also

14:18 launching their secondhand offering.

14:20 That market is growing very quickly,

14:22 showing a strong interest from customers

14:25 and actually

14:26 helping

14:28 to significantly increase

14:30 the utilization

14:32 of

14:32 clothing,

14:33 accessories,

14:34 and products.

14:35 And the second example we have is

14:38 from the renewal workshop.

14:39 So their model is really interesting.

14:41 The tech products that

14:43 are not good enough to be kept on the market either they fail

14:48 tests like

14:49 before commercialization or

14:52 their secondhand products being sent back to companies.

14:55 And they refurbish those products so they can be put back on the market,

15:00 so they work,

15:00 for example,

15:01 with costs.

15:03 Which is part of the H&M Group

15:05 to actually take some of the products that had some

15:09 quality issues

15:10 in order to

15:12 repair them and

15:13 to put them

15:14 back on the market,

15:15 so they are really able to

15:17 increase the durability of the products and make sure they can be

15:20 kept in use

15:21 for longer.

15:22 So those are really

15:23 two practical examples of what's happening in the economy

15:26 so that

15:27 clothing is used more.

15:30 The second example is like the second

15:33 area of our vision and area of action is

15:36 make sure that clothing is made to be made again and products

15:40 are made to be made again across the fashion industry,

15:43 and that basically means

15:44 from the outset thinking about how can these products be recovered.

15:50 And be recycled

15:52 when it stopped being used.

15:54 So can it be easily disassembled,

15:56 or are the materials that are being used compatible

16:00 with recycling

16:02 technologies?

16:03 But also,

16:04 what are some infrastructures

16:07 and

16:07 strategies that exist to ensure that those products are effectively collected,

16:12 because it's not good enough to make products that can be recycled.

16:15 What's really important to make sure that

16:16 they are collected and can be sent to the

16:18 appropriate end of.

16:20 Two great examples here.

16:22 The first one from Adidas,

16:23 who took

16:24 years of innovation to create a shoe that's made 100% from

16:29 the same polymer,

16:30 the same material,

16:32 and

16:32 which

16:33 means that when that shoe is worn out,

16:36 they can get it back,

16:37 shred it,

16:38 and put it back into a new shoe.

16:40 Technology today allows them to take approximately 10% of

16:43 an old shoe to put in a new shoe,

16:45 so it's not perfect yet.

16:46 But it's a good innovation to ensure that over time they can increase that content.

16:52 Now the real issue is how do you make sure that you can collect them.

16:55 So they've made,

16:55 for example,

16:56 a partnership with

16:57 a company called Stuffsta.

16:59 Which is an app based on smartphones helping people to order collection

17:05 when they stop being that good,

17:06 when they stop wearing that shoe,

17:09 so it can be easier and more convenient

17:11 for their customer to actually send stuff back.

17:14 Napa Pri took a different approach,

17:16 so they created a winter jacket

17:18 made 100% of nylon,

17:20 so same,

17:22 everything in that jacket is made of nylon.

17:24 A lot of it actually comes from real nylon,

17:27 a recycled nylon from

17:29 Econ.

17:31 Needed tons of innovation to make sure that the

17:33 insulation layer of the jacket would work with nylon,

17:37 which was the first,

17:38 that the buttons and stuff could be made in nylon,

17:41 made sure that all that could be sent to recycling when it's being collected,

17:44 and what they did was actually offer a buyback

17:47 option to the people who bought the jacket,

17:49 but you can only activate it

17:51 after 2 years so that they ensure that the jacket is kept for at least 2 years.

17:56 This should probably be kept even longer,

17:58 but um a good example of how they can also think about not

18:02 only the product but also the collection system on the side of it.

18:07 And the third

18:09 area of the vision,

18:09 the 3rd area of action,

18:11 is to ensure that materials are from

18:13 safe

18:14 inputs,

18:15 which basically means using safe chemistry,

18:17 so making clothing cause no harm to

18:21 either the people who make the clothes,

18:22 but also to the environment

18:26 and to the wearers,

18:28 but also that materials come from recycled or renewables.

18:31 Sources

18:32 and here are

18:34 two examples that we got.

18:36 The first one is

18:37 Stella McCartney did

18:39 a clothing line using recycled cashmere,

18:42 so taking cashmere from both pre-production but also post-consumer,

18:48 shredding it and weaving it,

18:50 reweaving it in a new

18:54 sweater.

18:56 And on the other side it's Wrangler,

18:59 amongst one of the many companies starting to investigate

19:03 the potential of growing cotton in a regenerative way,

19:06 that is

19:07 finding strategies to grow cotton in a way that can help rebuild soil health,

19:13 while cotton in a traditional way relies

19:15 very heavily on pesticides and fertilizer,

19:18 so quite a significant departure from traditional ways of making cotton.

19:24 And

19:24 an example of how you can bring all those ideas together is a project we conducted

19:30 called the genes redesign where we created guidelines

19:33 to create genes that incorporate high ability

19:37 materials that are organic or in transition phasing out a

19:40 lot of chemicals and processes that are hazardous for both

19:45 the workers and the environment.

19:48 But also looking at the recyclability and ease of disassembly of the

19:52 products and finally looking at how to ensure some level of traceability

19:57 so those genes can be easily identified

20:00 for customers but also so that collectors and recyclers can easily understand.

20:05 That those jeans have been made with certain criteria and can

20:09 be either used for a very long time or when they can't

20:13 be recycled effectively.

20:15 Here is a list of all the companies

20:16 that have committed to put volumes of their production

20:20 in line with the guidelines on the market before May this year.

20:25 You can check on our website.

20:26 We've

20:27 put a note to tell you when each of those companies will

20:31 put their jeans on the market.

20:33 And

20:34 that's it for me.

20:39 Thank you so much,

20:39 Francois,

20:40 for that great presentation and uh great timing as well.

20:44 Um,

20:46 and now we will move to

20:47 the

20:49 The first panel of the

20:51 of the webinar

20:53 and I'm just going to share my screen so you can see the pan.

20:58 Uh,

20:58 and

20:59 I will also introduce our moderator

21:02 for panel one which will focus a lot on the redesigning of the value chain,

21:07 focusing more on the upstream,

21:09 um,

21:10 and bringing questions on materials,

21:12 production and design,

21:13 uh.

21:14 So our moderator for panel one is

21:17 Professor Lisa Emerson,

21:19 and she's a professor of Environmental Science in the Environment

21:23 and Geography department at University of York

21:25 and she's also an affiliated researcher

21:27 at the Stockholm Environmental Institute.

21:30 Uh,

21:31 Lisa has over 20 years of experience in

21:33 the field of air pollution and climate change,

21:36 and between 2019 and 2020,

21:38 she was also the principal investigator of a research study

21:42 mapping manufacturing pollution hotspots,

21:44 uh,

21:45 as part of the sustainable manufacturing and Environmental pollution Program,

21:49 uh,

21:49 which was mentioned by Ms.

21:50 Duran in her opening remarks,

21:52 and this program uh focuses as well on the textiles industry.

21:56 So,

21:56 um,

21:57 Professor Emerson,

21:58 I welcome you to the floor.

22:03 OK,

22:03 thank you very much for the introduction.

22:06 Um,

22:06 and it's,

22:07 uh,

22:07 now my turn to introduce the other members on this panel.

22:11 Uh,

22:12 so first of all,

22:12 we have Khalid Mahmood

22:15 Russo,

22:15 who has over 40 years of corporate experience in textiles and clothing,

22:19 food and development sectors.

22:21 Um,

22:21 currently he is the executive director of Master Textile Mills in Pakistan,

22:26 leading a textile company engaged in exports of apparel and work with brick.

22:31 Second on the panel,

22:33 we have,

22:33 uh,

22:34 Jenny Fredriksdotter,

22:35 uh,

22:36 who has over 20 years of experience from the fashion industry working with buying,

22:40 production,

22:40 and sourcing for companies like H&M,

22:43 Gina Trickott in Europe and Asia.

22:46 Uh,

22:46 Jenny's also been working with sustainability and fashion for more

22:49 than 10 years and joined Renew Cell in 2017,

22:53 uh,

22:53 where she's part of the management team

22:55 in Renew Cell working with textile brand partners

22:57 towards closing the loop in the fashion industry.

23:01 And then finally,

23:02 on the panel,

23:03 we also have Amor Paul Havandana,

23:06 who has quickly become one of Thailand's

23:08 most influential green voices through his work

23:11 on turning landfill waste into sustainable material.

23:14 His company Moreloop,

23:16 co-founded with Tamawan Vedrachayan,

23:19 is an online platform that takes surplus fabric from garment and textile factories

23:23 and offers it to small businesses to purchase at an affordable price.

23:27 And to date,

23:28 Morloop has upcycled more than 20,000 kg of surplus fabric

23:32 and prevented the release of more than 300,000 kg of carbon dioxide.

23:37 So what I want to do is encourage people,

23:40 uh,

23:40 to be putting questions in the chats,

23:42 but I'm also obviously going to be putting questions to our panelists.

23:46 And I think just so that,

23:48 uh,

23:48 the audience can get a better idea of,

23:50 uh,

23:51 the companies and,

23:52 and the work that the panelists are doing themselves,

23:54 um,

23:55 it would be good if each of the panelists could,

23:58 uh,

23:59 briefly summarize

24:00 the businesses that you represent.

24:02 And if we start off with,

24:03 uh,

24:04 Khalid,

24:05 if that's OK.

24:07 Uh yeah,

24:08 thank you very much.

24:10 Uh,

24:10 my name is Khalid Mahmood.

24:11 I come from Pakistan.

24:12 I'm working with a company,

24:13 as they're told,

24:15 Master Textile Mills.

24:16 It's a vertically composite setup,

24:18 meaning by we have our own spinning,

24:20 weaving,

24:20 denim,

24:21 and then the dye processing and garmenting also.

24:24 Uh,

24:24 we are about $100 million US dollar company and primarily we are selling

24:27 our garments into Europe and America and a couple of other countries also.

24:31 And then fabric,

24:32 we specialize into the work there and the bottom tier fabric companies.

24:35 Thank you.

24:36 OK,

24:37 thank you very much.

24:38 That's very much on the production,

24:39 um,

24:39 end of things.

24:41 Uh,

24:41 and then next if we have Jenny.

24:46 Yes,

24:47 hello,

24:48 um,

24:49 from Stockholm.

24:50 I'm in Renewal headquarters here in Stockholm and it's very empty at the moment.

24:55 We are most of us working from home

24:58 due to the situation in the world.

24:59 Um,

25:00 so I'm the circular business manager in Renewal and we are a sustained tech company.

25:06 From Sweden

25:07 working in

25:09 recycling of cellulose-based textiles.

25:12 We have a small plant running here in Sweden and

25:15 we are just about

25:17 to build,

25:17 or we have actually started to build our second

25:20 plant that will be much bigger in scale.

25:23 So I work closely with brands and textile producers who want to integrate our new

25:28 fibers into their products.

25:31 OK,

25:31 thanks ever so much,

25:32 Jenny.

25:32 And then,

25:33 uh,

25:33 finally,

25:33 a more poll.

25:37 Everyone,

25:38 my name is Amopo.

25:38 I'm a CEO and co-founder of Moloop.

25:41 Um,

25:42 we are an online

25:43 marketplace for surplus fabric

25:46 from Thailand.

25:47 Um,

25:48 we are.

25:51 As we have collected over

25:54 300 tons of surplus fabrics

25:57 in various.

26:08 Uh,

26:08 I'm more,

26:08 we are not hearing you,

26:11 uh,

26:11 no.

26:11 OK.

26:13 Hopefully it'll be better if the video off,

26:15 but we can hear you now.

26:17 OK,

26:17 great.

26:19 Um,

26:19 so,

26:20 um,

26:21 yeah,

26:21 so we are,

26:22 uh,

26:22 Molo is an online marketplace for surplus fabric.

26:25 We are a young

26:26 startup from Thailand.

26:28 And through our marketplace we have been able to collect over

26:32 300 tons

26:34 of surplus fabrics

26:36 in various shapes and sizes

26:38 and from 10 yards,

26:41 as small as 10 yards to 1,000+ yards.

26:44 So now we have 300,

26:46 3500 different types of fabrics

26:49 and

26:50 Now that we have collected all of these surplus fabrics,

26:54 we turn them into

26:56 different products

26:58 for corporates

26:59 as well as our own small brand

27:01 and as well as pushing these surplus fabrics

27:04 to smaller SMEs,

27:06 so having the market mechanism working.

27:10 And we are

27:11 um experienced the early growth stage

27:14 at the moment,

27:16 yeah.

27:17 Thank you.

27:18 OK,

27:19 thanks ever so much,

27:20 I'm awful.

27:21 So,

27:21 um,

27:22 hopefully that gives a good indication we have really quite a diverse panel,

27:25 um,

27:26 here who have expertise

27:27 and the production in in new technologies,

27:30 and then in sort of different ways of recycling or upcycling.

27:34 Materials and textiles.

27:36 Uh,

27:36 I think it would be useful,

27:37 and we've seen from that previous talk,

27:39 um,

27:40 how

27:41 research very clearly shows that linear production,

27:44 which has been a large part of the textiles and fashion industry,

27:49 um,

27:49 causes pollution at the production end of the line and,

27:52 and,

27:53 uh,

27:53 waste problems at the disposal end

27:55 of the life cycle of those products.

27:57 So I just wonder if each of the panel members,

27:59 I'll go around in a slightly different order just to shake things up a little bit.

28:02 But if you could just give us an idea of what you think are the main sustainability

28:07 issues or problems that are associated,

28:09 um,

28:09 with textiles that your business is,

28:12 is really trying to focus on to improve.

28:14 So,

28:15 if I could maybe just go to Jenny first with that question.

28:19 Yes,

28:20 thank you.

28:22 Of course,

28:23 as was shown in the

28:25 picture by Francois earlier,

28:27 only 1% of the textiles that are being

28:30 produced is going back into new textiles again.

28:33 This is the area that we want to address with renew cells,

28:36 so we want to increase

28:38 the volumes of textile waste going back into new fibers

28:43 and being put back into new garments and textile products,

28:48 so.

28:49 eliminate

28:50 the waste stream as much as possible,

28:54 creating new products without using virgin raw materials.

28:58 And

28:59 could you just give us an idea of

29:00 what the biggest challenges associated with achieving that?

29:04 Yes,

29:05 of course,

29:06 we have several challenges,

29:08 but one,

29:08 of course,

29:09 is that there are many types of products,

29:11 many materials,

29:13 mixed materials,

29:15 so different technologies are needed to recycle all

29:19 the different types of textiles there is.

29:22 And of course there is also a logistic challenge that

29:26 There are limited possibilities for recycling today,

29:30 and they are not

29:32 necessarily in the same place as the waste,

29:34 as the waste is scattered all over the world with consumers in the factories

29:40 and also in the in the areas for landfill.

29:43 So of course there is a logistics challenge to put the waste

29:47 into the recycling possibility.

29:50 Plants.

29:52 Yeah,

29:52 so there's,

29:53 it's almost a bit of a transport issue as well in that case,

29:56 and it can be,

29:58 it could be,

30:00 yeah,

30:00 of course,

30:01 but we are,

30:01 we are,

30:02 it's early days for the recycling industry of textiles.

30:05 We have just started,

30:06 but they succeeded quite well with paper,

30:09 glass,

30:09 and so on.

30:10 So I hope we can make the same journey

30:12 with textiles.

30:14 OK,

30:14 that's excellent.

30:15 And then I think if I can bring um a more pole in.

30:18 Uh,

30:19 I,

30:19 I understand Amopo,

30:20 your sort of strategy is a little bit more sort of upcycling as opposed to recycling.

30:24 Could you just give us an idea of,

30:28 um,

30:28 how that is really gonna help in terms of moving towards a circular economy?

30:35 Our vision for our company is to make the circular economy a reality,

30:39 so

30:41 we try to make this

30:45 surplus

30:46 fabric movement

30:48 into

30:50 a real business that is

30:51 scalable

30:53 using the

30:54 digital tech

30:57 and the online platform to help to move this forward

31:01 and um.

31:02 At the moment we are

31:04 only focusing on the fabric industrial surpluses

31:09 that are stuck inside everyone's

31:12 factory.

31:14 And by doing this we are helping to

31:19 reduce the redundancy of producing

31:22 virgin materials

31:24 um

31:24 once we have scaled up a lot more.

31:27 But at the moment

31:29 we are

31:30 seeing that

31:32 there is a pain point

31:34 within

31:35 this industry in Thailand.

31:38 The first point is that

31:39 there is a pain point of the factory

31:41 have to manage all of these

31:43 redundancies and actually they are stuck inside

31:47 everyone's factory.

31:48 So we are relieving everybody

31:50 with this

31:51 and at the same time,

31:52 the smaller SMEs,

31:53 they can get access

31:54 to all of these quality fabrics that are lying around available,

31:59 and nobody is really using or doing anything with them

32:03 that efficiently.

32:05 At the same time,

32:06 these fabrics have their own shelf life as well.

32:10 So if

32:11 it,

32:12 you know,

32:12 in,

32:13 in,

32:13 in maybe 5 or 10 years,

32:15 they are no longer functional,

32:18 they have to throw it away in landfill anyway.

32:20 So why don't we map all of these surpluses out

32:25 and get

32:26 them all circulating back into the industry and

32:29 make everybody

32:33 be able to access all of these fabric.

32:34 So I,

32:35 I hope that

32:37 one day

32:38 our circular model

32:41 can go along with the linear model,

32:43 um,

32:43 find the right equilibrium,

32:45 so

32:46 we are like.

32:47 We're like a Pac-Man,

32:49 you know,

32:50 so the linear economy works very fast,

32:53 right?

32:53 They have a lot of wastage coming out

32:55 and we are like Pac-Man just

32:58 going,

32:58 you know,

32:59 collecting all of this waste

33:01 and putting them back into

33:02 the most

33:04 efficient use possible.

33:07 OK,

33:08 that's great.

33:08 And maybe just sort of following up on a comment that Jenny made.

33:11 I mean,

33:11 do you still,

33:12 do you have similar sort of

33:13 issues in terms of the logistics of transporting these

33:16 materials around?

33:17 Is that,

33:17 is that a problem for you?

33:21 At the moment we are very local based.

33:25 We only have a couple of international clients

33:28 and the most that we can do,

33:30 let's say we have a

33:32 client from Singapore

33:34 and she has the manufacturing base in Cambodia.

33:36 There is a logistic

33:38 that we can use,

33:40 but at the moment we keep everything pretty local

33:43 and I myself drive.

33:46 To,

33:48 to do the logistics for all of these fabric,

33:51 yes,

33:52 and um we try to find

33:54 the most efficient

33:55 way

33:56 to ship all of this around

33:58 and that um.

34:00 It's a challenge,

34:02 I think when we scale up,

34:03 but at the moment we have found

34:06 that logistics is not

34:08 the biggest challenge for us at the moment.

34:11 OK,

34:12 yeah.

34:12 So we will come back,

34:13 I think some availability,

34:15 um,

34:15 issues later on in the session.

34:18 Yeah,

34:18 that's interesting.

34:19 So,

34:20 so we focused a little bit there on,

34:21 on the kind of,

34:22 uh,

34:23 you know,

34:23 the products once they've been produced.

34:26 Um,

34:26 obviously there are issues.

34:27 Is in production of those products.

34:29 And

34:30 Khaled,

34:31 would you be able to give us an idea

34:33 of,

34:33 you know,

34:34 some of the ways in which your company has been trying to reduce the pollution,

34:38 um,

34:39 and make,

34:39 uh,

34:40 the production more efficient

34:42 in textiles?

34:45 Yeah,

34:45 my company is very much up to the challenge,

34:48 which we are all facing.

34:49 In fact,

34:50 as explained in the earlier presentation also that circular economy has

34:55 two different aspects as far as the,

34:58 America.

34:58 The consumption side is concerned.

35:00 They are looking at it differently,

35:02 as it was explained in the earlier presentation also.

35:05 My company or in the South Asia or the

35:08 all the companies who are on the manufacturing side,

35:10 we are having a different kind of challenges altogether.

35:13 So

35:14 the traditional economy has been basically made use

35:17 and disposed basis it has been operating.

35:20 And now that we are working and we are trying to move or graduate.

35:25 Into a circular economy.

35:27 So in circular economy,

35:29 basically it's a huge kind of a

35:31 mindset shift.

35:33 It's a kind of you have to shift that mindset

35:36 from the linear economy

35:38 to the circular economy where we are focusing,

35:40 make,

35:41 use,

35:41 recycle,

35:42 reuse.

35:43 Now in this.

35:45 There are 3 basic principles we are focusing as a company.

35:48 Number 1 is designing out on the waste and the pollution factors.

35:51 2,

35:53 how to keep the products and materials eco-friendly and reusable.

35:56 And then,

35:57 of course,

35:57 regenerating

35:58 the natural systems and all that.

36:00 Now if you look at these things,

36:01 these are 4 or 5 major areas our company is basically focusing.

36:05 One is basically the water recycling and depletion.

36:08 That is one very major area.

36:11 in the South Asian countries also and the other countries

36:14 also in Pakistan particularly we are water stressed countries also,

36:18 and the traditional technologies of the economies of

36:21 the textiles which we have been using,

36:22 we have been basically

36:24 using a lot of water,

36:25 and most of this water untreated is being disposed of also.

36:29 So now that the awareness is there,

36:31 that the brands are insisting for that also.

36:33 So the leading companies have already started working on this.

36:36 That we have the water treatment plant now.

36:38 Almost I know that all the leading Pakistani brands

36:41 are making some investment during the last 2 years or

36:45 during the next 1 1.5 years,

36:47 including my own company,

36:48 a massive investment in the water treatment.

36:51 And all that.

36:51 Now this is in water treatment.

36:53 We are going for the water conservation also

36:55 we are going for the recycling also.

36:58 We are going for the reharvesting the water as well.

37:01 Now the next point comes basically the energy.

37:03 Energy is we are trying to focus more on the conservation side also,

37:07 and from then we are moving on to the renewable energy sources also

37:12 in which most of the companies,

37:13 including my company also,

37:15 we are moving on to the solar

37:17 now.

37:17 The next point that comes in what kind of material are being used.

37:22 So we are trying that most of the brands are also partnered with that,

37:26 that we should be focusing on the

37:28 materials.

37:29 Which are more sustainable and reducing the waste

37:32 and as Aupo was saying that trying to reuse the wastages,

37:36 the leftover fabrics,

37:37 and all that

37:38 in a way that they can be,

37:40 I mean,

37:40 used in the proper manner also.

37:42 So that leads us to the next point that the,

37:45 uh,

37:45 the environment sustainability,

37:46 that includes air,

37:48 that includes water,

37:49 that includes energy,

37:50 that other kind of wastages also.

37:52 And then,

37:54 uh,

37:54 with all this.

37:55 The corporate social responsibility which traditionally we used to have,

37:58 it was more focused on the labor,

38:00 which was more focused on the environment only.

38:03 Now with all these things together,

38:05 we are having renewed and enhanced scope of the corporate social responsibility.

38:10 So that is basically what my company is focusing and most of the

38:14 manufacturing companies are focusing as well.

38:17 OK,

38:18 that's,

38:18 uh,

38:19 there's an awful lot of stuff,

38:20 um,

38:20 going on,

38:21 Cain.

38:21 I think you,

38:22 you've done a really good job at,

38:23 uh,

38:24 uh,

38:24 describing a lot of that.

38:25 Could I just,

38:26 um,

38:27 obviously within,

38:28 uh,

38:29 in particular in South,

38:30 uh,

38:31 uh,

38:31 South Asia and Southeast Asia,

38:33 um,

38:33 there are various different sizes of,

38:35 um,

38:36 uh,

38:36 textile manufacturing industry.

38:38 And my,

38:40 my knowledge would suggest that it,

38:41 it It becomes more and less difficult for companies to be bringing in these,

38:46 uh,

38:46 cleaner production,

38:47 uh,

38:47 technologies dependent a little bit on their size.

38:50 Could you just give us an idea of

38:53 how extensive across the whole manufacturing sector,

38:56 sort of,

38:57 uh,

38:57 more renewable technologies

38:59 are,

38:59 and if there are ways in which there can be some sort of,

39:03 uh,

39:03 technology transfer,

39:03 if you like,

39:04 across

39:05 different companies.

39:07 Your comment is very valid.

39:08 I highly appreciate that you raised this point.

39:12 Uh,

39:13 to the front,

39:14 uh,

39:14 well,

39:15 I mean,

39:15 we have three major kinds of companies.

39:17 One of the larger companies,

39:18 uh,

39:19 which have the larger financial muscles also,

39:21 they have access to the capital also.

39:24 So,

39:24 I mean,

39:24 they operate differently than medium size and the

39:27 small sized companies which are operating differently.

39:30 So as far as the major companies or the larger companies are concerned,

39:33 yes,

39:33 I mean,

39:34 the way I explained,

39:35 most of them,

39:35 they are operating on the basis of that.

39:37 And I know my counterparts in India and Bangladesh

39:40 and Sri Lanka also they are more or less,

39:43 we are in the same league,

39:44 but the problem is basically to the medium and small sized enterprises

39:48 because medium and small sized enterprises.

39:51 They are so usually strained and we are strained on the financial resources

39:55 and strained on the financial resources,

39:57 so focused on their survival and doing the business

40:00 and putting all the pieces together to surviving,

40:03 so they don't have basically a kind of a financial resource even if they want to.

40:07 And

40:08 number 2,

40:08 their business is usually so competitive that survival is

40:12 such a great priority for them that most of them,

40:15 they are unable to actually go for that also.

40:17 And the client kind of customers which they have,

40:20 usually those customers is a different mix than the major companies.

40:24 So with medium size and the smaller size,

40:27 the challenges are different.

40:29 But I think now there has to be kind of a

40:33 reshaping of the industry is coming up also that

40:36 like the governments are now coming in,

40:38 they are focusing more on the untreated water should not be disposed of.

40:42 They are focusing on

40:44 various kinds of environmental laws and all that,

40:47 so I think the industry

40:49 is moving into kind of a thing where they have to either

40:52 they should be clustered,

40:54 they should be housed into the industrial zones,

40:56 and then they can have a joint on the shared facilities of like water treatment,

41:02 renewable energy sources,

41:04 and as far as the compliance cost is concerned.

41:06 The thing is all these things look very nice.

41:08 I mean from the fire side,

41:10 we keep receiving a long.

41:12 of compliances and all fancy kind of

41:14 logics as well,

41:16 but at the end of the day,

41:17 compliance or making all these things according to those requirements,

41:21 it requires a huge capital cost as well.

41:24 It requires a mindset change,

41:26 training of the people,

41:27 and so on and so forth.

41:28 So I think they're

41:29 the larger sized companies,

41:31 they are doing fair.

41:32 But as far as the medium and the small sized companies are concerned,

41:35 unfortunately I think they

41:37 yet are not on the bandwagon as such.

41:39 They are not yet on the wave.

41:42 OK,

41:42 yeah,

41:42 I think that those are very well made points.

41:44 And I think it's something,

41:45 you know,

41:45 that we need,

41:46 we need to bear in mind as consumers that we might be expecting,

41:50 uh,

41:50 greater sustainability

41:52 in the products that we're consuming,

41:53 but that comes at some cost to,

41:56 doesn't it?

41:56 And that needs to be considered as well.

41:59 OK,

41:59 so,

42:00 moving um back to sort of thinking a little bit about recycling,

42:04 um,

42:04 rates in clothes,

42:06 um,

42:06 if I can maybe come back to Jenny.

42:08 Uh,

42:09 so I think it was mentioned earlier,

42:10 um,

42:11 in this session that the recycling rates of clothes is,

42:14 is quite dismal.

42:15 It stands at less than 1%.

42:17 Um,

42:17 and from the perspective of a post-consumer fabric recycler such as yourself,

42:22 is it time for the industry to fundamentally

42:24 reconsider the way it blends different materials,

42:27 as well as the design and manufacture

42:29 of clothing?

42:30 What do you

42:31 envision should be a desirable template for the manufacturing

42:34 of fabric so that recyclability at the end of life

42:37 is optimized?

42:39 So,

42:39 quite a substantial question there,

42:40 Jenny,

42:41 but

42:41 What are your thoughts on that?

42:43 Yes,

42:45 of course,

42:45 if all designs and the designs of products and fabrics

42:51 and other materials would be designed with the end of life

42:55 in mind,

42:57 using or making only products that

43:01 can be recycled.

43:04 It would make a huge difference.

43:07 I'm not sure that the industry is ready to go that far

43:11 yet,

43:12 so we have to continue to develop the recycling industry to suit

43:18 what the

43:19 consumers and

43:21 the brands want to make also,

43:23 but of course,

43:25 mindful

43:26 design

43:27 would help.

43:29 For us,

43:29 we are trying to make our technology better by optimizing it,

43:34 and we will be able to

43:36 accept the wider range of products and the materials in our coming plant,

43:42 but we are still focusing on the cellulose-based textiles,

43:45 but

43:46 there is a lot happening in the recycling industry both for us and for

43:51 Other companies

43:52 doing similar things.

43:54 OK,

43:55 and you,

43:55 you referred there to mindful design.

43:58 How might that be made to happen?

44:02 Yes,

44:03 of course.

44:04 But I think

44:06 more knowledge would help.

44:08 Uh,

44:09 the more information designers and brands have about

44:12 the possibilities of making circular and sustainable product,

44:16 it would help.

44:18 So,

44:18 I'm happy to see that this is more and more

44:20 integrated now in educations for the design and textile professionals.

44:25 So this is a subject.

44:26 When I was a student,

44:27 this was not

44:28 touched at all,

44:29 but now it's getting

44:31 into

44:33 All the education,

44:34 so students are learning about the possibilities

44:37 and the responsibilities of being a designer and

44:41 working in the textile industry.

44:43 So I think this is a good

44:44 first step to

44:46 create awareness and knowledge about

44:49 the possibilities and the responsibilities.

44:53 Yeah,

44:53 so I think that that really nicely emphasizes

44:55 the need for change right the way along,

44:57 and the sort of production and manufacturing process.

45:00 Um,

45:00 so I'm just gonna come to Armorpole for one sort of final question,

45:04 and then I think I might start to look at the,

45:06 I can see that there's some questions coming in from the audience as well.

45:09 So if I encourage the panelists to have a look at that too.

45:12 Um,

45:13 but Amorpole,

45:13 if I could just sort of,

45:15 uh,

45:15 move to you,

45:16 so obviously recycling is one option,

45:18 uh,

45:18 but I think what you're a bit more concerned about is,

45:20 is upcycling.

45:22 Um,

45:22 could you describe

45:24 to us briefly just how Morloop came to discover the opportunity to utilize,

45:28 to upcycle

45:29 surplus fabrics in the market,

45:31 and

45:31 how large do you think this opportunity is,

45:34 um,

45:34 and what sort of steps do entrepreneurs like yourself

45:38 perhaps need to,

45:39 to take to be able to apply this kind of method in other geographies,

45:43 uh,

45:44 to take advantage of the opportunity?

45:46 Sure,

45:47 thank you,

45:48 great,

45:48 great question,

45:49 actually,

45:50 for a startup,

45:51 um,

45:51 we,

45:52 we have to start looking at the opportunity

45:55 so that we can uh

45:58 start uh see that there is a potential for scaling,

46:00 so that is the first thing that we actually look at

46:04 and our business is actually comes from two sides,

46:07 the pain side and the passion side.

46:09 Um,

46:10 the paint size is,

46:11 uh,

46:11 from my co-founder who is a 2nd generation garment manufacturer,

46:16 so she has the paint of the surplus fabrics.

46:18 She sells her fabric,

46:20 um,

46:21 every day,

46:22 and she knows these are good quality,

46:23 but once the,

46:25 uh,

46:26 clothes is finished

46:27 production,

46:28 this just automatically becomes waste

46:31 and she cannot,

46:33 she doesn't want to sell this

46:34 as waste price,

46:35 so she kept it

46:37 in her factory.

46:38 And

46:39 a lot of

46:40 factories actually

46:42 have the same practice.

46:44 I mean

46:45 there are secondary market for this fabric,

46:47 sure,

46:48 but

46:48 actually we have found

46:50 that in Thailand,

46:51 most of them kept it inside

46:53 the factory.

46:54 And

46:56 what a lot of people don't realize is that

46:59 waste

47:00 gets wasted

47:01 even before you consume it.

47:03 We often talk about post-consumer waste

47:06 like in Thailand.

47:07 The post-consumer waste is 26 million tons

47:12 versus the industrial waste

47:14 which is 50 million tons.

47:16 So there's a lot of wastage happening

47:19 in the factories and in manufacturing.

47:21 And when we scope it down

47:24 to the um textile and garment industry in Thailand,

47:27 um actually the waste here,

47:30 the surplus fabric that is produced,

47:31 we have estimated

47:33 is 350,000 tons.

47:36 Which is an equivalent of making 700 million t-shirts.

47:40 Multiply that by about $10 you have the market size,

47:43 the annual market size

47:45 is $7

47:47 billion.

47:47 So I think this is quite attractive.

47:49 And um

47:51 and once we have um

47:54 Starting

47:55 to do this,

47:55 we have verified that the pain

47:58 is real

47:59 and at the same time also found out that

48:01 in Thailand we have quite a complete value chain

48:04 from the very upstream,

48:06 um,

48:07 from the

48:08 beaver

48:09 and to the garment

48:10 and also the traders.

48:12 They all have the same problem.

48:14 And Thailand

48:15 is actually

48:17 has this industry

48:20 for the past 30 years,

48:21 so we have a lot of experience,

48:23 therefore we have a lot of exports to Europe and America.

48:27 So all of these great

48:29 great materials ending up

48:31 here

48:33 and the finished products goes

48:35 abroad.

48:36 And the material

48:38 that is actually produced here or se here

48:41 get re-export back and people have to buy it at a much higher price.

48:46 And so

48:47 um all of these small tail end surplus now will get to be used

48:53 again and again you know again

48:56 and we,

48:56 we see this as a big opportunity.

48:59 Here in Thailand,

49:00 so I think the landscape is,

49:02 uh,

49:02 however,

49:02 the landscape,

49:03 I'm not sure it's the same

49:05 for every country,

49:07 uh,

49:07 for example,

49:08 um,

49:08 in the Philippines,

49:09 I think they don't have a lot of um cotton,

49:12 for example,

49:13 um,

49:14 they have more

49:15 on the polyester,

49:16 so,

49:17 um,

49:17 we haven't explored,

49:19 um,

49:19 uh,

49:20 the,

49:20 the,

49:21 the manufacturing base around the country yet,

49:23 but,

49:23 um,

49:24 the,

49:24 the reason that um Molo were able to start.

49:27 Uh,

49:28 this market,

49:29 I think firstly is because we were able to,

49:32 um,

49:33 my co-founder is able to

49:35 er penetrate all of her

49:37 er connections.

49:39 That we are able to get access to

49:43 first factory.

49:44 So we start with just one factory.

49:46 Now we have 70.

49:47 So

49:48 we start off small and then we start once we

49:51 have

49:52 found a use,

49:53 the suitable use for all of these materials,

49:57 we are able to attract more supply at the same time.

50:00 Um,

50:01 so it depends

50:02 on each country of the value chain that they have

50:06 and

50:06 and what the material that the surplus material that they can gather

50:10 and find a suitable use for all of these supplies.

50:14 I mean for us we have great quality materials.

50:17 Uh,

50:17 firstly I wanted to sell to

50:19 smaller SMEs and IG entrepreneur brands.

50:22 We have a lot of IG brands here in,

50:24 in,

50:24 in Thailand,

50:25 so,

50:25 um,

50:26 you know,

50:27 er,

50:27 er,

50:28 fresh grad who

50:29 wanted to buy some,

50:30 uh,

50:31 fabric and make her own clothing

50:34 fashion brand,

50:35 but

50:36 At the same time that that is like only 20% of our business.

50:40 The 70% of our business is actually using this fabric to sell to corporates

50:46 as t-shirts

50:47 and polo shirts

50:50 and bags

50:51 and masks and things like that.

50:53 So

50:54 um

50:55 we,

50:56 we are able to illustrate

50:59 how

50:59 how how great this material is and then put it into to good use.

51:04 Yeah,

51:04 so to actually uh copy the the the the model that we have established

51:11 needs to a lot of analysis and I think it is depends on country

51:15 and I think I'm quite lucky to have found

51:18 uh

51:19 the pain of my co-founder as well as

51:21 being in

51:22 Thailand with such complete value chain with quite a

51:25 sizable opportunity for us to kickstart this idea.

51:29 OK,

51:29 that's great.

51:30 Am I I think you might well be encouraging a

51:32 lot of entrepreneurs out there to at least explore the,

51:35 uh,

51:35 you know,

51:35 the opportunities of doing similar things in different countries.

51:39 Um,

51:40 so I just wanna come back to some of the questions that are in the chat,

51:44 um,

51:45 before.

51:45 I sort of carrying on with some of the other ones.

51:47 We have one here.

51:48 Um,

51:49 why do you believe,

51:50 who do you believe is really shifting the needle for circular fashion?

51:53 Are suppliers waiting for their existing customer

51:55 brands to push them and demand it,

51:57 or are suppliers focusing on it themselves and waiting for brands to come to them?

52:02 Khaled,

52:03 as a sort of production supplier person,

52:06 do you have any,

52:07 any views on,

52:07 on that one?

52:10 Can you repeat the question,

52:11 please?

52:12 I couldn't hear properly.

52:14 OK,

52:14 it's,

52:14 it's in the chat,

52:15 but I'll repeat it.

52:15 So who do you believe is really shifting the needle for circular fashion?

52:19 Is it the suppliers that are waiting for their existing customer brands to push them

52:24 and demand it,

52:25 or are suppliers focusing on it themselves

52:28 and waiting for brands to come,

52:30 then come to them?

52:32 I think it works both ways as far as the large manufacturers are concerned,

52:36 because large manufacturers do anticipate what kind of market trends are there.

52:41 And what are the requirements from the consumer side and so on and so forth.

52:44 What are the

52:46 new emerging requirements of the customers are concerned,

52:49 sustainability.

52:50 It's a major,

52:50 major theme with all the companies.

52:52 So as far as the,

52:53 I mean,

52:53 the supplier side is concerned,

52:55 they are also,

52:56 I think,

52:56 equally concerned.

52:57 They are investing.

52:58 They are training people.

53:00 They are going for massive kind of certifications also upgrading their

53:04 compliance requirement and sustainability teams and all that.

53:08 So far the client is concerned.

53:10 I think that the largest sized company in Pakistan,

53:12 in Bangladesh,

53:13 Sri Lanka,

53:14 and

53:15 Bangladesh,

53:16 they're all India,

53:18 they're all concerned about it,

53:19 and I see,

53:20 I mean,

53:20 a lot is happening as far as the supply side is concerned

53:23 as far as the buyer is concerned,

53:25 yes,

53:25 the buyer because they are.

53:26 are actually communicating with the consumer.

53:29 They are carrying the demands for the consumers

53:31 and this demand of the circular economy actually originated from there also.

53:37 So I think most of the buyers are also taking a lead into it.

53:40 But again,

53:41 different buyers have different kind of

53:44 Priorities or the sense of urgency or the kind of wholesome approach.

53:49 Some of the buyers are,

53:50 you know,

53:51 they are very much concerned for the whole

53:54 wholesome approach as such,

53:55 but a few of the buyers,

53:56 we think

53:57 that they are not that urgent.

53:59 So it is a mixed kind of a thing.

54:01 But as far as the medium and size,

54:03 medium and small operators are concerned.

54:06 Uh,

54:06 I think they are also cautious of this thing.

54:09 But again,

54:10 going for the sustainability,

54:11 going for the circular kind of thing,

54:13 uh,

54:14 I mean,

54:14 Capex is very much important,

54:16 and,

54:16 uh,

54:17 uh,

54:17 resources,

54:18 financial resources,

54:19 you need to have it.

54:20 The management and the corporate time is also involved into it,

54:24 and medium and small sized companies actually have the constraints over there.

54:28 And then again

54:29 from the buyer side,

54:30 also most of the buyers

54:32 which are for these medium and size,

54:35 small sized companies,

54:36 they also do not have those kind of a sensitive approach which the major brands have.

54:41 But good thing is,

54:42 at least the larger side company which are holding major

54:45 portion of the business,

54:47 they are sensitive from both sides,

54:49 from the buyer side also,

54:50 from the supplier side also.

54:53 I would like to highlight that lately the governments,

54:56 the policymaking

54:58 institutions,

54:58 they are becoming very active.

55:00 Also,

55:01 the new laws are being framed,

55:02 new authorities,

55:03 new organizations are being placed in,

55:06 the new benchmarks and certifications are required,

55:08 they are being placed,

55:10 and that is a good move,

55:11 I think,

55:11 unless the government moves in.

55:13 At the federal level and the provincial or the county level,

55:17 things cannot actually move on.

55:19 So I can very clearly see a sense of urgency,

55:22 a sense of alliance during the last many years in South Asian countries,

55:26 particularly I can speak of Pakistan,

55:29 that the governments are also now coming in.

55:31 And if you may allow to just close it,

55:35 that even in the the Millennium Goal development goals,

55:40 one of the

55:41 typical goals.

55:42 The governments have to actually report on the sustainability of the environment,

55:46 so it's very much there,

55:46 I think,

55:47 from the manufacturer side,

55:48 from the

55:49 buyer side,

55:50 and from the government side also,

55:51 and it is just the beginning,

55:53 but the road is very bumpy,

55:54 not an easy one also.

55:57 OK,

55:57 yeah.

55:58 So I think having this this push towards a circular economy right the

56:01 way along that that value chain is incredibly important is what you're saying.

56:06 And it can be more or less,

56:07 less sort of pushed by different components

56:10 within that chain.

56:11 Um,

56:12 there,

56:13 there's another question here,

56:14 which I think,

56:14 uh,

56:14 Jenny might

56:15 be quite a good person to try to answer.

56:17 Um,

56:18 recycling is effective if the waste is sorted according to fiber type.

56:22 This involves manual labor.

56:24 Training to sort blended fabrics is a challenge while scaling up.

56:27 How can this be overcome,

56:28 Jenny,

56:29 have you got any thoughts on,

56:31 on the actual sort of sourcing?

56:34 Yes,

56:35 of course,

56:36 uh,

56:37 the sorting is very important.

56:39 Both the first step to sort what can be sold like secondhand.

56:43 Garments and what

56:44 is not in a good condition that should go for more fiber recycling.

56:49 So of course this is the crucial step.

56:51 The first step,

56:52 I think the manual sorting is still

56:54 needed because

56:56 machines are not yet able to.

56:59 To determine if a garment can be sold as a garment or not,

57:03 but when it comes to the fiber

57:06 sorting of fiber level,

57:07 there are several initiatives in this area and several technologies

57:12 existing already.

57:13 In south of Sweden,

57:15 a plant has just been built for

57:19 Fiber sorting.

57:20 So

57:21 I think this is the way forward to

57:24 sort material that cannot be used as garment.

57:27 So

57:28 we will start to get material from this plant

57:31 very soon.

57:34 So there is technology to support.

57:37 OK,

57:38 so that's,

57:38 that,

57:38 that,

57:39 that sounds quite like quite exciting and new technology as well.

57:43 Um,

57:44 Jenny,

57:44 could you also just give us,

57:45 uh,

57:45 I mean,

57:46 obviously the,

57:46 the,

57:47 your company is working largely in Sweden.

57:49 Could you just give us a sense of how,

57:51 with what sort of ease with the technologies that your company has been developing,

57:55 be able to be applied in areas such as South Asia and East Asia,

57:59 where there's a huge amount of textile production?

58:02 Yes,

58:03 so yes,

58:04 our first

58:05 plant is in Sweden and our second plant will also be in Sweden,

58:09 but we

58:09 have very ambitious plans to open more plants

58:14 all over the world.

58:15 We have a goal to recycle

58:18 around.

58:20 I should say 3 360,000 metric tons of

58:26 dissolving pulp from recycled textiles by 2030.

58:30 So that's quite soon and that will require several

58:34 more plants than the one we are currently building.

58:37 So

58:37 we hope to have

58:39 plants in many areas of the world.

58:41 Of course,

58:43 uh,

58:43 Southeast,

58:44 East Asia and China are interesting markets since there are a lot of textile.

58:49 Production going on in that area and we work

58:52 both with textile waste from production and post-consumer waste.

58:57 So for the post-consumer waste,

58:58 of course,

58:59 all,

58:59 all areas where there are a lot of

59:02 people using clothes are interesting

59:05 if there is collection going on.

59:07 So

59:07 I hope we can have many plots in the next coming years.

59:12 OK,

59:12 that sounds sounds very good.

59:14 Good luck with that.

59:17 And

59:18 just as a as a final wrap up question,

59:20 I think to all the panel members who go around again in order.

59:24 Um,

59:24 I mean just thinking a little bit about the policies.

59:27 Um,

59:27 so both policies that would sort of influence the behavior of the public,

59:31 and the behavior of Consumers,

59:33 but also policies that might influence,

59:35 um,

59:35 the manufacturers as Khaled was sort of referring to before.

59:40 What would be your

59:42 top or your key policies in both those arenas that you would like to see

59:46 happen to start to allow us to move even more quickly

59:49 towards the circular economy?

59:50 And I'll,

59:51 I'll go first to Amalpo

59:53 to see if,

59:54 uh,

59:54 you can give us your thoughts on that.

59:57 Yes,

59:58 thank you very much,

59:59 um,

59:59 I think um the policy and the government is one of the,

1:00:04 you know,

1:00:04 key player

1:00:06 to actually drive this

1:00:07 forward

1:00:08 and I'm hoping to see

1:00:11 um policies such as um

1:00:14 circular procurement.

1:00:17 That the government endorsed to actually jumpstart the industry,

1:00:21 incentivize in a real way

1:00:24 for the company to be encouraged to

1:00:28 change

1:00:29 the way

1:00:30 they are producing and encourage that they are starting

1:00:34 to use and adopt the mindset.

1:00:38 Also,

1:00:40 the tax cut would be

1:00:42 great,

1:00:42 another great incentive to start off

1:00:46 slowly.

1:00:47 To implement the policy as well as

1:00:50 some

1:00:51 funding

1:00:52 for the circular

1:00:54 project alike

1:00:56 and in Thailand I'm part of the

1:01:00 subcommittee for the circular economy funding,

1:01:03 so we are

1:01:04 actively funding

1:01:06 some of the circular economy projects

1:01:09 and at the same time from the top down

1:01:12 spreading the word.

1:01:13 And also

1:01:15 spreading

1:01:15 the circular mindset and giving some of the examples,

1:01:20 building some CE

1:01:22 champion companies

1:01:24 here in Thailand so that

1:01:27 people can be

1:01:28 inspired and understand

1:01:30 the mindset because I think

1:01:31 the most effective way

1:01:33 to change

1:01:35 into transition into the circular economy

1:01:38 is actually by

1:01:40 Everybody

1:01:41 having the mindset

1:01:43 and having the mindset allows everybody's

1:01:47 imagination

1:01:49 to drive

1:01:51 and create

1:01:52 something new

1:01:53 out of

1:01:54 whatever they have available.

1:01:57 Like for example,

1:01:58 for me,

1:01:59 I actually just

1:02:01 have the mindset

1:02:03 from reading

1:02:05 the Resource revolution,

1:02:06 the book Resource Revolution,

1:02:08 as well as study very deeply.

1:02:10 Um,

1:02:10 er,

1:02:10 er,

1:02:10 the Ellen MacArthur Foundation website,

1:02:13 that's it.

1:02:15 And once I have,

1:02:16 and once I have the mindset,

1:02:18 it's starting to,

1:02:19 um,

1:02:20 uh,

1:02:20 grow on me

1:02:21 and wanting to test out

1:02:23 whether what this wonderful concept would look like,

1:02:28 um,

1:02:28 and so I think that,

1:02:30 um,

1:02:31 having

1:02:32 The,

1:02:32 um,

1:02:33 you know,

1:02:33 money incentive,

1:02:34 sure,

1:02:34 I think it's great,

1:02:35 but at the same time,

1:02:36 um,

1:02:37 educational

1:02:38 and building real

1:02:39 businesses,

1:02:40 I think,

1:02:41 uh,

1:02:41 uh,

1:02:42 having a real,

1:02:43 um,

1:02:44 example of,

1:02:45 of successful business

1:02:46 er who are scalable and profitable

1:02:49 and,

1:02:50 um,

1:02:50 incentivize everybody to build this industry,

1:02:53 um,

1:02:54 that would be one of the most effective way

1:02:57 of,

1:02:57 of building this,

1:02:58 this,

1:02:58 this new transition

1:02:59 and,

1:03:00 and I'm,

1:03:00 I'm seeing that.

1:03:01 A little bit here.

1:03:02 So,

1:03:03 yeah,

1:03:03 I just wanted to share.

1:03:05 OK,

1:03:06 thank you ever so much.

1:03:07 I think we probably have to end

1:03:09 on that note and we can come back to the others perhaps in the final panel session

1:03:14 here.

1:03:14 But I think that's,

1:03:15 that's a nice sort of place to end.

1:03:16 It's not just about resources,

1:03:18 but it's also about having the will

1:03:19 to really want to make a change.

1:03:21 So I hand back to,

1:03:22 um,

1:03:23 Dave,

1:03:24 I think,

1:03:25 for the next panel session.

1:03:28 Thanks so much Lisa.

1:03:30 That was a really great discussion,

1:03:32 um,

1:03:33 and now we'll move on to panel two where we'll be focusing on

1:03:38 the role of the brand,

1:03:40 uh,

1:03:40 and focusing on,

1:03:42 you know,

1:03:42 new,

1:03:43 uh,

1:03:43 ways to,

1:03:45 to,

1:03:45 to engage the consumer and so on,

1:03:47 so we'll be speaking to players,

1:03:49 you know,

1:03:49 uh,

1:03:49 more involved.

1:03:50 In the downstream side,

1:03:52 uh,

1:03:52 and I would like to welcome our moderator for panel two.

1:03:55 So we have Whitney Bok,

1:03:57 which is the senior sustainability reporter at Fashionista,

1:04:01 and prior to working with Fashionista,

1:04:03 she also wrote for The New York Times and The Washington Post and in 2020,

1:04:08 Whitney was named the Environmental Reporting Fellow at the McHealth Institute.

1:04:12 Whitney,

1:04:13 uh,

1:04:13 is the sessions yours.

1:04:15 Thanks.

1:04:17 Thanks so much.

1:04:18 I'm so glad to be here.

1:04:19 I'm here with Mark Drake Knight,

1:04:21 Jessica Long,

1:04:21 and Sarah Hayes,

1:04:22 and I'm actually gonna have each of the panelists

1:04:25 introduce themselves a little bit about

1:04:27 themselves and their company and sort of their expertise.

1:04:29 So,

1:04:30 Mark,

1:04:30 could we start with you?

1:04:35 Sure,

1:04:36 hi Whitney,

1:04:36 um,

1:04:37 just checking if you can hear me.

1:04:38 Yes,

1:04:39 it's great,

1:04:39 um,

1:04:40 yeah,

1:04:40 I'm,

1:04:40 I'm Mark,

1:04:41 um,

1:04:42 I'm,

1:04:42 uh,

1:04:42 an engineer,

1:04:43 one of the co-founders at TI.

1:04:45 Uh,

1:04:45 we make products from natural materials,

1:04:47 uh,

1:04:47 we use renewable energy.

1:04:50 We produce products,

1:04:51 uh,

1:04:52 in real time,

1:04:53 um,

1:04:54 and I think,

1:04:54 uh,

1:04:55 perhaps the

1:04:55 two bits of our business that are

1:04:58 interesting and,

1:04:58 and relevant to this is that every product we make is designed

1:05:00 from the start to come back to us when it's worn out,

1:05:03 and we make our new products from the material that we recover.

1:05:07 And in recent years,

1:05:08 what we've been doing is packaging all of that up,

1:05:11 um,

1:05:11 in a platform at Til and giving it away to people

1:05:14 so that they can participate and start their own circular businesses.

1:05:19 Red.

1:05:20 Sarah?

1:05:24 Yes,

1:05:25 hi,

1:05:25 Whitney,

1:05:25 can you hear me?

1:05:26 Yes,

1:05:28 great,

1:05:28 thanks.

1:05:29 Yeah,

1:05:30 uh,

1:05:30 delighted to be here.

1:05:31 My name is Sarah Hayes,

1:05:33 and I'm working with the H&M Group Global sustainability department,

1:05:38 so I'm based in Stockholm,

1:05:40 Sweden as well,

1:05:41 and I'm part of the circular team there.

1:05:44 And my current focus at the moment is really looking at

1:05:49 how do we accelerate initiatives within circular design,

1:05:53 but also how do we transform towards a circular business model

1:05:58 and really going from

1:06:00 testing to scale there.

1:06:04 Great.

1:06:04 And Jessica?

1:06:06 Great.

1:06:06 Thank you,

1:06:07 Whitney,

1:06:07 and hello to everyone.

1:06:08 Also quite excited to be on today's panel discussion.

1:06:11 I've already seen

1:06:13 a lot of the really interesting questions from the the first panel.

1:06:16 Um,

1:06:17 I've spent the last 20 years or so working

1:06:20 at the intersection of,

1:06:21 of business,

1:06:22 uh,

1:06:23 nonprofit and sustainability and responsible business across North America,

1:06:27 Africa.

1:06:28 Asia and Latin America

1:06:31 spent about close to 28 years working at Accenture,

1:06:35 leading their responsible business and sustainable business practice,

1:06:39 and with Accenture

1:06:40 co-published a book called The Circular Economy Handbook,

1:06:43 basically sharing all of our lessons over

1:06:46 several years working at Circular Economy.

1:06:48 I've recently joined a leading Investment firm

1:06:52 based in New York called Closed Loop Partners that is specifically focused on

1:06:57 kind of filling that necessary gap

1:07:00 in circular economy transformation and scaling circular solutions,

1:07:04 so bringing financing and then actually building out

1:07:08 a lot of the solutions and infrastructure that

1:07:11 I'm sure we will talk about today.

1:07:13 Thanks,

1:07:13 Whitney.

1:07:15 Great.

1:07:15 So,

1:07:15 I'd love to start out with a question for all of you,

1:07:17 and any of you can sort of jump in wherever feels right with this.

1:07:21 Um,

1:07:22 how can we make circular fashion,

1:07:23 whether that's in terms of durable materials or rental models,

1:07:27 more accessible for the average customer?

1:07:35 Yeah,

1:07:35 happy to shoot on that one,

1:07:37 Whitney.

1:07:38 Um,

1:07:39 I mean,

1:07:39 I think

1:07:41 that's

1:07:42 really important to look at how do we actually increase accessibility here.

1:07:46 That's actually

1:07:48 a core part of our vision at the H&M Group.

1:07:51 But then when it comes to

1:07:53 the how part,

1:07:55 uh,

1:07:55 I think what we're seeing there is that

1:07:57 firstly it needs to be really easy

1:08:00 and it needs to be really convenient.

1:08:02 So really focusing on

1:08:04 customer centric solutions.

1:08:06 Um,

1:08:06 it's also quite key that

1:08:08 it's wallet friendly,

1:08:10 like especially now,

1:08:11 um,

1:08:12 post-COVID we're seeing that there is a

1:08:14 bit more sensitivity uh with customer spend.

1:08:18 Um,

1:08:18 in different sectors and different regions,

1:08:21 um,

1:08:22 but then overall I think we still need to

1:08:25 think fashion here and how do we meet

1:08:28 the customer's fashion needs,

1:08:30 but,

1:08:31 um,

1:08:31 in a more sustainable way.

1:08:34 So one thing that I think

1:08:36 can be key when looking at how do we increase accessibility,

1:08:41 we need

1:08:43 a diversity in models here,

1:08:44 especially as we move on towards a more circular model.

1:08:47 It's really not

1:08:48 a one size fits all.

1:08:51 And the customer will want to meet

1:08:53 those fashion needs in different ways and experience fashion in different ways,

1:08:57 and

1:08:57 I think that's where we can really dig into the creativity.

1:09:00 Like some customers really

1:09:03 will have pieces that they love,

1:09:05 they want to keep them for a long time,

1:09:07 repair them.

1:09:09 Uh,

1:09:10 where some customers will be more eager to

1:09:13 like tap into the rental and the

1:09:15 swapping scene where they can actually access pieces

1:09:18 in

1:09:19 maybe a higher price point that they actually couldn't

1:09:22 afford in a traditional retail model,

1:09:23 but they can actually access them in other ways.

1:09:27 Uh,

1:09:27 so I think,

1:09:28 I think,

1:09:28 I think there is really a lot of potential there.

1:09:36 Art or Jessica,

1:09:37 is there anything you could add to that?

1:09:38 00,

1:09:39 sorry,

1:09:39 go ahead,

1:09:40 Mark.

1:09:40 Yeah,

1:09:41 sorry,

1:09:41 I was,

1:09:41 um,

1:09:42 I was being polite,

1:09:43 waiting,

1:09:43 waiting,

1:09:43 waiting for someone to ask,

1:09:44 ask me,

1:09:45 um,

1:09:45 yeah,

1:09:45 I,

1:09:46 I think,

1:09:46 um.

1:09:48 I,

1:09:48 I,

1:09:49 I kind of agree with Sarah's point,

1:09:50 you know,

1:09:50 you want,

1:09:50 you want products,

1:09:51 you know,

1:09:51 if we're gonna make,

1:09:53 we're serious about this circular thing,

1:09:54 we need the products to be like,

1:09:55 really awesome.

1:09:56 But I,

1:09:56 I think the fashion industry,

1:09:57 there's one thing the fashion industry are amazing at,

1:09:59 is making products that,

1:10:01 that,

1:10:01 that look great,

1:10:02 um,

1:10:03 and really circular business is,

1:10:05 is.

1:10:07 A lot about materials and model.

1:10:09 So we can still have products that look amazing,

1:10:12 but what we're talking about here is,

1:10:14 is not,

1:10:14 it's not the products,

1:10:15 it's the way they're made and what happens when,

1:10:17 when,

1:10:17 what they're made from,

1:10:18 the way they're made and what happens when they're,

1:10:19 when they're worn out.

1:10:20 And I,

1:10:20 I think,

1:10:21 um,

1:10:21 when we talk about accessibility,

1:10:23 you know,

1:10:23 something like 40% of all clothing production is never utilized,

1:10:26 it goes straight into,

1:10:27 into landfill.

1:10:28 And,

1:10:28 um,

1:10:29 so,

1:10:29 so I,

1:10:30 I kind of wanna,

1:10:30 wanna make a point here,

1:10:31 which is that.

1:10:33 Actually,

1:10:33 surely it would be cheaper not to waste

1:10:36 that,

1:10:36 and theoretically up to 40% cheaper.

1:10:39 So,

1:10:39 uh,

1:10:39 uh,

1:10:40 you know,

1:10:40 too often in this conversation,

1:10:41 um,

1:10:42 you know,

1:10:42 people equivocate a little bit,

1:10:44 or,

1:10:44 or say,

1:10:44 well,

1:10:44 you know,

1:10:45 we'd like to do something that's gonna be more expensive.

1:10:47 Um,

1:10:47 I think if a business sets out,

1:10:50 um,

1:10:50 not because of external pressure to kind of be seen to be doing something,

1:10:53 but sets out to say,

1:10:53 how do we actually change the way that products are made,

1:10:55 change,

1:10:56 change the factories,

1:10:57 um.

1:10:59 Uh,

1:10:59 and,

1:10:59 and change that 40% of waste,

1:11:01 so we could end up with products where they're designed

1:11:03 from the start to come back and be remade,

1:11:04 where the,

1:11:05 where the brand,

1:11:06 saves money,

1:11:07 the consumer saves money,

1:11:08 and it's better for the environment,

1:11:09 so the potential win,

1:11:10 win,

1:11:10 win.

1:11:15 And Whitney,

1:11:15 I'll just say I completely agree with with all

1:11:17 the comments that have been made so far.

1:11:19 I think it is,

1:11:20 there's not a silver bullet,

1:11:21 right?

1:11:21 It's not like here's the one model or the one solution or the one company.

1:11:26 It's not even just how to,

1:11:28 here's the way that we deal with waste.

1:11:30 It truly is that full end to end

1:11:33 value chain that Mark just mentioned,

1:11:36 and I think it is,

1:11:37 it's a matter of

1:11:39 And I apology,

1:11:40 I apologize for the pun here,

1:11:41 but closing the loop,

1:11:42 right,

1:11:43 of truly looking at end to end,

1:11:45 um,

1:11:46 what,

1:11:46 what are the consumers demanding?

1:11:48 How do we help inform them better about and educate

1:11:51 about the different products and materials that are out there?

1:11:53 How do we design products

1:11:55 with materials that are meant to be

1:11:57 reused or recycled or brought back to their original condition

1:12:02 and And when consumers are done using whatever particular product

1:12:06 or clothing or bedding or whatever textile they're using,

1:12:09 how do we make sure we are getting it back?

1:12:12 So that collection,

1:12:12 that reverse logistics piece

1:12:14 is just,

1:12:15 is just so critical.

1:12:16 And to Sarah's point,

1:12:17 it's not one answer for how that model should work.

1:12:20 Some people

1:12:22 are happy to bring their product back into a store.

1:12:25 Some people

1:12:25 Really want it or need it to be collected or picked up from them.

1:12:29 Some people need different incentives models,

1:12:31 right?

1:12:31 So

1:12:32 the kind of subscription model works quite well in certain parts of the

1:12:35 world and in other parts of the world it doesn't work at all,

1:12:38 right?

1:12:38 So providing these different models and different options just like we do with

1:12:42 every other industry out there,

1:12:44 I think is going to be critical to making sure it is

1:12:47 both accessible and affordable.

1:12:50 Mm

1:12:51 A point that's often talked about in sort of circular economy

1:12:55 conversations is the importance of collaboration across the value chain.

1:12:58 I'm curious what any of you think makes successful collaborations

1:13:02 in the fashion industry and how do we make collaborations

1:13:05 more inclusive both across developed,

1:13:07 developed and developing economies.

1:13:13 I'll jump in with one quick thing around collaboration because I actually

1:13:17 think it's the key to making this whole thing work because it is

1:13:21 in many ways a volume game.

1:13:23 It's a matching supply and demand,

1:13:24 and we know whenever people do complain about

1:13:27 a more sustainable product being more expensive,

1:13:30 oftentimes it's just because we don't have the volume that's needed

1:13:33 to make it be.

1:13:34 The more affordable option.

1:13:36 Or to Mark's point,

1:13:37 we're not looking at the full cost of ownership of that actual product.

1:13:41 And by full cost of ownership,

1:13:42 I mean including

1:13:43 all of the wasted product that

1:13:45 doesn't actually go to market

1:13:47 or the cost of actually recycling or the cost of landfilling something

1:13:51 and the the the burden on municipalities or on

1:13:54 local governments to To pay for that cost.

1:13:57 Um,

1:13:57 so I think to

1:13:59 get the sustainable circular products and services

1:14:02 to a point where

1:14:04 they are the preferred option,

1:14:05 you actually have to have collaboration,

1:14:07 right?

1:14:07 It's not one company saying,

1:14:09 we want to use this,

1:14:10 this circular product.

1:14:12 You have to get the volume of the vast majority of companies to want that,

1:14:17 um,

1:14:17 so that

1:14:18 the price points make sense.

1:14:22 I think,

1:14:22 uh,

1:14:22 for,

1:14:23 for me,

1:14:23 collaboration,

1:14:23 I'd say the most important thing is to have the same values.

1:14:26 It doesn't work if you've got,

1:14:27 you've got,

1:14:28 you know,

1:14:28 you've got different values.

1:14:29 But I think we stoical economy that the,

1:14:31 the collaboration,

1:14:32 uh,

1:14:32 the most interesting collaboration is the fact

1:14:33 that you're collaborating with your customer.

1:14:36 So,

1:14:36 you know,

1:14:37 really to make the,

1:14:37 the,

1:14:38 the product flow around,

1:14:39 um,

1:14:40 it's not just about working a materials level or a factories level,

1:14:43 but,

1:14:43 um,

1:14:44 it's realizing that,

1:14:45 and taking responsibility for what happens to the product after the in-use phase.

1:14:51 And so you need to work with your customer to,

1:14:53 and build a relationship.

1:14:54 And you get some quite interesting dynamics if you,

1:14:56 if you do that.

1:14:57 Um,

1:14:57 like,

1:14:58 for example,

1:14:58 um,

1:14:59 our customer,

1:15:00 uh Til is also our supplier.

1:15:02 They supply us with,

1:15:03 um,

1:15:04 our raw material.

1:15:05 Um,

1:15:06 and so going forward,

1:15:07 one of the things that we realized was this

1:15:08 is a really big opportunity to rapidly scale,

1:15:12 um,

1:15:13 You know,

1:15:13 the impact that we wanted to have and,

1:15:15 and the technology that we wanted to have by sharing it with our customers,

1:15:18 which is why,

1:15:18 why we built the platform,

1:15:20 and,

1:15:20 um,

1:15:22 and allow them to sort of participate on the supply side

1:15:25 as well.

1:15:26 Um,

1:15:27 so I think that values and the most important collaboration is,

1:15:30 is with,

1:15:30 with the user.

1:15:33 Yeah,

1:15:34 I think I could really

1:15:36 agree here with both actually.

1:15:37 I mean,

1:15:38 if we're going to have impact here,

1:15:40 we need to be collaborating.

1:15:41 It needs to be majority doing it

1:15:43 and yeah,

1:15:44 there definitely is a certain magic when we are

1:15:48 having that collaboration with the customer,

1:15:50 but I think also when

1:15:51 I'm reflecting a bit on,

1:15:53 OK,

1:15:53 what actually makes,

1:15:54 um,

1:15:55 yeah,

1:15:56 successful collaboration.

1:15:57 I think what we've seen a bit is when you're

1:16:00 also finding partners that have complementary capabilities.

1:16:05 It's really not that you need to be

1:16:07 an expert in everything you do,

1:16:10 so I mean when you're mapping your ecosystem and you know where are the gaps,

1:16:15 really inviting others in

1:16:17 and to really see how you can build on that together.

1:16:21 Um,

1:16:22 and I think also sharing knowledge is another

1:16:25 key success factor when it comes to collaboration as well,

1:16:29 because it does take,

1:16:30 it takes all sorts,

1:16:31 um,

1:16:32 it takes big,

1:16:33 small,

1:16:33 old and new,

1:16:34 it takes all kinds of partnerships to get us there

1:16:37 and um

1:16:39 yeah,

1:16:39 even being able to

1:16:41 share access and to share knowledge is what's going to get us there faster as well.

1:16:47 It's great.

1:16:49 Mark,

1:16:49 I would love to go back to you and talk a little

1:16:51 bit about uh TMill's sort of made to order supply chain,

1:16:54 cause it's organized as a platform that's

1:16:57 open source and freely accessible to any company in the fashion industry.

1:17:01 What

1:17:01 is the uptake of this service so far and

1:17:04 how long do you think it will take for made to order to sort of become more mainstream,

1:17:07 so we can be cutting out that waste that you were talking

1:17:09 about on the sort of front end of the production cycle?

1:17:16 So we're quite a simple place,

1:17:18 and I,

1:17:18 I think,

1:17:19 uh,

1:17:19 we sort of look at these things sometimes in quite a helpful,

1:17:21 a naive but helpful way,

1:17:23 which is that we would say,

1:17:24 well,

1:17:24 aren't all clothes made to order?

1:17:26 I mean,

1:17:26 somebody orders them.

1:17:28 Um,

1:17:28 it just sort of seems,

1:17:29 uh,

1:17:30 crazy to us that there will be somebody sat in the middle who's predicting

1:17:33 what people want to buy.

1:17:35 And then you end up with,

1:17:36 obviously that's inaccurate,

1:17:37 so you end up with all of this,

1:17:38 this waste,

1:17:39 um,

1:17:39 and you need a marketing team to try and push what you want to sell instead.

1:17:42 And it seems more obvious logical to us to say,

1:17:44 well,

1:17:45 why don't we just produce the,

1:17:47 make what people need,

1:17:49 uh,

1:17:49 when they need it.

1:17:50 Now,

1:17:51 for us to make that possible,

1:17:52 um,

1:17:53 if we

1:17:54 use technology.

1:17:56 And to,

1:17:57 to make a lot of these things possible,

1:17:59 uh,

1:17:59 like the reverse logistics system that we have and the recovery,

1:18:02 you know,

1:18:02 we,

1:18:03 we've developed

1:18:03 tech technologies of our own,

1:18:06 um,

1:18:06 hardware,

1:18:07 software,

1:18:07 but also,

1:18:08 the thing about tech is it's not.

1:18:11 Evenly distributed,

1:18:12 so something that's very obvious and simple in a parallel industry

1:18:15 is like really profound when you apply it to fashion.

1:18:18 So,

1:18:18 so,

1:18:18 so,

1:18:19 um,

1:18:20 you know,

1:18:21 when you,

1:18:21 when you kind of put it,

1:18:22 put it all together,

1:18:23 it's,

1:18:23 um,

1:18:24 a relatively

1:18:25 simple proposition to say,

1:18:26 you know,

1:18:27 here's a platform,

1:18:29 build your business,

1:18:29 and we'll produce the products in real time.

1:18:31 And because we only make what people need when they need it,

1:18:33 we don't need to hold a load of stock so we can give it away for free.

1:18:36 And because we give it away for free,

1:18:37 the uptake's been really great.

1:18:38 I mean,

1:18:39 there's.

1:18:39 You know,

1:18:40 enough,

1:18:40 um,

1:18:40 people running Teamil,

1:18:42 uh,

1:18:43 powered businesses online now to fill,

1:18:45 you know,

1:18:45 a decent sized football stadium.

1:18:47 Some of them are really big businesses,

1:18:48 like BBC or Google.

1:18:50 But I think what's most interesting is how many

1:18:53 people that would never have

1:18:55 participated as a business.

1:18:59 Um,

1:18:59 particularly with COVID,

1:19:00 you know,

1:19:01 it's people,

1:19:01 people who,

1:19:02 it's their first business.

1:19:03 And for me,

1:19:04 that's the most exciting one,

1:19:05 because you can see how

1:19:07 a technology,

1:19:08 an enabling technology,

1:19:10 um,

1:19:10 can create such

1:19:12 quick,

1:19:13 um.

1:19:15 Impact

1:19:16 when people are actually have the way,

1:19:19 uh,

1:19:19 you know,

1:19:20 as well as the will.

1:19:23 Yeah,

1:19:23 that makes sense.

1:19:25 I'd love to go back to Sarah,

1:19:27 since we're,

1:19:27 we've sort of talked about collaboration with the customer.

1:19:30 Um,

1:19:30 at the current rate,

1:19:31 the

1:19:32 current junction,

1:19:32 the rate of consumption

1:19:34 of fast fashion is

1:19:35 pretty alarming.

1:19:36 The average customer buys 60% more clothing items

1:19:40 than they did 16 years ago and

1:19:42 keeps each item for half,

1:19:43 half as long.

1:19:44 Um,

1:19:45 garments can be used

1:19:47 7 or 8 times before they're discarded,

1:19:49 that we can go on and on with the stats in terms of how much is,

1:19:52 how much textile waste is landfilled every second.

1:19:55 Um,

1:19:55 I'm curious,

1:19:56 Sarah,

1:19:57 how is H&M planning to take responsibility to help slow down that

1:20:00 rate of consumption on the front end before we even talk about

1:20:03 bringing those clothing,

1:20:04 those clothing items back into a circular loop?

1:20:08 Yeah,

1:20:09 um,

1:20:09 I mean,

1:20:10 there is,

1:20:11 there are a few different initiatives that we have going on there,

1:20:14 um,

1:20:15 that we get into,

1:20:16 but I also first wanted to

1:20:20 start with thinking a little bit about,

1:20:22 um,

1:20:22 I mean when we

1:20:23 talk about

1:20:24 consumption as well because for me also it's

1:20:28 Uh,

1:20:29 it's an interesting one because for me it's

1:20:31 not even the biggest concern about the speed,

1:20:35 but it's

1:20:35 actually a bit more about

1:20:37 how are we using resources.

1:20:40 Uh,

1:20:41 because when you're consuming something,

1:20:42 you're actually,

1:20:44 uh,

1:20:44 using it up,

1:20:46 um,

1:20:46 but when we think about fashion,

1:20:48 I mean you're using it,

1:20:49 you're not actually using it up in the same way.

1:20:51 It's not like an apple or

1:20:53 toothpaste,

1:20:54 um,

1:20:55 for example,

1:20:56 like we're not in the biological cycle here,

1:20:58 we're actually in

1:20:59 the technical cycle,

1:21:01 and there is where you really want

1:21:03 products and resources and materials to recirculate as many times as possible.

1:21:08 Um,

1:21:08 so I think that's where we really need to be focusing on how

1:21:12 can you use products more?

1:21:14 How do we need to design products and systems to enable recirculation at scale,

1:21:20 because if we can keep

1:21:21 these products and materials in the loop,

1:21:23 if we can

1:21:24 manage to reduce the leakage,

1:21:26 then the speed isn't

1:21:29 as much of a challenge because you can access fashion in fast and slow ways,

1:21:34 like if you are accessing through a rental or a swapping model.

1:21:38 Then you can actually

1:21:40 um

1:21:41 yeah meet those fashion needs of news value,

1:21:44 um.

1:21:46 But you're not

1:21:48 you're not having the same leakage,

1:21:50 you're keeping those products in use,

1:21:52 you're keeping them in the system.

1:21:54 Um,

1:21:55 yeah,

1:21:55 so I think that's where we really need to be

1:21:58 focusing on because we simply can't continue

1:22:01 with the system that we have today where we're,

1:22:04 you know,

1:22:04 extracting,

1:22:05 using,

1:22:06 but then it's just massive leakage,

1:22:08 it's just not,

1:22:10 um,

1:22:10 we just can't continue like that long term.

1:22:12 So I think the main things that

1:22:14 we're really focusing on then,

1:22:16 I mean,

1:22:17 where do you go from there?

1:22:19 We're looking at

1:22:21 Different types of reuse models and we've initially been doing

1:22:25 a lot of different pilots within different areas,

1:22:29 but now seeing,

1:22:31 OK,

1:22:31 how to move on from that,

1:22:32 how do we take those learnings and go towards scale,

1:22:35 but I think also

1:22:37 hand in hand with that

1:22:38 you need to be looking at how do you actually create products that are enabled

1:22:43 to recirculate in that system.

1:22:45 They need to be designed from the beginning

1:22:47 to be able to recirculate.

1:22:48 I mean,

1:22:49 much like we heard on the last panel.

1:22:51 Um,

1:22:52 yeah,

1:22:52 otherwise you're at a bit of a losing game with yourself.

1:22:55 So I think those are the main focuses for us right now.

1:22:59 Mm

1:23:01 So,

1:23:01 Jessica,

1:23:02 so far we've been talking a lot about um sort of the

1:23:06 the citizen customer side of things,

1:23:07 and we've talked about the business side of things.

1:23:09 I'm curious if you've seen in your,

1:23:11 in your sort of research,

1:23:12 what role can

1:23:14 governments play in sort of encouraging or supporting

1:23:17 businesses and citizens in the transition to more circular economies.

1:23:23 Well,

1:23:23 do you,

1:23:23 do you mind if I just comment on one thing that Sarah just said,

1:23:25 because I,

1:23:26 I love this point about consumers

1:23:28 and if

1:23:29 You really go back into history around like how actually

1:23:31 not that far back in the 1950s or so,

1:23:35 and,

1:23:35 and you look at the word like

1:23:37 consumerism and consumption and how it gets applied

1:23:40 to durable,

1:23:42 durable goods like the stuff in our house,

1:23:44 like

1:23:44 the chair,

1:23:45 the beds,

1:23:45 you know,

1:23:46 the,

1:23:46 even our refrigerators and TVs,

1:23:48 our clothing.

1:23:49 It's quite interesting,

1:23:50 right?

1:23:51 Because consumption was really meant to be,

1:23:53 and even

1:23:53 The,

1:23:54 the assumption of um what a consumer is,

1:23:56 was meant to be things that

1:23:58 um

1:23:59 that we eat,

1:24:00 right?

1:24:00 Things that we consume energy,

1:24:02 uh,

1:24:03 food,

1:24:03 drink,

1:24:03 whatever it might be,

1:24:04 things that we literally consume and digest

1:24:07 and is gone,

1:24:08 right?

1:24:08 I mean,

1:24:09 that was part of the original,

1:24:10 I can't remember the Latin definition,

1:24:12 but it's something about like eating and and killing and and fully

1:24:16 uh consuming and digesting

1:24:17 it then.

1:24:18 was applied to everyday goods,

1:24:20 right,

1:24:21 and consumable and durables and things in our house.

1:24:23 And that has quite an interesting negative implication,

1:24:26 similar to what both Sarah

1:24:28 and Mark talked about,

1:24:29 right?

1:24:29 This idea that

1:24:31 we are,

1:24:31 we buy things and then

1:24:33 we use them up and then we throw them away,

1:24:36 right?

1:24:36 And I say all that just because I think there's an interesting,

1:24:39 um both

1:24:41 behavioral mindset change that Has to happen

1:24:44 um around this idea of consumption,

1:24:46 as well as Whitney,

1:24:47 to your question,

1:24:48 um,

1:24:48 potentially policy or government

1:24:51 changes as well

1:24:52 around this idea of consumption or around this idea of,

1:24:55 I can,

1:24:56 I can extract resources from the ground,

1:24:58 I can then turn it into something,

1:25:00 and then it gets used for a relatively short amount of time,

1:25:03 and then it's just

1:25:04 thrown away into some,

1:25:06 you know,

1:25:07 Um,

1:25:08 vast area that nobody sees,

1:25:10 right,

1:25:10 i.e.,

1:25:11 landfills or oceans.

1:25:13 Um,

1:25:14 so to your question on government and policy,

1:25:16 I think there's a lot of stuff that that fits in there,

1:25:18 less,

1:25:19 um,

1:25:19 in terms of the role of policy,

1:25:23 I think there's some very basic ones that have been around for years,

1:25:26 like around

1:25:27 um

1:25:28 the use of toxic materials or creating safer products,

1:25:32 um,

1:25:32 and how those products.

1:25:34 designed,

1:25:34 so you look at all of the amazing innovations and things like

1:25:38 um dyeing and the and the use of dyeing and water production and

1:25:42 the leakage out into our water streams and a lot of regulation around that

1:25:46 has been,

1:25:47 has been quite successful.

1:25:49 Um,

1:25:49 so I think there's some basic things like that.

1:25:51 I think government's really tackling waste definitions and waste hierarchies

1:25:55 and how we think about waste and treat waste.

1:25:58 Right now we talk about waste as it is.

1:26:00 As it says if it is this one

1:26:03 thing,

1:26:04 and it is

1:26:04 bad,

1:26:05 um,

1:26:05 as opposed to looking at it,

1:26:07 um,

1:26:07 as Mark mentioned earlier,

1:26:09 actually as potential inputs back into our supply chain.

1:26:12 So really understanding,

1:26:13 um,

1:26:14 both what is good waste

1:26:16 or reusable waste versus what are those things that um

1:26:21 we can't do anything with.

1:26:22 And then once you have those waste definitions,

1:26:25 starting to think about.

1:26:26 What,

1:26:27 what's the highest value that I can extract from that waste,

1:26:30 right?

1:26:31 So is it about turning it back into the same product?

1:26:33 Is it about

1:26:34 upcycling or recycling?

1:26:36 Is it about conversion to energy?

1:26:38 Is it something else?

1:26:39 So,

1:26:40 there are really no standards on these definitions or values across waste.

1:26:45 So I could definitely see the role of government,

1:26:47 um,

1:26:48 especially when you're at the city level or at the regional level,

1:26:51 making,

1:26:51 you know,

1:26:52 a huge difference,

1:26:53 um.

1:26:54 I think aligning incentives would be quite interesting.

1:26:57 We've seen a huge boom

1:26:58 in the world of renewable energy because

1:27:01 there are these amazing government programs and rebates

1:27:05 with respect to getting consumers to buy,

1:27:08 um,

1:27:08 you know,

1:27:08 things in the world of renewables or EVs.

1:27:11 So I think I could definitely see a lot more

1:27:13 happening there.

1:27:14 And then finally,

1:27:15 I think there's some really big game changer type of

1:27:18 policies that could come out and make a huge difference like

1:27:21 EPR or extended producer responsibility.

1:27:23 legislation,

1:27:24 right,

1:27:25 where you tell a consumer,

1:27:26 a company,

1:27:27 if you created this device,

1:27:29 you know,

1:27:29 you own it

1:27:30 all the way,

1:27:31 you know,

1:27:31 from beginning of production all the way through whatever happens to it

1:27:34 at the end of use or end of life of that product.

1:27:37 Um,

1:27:37 I think that kind of thing could be a game changer.

1:27:39 It,

1:27:39 it's

1:27:40 to be seen,

1:27:41 I think over the next couple of years,

1:27:42 whether that will truly be

1:27:44 rolled out,

1:27:45 um,

1:27:45 broadly.

1:27:46 But again,

1:27:47 lots of things that can happen both at the local level as well as the

1:27:50 kind of the federal or global level.

1:27:53 That's great.

1:27:55 Um,

1:27:56 going back to you,

1:27:56 Mark,

1:27:57 I would love to talk about the free returns that you

1:28:00 sort of offer for customers to send back worn items.

1:28:02 You said,

1:28:03 you know,

1:28:04 your customer is also your supplier.

1:28:06 I'm curious about how the economics of this reverse logistics network work

1:28:10 and what are the sort of key cost considerations and also opportunities

1:28:14 that you've seen and that other companies could

1:28:16 consider as they try to emulate this practice.

1:28:20 Yeah,

1:28:21 kind of to comment on the policy thing,

1:28:22 I mean,

1:28:22 to start with,

1:28:23 it's,

1:28:24 on the surface,

1:28:24 it's not cheaper.

1:28:26 I mean,

1:28:26 um,

1:28:27 one of the things that happened when we

1:28:29 started out.

1:28:30 Trying to use

1:28:32 natural materials,

1:28:32 renewables,

1:28:33 or,

1:28:33 or,

1:28:34 uh,

1:28:34 recovered products is,

1:28:36 when we tried to do the right thing,

1:28:38 everything got more expensive.

1:28:40 And

1:28:40 people don't talk about that very much,

1:28:42 but that's totally insane,

1:28:43 like,

1:28:44 the,

1:28:44 the system is set up to

1:28:46 punish,

1:28:48 uh,

1:28:48 that kind of

1:28:49 effort.

1:28:50 Um,

1:28:51 what we did was we,

1:28:52 uh,

1:28:53 uh,

1:28:53 you know,

1:28:53 the reality is the fashion system is a high volume,

1:28:56 low value materials flow,

1:28:58 fundamentally,

1:28:58 if you go back down to the physics.

1:29:00 So,

1:29:01 so it's,

1:29:01 if,

1:29:02 if,

1:29:02 if it,

1:29:02 if it's hard,

1:29:03 or you have to process it by,

1:29:05 uh,

1:29:07 separating different materials,

1:29:08 so to put in work,

1:29:10 um.

1:29:11 Uh,

1:29:11 or,

1:29:12 or if you have to pay people to manually operate it,

1:29:15 you,

1:29:15 you're going to create a lot of cost for not much return.

1:29:18 Or,

1:29:18 or to put it another way,

1:29:19 for this to work,

1:29:20 it needs to be automated.

1:29:22 And you have to make millions of little decisions at the speed of light,

1:29:24 which is why people haven't done it till now,

1:29:26 because people

1:29:27 can't do that.

1:29:28 But that's exactly what computers do.

1:29:30 So,

1:29:31 what we did was just wrote the code for the reverse logistics system.

1:29:34 So

1:29:34 every product has like a.

1:29:37 Um,

1:29:38 I've got some props.

1:29:39 There you go.

1:29:40 The t-shirt I'm wearing has got a,

1:29:41 a thing in,

1:29:42 you scan it,

1:29:42 and then,

1:29:43 you know,

1:29:43 you,

1:29:43 it tells you how to send it back.

1:29:44 It costs you nothing.

1:29:46 Uh,

1:29:46 and,

1:29:47 and,

1:29:47 and I think the key thing I would,

1:29:48 I would just like to say here is,

1:29:50 um,

1:29:51 we've,

1:29:51 we,

1:29:51 we're just

1:29:52 using technology to find efficiencies to pay for it.

1:29:55 It,

1:29:56 the,

1:29:56 the,

1:29:56 the,

1:29:56 the efficiency in this case is to recover this to design

1:29:59 this shirt from the start to be simple and be remade.

1:30:02 So,

1:30:03 and then,

1:30:03 and then,

1:30:04 uh,

1:30:05 it's worth it to us to recover it,

1:30:07 because we can use the material.

1:30:09 So rather than pay for more cotton,

1:30:11 more organic cotton,

1:30:12 we just give the customer

1:30:14 an incentive to send it back.

1:30:17 Um,

1:30:18 and it,

1:30:18 it,

1:30:19 it,

1:30:19 if you.

1:30:21 Mess with the finances at a systemic level,

1:30:24 uh,

1:30:24 you can,

1:30:25 you can see that,

1:30:26 uh,

1:30:26 uh,

1:30:26 whilst,

1:30:27 uh,

1:30:28 yes,

1:30:28 it does cost us money to kind of have it posted back here and process it,

1:30:31 but we save money over here on materials costs.

1:30:34 Um,

1:30:35 so a little bit of,

1:30:35 of,

1:30:36 of clever sort of systems design,

1:30:37 plus the conscientious application of technology

1:30:40 is how we find these efficiencies.

1:30:42 And then it's those efficiencies that we reinvest

1:30:45 to pay for.

1:30:46 Um,

1:30:47 projects like this.

1:30:48 And this is an example sat next to me,

1:30:49 that,

1:30:49 the clothes I'm wearing are made out of waist,

1:30:51 by the way.

1:30:52 Um,

1:30:52 and,

1:30:52 and here's a,

1:30:53 here's a roll of

1:30:55 What used to be

1:30:56 t-shirts

1:30:58 before being made back into new ones.

1:31:00 And so I guess,

1:31:01 I guess,

1:31:01 um,

1:31:02 You know,

1:31:03 I think

1:31:04 what I'd like people to,

1:31:05 I think people don't talk about enough is the fact that.

1:31:08 You know,

1:31:08 this is not an ambition,

1:31:09 this is working

1:31:10 here.

1:31:12 Um

1:31:13 It's,

1:31:14 and,

1:31:14 and it,

1:31:14 and,

1:31:14 and it can be done with technology that's available

1:31:17 today.

1:31:17 We don't need

1:31:19 to wait

1:31:20 for someone to do something for regulatory change,

1:31:23 um,

1:31:24 although that would,

1:31:25 that would accelerate things.

1:31:27 You know,

1:31:27 I think,

1:31:27 I think it's a,

1:31:28 it's a point of hope,

1:31:29 really,

1:31:29 that,

1:31:30 um,

1:31:32 That businesses can make this work within the current system.

1:31:36 Mm

1:31:38 Sort of on that note,

1:31:39 Sarah,

1:31:39 I would love to talk to you about,

1:31:41 this is actually a question from Tanya in the chat

1:31:44 about what helped sort of get the internal buy-in for H&M to focus on circularity,

1:31:49 because I think there is a big difference between

1:31:51 a business,

1:31:51 the scale that Mart is running and a business,

1:31:54 the scale of H&M.

1:31:55 So,

1:31:55 at H&M,

1:31:56 was it sort of talking about numbers and cost saving,

1:31:59 or was it showing

1:32:00 sort of consumer demand and emphasis on sustainability?

1:32:04 How did that,

1:32:05 how did that become a focus at H&M?

1:32:11 Oh

1:32:13 It was just,

1:32:15 yeah,

1:32:15 recognizing that

1:32:17 we just can't continue doing business the way we can

1:32:21 and

1:32:22 I mean,

1:32:23 yeah,

1:32:23 and the size and scale that we are,

1:32:25 I mean the population is booming and we need to,

1:32:29 we want to continue offering

1:32:31 um

1:32:31 people fashion and to experience fashion in an accessible way,

1:32:35 in a way that's sustainable

1:32:37 um

1:32:38 but we can't continue to do that in the current system.

1:32:40 To find a way to decouple,

1:32:42 we just can't

1:32:43 continue to extract resources,

1:32:47 use them,

1:32:47 and then ditch them.

1:32:49 It's the bats just doesn't add up,

1:32:51 basically.

1:32:52 So

1:32:53 logic,

1:32:54 I think,

1:32:54 was really what won

1:32:57 through there

1:32:59 that we just need to find a way to decouple.

1:33:02 So we have been setting a lot of strong visions

1:33:04 and targets on that the last number of years,

1:33:07 but now it's really coming down to the crunch.

1:33:10 What are the actions we need to take to get there?

1:33:12 Um,

1:33:13 how do you decouple in reality?

1:33:16 And I think we've also seen um

1:33:19 Kind of a double edged approach as well.

1:33:21 It's been both top down and bottom up.

1:33:24 Like we also got a new CEO now this year,

1:33:27 and I mean that's created incredible momentum and

1:33:31 Helena has a super strong message.

1:33:33 She thinks,

1:33:35 I mean,

1:33:35 circularity is the only way,

1:33:39 but at the same time we also have really engaged colleagues.

1:33:43 and it's not just people sitting at the sustainability department globally or

1:33:48 even in the regional sustainability teams,

1:33:50 it's people all over the company who

1:33:52 are really searching to engage with this and you know how can I contribute

1:33:57 on this transition to a more circular system

1:34:01 and

1:34:02 yeah,

1:34:02 so I think it's a combination of factors there.

1:34:07 Gotcha.

1:34:08 And

1:34:09 Jessica,

1:34:09 I'd love to go back to you and see if

1:34:11 you have any insight from um other industries' experiences.

1:34:14 Are there anything that you've seen happen in

1:34:17 other industries that you think the fashion industry

1:34:19 could learn from in terms of trying to transition to a circular economy?

1:34:24 Yeah,

1:34:24 I think,

1:34:25 I think there's probably a few different things.

1:34:27 One is,

1:34:28 um,

1:34:28 especially given everything we've just heard from

1:34:30 Sarah and Martin from the first panel,

1:34:33 um,

1:34:33 you know,

1:34:33 a lot of us have been talking about resources and the use of resources.

1:34:37 It'd be interesting if you start looking at

1:34:39 the fashion industry as an extractive industry,

1:34:42 right,

1:34:43 or a resource intensive industry,

1:34:44 just like mining,

1:34:46 oil and gas,

1:34:47 or

1:34:47 even the high tech.

1:34:49 right?

1:34:49 They're literally taking things from the ground,

1:34:52 creating it at

1:34:54 without necessarily paying for the full cost,

1:34:56 right,

1:34:57 of those of those resources that they're taking.

1:35:00 And I bring that up,

1:35:00 Whitney,

1:35:01 just because it's not necessarily something that we

1:35:03 would think about as as a parallel industry.

1:35:05 But the the mining industry,

1:35:07 in particular,

1:35:09 over the years has,

1:35:09 has

1:35:10 done some really interesting things around um trying

1:35:14 To limit or stop mining in some areas,

1:35:18 or when they are mining to do so in more water and energy efficient ways.

1:35:23 So I think learning from an operational or operational efficiency perspective

1:35:27 from some of those resource intensive industries could be really interesting,

1:35:31 right?

1:35:31 Especially those industries that have,

1:35:34 have had to start pricing in the cost of those externalities,

1:35:37 right?

1:35:37 So the cost of carbon,

1:35:38 the cost.

1:35:39 Cost of water,

1:35:39 you know,

1:35:40 the cost of

1:35:41 pollution,

1:35:42 that type of thing.

1:35:43 I think another really interesting industry could be um

1:35:46 some successes that the food industry has had

1:35:49 in two different ways.

1:35:51 One is

1:35:52 the collaboration stuff we talked about earlier.

1:35:54 So getting enough companies together

1:35:56 to demand,

1:35:57 you know,

1:35:57 a more sustainable palm oil,

1:35:59 for example,

1:36:00 or an alternative

1:36:01 to unsustainable palm oil,

1:36:03 or The food and beverage industries coming

1:36:06 together to find alternatives to single-use plastics

1:36:09 or or multi-layer plastics,

1:36:11 things that cannot be easily

1:36:13 reclaimed and recycled.

1:36:15 So seeing these

1:36:16 collaborations or consortiums of

1:36:19 companies coming together has been

1:36:21 quite interesting in the just the recent years

1:36:24 in the food and beverage.

1:36:25 And another thing from food,

1:36:26 I think actually could be the rise in

1:36:29 Um,

1:36:29 alternative material,

1:36:30 alternative foods,

1:36:31 right?

1:36:31 So we're seeing a lot around things like

1:36:33 Beyond Meat and Impossible Burgers and,

1:36:36 um,

1:36:37 Just Egg,

1:36:38 things like that.

1:36:39 I think we're just now starting to see that as well in the,

1:36:42 in the world of fashion and textiles with respect to,

1:36:45 you know,

1:36:45 using

1:36:46 pineapples or mushroom or other types of materials as alternatives to leather,

1:36:51 right,

1:36:51 as we know leather

1:36:52 and cotton

1:36:53 are.

1:36:54 Very um

1:36:55 water intensive,

1:36:56 energy intensive,

1:36:57 resource intensive materials.

1:36:59 So I think learning from those industries

1:37:01 could be quite

1:37:03 interesting.

1:37:04 And then the last thing I'll just mention on industries,

1:37:06 again,

1:37:06 we don't think of it as an industry always,

1:37:08 but um is nature.

1:37:09 I think nature is one of our best

1:37:12 places to learn

1:37:13 with respect to circular economy models,

1:37:16 and there's some amazing new innovations and.

1:37:18 Technologies out there

1:37:20 that really come from nature.

1:37:21 There's a company called

1:37:22 Mori that basically learns from silkworms

1:37:26 to

1:37:27 put invisible coatings on products,

1:37:29 um,

1:37:30 and,

1:37:30 and many other things like that.

1:37:31 There's a company called Evernew that's able to take

1:37:33 materials and put them right back to their original,

1:37:36 um,

1:37:36 original form again,

1:37:37 learning from nature.

1:37:39 So probably don't consider that an industry,

1:37:41 but

1:37:41 hopefully one that we,

1:37:42 we learn a lot more from.

1:37:45 Yeah,

1:37:45 absolutely.

1:37:47 Sarah,

1:37:47 I would love to go back to you real quick,

1:37:49 um,

1:37:49 in terms of talking about what,

1:37:52 what are some of the low hanging fruits that,

1:37:54 that H&M has already sort of reached towards or

1:37:57 that a business of that scale can have,

1:38:00 can do today,

1:38:00 can do tomorrow,

1:38:01 versus what are some of the sort of,

1:38:03 um,

1:38:04 reach goals of things that are a little bit further out,

1:38:07 but that will have a sort of effective and more impactful impact on the,

1:38:11 um,

1:38:11 industry overall.

1:38:14 Yeah,

1:38:14 sure.

1:38:15 I mean when it comes

1:38:17 to

1:38:18 the model side of things,

1:38:20 I think

1:38:21 low hanging fruit is,

1:38:23 um,

1:38:24 I mean,

1:38:25 test things,

1:38:26 just try it out.

1:38:28 There's so many

1:38:29 different types of models out there,

1:38:31 so test and learn,

1:38:32 test and learn,

1:38:34 that's what we've been trying to focus on now

1:38:36 the last two years or so.

1:38:38 And I mean being part of a group,

1:38:41 we have

1:38:42 quite an array of brands as well and that's really been a plus there that

1:38:46 they can all try out different types of models

1:38:49 and then share the learnings as well across the group

1:38:52 um.

1:38:53 So I think yeah,

1:38:54 on the model side

1:38:56 just start

1:38:57 uh test and learn,

1:38:58 but then when it comes to,

1:39:01 yeah,

1:39:01 long term reach goals,

1:39:03 then it's how do you take those learnings and take them to scale,

1:39:06 and that's not quite so simple,

1:39:08 um,

1:39:09 especially if you are a large organization

1:39:12 and you've been

1:39:13 headed in a direction for

1:39:15 a certain amount of time.

1:39:15 It's like being a big ship and you need to take a sharp turn.

1:39:19 Uh,

1:39:20 so

1:39:21 yeah,

1:39:21 there's a certain amount of um

1:39:24 reorganization that needs to go into that and I

1:39:26 mean also shifting your systems and developing your systems.

1:39:30 I mean it's the

1:39:31 it's the IT,

1:39:32 it's the accounting,

1:39:33 it's the logistics,

1:39:35 and it's all of those things.

1:39:38 Uh,

1:39:38 so that

1:39:40 is definitely a bit more of a challenge,

1:39:41 but

1:39:42 I mean needed if we're going to scale and head towards the needed impact.

1:39:48 Um,

1:39:49 but then I think also on

1:39:51 the product side,

1:39:52 um,

1:39:53 because if you're looking at

1:39:54 the products that you're then going to circulate in those varying models,

1:39:58 um,

1:40:00 Yeah,

1:40:00 I think there's also different levels of how you could approach that

1:40:04 like more low hanging fruit,

1:40:06 yeah,

1:40:06 looking at the materials,

1:40:08 and

1:40:09 yeah,

1:40:09 we're trying right now to increase the share of recycled,

1:40:12 also

1:40:13 tapping into some of those new gen materials that you were talking a bit about,

1:40:16 Jessica.

1:40:17 There's really an array of things that you can do there,

1:40:19 so I think that's

1:40:22 Yeah,

1:40:22 like a start,

1:40:24 but then I think more

1:40:25 long term is also.

1:40:29 Yet moving from sustainable materials to circular products,

1:40:33 it's a bit of a mindset shift

1:40:35 needed.

1:40:37 Yeah,

1:40:38 and zooming out a bit just from materials,

1:40:40 it's how do you combine those materials?

1:40:42 What are the processes as well?

1:40:43 How do you put them together in a way that you can also take them apart,

1:40:47 that you can repair them easily,

1:40:49 also that they're fit for

1:40:52 the type of.

1:40:53 Purpose or the type of use

1:40:56 that they're intended for,

1:40:58 um,

1:40:59 so I think that is also a bit more challenging,

1:41:02 but we need to start from the drawing board here to actually enable products

1:41:07 to recirculate within those models.

1:41:11 Great.

1:41:12 Well,

1:41:12 I feel like I could keep asking you all questions all day,

1:41:14 but it looks like we're at the end of our time,

1:41:16 so I'm gonna hand it over and see if we can get into

1:41:19 some of the concluding remarks and maybe a little bit more of Q&A.

1:41:24 Thanks so much for and panel,

1:41:27 uh,

1:41:27 panelists.

1:41:28 We are,

1:41:29 we are,

1:41:29 so we have arrived at the final.

1:41:33 Thank you for staying with us throughout.

1:41:35 Uh,

1:41:36 so,

1:41:36 um,

1:41:37 yeah,

1:41:37 let me introduce the moderator for the final Q&A.

1:41:41 Uh,

1:41:42 please welcome

1:41:43 Doctor Henrique Pasini,

1:41:44 and he's an economist at ANCTED where he works,

1:41:47 uh,

1:41:47 on circular economy issues.

1:41:50 He's also,

1:41:51 uh,

1:41:51 part of the core team responsible for the sustainable manufacturing.

1:41:54 Environmental pollution program which is implemented

1:41:58 in partnership with the UK FCDO.

1:42:01 Uh,

1:42:01 Doctor Bacini

1:42:02 also published over 30 articles on environment,

1:42:05 trade and development issues and has worked for various private and

1:42:08 public institutions including the European

1:42:10 Commission and the Brazilian government.

1:42:14 Oh yes.

1:42:15 Thank you,

1:42:16 Zi.

1:42:16 Thanks,

1:42:16 everybody.

1:42:17 It has been thrilling so far to

1:42:19 listen to the panelists.

1:42:20 I've been learning a lot.

1:42:22 I,

1:42:22 uh,

1:42:22 I'm sure the audience as well because we've got so many questions.

1:42:25 I am overwhelmed with questions here.

1:42:27 We'll certainly not be able to go through all of them,

1:42:29 but without further ado,

1:42:30 and,

1:42:30 uh,

1:42:31 allow me to be a bit uh dictatorial in uh my approach,

1:42:34 I'll be saying the name of the

1:42:36 uh panelists.

1:42:37 Or a moderator,

1:42:38 uh,

1:42:38 to whom I'll be addressing the question to

1:42:41 because there are so many questions and it's kind of uh nice if we can find a match

1:42:45 straight on.

1:42:46 So,

1:42:46 uh,

1:42:46 to the point,

1:42:47 I have a question here from Sophie Homans

1:42:49 on the,

1:42:50 uh,

1:42:51 to,

1:42:51 uh,

1:42:51 that I addressed to Francois.

1:42:53 Francois,

1:42:53 uh,

1:42:53 uh,

1:42:54 using information linked to third vision points made from safe recycled.

1:42:58 or renewable inputs,

1:43:00 so labeling,

1:43:01 uh,

1:43:01 is,

1:43:02 uh,

1:43:02 uh,

1:43:03 are,

1:43:03 are you,

1:43:03 do you see a way to prompt businesses and governments to develop

1:43:07 and use more

1:43:08 eco label,

1:43:09 especially eco label related to circularity.

1:43:11 For example,

1:43:12 could you have,

1:43:13 uh,

1:43:13 uh,

1:43:14 genes,

1:43:14 uh,

1:43:14 redesigned,

1:43:15 developing into a more solid standards that people can adopt,

1:43:20 for example.

1:43:22 That is a very good question.

1:43:25 Um,

1:43:26 I,

1:43:27 I agree that today one of the main issues that we

1:43:31 face is the lack of homogeneity and alignment behind specific standards.

1:43:36 So

1:43:37 you have a number of different standards alongside different aspects of a product.

1:43:42 If you take blue signs,

1:43:43 they look at the chemicals that are used in a product.

1:43:47 If you look at

1:43:48 organic certifications,

1:43:50 they look at the materials or recycling certifications,

1:43:53 so all of them look at aspects of a product

1:43:56 that are quite discrete.

1:43:57 You've got cradle to cradle that can look at a varying degree

1:44:01 of aspects of the product,

1:44:02 but which is very,

1:44:03 very strict

1:44:04 and limits to some extent its adoption of cost,

1:44:07 but brings a lot of clarity on all the different aspects of the product.

1:44:12 I guess there are a number of considerations

1:44:15 to have when you look at certifications.

1:44:17 First is

1:44:18 how expensive or difficult it is

1:44:21 to get.

1:44:22 The second one is

1:44:23 how controversial some of its measures are and how difficult it is to drive adoption

1:44:29 across the industry.

1:44:31 What you mentioned the genes and what we took there is

1:44:36 basically brought together some level of standards or initiatives,

1:44:40 so for example,

1:44:41 ZDHC or

1:44:43 some certification around organic cotton

1:44:46 and brought all that under a more

1:44:49 like

1:44:51 Like broad

1:44:52 umbrella where we also looked at durability,

1:44:54 where we also looked at

1:44:56 recyclability

1:44:59 but actually

1:45:00 did it in a way that

1:45:02 Ask people to self-report on what they were doing,

1:45:06 so it's not really a certification because we

1:45:08 don't go as far as validating ourselves,

1:45:11 but we aim to bring transparency

1:45:14 so people can

1:45:15 ask questions and challenge and understand

1:45:19 what is happening with the products that they purchased.

1:45:22 I hope that answers the question.

1:45:25 That's great,

1:45:25 Francois.

1:45:28 a number of questions related to the social impact of

1:45:30 this transformation from linear

1:45:32 production to circular

1:45:34 production and marketing.

1:45:35 Uh,

1:45:35 I'm gonna address,

1:45:36 uh,

1:45:36 Jessica here,

1:45:37 uh,

1:45:37 with your,

1:45:38 your previous literature,

1:45:39 uh,

1:45:40 Jessica.

1:45:40 The debate about the,

1:45:41 uh,

1:45:42 a question from Laura Macides,

1:45:43 by the way,

1:45:44 the debate

1:45:45 about circularity focuses on the environmental aspects mainly,

1:45:49 but,

1:45:49 uh,

1:45:50 less so on the social aspects.

1:45:52 What do you think could be the major social Impact,

1:45:54 especially on jobs

1:45:55 and,

1:45:56 and Francois,

1:45:56 I know as well that the the Helen McArthur

1:45:58 Foundation did some analysis on the job creation aspect,

1:46:02 but,

1:46:02 uh,

1:46:02 initially,

1:46:03 Jessica,

1:46:03 uh she want to comment,

1:46:05 Francois,

1:46:06 please do it.

1:46:06 So do you think the transition from circularity

1:46:09 to,

1:46:09 uh,

1:46:10 to,

1:46:10 from linearity to circularity

1:46:12 in,

1:46:12 in fashion and textiles

1:46:14 will bring about more jobs or more,

1:46:16 more high-quality jobs

1:46:18 than what we have today?

1:46:21 Yes,

1:46:22 so I think there's,

1:46:23 and there's probably a lot of things you can look at,

1:46:25 um,

1:46:25 Henry,

1:46:26 when you look at the social impact or the social

1:46:29 benefits of the linear to circular transition.

1:46:32 I'll just say,

1:46:34 first,

1:46:34 probably the biggest one or one of the biggest ones is

1:46:37 affordability or access to

1:46:40 more affordable products and services.

1:46:42 So when again,

1:46:42 we,

1:46:43 we think about a product,

1:46:45 whether it's clothing.

1:46:46 Or

1:46:46 shoes or vehicles or whatever it might be,

1:46:49 having multiple lives,

1:46:51 um,

1:46:51 then that the cost of that product spread

1:46:54 across multiple people makes it much more affordable,

1:46:57 and that's much more accessible

1:46:59 to people across the world.

1:47:00 So I think that

1:47:01 that affordability,

1:47:02 accessibility piece is huge

1:47:05 from a social impact perspective.

1:47:07 Another big one that I just,

1:47:09 I do want to mention because it's,

1:47:10 it is directly linked to Environmental impact

1:47:13 is the

1:47:14 the

1:47:15 the health issues related to the negative environmental impacts that we see today

1:47:21 in the world of fashion and textiles.

1:47:23 So that could be

1:47:24 pollution,

1:47:25 it could be toxicity of dyes and other chemicals being

1:47:29 put into our water streams or put directly into our soil.

1:47:32 It could be the impact of clothing being washed

1:47:35 multiple times and Um,

1:47:37 you know,

1:47:37 microfibers or microplastics ending up in our drinking water

1:47:40 or ending up in our systems and our food.

1:47:43 So there's a huge,

1:47:44 you know,

1:47:45 environmental,

1:47:45 social health impact,

1:47:46 and as we know,

1:47:48 it's typically persons from

1:47:50 uniquely disadvantaged communities

1:47:52 that are

1:47:53 disproportionately impacted by those negative environmental consequences.

1:47:58 And then to your to your actual question,

1:48:00 um,

1:48:00 I completely believe.

1:48:01 That the job opportunities here are much greater,

1:48:04 right?

1:48:04 Because we're not talking about a one and done system,

1:48:06 a one and done linear system where I'm

1:48:08 creating something and then it goes somewhere else to be

1:48:11 just to be sold and shipped,

1:48:12 and then,

1:48:13 and then it's done,

1:48:14 right?

1:48:14 I'm creating

1:48:15 this very virtuous cycle or this ecosystem,

1:48:19 where multiple people can be part of

1:48:22 a reselling economy or a sharing economy,

1:48:25 um or an upcycling economy.

1:48:27 Right?

1:48:27 So you're kind of democratizing

1:48:29 our fashion world as well.

1:48:31 So I think there's job creation opportunities

1:48:34 from

1:48:35 the start of the value chain,

1:48:36 if I'm talking about material sciences and creation of new products,

1:48:40 um,

1:48:40 all the way through,

1:48:41 uh,

1:48:42 you know,

1:48:42 the,

1:48:43 the use of the products all the way through the collection,

1:48:46 um,

1:48:46 and then turning it back into other goods and services.

1:48:49 So,

1:48:50 yeah,

1:48:50 I think huge opportunities.

1:48:53 Uh,

1:48:53 taking a hook on this point of the,

1:48:55 the social impact,

1:48:56 uh,

1:48:57 going to,

1:48:57 to Lisa,

1:48:58 uh,

1:48:58 if I may,

1:48:59 uh,

1:48:59 speak on

1:49:00 moderators as well.

1:49:01 Lisa,

1:49:01 you've worked on an assessment

1:49:03 looking at the,

1:49:04 uh,

1:49:05 environmental and health impacts of,

1:49:07 of light industries in the developing countries.

1:49:09 Uh,

1:49:10 do you have something to say about

1:49:11 this,

1:49:12 uh,

1:49:12 this linkage between circular economy practices and

1:49:15 social impact?

1:49:16 This question came from Rebecca Klube from the Imperial College.

1:49:22 Yeah,

1:49:22 so we,

1:49:23 um,

1:49:24 we did a quite an extensive literature review,

1:49:26 sort of looking at the,

1:49:28 um,

1:49:28 the role that the textiles manufacturing industry,

1:49:32 uh,

1:49:32 took in terms of producing various different types of pollutants.

1:49:35 Um,

1:49:36 so we've had them mentioned here,

1:49:37 the sort of blind.

1:49:38 The dyes,

1:49:39 the bleachers,

1:49:40 the heavy metals that are all used in,

1:49:42 in the production of,

1:49:43 um,

1:49:43 textiles and then how they're released into the environment.

1:49:46 Um,

1:49:47 largely,

1:49:47 we tend to talk about water and water pollution,

1:49:49 but there's also,

1:49:50 um,

1:49:51 you know,

1:49:51 uh,

1:49:52 effects on contaminating soil as well.

1:49:55 Um,

1:49:56 and I think there were,

1:49:57 there were sort of two important aspects that came out of this.

1:49:59 The first was the people actually working in the factories,

1:50:02 as the sort of occupational health

1:50:04 and the impacts on those people.

1:50:06 Um,

1:50:07 As,

1:50:08 uh,

1:50:08 as Jessica,

1:50:09 I think said,

1:50:10 you know,

1:50:10 that they,

1:50:10 they also tend to be sort of more vulnerable,

1:50:13 um,

1:50:13 employees potentially,

1:50:15 um,

1:50:15 sort of often low skilled.

1:50:17 Uh,

1:50:17 there can sometimes be a gender dimension as well that there might be,

1:50:21 you know,

1:50:21 more women being affected by,

1:50:22 by some of these pollutants.

1:50:24 Um,

1:50:25 and there are various different ways in which

1:50:26 you might be able to overcome those impacts,

1:50:29 but they would require resources being put in by,

1:50:31 by the textile manufacturer.

1:50:33 So,

1:50:33 you know,

1:50:34 keep it.

1:50:34 As we all know a lot about now.

1:50:36 Um,

1:50:37 and then also we,

1:50:38 we also

1:50:39 looked at the sort of local communities and how the pollution,

1:50:42 which does get into the soil and the,

1:50:44 and the watercours was then affecting,

1:50:46 um,

1:50:46 local communities.

1:50:47 And again,

1:50:47 they may be

1:50:48 more vulnerable communities.

1:50:50 And I think Khalid in our

1:50:52 panel session was talking about this,

1:50:54 this,

1:50:54 um,

1:50:55 sort of a new move towards industrial zoning,

1:50:58 where you might be bringing together a whole host of different manufacturing.

1:51:01 Industries into a single location to try to benefit from the economies of scale

1:51:06 of,

1:51:07 uh,

1:51:07 some of the,

1:51:07 the,

1:51:08 um,

1:51:08 effluent pollutant treatment plants,

1:51:10 for example.

1:51:11 Um,

1:51:11 and I think there were,

1:51:12 there was some sort of,

1:51:13 it would be interesting to explore that further as to how

1:51:16 effective those sorts of implementations are.

1:51:19 Can you really scale up those things?

1:51:21 Are we really identifying and tackling the pollutants that are

1:51:24 causing most damage to human health and to occupational,

1:51:27 um,

1:51:27 health as well?

1:51:28 Um,

1:51:29 and,

1:51:29 and,

1:51:30 you know,

1:51:30 be thinking a little bit more about the regulation

1:51:32 and the policy to really target those pollutants that are

1:51:35 causing the,

1:51:36 the cancers and the neurotoxic effects,

1:51:38 and so on.

1:51:41 Thank you,

1:51:41 Lisa.

1:51:41 It's uh,

1:51:42 of course,

1:51:42 important to imagine a transition to a circular textiles and fashion industry

1:51:46 that has a lower,

1:51:48 uh,

1:51:48 the pollution effects on the air,

1:51:50 soils,

1:51:51 and water.

1:51:51 Uh,

1:51:52 Khalid,

1:51:52 I have a question for you

1:51:54 from,

1:51:54 um,

1:51:55 Raja

1:51:56 Daniel,

1:51:57 who asks about non-fashion textiles such as carpets,

1:52:01 curtains,

1:52:01 and bed linen.

1:52:03 What are your views on these products

1:52:05 to become circular?

1:52:06 Because I know that Master tax is also involved in uh non-fashion

1:52:10 products.

1:52:11 It's a very interesting,

1:52:13 uh,

1:52:13 frankly speaking,

1:52:14 so far the circularity of,

1:52:16 uh,

1:52:17 the economy is more focused on the export-driven,

1:52:20 uh,

1:52:20 business areas,

1:52:21 which is,

1:52:21 of course,

1:52:22 textiles and apparel,

1:52:23 home textiles and the whole

1:52:25 host of products.

1:52:27 Uh,

1:52:27 and the other,

1:52:28 uh,

1:52:28 business area that is basically leather-based products,

1:52:32 kind of a leather industry and leather-based product

1:52:34 that is also the export-driven business in Pakistan.

1:52:37 So,

1:52:37 uh,

1:52:38 that is one of the

1:52:40 Very largest polluters

1:52:42 in so many senses,

1:52:43 along with the textiles,

1:52:44 so the government and I have been focusing more on that.

1:52:48 Other than that,

1:52:48 like curtains are.

1:52:51 Car seats or for the domestic market,

1:52:54 frankly speaking,

1:52:55 that level of awareness has not come.

1:52:57 And I think it is required as uh during this whole discussion,

1:53:01 we could see that

1:53:02 in European Union,

1:53:04 in your ATA and World Bank,

1:53:06 they are now trying to create the awareness and so on and so forth.

1:53:09 So from the

1:53:11 buyer side and the manufacturing side,

1:53:13 things have already started moving in.

1:53:15 So I think as far as the

1:53:16 other non-textile industry is concerned other than the leather,

1:53:19 I think

1:53:20 it's it's it's awareness is required.

1:53:23 I understand that,

1:53:24 for example,

1:53:24 in food,

1:53:25 in the rice exports,

1:53:27 the European Union have imposed certain

1:53:30 strict kind of rules and regulation,

1:53:32 and ultimately people are obliged to follow that.

1:53:35 So I think in,

1:53:36 in that way,

1:53:37 at least the process and the awareness in the industry has started.

1:53:40 Business models have started emerging,

1:53:42 which need to be sustainable,

1:53:43 which need to be uh uh

1:53:45 circular

1:53:46 in its nature.

1:53:48 uh,

1:53:48 but as far as the domestic market is concerned,

1:53:50 I think it's a long way to go.

1:53:52 Thank,

1:53:53 thanks a lot,

1:53:53 Khalid.

1:53:53 It's really interesting to know

1:53:55 because those are also large markets,

1:53:57 uh,

1:53:57 even though fashion is about 60% of textiles worldwide,

1:54:01 there's still 40%.

1:54:02 There are many other things.

1:54:03 So,

1:54:04 uh,

1:54:04 question

1:54:05 goes to,

1:54:06 um,

1:54:07 to Sarah.

1:54:09 Uh,

1:54:09 Sarah,

1:54:10 I have a tough question for you here.

1:54:11 Um,

1:54:12 uh,

1:54:12 even if,

1:54:13 uh,

1:54:13 from deskta Nebratu,

1:54:14 even if most of the corporate companies talk

1:54:17 about their commitment to sustainability and sustainable production,

1:54:20 Uh,

1:54:21 uh,

1:54:21 most of their textile and garments facilities in developing countries

1:54:24 are largely operating in a linear structure of production.

1:54:28 How to change that?

1:54:30 Hm,

1:54:31 yeah,

1:54:31 good question.

1:54:33 I mean,

1:54:34 Yeah,

1:54:34 really we are on a transition

1:54:37 towards a circular

1:54:39 model,

1:54:39 towards a circular system.

1:54:40 We're not there yet.

1:54:41 We're not even close.

1:54:43 And

1:54:43 yeah,

1:54:44 so a large part of how we do business,

1:54:46 it is still linear and we're learning as we go.

1:54:50 And

1:54:50 yes,

1:54:51 but also I think to touch back on what we talked about a little bit in the panel,

1:54:56 and this really takes collaboration as well,

1:54:59 and

1:55:00 we need to shift.

1:55:03 We need a shift

1:55:04 across our entire

1:55:05 ecosystem.

1:55:06 Uh,

1:55:07 we can't just change one part of the business,

1:55:10 um,

1:55:10 and there we have to work together and also learn together,

1:55:14 um,

1:55:14 as we move towards scaling new business models,

1:55:18 also as we're trying to adapt circular design principles,

1:55:22 it is a learning curve there and

1:55:24 that we're working on together with the supply chain,

1:55:27 um,

1:55:27 because I mean they are also the experts in what they do.

1:55:31 And so I think the key is really

1:55:34 to

1:55:35 learn together

1:55:36 on this transition.

1:55:38 Absolutely.

1:55:39 And,

1:55:39 uh,

1:55:40 one final question before we go to the closing remarks by the World Bank

1:55:43 is to Marx.

1:55:44 Uh,

1:55:45 Marx,

1:55:45 uh,

1:55:45 do you think

1:55:46 that uh blockchain technology could be of help

1:55:49 in a more circular production system

1:55:51 and what further advancements,

1:55:53 uh,

1:55:53 would be needed for it to be effective?

1:55:54 I ask you because

1:55:56 your company has

1:55:57 this,

1:55:57 uh,

1:55:57 uh,

1:55:58 traceability return system that is

1:56:00 quite innovative.

1:56:02 Yeah,

1:56:02 um,

1:56:04 uh,

1:56:04 yeah,

1:56:04 blockchain's interesting.

1:56:05 I,

1:56:06 I,

1:56:06 I'm not sure if I can comment too much about it,

1:56:09 because I'm,

1:56:09 I'm,

1:56:09 I'm not an expert on it specifically,

1:56:11 but certainly,

1:56:12 what it does is offer the opportunity to give

1:56:15 more credible data to the,

1:56:17 uh,

1:56:17 source

1:56:18 of where things come from,

1:56:19 what they're,

1:56:20 what they're made,

1:56:21 made from.

1:56:21 I think what I'd just say is,

1:56:22 you know,

1:56:22 traceability,

1:56:24 like,

1:56:24 looking back into the supply chain,

1:56:26 is only half of the story.

1:56:27 It's not about finding out.

1:56:29 Where stuff comes from and talking about it,

1:56:30 it's finding out where stuff comes from and actually changing,

1:56:33 uh,

1:56:34 where it comes from,

1:56:34 how it's made and what it's,

1:56:35 what it's,

1:56:36 what it's made,

1:56:36 made from,

1:56:37 because we,

1:56:37 we,

1:56:38 we don't wanna just

1:56:39 be transparent

1:56:40 about,

1:56:40 uh,

1:56:41 supply chains.

1:56:41 We want to completely redesign them and change the direction.

1:56:44 But certainly,

1:56:45 what I will say is technology itself has a massive role to play here.

1:56:48 Tech by itself doesn't really do anything.

1:56:51 It's,

1:56:51 uh,

1:56:51 amplifies someone's intent.

1:56:53 And I would,

1:56:54 for anyone who's looking.

1:56:56 You know,

1:56:56 and hoping for a big change in the fashion industry,

1:56:58 I draw everyone's attention to companies like Airbnb or Uber,

1:57:03 um,

1:57:04 where they've taken a

1:57:07 software approach

1:57:09 to a large,

1:57:10 relatively underutilized

1:57:13 bunch of materials in the form of assets,

1:57:15 cars and houses,

1:57:16 and a massively increased utilization,

1:57:19 created a load of value.

1:57:20 And,

1:57:21 you know,

1:57:21 um,

1:57:22 Airbnb,

1:57:22 for example,

1:57:23 was,

1:57:24 Uh,

1:57:24 you know,

1:57:24 built

1:57:26 hundreds of thousands of hotel rooms without laying a brick.

1:57:28 It's been done in the cloud.

1:57:29 So I think that,

1:57:30 I think that,

1:57:31 you know,

1:57:31 technologies like that,

1:57:33 which empower people to,

1:57:36 um,

1:57:36 participate on the supply side using the internet,

1:57:39 have got,

1:57:40 uh,

1:57:40 uh,

1:57:41 uh,

1:57:41 uh,

1:57:42 the question in the right direction.

1:57:44 Um,

1:57:44 and,

1:57:44 and that's certainly why we,

1:57:46 we,

1:57:46 we're trying to do what we're trying to do.

1:57:49 Thank you,

1:57:49 Mark.

1:57:49 I have so many other questions that I might

1:57:51 be able to address here to point to panelists.

1:57:54 I'd like to thank the panelists and especially the audience for sending so many

1:57:57 questions over.

1:57:58 I'll now pass the,

1:57:59 the microphone to the World Bank for final conclusions.

1:58:03 Enrique for the really great discussion,

1:58:05 um,

1:58:08 and,

1:58:08 uh,

1:58:08 yes,

1:58:08 welcome Etienne

1:58:10 who is the senior specialist and also leading this learning series,

1:58:14 uh,

1:58:15 Etienne,

1:58:15 for your last words,

1:58:16 thanks.

1:58:18 Yeah,

1:58:19 I'll be,

1:58:19 I'll be brief because the discussions have been extremely

1:58:23 interesting and,

1:58:24 and,

1:58:24 and helpful.

1:58:25 Um,

1:58:25 first,

1:58:26 I,

1:58:26 I want to sincerely thank

1:58:28 Z and Henrique for setting this up and also

1:58:32 Francois from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation for

1:58:34 his insights and help in designing this.

1:58:36 A sincere thanks to Isabel for the opening remarks and,

1:58:39 and making sure that we do this collaboratively.

1:58:42 Um,

1:58:43 I'm in general surprised nobody mentioned Bernie Sanders' mittens.

1:58:48 Which I think were

1:58:51 reminded us all of,

1:58:52 of,

1:58:52 you know,

1:58:52 that,

1:58:53 that there are things happening at a very small scale,

1:58:56 um,

1:58:56 that

1:58:57 awareness is,

1:58:58 is a key part of this,

1:58:59 uh,

1:58:59 this,

1:59:00 this transition,

1:59:01 and it's important that we collaborate and we work together

1:59:04 in designing kind of a different vision for the sector.

1:59:07 Um,

1:59:08 I,

1:59:09 I,

1:59:09 I personally,

1:59:10 I mean,

1:59:10 we've been working on the sector for many years.

1:59:12 The bank and the IFC have many programs,

1:59:15 and the IFC,

1:59:15 especially,

1:59:16 um,

1:59:17 as the Global Partnership for,

1:59:18 for Cleaner Textiles,

1:59:19 which is,

1:59:20 has been running in Bangladesh and other,

1:59:21 other countries,

1:59:23 that is taking this very

1:59:24 comprehensive approach.

1:59:26 Looking at the demand and supply side of textiles

1:59:28 and trying to see where it can really make a dent in in in the industry.

1:59:33 The,

1:59:33 the challenge is,

1:59:35 uh,

1:59:35 for,

1:59:35 for me,

1:59:36 at least for my,

1:59:37 my,

1:59:37 this is mostly my personal view is,

1:59:39 is that the cost of environmental damage is not included in the final product.

1:59:45 Um,

1:59:45 and this is a,

1:59:46 a significant issue in at least the countries where,

1:59:49 where we work,

1:59:50 um,

1:59:50 because they absorb a lot of that environmental costs and the regulations,

1:59:54 and we haven't spoken about the basic regulations right

1:59:57 before we even get to the circular economy concept.

1:59:59 Ideally these are things

2:00:00 is that

2:00:02 they are not able to regulate the industry in a way where it doesn't harm the,

2:00:06 the country and its ability to grow,

2:00:08 and I think this is a,

2:00:10 Balance of pricing,

2:00:12 it's a very price sensitive industry.

2:00:14 Any changes made on the production side are going to be

2:00:16 uh accounted for in the product side,

2:00:19 um,

2:00:19 and making sure you find a balance between those elements

2:00:22 in a way that makes industry,

2:00:24 entire industry sustainable is going to be critical.

2:00:26 It's an extremely complicated industry.

2:00:29 Um,

2:00:29 it touches upon our more uh inner,

2:00:31 innert,

2:00:32 uh,

2:00:32 you know,

2:00:33 desires in terms of looking good,

2:00:35 uh,

2:00:35 but also comfort and,

2:00:36 And warmth and other types of uh

2:00:39 of emotions that that that that other products don't really have.

2:00:42 So it's hard to compare it

2:00:43 to an iPhone or other devices,

2:00:46 and therefore,

2:00:47 making sure that this is done,

2:00:49 um,

2:00:49 as was mentioned in a transitional phase.

2:00:51 And to me,

2:00:52 the question is,

2:00:52 what does the transition look like?

2:00:54 And how do we work with different parts

2:00:56 of value chain to actually enable that transition?

2:00:59 And I think we're,

2:01:00 as I mentioned,

2:01:01 we're not there yet,

2:01:02 but at least we understand the parameters of what needs to be done.

2:01:05 And there needs to be some kind of a global

2:01:08 link to bring these pieces together to really make them,

2:01:11 make us move towards a circular economy

2:01:13 in the textile

2:01:15 industry.

2:01:16 But again,

2:01:17 I want to thank everyone.

2:01:18 This is,

2:01:18 this is a journey.

2:01:19 This is not a conclusion.

2:01:20 This is the 7th session of our learning

2:01:23 series between the World Bank and our partners,

2:01:25 and we very much look forward to again having you.

2:01:28 Um,

2:01:29 part of the series and,

2:01:30 and learning from,

2:01:31 from,

2:01:31 as we tackle this issue in,

2:01:32 in different uh

2:01:34 sectors.

2:01:34 Uh,

2:01:34 I want to thank again the speakers and the panelists,

2:01:37 as well as the participants

2:01:38 who stayed up,

2:01:39 uh,

2:01:39 many hours to work on this,

2:01:41 and,

2:01:42 um,

2:01:42 and yeah,

2:01:42 and hope to look,

2:01:43 uh,

2:01:44 look forward to welcoming you again in the

2:01:46 next series on uh the construction industry.

2:01:49 So thank you very much to everyone.

2:01:54 Thank you,

2:01:55 everyone.

2:01:55 I'm closing this call.

2:01:58 Bye.

2:01:58 Have a good day.

2:02:02 Bye.

showAllTimestamps
no
transcript
Hello everyone, my name is Z and I'm a consultant with the Finance Competitiveness and Innovation Global Practice at the World Bank. Welcome to the 7th session of the World Bank's learning series on circular economy and private sector development. Jane, uh, in this session that is co-hosted with the United Nations Conference for Trade and Development. Typically chose the textiles and fashion industry because it has a significant environmental footprint, um, contributing to 10% of global greenhouse gas and it is the second biggest consumer of water among others, but it also has the enormous potential to transform away from the linear model across its entire value chain. Throughout this webinar, please feel free at any point to drop your questions in the Q&A panel on this platform and we will address. Uh, this, uh, agenda, uh, we will have two panel sessions, panel discussions, uh, a presentation, and, uh, finally, now, without further ado, let me introduce our open speaker. This is about to end the territory. You are the foreign minister and It's OK, so do you hear me? It's OK? OK. So first of all, uh, um, good morning, good afternoon, uh, everyone. And, um, first of all, um, I would like to, to share with you some thoughts about, uh, textile and circular economy. As we strive to maintain and foster a healthy planet, we need to change definitely our business model and policies. Therefore, today's webinar is very timely and relevant. The circular economy is on everyone's mind when we talk about green recovery and for good reasons. If effectively implemented, implemented, circular economy contributed to several development objectives. It can mitigate climate change, open new opportunities for trade, and create jobs, help reduce the cost of waste disposal in both developed and developing countries. It is estimated that expanding the life cycle of materials in the economy through reuse, repurposing or recycling could reduce 33% of the carbon dioxide emissions embedded in products. So a circular economy approach in the textile industry are needed, and they can have an immense impact given the size of that industry. The global textiles market is estimated at around $1 trillion US dollars, and the clothing industry employs more than 300 million people along the value chain. A key feature of the textile industry is that it's global. Its supply chains are sourced from vast agriculture and petrochemical sectors, and production stretches across the globe with millions of jobs in developing countries, most notably China, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Brazil, and also Turkey. All is just perfect? Definitely not, because so far the textile industry is not a good example of how to make good use of circular economy approaches. The fast fashion model is characterized by overproduction and overconsumption of low cost clothes, which are often produced under poor working conditions. We all remember the tragedy of the Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh. Also, the fashion industry is a major source of pollution and waste. Moreover, under the guise of characterative purposes, we are collecting old clothes for donation, creating an illusion of solidarity and circularity, but the reality is more complex. A very small percentage of clothes collected are provided as charity to people in need. The vast majority is used for business, and this business is big and growing. According to some estimators, it is worth around $25 billion US dollars. And most of the time this trade is unregulated. Actually, it is a huge business. A key concern for many developing countries is that trade in secondhand clothing affects the textile industry to prosper. Several countries in East Africa have denounced this trade as being detrimental to their national development efforts. So ladies and gentlemen, the linear fast fashion model, the make, use, dispose, are totally unsustainable. The good news is that consumers, businesses, and regulators are starting to identify ways to make textiles and appeal into a more efficient and less polluting sector. Their growing interest and application of circular economy approaches in the textile industry covers a broad range of aspects such as renewable and safe inputs, increasing clothing use, or turning used clothes into new to prolong their life cycle. This calls for greater reuse and repair business model to be mainstreamed and made easily accessible to consumers. It also depends on the adoption of innovative materials that can make textiles fulfill their purpose without straining the environment and society in the way the linear production systems do. Textis are made of a variety of natural and synthetic fibers as well as various blends whose life cycles bring environmental and social consequences for both producing and consuming countries. Those include CO2 emissions embedded in materials, health impacts from synthetic dyes, and toxic metal used in their production, as well as ocean plastics pollution, especially linked to polyester and other plastic fibers. UNCTAD is active, active in this area through the Sustainable Manufacturing and Environmental Pollution Program, which is supported by the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office. This program focuses on ways to reduce manufacturing pollution in developing countries, including in the textile industry. In our work on the circular economy, we take an encompassing approach. We facilitate discussion and activities seeking to add value from waste streams. We foster collaborative economy sectors. We examine innovate business models. We raise consumer awareness and encourage behavioral shifts. In today's session on circular economy and private sector development, I really encourage the presenters to enlighten the audience with practical examples on how circularity can be upscaled in the various dimensions. the textile business and also how policymakers can help promote and support concretely this necessary transformation. So I wish you and I wish us fruitful discussion and exchanges, and I thank you for your attention. Thank you so much, Ms. Duran, for your remarks. And for now we are going to transition to uh our first presentation of this webinar, uh, and I would like to introduce our presenter, Mr. To make program, Alan McCar Foundation, uh, it is a program seems to be a truly disruptive force within the industry to redesign the fashion industry based on circular economy principles. So, uh, very excited to hear from Francois. To you, Francois, thanks. Thank you very much. I hope um you can hear me OK, um, and thank you very much for having me today. So I'm just going to share some thoughts on circular fashion and why it's relevant and as Ms. Duran said, the currently our economy is today extremely wasteful, polluting. When we make new products, it means we need new materials. We often only think about recycling at the end of pipes, so it's very much like a sort of cure for a problem that's already existing. And waste is extremely high within the economy. And waste is not just what we throw away after using it, but it's also what we fail to use at its full potential. All the cars that are parked all the time, office buildings that are empty most of the time, it's all these materials that we mobilize and fail to use at their full potential. And so we believe with the McArthur that a circular economy is a framework to find systemic solutions that help tackle some of the global challenges, as Ms. Jones said, like climate change, like biodiversity loss, like waste and pollution. And a circular economy is based on three principles which are all driven by design, which means that for each of them we need to think upstream. We need to think very early on about how to apply them. But also what's important to know is that a circular economy to work needs to be based on renewable energy and needs to increasingly adopt renewable materials so that they can flow over and over within the economy. So those three principles are first, to eliminate waste and pollution. And which basically means thinking from the beginning about how do we design businesses and products so they won't end up as waste and so they won't cause pollution in the manufacturing process but also when they are being used. In fashion, it's, for example, known that 80% of the emissions of a product are decided at the design stage. The second principle of a circular academy is to keep products and materials in use. That basically means finding new business models that help and ensure that those products can be used as much as possible, like reuse, repair, resale. Like recycling. And finally, the third principle is to regenerate natural systems. So if you take agricultural practices, for example, it's finding practices that not only limit the depletion of soil health, but actually rebuild it over time. So the soil is enriched every crop cycle. Now what does that mean for fashion? How can a circular economy be applied to fashion? Well, as Ms. Jerome just said, the fashion industry is a very traditional example of a linear industry. It takes a lot of virgin resources to make into products that are used less and less, linking to overproduction, and most of those products will be discarded to go into landfill or incineration because a lot of those products use synthetic fiber. A lot of them will shed microfibers that will end up contaminating oceans, freshwater sources, and a tiny, tiny fraction of all those materials will be able to be taken back and put back into the system. So very now. And what we did at the foundation is work with a vast number of organizations from across the industry to create a vision for an industry that can thrive over the long term, for a circular economy for fashion. And what we brought it back to is to 3 key elements that need to change. The first one is clothing needs to be used more. The second one is clothing needs to be made to be made again. And the third one is it needs to be made from safe and recycled or renewable inputs. So I'm showing you a few examples of what that can mean in practice. Use more as Duro said as an increased interest from customers to actually adopt new business models that infinite increase clothing use like resale, so the real wheel is. Example from the US, we've got great examples in Europe with STR Collective, all of those companies have global operation. You've got, you've got a multiplication of secondhand platforms at the moment. A lot of brands also launching their secondhand offering. That market is growing very quickly, showing a strong interest from customers and actually helping to significantly increase the utilization of clothing, accessories, and products. And the second example we have is from the renewal workshop. So their model is really interesting. The tech products that are not good enough to be kept on the market either they fail tests like before commercialization or their secondhand products being sent back to companies. And they refurbish those products so they can be put back on the market, so they work, for example, with costs. Which is part of the H&M Group to actually take some of the products that had some quality issues in order to repair them and to put them back on the market, so they are really able to increase the durability of the products and make sure they can be kept in use for longer. So those are really two practical examples of what's happening in the economy so that clothing is used more. The second example is like the second area of our vision and area of action is make sure that clothing is made to be made again and products are made to be made again across the fashion industry, and that basically means from the outset thinking about how can these products be recovered. And be recycled when it stopped being used. So can it be easily disassembled, or are the materials that are being used compatible with recycling technologies? But also, what are some infrastructures and strategies that exist to ensure that those products are effectively collected, because it's not good enough to make products that can be recycled. What's really important to make sure that they are collected and can be sent to the appropriate end of. Two great examples here. The first one from Adidas, who took years of innovation to create a shoe that's made 100% from the same polymer, the same material, and which means that when that shoe is worn out, they can get it back, shred it, and put it back into a new shoe. Technology today allows them to take approximately 10% of an old shoe to put in a new shoe, so it's not perfect yet. But it's a good innovation to ensure that over time they can increase that content. Now the real issue is how do you make sure that you can collect them. So they've made, for example, a partnership with a company called Stuffsta. Which is an app based on smartphones helping people to order collection when they stop being that good, when they stop wearing that shoe, so it can be easier and more convenient for their customer to actually send stuff back. Napa Pri took a different approach, so they created a winter jacket made 100% of nylon, so same, everything in that jacket is made of nylon. A lot of it actually comes from real nylon, a recycled nylon from Econ. Needed tons of innovation to make sure that the insulation layer of the jacket would work with nylon, which was the first, that the buttons and stuff could be made in nylon, made sure that all that could be sent to recycling when it's being collected, and what they did was actually offer a buyback option to the people who bought the jacket, but you can only activate it after 2 years so that they ensure that the jacket is kept for at least 2 years. This should probably be kept even longer, but um a good example of how they can also think about not only the product but also the collection system on the side of it. And the third area of the vision, the 3rd area of action, is to ensure that materials are from safe inputs, which basically means using safe chemistry, so making clothing cause no harm to either the people who make the clothes, but also to the environment and to the wearers, but also that materials come from recycled or renewables. Sources and here are two examples that we got. The first one is Stella McCartney did a clothing line using recycled cashmere, so taking cashmere from both pre-production but also post-consumer, shredding it and weaving it, reweaving it in a new sweater. And on the other side it's Wrangler, amongst one of the many companies starting to investigate the potential of growing cotton in a regenerative way, that is finding strategies to grow cotton in a way that can help rebuild soil health, while cotton in a traditional way relies very heavily on pesticides and fertilizer, so quite a significant departure from traditional ways of making cotton. And an example of how you can bring all those ideas together is a project we conducted called the genes redesign where we created guidelines to create genes that incorporate high ability materials that are organic or in transition phasing out a lot of chemicals and processes that are hazardous for both the workers and the environment. But also looking at the recyclability and ease of disassembly of the products and finally looking at how to ensure some level of traceability so those genes can be easily identified for customers but also so that collectors and recyclers can easily understand. That those jeans have been made with certain criteria and can be either used for a very long time or when they can't be recycled effectively. Here is a list of all the companies that have committed to put volumes of their production in line with the guidelines on the market before May this year. You can check on our website. We've put a note to tell you when each of those companies will put their jeans on the market. And that's it for me. Thank you so much, Francois, for that great presentation and uh great timing as well. Um, and now we will move to the The first panel of the of the webinar and I'm just going to share my screen so you can see the pan. Uh, and I will also introduce our moderator for panel one which will focus a lot on the redesigning of the value chain, focusing more on the upstream, um, and bringing questions on materials, production and design, uh. So our moderator for panel one is Professor Lisa Emerson, and she's a professor of Environmental Science in the Environment and Geography department at University of York and she's also an affiliated researcher at the Stockholm Environmental Institute. Uh, Lisa has over 20 years of experience in the field of air pollution and climate change, and between 2019 and 2020, she was also the principal investigator of a research study mapping manufacturing pollution hotspots, uh, as part of the sustainable manufacturing and Environmental pollution Program, uh, which was mentioned by Ms. Duran in her opening remarks, and this program uh focuses as well on the textiles industry. So, um, Professor Emerson, I welcome you to the floor. OK, thank you very much for the introduction. Um, and it's, uh, now my turn to introduce the other members on this panel. Uh, so first of all, we have Khalid Mahmood Russo, who has over 40 years of corporate experience in textiles and clothing, food and development sectors. Um, currently he is the executive director of Master Textile Mills in Pakistan, leading a textile company engaged in exports of apparel and work with brick. Second on the panel, we have, uh, Jenny Fredriksdotter, uh, who has over 20 years of experience from the fashion industry working with buying, production, and sourcing for companies like H&M, Gina Trickott in Europe and Asia. Uh, Jenny's also been working with sustainability and fashion for more than 10 years and joined Renew Cell in 2017, uh, where she's part of the management team in Renew Cell working with textile brand partners towards closing the loop in the fashion industry. And then finally, on the panel, we also have Amor Paul Havandana, who has quickly become one of Thailand's most influential green voices through his work on turning landfill waste into sustainable material. His company Moreloop, co-founded with Tamawan Vedrachayan, is an online platform that takes surplus fabric from garment and textile factories and offers it to small businesses to purchase at an affordable price. And to date, Morloop has upcycled more than 20,000 kg of surplus fabric and prevented the release of more than 300,000 kg of carbon dioxide. So what I want to do is encourage people, uh, to be putting questions in the chats, but I'm also obviously going to be putting questions to our panelists. And I think just so that, uh, the audience can get a better idea of, uh, the companies and, and the work that the panelists are doing themselves, um, it would be good if each of the panelists could, uh, briefly summarize the businesses that you represent. And if we start off with, uh, Khalid, if that's OK. Uh yeah, thank you very much. Uh, my name is Khalid Mahmood. I come from Pakistan. I'm working with a company, as they're told, Master Textile Mills. It's a vertically composite setup, meaning by we have our own spinning, weaving, denim, and then the dye processing and garmenting also. Uh, we are about $100 million US dollar company and primarily we are selling our garments into Europe and America and a couple of other countries also. And then fabric, we specialize into the work there and the bottom tier fabric companies. Thank you. OK, thank you very much. That's very much on the production, um, end of things. Uh, and then next if we have Jenny. Yes, hello, um, from Stockholm. I'm in Renewal headquarters here in Stockholm and it's very empty at the moment. We are most of us working from home due to the situation in the world. Um, so I'm the circular business manager in Renewal and we are a sustained tech company. From Sweden working in recycling of cellulose-based textiles. We have a small plant running here in Sweden and we are just about to build, or we have actually started to build our second plant that will be much bigger in scale. So I work closely with brands and textile producers who want to integrate our new fibers into their products. OK, thanks ever so much, Jenny. And then, uh, finally, a more poll. Everyone, my name is Amopo. I'm a CEO and co-founder of Moloop. Um, we are an online marketplace for surplus fabric from Thailand. Um, we are. As we have collected over 300 tons of surplus fabrics in various. Uh, I'm more, we are not hearing you, uh, no. OK. Hopefully it'll be better if the video off, but we can hear you now. OK, great. Um, so, um, yeah, so we are, uh, Molo is an online marketplace for surplus fabric. We are a young startup from Thailand. And through our marketplace we have been able to collect over 300 tons of surplus fabrics in various shapes and sizes and from 10 yards, as small as 10 yards to 1,000+ yards. So now we have 300, 3500 different types of fabrics and Now that we have collected all of these surplus fabrics, we turn them into different products for corporates as well as our own small brand and as well as pushing these surplus fabrics to smaller SMEs, so having the market mechanism working. And we are um experienced the early growth stage at the moment, yeah. Thank you. OK, thanks ever so much, I'm awful. So, um, hopefully that gives a good indication we have really quite a diverse panel, um, here who have expertise and the production in in new technologies, and then in sort of different ways of recycling or upcycling. Materials and textiles. Uh, I think it would be useful, and we've seen from that previous talk, um, how research very clearly shows that linear production, which has been a large part of the textiles and fashion industry, um, causes pollution at the production end of the line and, and, uh, waste problems at the disposal end of the life cycle of those products. So I just wonder if each of the panel members, I'll go around in a slightly different order just to shake things up a little bit. But if you could just give us an idea of what you think are the main sustainability issues or problems that are associated, um, with textiles that your business is, is really trying to focus on to improve. So, if I could maybe just go to Jenny first with that question. Yes, thank you. Of course, as was shown in the picture by Francois earlier, only 1% of the textiles that are being produced is going back into new textiles again. This is the area that we want to address with renew cells, so we want to increase the volumes of textile waste going back into new fibers and being put back into new garments and textile products, so. eliminate the waste stream as much as possible, creating new products without using virgin raw materials. And could you just give us an idea of what the biggest challenges associated with achieving that? Yes, of course, we have several challenges, but one, of course, is that there are many types of products, many materials, mixed materials, so different technologies are needed to recycle all the different types of textiles there is. And of course there is also a logistic challenge that There are limited possibilities for recycling today, and they are not necessarily in the same place as the waste, as the waste is scattered all over the world with consumers in the factories and also in the in the areas for landfill. So of course there is a logistics challenge to put the waste into the recycling possibility. Plants. Yeah, so there's, it's almost a bit of a transport issue as well in that case, and it can be, it could be, yeah, of course, but we are, we are, it's early days for the recycling industry of textiles. We have just started, but they succeeded quite well with paper, glass, and so on. So I hope we can make the same journey with textiles. OK, that's excellent. And then I think if I can bring um a more pole in. Uh, I, I understand Amopo, your sort of strategy is a little bit more sort of upcycling as opposed to recycling. Could you just give us an idea of, um, how that is really gonna help in terms of moving towards a circular economy? Our vision for our company is to make the circular economy a reality, so we try to make this surplus fabric movement into a real business that is scalable using the digital tech and the online platform to help to move this forward and um. At the moment we are only focusing on the fabric industrial surpluses that are stuck inside everyone's factory. And by doing this we are helping to reduce the redundancy of producing virgin materials um once we have scaled up a lot more. But at the moment we are seeing that there is a pain point within this industry in Thailand. The first point is that there is a pain point of the factory have to manage all of these redundancies and actually they are stuck inside everyone's factory. So we are relieving everybody with this and at the same time, the smaller SMEs, they can get access to all of these quality fabrics that are lying around available, and nobody is really using or doing anything with them that efficiently. At the same time, these fabrics have their own shelf life as well. So if it, you know, in, in, in maybe 5 or 10 years, they are no longer functional, they have to throw it away in landfill anyway. So why don't we map all of these surpluses out and get them all circulating back into the industry and make everybody be able to access all of these fabric. So I, I hope that one day our circular model can go along with the linear model, um, find the right equilibrium, so we are like. We're like a Pac-Man, you know, so the linear economy works very fast, right? They have a lot of wastage coming out and we are like Pac-Man just going, you know, collecting all of this waste and putting them back into the most efficient use possible. OK, that's great. And maybe just sort of following up on a comment that Jenny made. I mean, do you still, do you have similar sort of issues in terms of the logistics of transporting these materials around? Is that, is that a problem for you? At the moment we are very local based. We only have a couple of international clients and the most that we can do, let's say we have a client from Singapore and she has the manufacturing base in Cambodia. There is a logistic that we can use, but at the moment we keep everything pretty local and I myself drive. To, to do the logistics for all of these fabric, yes, and um we try to find the most efficient way to ship all of this around and that um. It's a challenge, I think when we scale up, but at the moment we have found that logistics is not the biggest challenge for us at the moment. OK, yeah. So we will come back, I think some availability, um, issues later on in the session. Yeah, that's interesting. So, so we focused a little bit there on, on the kind of, uh, you know, the products once they've been produced. Um, obviously there are issues. Is in production of those products. And Khaled, would you be able to give us an idea of, you know, some of the ways in which your company has been trying to reduce the pollution, um, and make, uh, the production more efficient in textiles? Yeah, my company is very much up to the challenge, which we are all facing. In fact, as explained in the earlier presentation also that circular economy has two different aspects as far as the, America. The consumption side is concerned. They are looking at it differently, as it was explained in the earlier presentation also. My company or in the South Asia or the all the companies who are on the manufacturing side, we are having a different kind of challenges altogether. So the traditional economy has been basically made use and disposed basis it has been operating. And now that we are working and we are trying to move or graduate. Into a circular economy. So in circular economy, basically it's a huge kind of a mindset shift. It's a kind of you have to shift that mindset from the linear economy to the circular economy where we are focusing, make, use, recycle, reuse. Now in this. There are 3 basic principles we are focusing as a company. Number 1 is designing out on the waste and the pollution factors. 2, how to keep the products and materials eco-friendly and reusable. And then, of course, regenerating the natural systems and all that. Now if you look at these things, these are 4 or 5 major areas our company is basically focusing. One is basically the water recycling and depletion. That is one very major area. in the South Asian countries also and the other countries also in Pakistan particularly we are water stressed countries also, and the traditional technologies of the economies of the textiles which we have been using, we have been basically using a lot of water, and most of this water untreated is being disposed of also. So now that the awareness is there, that the brands are insisting for that also. So the leading companies have already started working on this. That we have the water treatment plant now. Almost I know that all the leading Pakistani brands are making some investment during the last 2 years or during the next 1 1.5 years, including my own company, a massive investment in the water treatment. And all that. Now this is in water treatment. We are going for the water conservation also we are going for the recycling also. We are going for the reharvesting the water as well. Now the next point comes basically the energy. Energy is we are trying to focus more on the conservation side also, and from then we are moving on to the renewable energy sources also in which most of the companies, including my company also, we are moving on to the solar now. The next point that comes in what kind of material are being used. So we are trying that most of the brands are also partnered with that, that we should be focusing on the materials. Which are more sustainable and reducing the waste and as Aupo was saying that trying to reuse the wastages, the leftover fabrics, and all that in a way that they can be, I mean, used in the proper manner also. So that leads us to the next point that the, uh, the environment sustainability, that includes air, that includes water, that includes energy, that other kind of wastages also. And then, uh, with all this. The corporate social responsibility which traditionally we used to have, it was more focused on the labor, which was more focused on the environment only. Now with all these things together, we are having renewed and enhanced scope of the corporate social responsibility. So that is basically what my company is focusing and most of the manufacturing companies are focusing as well. OK, that's, uh, there's an awful lot of stuff, um, going on, Cain. I think you, you've done a really good job at, uh, uh, describing a lot of that. Could I just, um, obviously within, uh, in particular in South, uh, uh, South Asia and Southeast Asia, um, there are various different sizes of, um, uh, textile manufacturing industry. And my, my knowledge would suggest that it, it It becomes more and less difficult for companies to be bringing in these, uh, cleaner production, uh, technologies dependent a little bit on their size. Could you just give us an idea of how extensive across the whole manufacturing sector, sort of, uh, more renewable technologies are, and if there are ways in which there can be some sort of, uh, technology transfer, if you like, across different companies. Your comment is very valid. I highly appreciate that you raised this point. Uh, to the front, uh, well, I mean, we have three major kinds of companies. One of the larger companies, uh, which have the larger financial muscles also, they have access to the capital also. So, I mean, they operate differently than medium size and the small sized companies which are operating differently. So as far as the major companies or the larger companies are concerned, yes, I mean, the way I explained, most of them, they are operating on the basis of that. And I know my counterparts in India and Bangladesh and Sri Lanka also they are more or less, we are in the same league, but the problem is basically to the medium and small sized enterprises because medium and small sized enterprises. They are so usually strained and we are strained on the financial resources and strained on the financial resources, so focused on their survival and doing the business and putting all the pieces together to surviving, so they don't have basically a kind of a financial resource even if they want to. And number 2, their business is usually so competitive that survival is such a great priority for them that most of them, they are unable to actually go for that also. And the client kind of customers which they have, usually those customers is a different mix than the major companies. So with medium size and the smaller size, the challenges are different. But I think now there has to be kind of a reshaping of the industry is coming up also that like the governments are now coming in, they are focusing more on the untreated water should not be disposed of. They are focusing on various kinds of environmental laws and all that, so I think the industry is moving into kind of a thing where they have to either they should be clustered, they should be housed into the industrial zones, and then they can have a joint on the shared facilities of like water treatment, renewable energy sources, and as far as the compliance cost is concerned. The thing is all these things look very nice. I mean from the fire side, we keep receiving a long. of compliances and all fancy kind of logics as well, but at the end of the day, compliance or making all these things according to those requirements, it requires a huge capital cost as well. It requires a mindset change, training of the people, and so on and so forth. So I think they're the larger sized companies, they are doing fair. But as far as the medium and the small sized companies are concerned, unfortunately I think they yet are not on the bandwagon as such. They are not yet on the wave. OK, yeah, I think that those are very well made points. And I think it's something, you know, that we need, we need to bear in mind as consumers that we might be expecting, uh, greater sustainability in the products that we're consuming, but that comes at some cost to, doesn't it? And that needs to be considered as well. OK, so, moving um back to sort of thinking a little bit about recycling, um, rates in clothes, um, if I can maybe come back to Jenny. Uh, so I think it was mentioned earlier, um, in this session that the recycling rates of clothes is, is quite dismal. It stands at less than 1%. Um, and from the perspective of a post-consumer fabric recycler such as yourself, is it time for the industry to fundamentally reconsider the way it blends different materials, as well as the design and manufacture of clothing? What do you envision should be a desirable template for the manufacturing of fabric so that recyclability at the end of life is optimized? So, quite a substantial question there, Jenny, but What are your thoughts on that? Yes, of course, if all designs and the designs of products and fabrics and other materials would be designed with the end of life in mind, using or making only products that can be recycled. It would make a huge difference. I'm not sure that the industry is ready to go that far yet, so we have to continue to develop the recycling industry to suit what the consumers and the brands want to make also, but of course, mindful design would help. For us, we are trying to make our technology better by optimizing it, and we will be able to accept the wider range of products and the materials in our coming plant, but we are still focusing on the cellulose-based textiles, but there is a lot happening in the recycling industry both for us and for Other companies doing similar things. OK, and you, you referred there to mindful design. How might that be made to happen? Yes, of course. But I think more knowledge would help. Uh, the more information designers and brands have about the possibilities of making circular and sustainable product, it would help. So, I'm happy to see that this is more and more integrated now in educations for the design and textile professionals. So this is a subject. When I was a student, this was not touched at all, but now it's getting into All the education, so students are learning about the possibilities and the responsibilities of being a designer and working in the textile industry. So I think this is a good first step to create awareness and knowledge about the possibilities and the responsibilities. Yeah, so I think that that really nicely emphasizes the need for change right the way along, and the sort of production and manufacturing process. Um, so I'm just gonna come to Armorpole for one sort of final question, and then I think I might start to look at the, I can see that there's some questions coming in from the audience as well. So if I encourage the panelists to have a look at that too. Um, but Amorpole, if I could just sort of, uh, move to you, so obviously recycling is one option, uh, but I think what you're a bit more concerned about is, is upcycling. Um, could you describe to us briefly just how Morloop came to discover the opportunity to utilize, to upcycle surplus fabrics in the market, and how large do you think this opportunity is, um, and what sort of steps do entrepreneurs like yourself perhaps need to, to take to be able to apply this kind of method in other geographies, uh, to take advantage of the opportunity? Sure, thank you, great, great question, actually, for a startup, um, we, we have to start looking at the opportunity so that we can uh start uh see that there is a potential for scaling, so that is the first thing that we actually look at and our business is actually comes from two sides, the pain side and the passion side. Um, the paint size is, uh, from my co-founder who is a 2nd generation garment manufacturer, so she has the paint of the surplus fabrics. She sells her fabric, um, every day, and she knows these are good quality, but once the, uh, clothes is finished production, this just automatically becomes waste and she cannot, she doesn't want to sell this as waste price, so she kept it in her factory. And a lot of factories actually have the same practice. I mean there are secondary market for this fabric, sure, but actually we have found that in Thailand, most of them kept it inside the factory. And what a lot of people don't realize is that waste gets wasted even before you consume it. We often talk about post-consumer waste like in Thailand. The post-consumer waste is 26 million tons versus the industrial waste which is 50 million tons. So there's a lot of wastage happening in the factories and in manufacturing. And when we scope it down to the um textile and garment industry in Thailand, um actually the waste here, the surplus fabric that is produced, we have estimated is 350,000 tons. Which is an equivalent of making 700 million t-shirts. Multiply that by about $10 you have the market size, the annual market size is $7 billion. So I think this is quite attractive. And um and once we have um Starting to do this, we have verified that the pain is real and at the same time also found out that in Thailand we have quite a complete value chain from the very upstream, um, from the beaver and to the garment and also the traders. They all have the same problem. And Thailand is actually has this industry for the past 30 years, so we have a lot of experience, therefore we have a lot of exports to Europe and America. So all of these great great materials ending up here and the finished products goes abroad. And the material that is actually produced here or se here get re-export back and people have to buy it at a much higher price. And so um all of these small tail end surplus now will get to be used again and again you know again and we, we see this as a big opportunity. Here in Thailand, so I think the landscape is, uh, however, the landscape, I'm not sure it's the same for every country, uh, for example, um, in the Philippines, I think they don't have a lot of um cotton, for example, um, they have more on the polyester, so, um, we haven't explored, um, uh, the, the, the manufacturing base around the country yet, but, um, the, the reason that um Molo were able to start. Uh, this market, I think firstly is because we were able to, um, my co-founder is able to er penetrate all of her er connections. That we are able to get access to first factory. So we start with just one factory. Now we have 70. So we start off small and then we start once we have found a use, the suitable use for all of these materials, we are able to attract more supply at the same time. Um, so it depends on each country of the value chain that they have and and what the material that the surplus material that they can gather and find a suitable use for all of these supplies. I mean for us we have great quality materials. Uh, firstly I wanted to sell to smaller SMEs and IG entrepreneur brands. We have a lot of IG brands here in, in, in Thailand, so, um, you know, er, er, fresh grad who wanted to buy some, uh, fabric and make her own clothing fashion brand, but At the same time that that is like only 20% of our business. The 70% of our business is actually using this fabric to sell to corporates as t-shirts and polo shirts and bags and masks and things like that. So um we, we are able to illustrate how how how great this material is and then put it into to good use. Yeah, so to actually uh copy the the the the model that we have established needs to a lot of analysis and I think it is depends on country and I think I'm quite lucky to have found uh the pain of my co-founder as well as being in Thailand with such complete value chain with quite a sizable opportunity for us to kickstart this idea. OK, that's great. Am I I think you might well be encouraging a lot of entrepreneurs out there to at least explore the, uh, you know, the opportunities of doing similar things in different countries. Um, so I just wanna come back to some of the questions that are in the chat, um, before. I sort of carrying on with some of the other ones. We have one here. Um, why do you believe, who do you believe is really shifting the needle for circular fashion? Are suppliers waiting for their existing customer brands to push them and demand it, or are suppliers focusing on it themselves and waiting for brands to come to them? Khaled, as a sort of production supplier person, do you have any, any views on, on that one? Can you repeat the question, please? I couldn't hear properly. OK, it's, it's in the chat, but I'll repeat it. So who do you believe is really shifting the needle for circular fashion? Is it the suppliers that are waiting for their existing customer brands to push them and demand it, or are suppliers focusing on it themselves and waiting for brands to come, then come to them? I think it works both ways as far as the large manufacturers are concerned, because large manufacturers do anticipate what kind of market trends are there. And what are the requirements from the consumer side and so on and so forth. What are the new emerging requirements of the customers are concerned, sustainability. It's a major, major theme with all the companies. So as far as the, I mean, the supplier side is concerned, they are also, I think, equally concerned. They are investing. They are training people. They are going for massive kind of certifications also upgrading their compliance requirement and sustainability teams and all that. So far the client is concerned. I think that the largest sized company in Pakistan, in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh, they're all India, they're all concerned about it, and I see, I mean, a lot is happening as far as the supply side is concerned as far as the buyer is concerned, yes, the buyer because they are. are actually communicating with the consumer. They are carrying the demands for the consumers and this demand of the circular economy actually originated from there also. So I think most of the buyers are also taking a lead into it. But again, different buyers have different kind of Priorities or the sense of urgency or the kind of wholesome approach. Some of the buyers are, you know, they are very much concerned for the whole wholesome approach as such, but a few of the buyers, we think that they are not that urgent. So it is a mixed kind of a thing. But as far as the medium and size, medium and small operators are concerned. Uh, I think they are also cautious of this thing. But again, going for the sustainability, going for the circular kind of thing, uh, I mean, Capex is very much important, and, uh, uh, resources, financial resources, you need to have it. The management and the corporate time is also involved into it, and medium and small sized companies actually have the constraints over there. And then again from the buyer side, also most of the buyers which are for these medium and size, small sized companies, they also do not have those kind of a sensitive approach which the major brands have. But good thing is, at least the larger side company which are holding major portion of the business, they are sensitive from both sides, from the buyer side also, from the supplier side also. I would like to highlight that lately the governments, the policymaking institutions, they are becoming very active. Also, the new laws are being framed, new authorities, new organizations are being placed in, the new benchmarks and certifications are required, they are being placed, and that is a good move, I think, unless the government moves in. At the federal level and the provincial or the county level, things cannot actually move on. So I can very clearly see a sense of urgency, a sense of alliance during the last many years in South Asian countries, particularly I can speak of Pakistan, that the governments are also now coming in. And if you may allow to just close it, that even in the the Millennium Goal development goals, one of the typical goals. The governments have to actually report on the sustainability of the environment, so it's very much there, I think, from the manufacturer side, from the buyer side, and from the government side also, and it is just the beginning, but the road is very bumpy, not an easy one also. OK, yeah. So I think having this this push towards a circular economy right the way along that that value chain is incredibly important is what you're saying. And it can be more or less, less sort of pushed by different components within that chain. Um, there, there's another question here, which I think, uh, Jenny might be quite a good person to try to answer. Um, recycling is effective if the waste is sorted according to fiber type. This involves manual labor. Training to sort blended fabrics is a challenge while scaling up. How can this be overcome, Jenny, have you got any thoughts on, on the actual sort of sourcing? Yes, of course, uh, the sorting is very important. Both the first step to sort what can be sold like secondhand. Garments and what is not in a good condition that should go for more fiber recycling. So of course this is the crucial step. The first step, I think the manual sorting is still needed because machines are not yet able to. To determine if a garment can be sold as a garment or not, but when it comes to the fiber sorting of fiber level, there are several initiatives in this area and several technologies existing already. In south of Sweden, a plant has just been built for Fiber sorting. So I think this is the way forward to sort material that cannot be used as garment. So we will start to get material from this plant very soon. So there is technology to support. OK, so that's, that, that, that sounds quite like quite exciting and new technology as well. Um, Jenny, could you also just give us, uh, I mean, obviously the, the, your company is working largely in Sweden. Could you just give us a sense of how, with what sort of ease with the technologies that your company has been developing, be able to be applied in areas such as South Asia and East Asia, where there's a huge amount of textile production? Yes, so yes, our first plant is in Sweden and our second plant will also be in Sweden, but we have very ambitious plans to open more plants all over the world. We have a goal to recycle around. I should say 3 360,000 metric tons of dissolving pulp from recycled textiles by 2030. So that's quite soon and that will require several more plants than the one we are currently building. So we hope to have plants in many areas of the world. Of course, uh, Southeast, East Asia and China are interesting markets since there are a lot of textile. Production going on in that area and we work both with textile waste from production and post-consumer waste. So for the post-consumer waste, of course, all, all areas where there are a lot of people using clothes are interesting if there is collection going on. So I hope we can have many plots in the next coming years. OK, that sounds sounds very good. Good luck with that. And just as a as a final wrap up question, I think to all the panel members who go around again in order. Um, I mean just thinking a little bit about the policies. Um, so both policies that would sort of influence the behavior of the public, and the behavior of Consumers, but also policies that might influence, um, the manufacturers as Khaled was sort of referring to before. What would be your top or your key policies in both those arenas that you would like to see happen to start to allow us to move even more quickly towards the circular economy? And I'll, I'll go first to Amalpo to see if, uh, you can give us your thoughts on that. Yes, thank you very much, um, I think um the policy and the government is one of the, you know, key player to actually drive this forward and I'm hoping to see um policies such as um circular procurement. That the government endorsed to actually jumpstart the industry, incentivize in a real way for the company to be encouraged to change the way they are producing and encourage that they are starting to use and adopt the mindset. Also, the tax cut would be great, another great incentive to start off slowly. To implement the policy as well as some funding for the circular project alike and in Thailand I'm part of the subcommittee for the circular economy funding, so we are actively funding some of the circular economy projects and at the same time from the top down spreading the word. And also spreading the circular mindset and giving some of the examples, building some CE champion companies here in Thailand so that people can be inspired and understand the mindset because I think the most effective way to change into transition into the circular economy is actually by Everybody having the mindset and having the mindset allows everybody's imagination to drive and create something new out of whatever they have available. Like for example, for me, I actually just have the mindset from reading the Resource revolution, the book Resource Revolution, as well as study very deeply. Um, er, er, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation website, that's it. And once I have, and once I have the mindset, it's starting to, um, uh, grow on me and wanting to test out whether what this wonderful concept would look like, um, and so I think that, um, having The, um, you know, money incentive, sure, I think it's great, but at the same time, um, educational and building real businesses, I think, uh, uh, having a real, um, example of, of successful business er who are scalable and profitable and, um, incentivize everybody to build this industry, um, that would be one of the most effective way of, of building this, this, this new transition and, and I'm, I'm seeing that. A little bit here. So, yeah, I just wanted to share. OK, thank you ever so much. I think we probably have to end on that note and we can come back to the others perhaps in the final panel session here. But I think that's, that's a nice sort of place to end. It's not just about resources, but it's also about having the will to really want to make a change. So I hand back to, um, Dave, I think, for the next panel session. Thanks so much Lisa. That was a really great discussion, um, and now we'll move on to panel two where we'll be focusing on the role of the brand, uh, and focusing on, you know, new, uh, ways to, to, to engage the consumer and so on, so we'll be speaking to players, you know, uh, more involved. In the downstream side, uh, and I would like to welcome our moderator for panel two. So we have Whitney Bok, which is the senior sustainability reporter at Fashionista, and prior to working with Fashionista, she also wrote for The New York Times and The Washington Post and in 2020, Whitney was named the Environmental Reporting Fellow at the McHealth Institute. Whitney, uh, is the sessions yours. Thanks. Thanks so much. I'm so glad to be here. I'm here with Mark Drake Knight, Jessica Long, and Sarah Hayes, and I'm actually gonna have each of the panelists introduce themselves a little bit about themselves and their company and sort of their expertise. So, Mark, could we start with you? Sure, hi Whitney, um, just checking if you can hear me. Yes, it's great, um, yeah, I'm, I'm Mark, um, I'm, uh, an engineer, one of the co-founders at TI. Uh, we make products from natural materials, uh, we use renewable energy. We produce products, uh, in real time, um, and I think, uh, perhaps the two bits of our business that are interesting and, and relevant to this is that every product we make is designed from the start to come back to us when it's worn out, and we make our new products from the material that we recover. And in recent years, what we've been doing is packaging all of that up, um, in a platform at Til and giving it away to people so that they can participate and start their own circular businesses. Red. Sarah? Yes, hi, Whitney, can you hear me? Yes, great, thanks. Yeah, uh, delighted to be here. My name is Sarah Hayes, and I'm working with the H&M Group Global sustainability department, so I'm based in Stockholm, Sweden as well, and I'm part of the circular team there. And my current focus at the moment is really looking at how do we accelerate initiatives within circular design, but also how do we transform towards a circular business model and really going from testing to scale there. Great. And Jessica? Great. Thank you, Whitney, and hello to everyone. Also quite excited to be on today's panel discussion. I've already seen a lot of the really interesting questions from the the first panel. Um, I've spent the last 20 years or so working at the intersection of, of business, uh, nonprofit and sustainability and responsible business across North America, Africa. Asia and Latin America spent about close to 28 years working at Accenture, leading their responsible business and sustainable business practice, and with Accenture co-published a book called The Circular Economy Handbook, basically sharing all of our lessons over several years working at Circular Economy. I've recently joined a leading Investment firm based in New York called Closed Loop Partners that is specifically focused on kind of filling that necessary gap in circular economy transformation and scaling circular solutions, so bringing financing and then actually building out a lot of the solutions and infrastructure that I'm sure we will talk about today. Thanks, Whitney. Great. So, I'd love to start out with a question for all of you, and any of you can sort of jump in wherever feels right with this. Um, how can we make circular fashion, whether that's in terms of durable materials or rental models, more accessible for the average customer? Yeah, happy to shoot on that one, Whitney. Um, I mean, I think that's really important to look at how do we actually increase accessibility here. That's actually a core part of our vision at the H&M Group. But then when it comes to the how part, uh, I think what we're seeing there is that firstly it needs to be really easy and it needs to be really convenient. So really focusing on customer centric solutions. Um, it's also quite key that it's wallet friendly, like especially now, um, post-COVID we're seeing that there is a bit more sensitivity uh with customer spend. Um, in different sectors and different regions, um, but then overall I think we still need to think fashion here and how do we meet the customer's fashion needs, but, um, in a more sustainable way. So one thing that I think can be key when looking at how do we increase accessibility, we need a diversity in models here, especially as we move on towards a more circular model. It's really not a one size fits all. And the customer will want to meet those fashion needs in different ways and experience fashion in different ways, and I think that's where we can really dig into the creativity. Like some customers really will have pieces that they love, they want to keep them for a long time, repair them. Uh, where some customers will be more eager to like tap into the rental and the swapping scene where they can actually access pieces in maybe a higher price point that they actually couldn't afford in a traditional retail model, but they can actually access them in other ways. Uh, so I think, I think, I think there is really a lot of potential there. Art or Jessica, is there anything you could add to that? 00, sorry, go ahead, Mark. Yeah, sorry, I was, um, I was being polite, waiting, waiting, waiting for someone to ask, ask me, um, yeah, I, I think, um. I, I, I kind of agree with Sarah's point, you know, you want, you want products, you know, if we're gonna make, we're serious about this circular thing, we need the products to be like, really awesome. But I, I think the fashion industry, there's one thing the fashion industry are amazing at, is making products that, that, that look great, um, and really circular business is, is. A lot about materials and model. So we can still have products that look amazing, but what we're talking about here is, is not, it's not the products, it's the way they're made and what happens when, when, what they're made from, the way they're made and what happens when they're, when they're worn out. And I, I think, um, when we talk about accessibility, you know, something like 40% of all clothing production is never utilized, it goes straight into, into landfill. And, um, so, so I, I kind of wanna, wanna make a point here, which is that. Actually, surely it would be cheaper not to waste that, and theoretically up to 40% cheaper. So, uh, uh, you know, too often in this conversation, um, you know, people equivocate a little bit, or, or say, well, you know, we'd like to do something that's gonna be more expensive. Um, I think if a business sets out, um, not because of external pressure to kind of be seen to be doing something, but sets out to say, how do we actually change the way that products are made, change, change the factories, um. Uh, and, and change that 40% of waste, so we could end up with products where they're designed from the start to come back and be remade, where the, where the brand, saves money, the consumer saves money, and it's better for the environment, so the potential win, win, win. And Whitney, I'll just say I completely agree with with all the comments that have been made so far. I think it is, there's not a silver bullet, right? It's not like here's the one model or the one solution or the one company. It's not even just how to, here's the way that we deal with waste. It truly is that full end to end value chain that Mark just mentioned, and I think it is, it's a matter of And I apology, I apologize for the pun here, but closing the loop, right, of truly looking at end to end, um, what, what are the consumers demanding? How do we help inform them better about and educate about the different products and materials that are out there? How do we design products with materials that are meant to be reused or recycled or brought back to their original condition and And when consumers are done using whatever particular product or clothing or bedding or whatever textile they're using, how do we make sure we are getting it back? So that collection, that reverse logistics piece is just, is just so critical. And to Sarah's point, it's not one answer for how that model should work. Some people are happy to bring their product back into a store. Some people Really want it or need it to be collected or picked up from them. Some people need different incentives models, right? So the kind of subscription model works quite well in certain parts of the world and in other parts of the world it doesn't work at all, right? So providing these different models and different options just like we do with every other industry out there, I think is going to be critical to making sure it is both accessible and affordable. Mm A point that's often talked about in sort of circular economy conversations is the importance of collaboration across the value chain. I'm curious what any of you think makes successful collaborations in the fashion industry and how do we make collaborations more inclusive both across developed, developed and developing economies. I'll jump in with one quick thing around collaboration because I actually think it's the key to making this whole thing work because it is in many ways a volume game. It's a matching supply and demand, and we know whenever people do complain about a more sustainable product being more expensive, oftentimes it's just because we don't have the volume that's needed to make it be. The more affordable option. Or to Mark's point, we're not looking at the full cost of ownership of that actual product. And by full cost of ownership, I mean including all of the wasted product that doesn't actually go to market or the cost of actually recycling or the cost of landfilling something and the the the burden on municipalities or on local governments to To pay for that cost. Um, so I think to get the sustainable circular products and services to a point where they are the preferred option, you actually have to have collaboration, right? It's not one company saying, we want to use this, this circular product. You have to get the volume of the vast majority of companies to want that, um, so that the price points make sense. I think, uh, for, for me, collaboration, I'd say the most important thing is to have the same values. It doesn't work if you've got, you've got, you know, you've got different values. But I think we stoical economy that the, the collaboration, uh, the most interesting collaboration is the fact that you're collaborating with your customer. So, you know, really to make the, the, the product flow around, um, it's not just about working a materials level or a factories level, but, um, it's realizing that, and taking responsibility for what happens to the product after the in-use phase. And so you need to work with your customer to, and build a relationship. And you get some quite interesting dynamics if you, if you do that. Um, like, for example, um, our customer, uh Til is also our supplier. They supply us with, um, our raw material. Um, and so going forward, one of the things that we realized was this is a really big opportunity to rapidly scale, um, You know, the impact that we wanted to have and, and the technology that we wanted to have by sharing it with our customers, which is why, why we built the platform, and, um, and allow them to sort of participate on the supply side as well. Um, so I think that values and the most important collaboration is, is with, with the user. Yeah, I think I could really agree here with both actually. I mean, if we're going to have impact here, we need to be collaborating. It needs to be majority doing it and yeah, there definitely is a certain magic when we are having that collaboration with the customer, but I think also when I'm reflecting a bit on, OK, what actually makes, um, yeah, successful collaboration. I think what we've seen a bit is when you're also finding partners that have complementary capabilities. It's really not that you need to be an expert in everything you do, so I mean when you're mapping your ecosystem and you know where are the gaps, really inviting others in and to really see how you can build on that together. Um, and I think also sharing knowledge is another key success factor when it comes to collaboration as well, because it does take, it takes all sorts, um, it takes big, small, old and new, it takes all kinds of partnerships to get us there and um yeah, even being able to share access and to share knowledge is what's going to get us there faster as well. It's great. Mark, I would love to go back to you and talk a little bit about uh TMill's sort of made to order supply chain, cause it's organized as a platform that's open source and freely accessible to any company in the fashion industry. What is the uptake of this service so far and how long do you think it will take for made to order to sort of become more mainstream, so we can be cutting out that waste that you were talking about on the sort of front end of the production cycle? So we're quite a simple place, and I, I think, uh, we sort of look at these things sometimes in quite a helpful, a naive but helpful way, which is that we would say, well, aren't all clothes made to order? I mean, somebody orders them. Um, it just sort of seems, uh, crazy to us that there will be somebody sat in the middle who's predicting what people want to buy. And then you end up with, obviously that's inaccurate, so you end up with all of this, this waste, um, and you need a marketing team to try and push what you want to sell instead. And it seems more obvious logical to us to say, well, why don't we just produce the, make what people need, uh, when they need it. Now, for us to make that possible, um, if we use technology. And to, to make a lot of these things possible, uh, like the reverse logistics system that we have and the recovery, you know, we, we've developed tech technologies of our own, um, hardware, software, but also, the thing about tech is it's not. Evenly distributed, so something that's very obvious and simple in a parallel industry is like really profound when you apply it to fashion. So, so, so, um, you know, when you, when you kind of put it, put it all together, it's, um, a relatively simple proposition to say, you know, here's a platform, build your business, and we'll produce the products in real time. And because we only make what people need when they need it, we don't need to hold a load of stock so we can give it away for free. And because we give it away for free, the uptake's been really great. I mean, there's. You know, enough, um, people running Teamil, uh, powered businesses online now to fill, you know, a decent sized football stadium. Some of them are really big businesses, like BBC or Google. But I think what's most interesting is how many people that would never have participated as a business. Um, particularly with COVID, you know, it's people, people who, it's their first business. And for me, that's the most exciting one, because you can see how a technology, an enabling technology, um, can create such quick, um. Impact when people are actually have the way, uh, you know, as well as the will. Yeah, that makes sense. I'd love to go back to Sarah, since we're, we've sort of talked about collaboration with the customer. Um, at the current rate, the current junction, the rate of consumption of fast fashion is pretty alarming. The average customer buys 60% more clothing items than they did 16 years ago and keeps each item for half, half as long. Um, garments can be used 7 or 8 times before they're discarded, that we can go on and on with the stats in terms of how much is, how much textile waste is landfilled every second. Um, I'm curious, Sarah, how is H&M planning to take responsibility to help slow down that rate of consumption on the front end before we even talk about bringing those clothing, those clothing items back into a circular loop? Yeah, um, I mean, there is, there are a few different initiatives that we have going on there, um, that we get into, but I also first wanted to start with thinking a little bit about, um, I mean when we talk about consumption as well because for me also it's Uh, it's an interesting one because for me it's not even the biggest concern about the speed, but it's actually a bit more about how are we using resources. Uh, because when you're consuming something, you're actually, uh, using it up, um, but when we think about fashion, I mean you're using it, you're not actually using it up in the same way. It's not like an apple or toothpaste, um, for example, like we're not in the biological cycle here, we're actually in the technical cycle, and there is where you really want products and resources and materials to recirculate as many times as possible. Um, so I think that's where we really need to be focusing on how can you use products more? How do we need to design products and systems to enable recirculation at scale, because if we can keep these products and materials in the loop, if we can manage to reduce the leakage, then the speed isn't as much of a challenge because you can access fashion in fast and slow ways, like if you are accessing through a rental or a swapping model. Then you can actually um yeah meet those fashion needs of news value, um. But you're not you're not having the same leakage, you're keeping those products in use, you're keeping them in the system. Um, yeah, so I think that's where we really need to be focusing on because we simply can't continue with the system that we have today where we're, you know, extracting, using, but then it's just massive leakage, it's just not, um, we just can't continue like that long term. So I think the main things that we're really focusing on then, I mean, where do you go from there? We're looking at Different types of reuse models and we've initially been doing a lot of different pilots within different areas, but now seeing, OK, how to move on from that, how do we take those learnings and go towards scale, but I think also hand in hand with that you need to be looking at how do you actually create products that are enabled to recirculate in that system. They need to be designed from the beginning to be able to recirculate. I mean, much like we heard on the last panel. Um, yeah, otherwise you're at a bit of a losing game with yourself. So I think those are the main focuses for us right now. Mm So, Jessica, so far we've been talking a lot about um sort of the the citizen customer side of things, and we've talked about the business side of things. I'm curious if you've seen in your, in your sort of research, what role can governments play in sort of encouraging or supporting businesses and citizens in the transition to more circular economies. Well, do you, do you mind if I just comment on one thing that Sarah just said, because I, I love this point about consumers and if You really go back into history around like how actually not that far back in the 1950s or so, and, and you look at the word like consumerism and consumption and how it gets applied to durable, durable goods like the stuff in our house, like the chair, the beds, you know, the, even our refrigerators and TVs, our clothing. It's quite interesting, right? Because consumption was really meant to be, and even The, the assumption of um what a consumer is, was meant to be things that um that we eat, right? Things that we consume energy, uh, food, drink, whatever it might be, things that we literally consume and digest and is gone, right? I mean, that was part of the original, I can't remember the Latin definition, but it's something about like eating and and killing and and fully uh consuming and digesting it then. was applied to everyday goods, right, and consumable and durables and things in our house. And that has quite an interesting negative implication, similar to what both Sarah and Mark talked about, right? This idea that we are, we buy things and then we use them up and then we throw them away, right? And I say all that just because I think there's an interesting, um both behavioral mindset change that Has to happen um around this idea of consumption, as well as Whitney, to your question, um, potentially policy or government changes as well around this idea of consumption or around this idea of, I can, I can extract resources from the ground, I can then turn it into something, and then it gets used for a relatively short amount of time, and then it's just thrown away into some, you know, Um, vast area that nobody sees, right, i.e., landfills or oceans. Um, so to your question on government and policy, I think there's a lot of stuff that that fits in there, less, um, in terms of the role of policy, I think there's some very basic ones that have been around for years, like around um the use of toxic materials or creating safer products, um, and how those products. designed, so you look at all of the amazing innovations and things like um dyeing and the and the use of dyeing and water production and the leakage out into our water streams and a lot of regulation around that has been, has been quite successful. Um, so I think there's some basic things like that. I think government's really tackling waste definitions and waste hierarchies and how we think about waste and treat waste. Right now we talk about waste as it is. As it says if it is this one thing, and it is bad, um, as opposed to looking at it, um, as Mark mentioned earlier, actually as potential inputs back into our supply chain. So really understanding, um, both what is good waste or reusable waste versus what are those things that um we can't do anything with. And then once you have those waste definitions, starting to think about. What, what's the highest value that I can extract from that waste, right? So is it about turning it back into the same product? Is it about upcycling or recycling? Is it about conversion to energy? Is it something else? So, there are really no standards on these definitions or values across waste. So I could definitely see the role of government, um, especially when you're at the city level or at the regional level, making, you know, a huge difference, um. I think aligning incentives would be quite interesting. We've seen a huge boom in the world of renewable energy because there are these amazing government programs and rebates with respect to getting consumers to buy, um, you know, things in the world of renewables or EVs. So I think I could definitely see a lot more happening there. And then finally, I think there's some really big game changer type of policies that could come out and make a huge difference like EPR or extended producer responsibility. legislation, right, where you tell a consumer, a company, if you created this device, you know, you own it all the way, you know, from beginning of production all the way through whatever happens to it at the end of use or end of life of that product. Um, I think that kind of thing could be a game changer. It, it's to be seen, I think over the next couple of years, whether that will truly be rolled out, um, broadly. But again, lots of things that can happen both at the local level as well as the kind of the federal or global level. That's great. Um, going back to you, Mark, I would love to talk about the free returns that you sort of offer for customers to send back worn items. You said, you know, your customer is also your supplier. I'm curious about how the economics of this reverse logistics network work and what are the sort of key cost considerations and also opportunities that you've seen and that other companies could consider as they try to emulate this practice. Yeah, kind of to comment on the policy thing, I mean, to start with, it's, on the surface, it's not cheaper. I mean, um, one of the things that happened when we started out. Trying to use natural materials, renewables, or, or, uh, recovered products is, when we tried to do the right thing, everything got more expensive. And people don't talk about that very much, but that's totally insane, like, the, the system is set up to punish, uh, that kind of effort. Um, what we did was we, uh, uh, you know, the reality is the fashion system is a high volume, low value materials flow, fundamentally, if you go back down to the physics. So, so it's, if, if, if it, if it's hard, or you have to process it by, uh, separating different materials, so to put in work, um. Uh, or, or if you have to pay people to manually operate it, you, you're going to create a lot of cost for not much return. Or, or to put it another way, for this to work, it needs to be automated. And you have to make millions of little decisions at the speed of light, which is why people haven't done it till now, because people can't do that. But that's exactly what computers do. So, what we did was just wrote the code for the reverse logistics system. So every product has like a. Um, I've got some props. There you go. The t-shirt I'm wearing has got a, a thing in, you scan it, and then, you know, you, it tells you how to send it back. It costs you nothing. Uh, and, and, and I think the key thing I would, I would just like to say here is, um, we've, we, we're just using technology to find efficiencies to pay for it. It, the, the, the, the efficiency in this case is to recover this to design this shirt from the start to be simple and be remade. So, and then, and then, uh, it's worth it to us to recover it, because we can use the material. So rather than pay for more cotton, more organic cotton, we just give the customer an incentive to send it back. Um, and it, it, it, if you. Mess with the finances at a systemic level, uh, you can, you can see that, uh, uh, whilst, uh, yes, it does cost us money to kind of have it posted back here and process it, but we save money over here on materials costs. Um, so a little bit of, of, of clever sort of systems design, plus the conscientious application of technology is how we find these efficiencies. And then it's those efficiencies that we reinvest to pay for. Um, projects like this. And this is an example sat next to me, that, the clothes I'm wearing are made out of waist, by the way. Um, and, and here's a, here's a roll of What used to be t-shirts before being made back into new ones. And so I guess, I guess, um, You know, I think what I'd like people to, I think people don't talk about enough is the fact that. You know, this is not an ambition, this is working here. Um It's, and, and it, and, and it can be done with technology that's available today. We don't need to wait for someone to do something for regulatory change, um, although that would, that would accelerate things. You know, I think, I think it's a, it's a point of hope, really, that, um, That businesses can make this work within the current system. Mm Sort of on that note, Sarah, I would love to talk to you about, this is actually a question from Tanya in the chat about what helped sort of get the internal buy-in for H&M to focus on circularity, because I think there is a big difference between a business, the scale that Mart is running and a business, the scale of H&M. So, at H&M, was it sort of talking about numbers and cost saving, or was it showing sort of consumer demand and emphasis on sustainability? How did that, how did that become a focus at H&M? Oh It was just, yeah, recognizing that we just can't continue doing business the way we can and I mean, yeah, and the size and scale that we are, I mean the population is booming and we need to, we want to continue offering um people fashion and to experience fashion in an accessible way, in a way that's sustainable um but we can't continue to do that in the current system. To find a way to decouple, we just can't continue to extract resources, use them, and then ditch them. It's the bats just doesn't add up, basically. So logic, I think, was really what won through there that we just need to find a way to decouple. So we have been setting a lot of strong visions and targets on that the last number of years, but now it's really coming down to the crunch. What are the actions we need to take to get there? Um, how do you decouple in reality? And I think we've also seen um Kind of a double edged approach as well. It's been both top down and bottom up. Like we also got a new CEO now this year, and I mean that's created incredible momentum and Helena has a super strong message. She thinks, I mean, circularity is the only way, but at the same time we also have really engaged colleagues. and it's not just people sitting at the sustainability department globally or even in the regional sustainability teams, it's people all over the company who are really searching to engage with this and you know how can I contribute on this transition to a more circular system and yeah, so I think it's a combination of factors there. Gotcha. And Jessica, I'd love to go back to you and see if you have any insight from um other industries' experiences. Are there anything that you've seen happen in other industries that you think the fashion industry could learn from in terms of trying to transition to a circular economy? Yeah, I think, I think there's probably a few different things. One is, um, especially given everything we've just heard from Sarah and Martin from the first panel, um, you know, a lot of us have been talking about resources and the use of resources. It'd be interesting if you start looking at the fashion industry as an extractive industry, right, or a resource intensive industry, just like mining, oil and gas, or even the high tech. right? They're literally taking things from the ground, creating it at without necessarily paying for the full cost, right, of those of those resources that they're taking. And I bring that up, Whitney, just because it's not necessarily something that we would think about as as a parallel industry. But the the mining industry, in particular, over the years has, has done some really interesting things around um trying To limit or stop mining in some areas, or when they are mining to do so in more water and energy efficient ways. So I think learning from an operational or operational efficiency perspective from some of those resource intensive industries could be really interesting, right? Especially those industries that have, have had to start pricing in the cost of those externalities, right? So the cost of carbon, the cost. Cost of water, you know, the cost of pollution, that type of thing. I think another really interesting industry could be um some successes that the food industry has had in two different ways. One is the collaboration stuff we talked about earlier. So getting enough companies together to demand, you know, a more sustainable palm oil, for example, or an alternative to unsustainable palm oil, or The food and beverage industries coming together to find alternatives to single-use plastics or or multi-layer plastics, things that cannot be easily reclaimed and recycled. So seeing these collaborations or consortiums of companies coming together has been quite interesting in the just the recent years in the food and beverage. And another thing from food, I think actually could be the rise in Um, alternative material, alternative foods, right? So we're seeing a lot around things like Beyond Meat and Impossible Burgers and, um, Just Egg, things like that. I think we're just now starting to see that as well in the, in the world of fashion and textiles with respect to, you know, using pineapples or mushroom or other types of materials as alternatives to leather, right, as we know leather and cotton are. Very um water intensive, energy intensive, resource intensive materials. So I think learning from those industries could be quite interesting. And then the last thing I'll just mention on industries, again, we don't think of it as an industry always, but um is nature. I think nature is one of our best places to learn with respect to circular economy models, and there's some amazing new innovations and. Technologies out there that really come from nature. There's a company called Mori that basically learns from silkworms to put invisible coatings on products, um, and, and many other things like that. There's a company called Evernew that's able to take materials and put them right back to their original, um, original form again, learning from nature. So probably don't consider that an industry, but hopefully one that we, we learn a lot more from. Yeah, absolutely. Sarah, I would love to go back to you real quick, um, in terms of talking about what, what are some of the low hanging fruits that, that H&M has already sort of reached towards or that a business of that scale can have, can do today, can do tomorrow, versus what are some of the sort of, um, reach goals of things that are a little bit further out, but that will have a sort of effective and more impactful impact on the, um, industry overall. Yeah, sure. I mean when it comes to the model side of things, I think low hanging fruit is, um, I mean, test things, just try it out. There's so many different types of models out there, so test and learn, test and learn, that's what we've been trying to focus on now the last two years or so. And I mean being part of a group, we have quite an array of brands as well and that's really been a plus there that they can all try out different types of models and then share the learnings as well across the group um. So I think yeah, on the model side just start uh test and learn, but then when it comes to, yeah, long term reach goals, then it's how do you take those learnings and take them to scale, and that's not quite so simple, um, especially if you are a large organization and you've been headed in a direction for a certain amount of time. It's like being a big ship and you need to take a sharp turn. Uh, so yeah, there's a certain amount of um reorganization that needs to go into that and I mean also shifting your systems and developing your systems. I mean it's the it's the IT, it's the accounting, it's the logistics, and it's all of those things. Uh, so that is definitely a bit more of a challenge, but I mean needed if we're going to scale and head towards the needed impact. Um, but then I think also on the product side, um, because if you're looking at the products that you're then going to circulate in those varying models, um, Yeah, I think there's also different levels of how you could approach that like more low hanging fruit, yeah, looking at the materials, and yeah, we're trying right now to increase the share of recycled, also tapping into some of those new gen materials that you were talking a bit about, Jessica. There's really an array of things that you can do there, so I think that's Yeah, like a start, but then I think more long term is also. Yet moving from sustainable materials to circular products, it's a bit of a mindset shift needed. Yeah, and zooming out a bit just from materials, it's how do you combine those materials? What are the processes as well? How do you put them together in a way that you can also take them apart, that you can repair them easily, also that they're fit for the type of. Purpose or the type of use that they're intended for, um, so I think that is also a bit more challenging, but we need to start from the drawing board here to actually enable products to recirculate within those models. Great. Well, I feel like I could keep asking you all questions all day, but it looks like we're at the end of our time, so I'm gonna hand it over and see if we can get into some of the concluding remarks and maybe a little bit more of Q&A. Thanks so much for and panel, uh, panelists. We are, we are, so we have arrived at the final. Thank you for staying with us throughout. Uh, so, um, yeah, let me introduce the moderator for the final Q&A. Uh, please welcome Doctor Henrique Pasini, and he's an economist at ANCTED where he works, uh, on circular economy issues. He's also, uh, part of the core team responsible for the sustainable manufacturing. Environmental pollution program which is implemented in partnership with the UK FCDO. Uh, Doctor Bacini also published over 30 articles on environment, trade and development issues and has worked for various private and public institutions including the European Commission and the Brazilian government. Oh yes. Thank you, Zi. Thanks, everybody. It has been thrilling so far to listen to the panelists. I've been learning a lot. I, uh, I'm sure the audience as well because we've got so many questions. I am overwhelmed with questions here. We'll certainly not be able to go through all of them, but without further ado, and, uh, allow me to be a bit uh dictatorial in uh my approach, I'll be saying the name of the uh panelists. Or a moderator, uh, to whom I'll be addressing the question to because there are so many questions and it's kind of uh nice if we can find a match straight on. So, uh, to the point, I have a question here from Sophie Homans on the, uh, to, uh, that I addressed to Francois. Francois, uh, uh, using information linked to third vision points made from safe recycled. or renewable inputs, so labeling, uh, is, uh, uh, are, are you, do you see a way to prompt businesses and governments to develop and use more eco label, especially eco label related to circularity. For example, could you have, uh, uh, genes, uh, redesigned, developing into a more solid standards that people can adopt, for example. That is a very good question. Um, I, I agree that today one of the main issues that we face is the lack of homogeneity and alignment behind specific standards. So you have a number of different standards alongside different aspects of a product. If you take blue signs, they look at the chemicals that are used in a product. If you look at organic certifications, they look at the materials or recycling certifications, so all of them look at aspects of a product that are quite discrete. You've got cradle to cradle that can look at a varying degree of aspects of the product, but which is very, very strict and limits to some extent its adoption of cost, but brings a lot of clarity on all the different aspects of the product. I guess there are a number of considerations to have when you look at certifications. First is how expensive or difficult it is to get. The second one is how controversial some of its measures are and how difficult it is to drive adoption across the industry. What you mentioned the genes and what we took there is basically brought together some level of standards or initiatives, so for example, ZDHC or some certification around organic cotton and brought all that under a more like Like broad umbrella where we also looked at durability, where we also looked at recyclability but actually did it in a way that Ask people to self-report on what they were doing, so it's not really a certification because we don't go as far as validating ourselves, but we aim to bring transparency so people can ask questions and challenge and understand what is happening with the products that they purchased. I hope that answers the question. That's great, Francois. a number of questions related to the social impact of this transformation from linear production to circular production and marketing. Uh, I'm gonna address, uh, Jessica here, uh, with your, your previous literature, uh, Jessica. The debate about the, uh, a question from Laura Macides, by the way, the debate about circularity focuses on the environmental aspects mainly, but, uh, less so on the social aspects. What do you think could be the major social Impact, especially on jobs and, and Francois, I know as well that the the Helen McArthur Foundation did some analysis on the job creation aspect, but, uh, initially, Jessica, uh she want to comment, Francois, please do it. So do you think the transition from circularity to, uh, to, from linearity to circularity in, in fashion and textiles will bring about more jobs or more, more high-quality jobs than what we have today? Yes, so I think there's, and there's probably a lot of things you can look at, um, Henry, when you look at the social impact or the social benefits of the linear to circular transition. I'll just say, first, probably the biggest one or one of the biggest ones is affordability or access to more affordable products and services. So when again, we, we think about a product, whether it's clothing. Or shoes or vehicles or whatever it might be, having multiple lives, um, then that the cost of that product spread across multiple people makes it much more affordable, and that's much more accessible to people across the world. So I think that that affordability, accessibility piece is huge from a social impact perspective. Another big one that I just, I do want to mention because it's, it is directly linked to Environmental impact is the the the health issues related to the negative environmental impacts that we see today in the world of fashion and textiles. So that could be pollution, it could be toxicity of dyes and other chemicals being put into our water streams or put directly into our soil. It could be the impact of clothing being washed multiple times and Um, you know, microfibers or microplastics ending up in our drinking water or ending up in our systems and our food. So there's a huge, you know, environmental, social health impact, and as we know, it's typically persons from uniquely disadvantaged communities that are disproportionately impacted by those negative environmental consequences. And then to your to your actual question, um, I completely believe. That the job opportunities here are much greater, right? Because we're not talking about a one and done system, a one and done linear system where I'm creating something and then it goes somewhere else to be just to be sold and shipped, and then, and then it's done, right? I'm creating this very virtuous cycle or this ecosystem, where multiple people can be part of a reselling economy or a sharing economy, um or an upcycling economy. Right? So you're kind of democratizing our fashion world as well. So I think there's job creation opportunities from the start of the value chain, if I'm talking about material sciences and creation of new products, um, all the way through, uh, you know, the, the use of the products all the way through the collection, um, and then turning it back into other goods and services. So, yeah, I think huge opportunities. Uh, taking a hook on this point of the, the social impact, uh, going to, to Lisa, uh, if I may, uh, speak on moderators as well. Lisa, you've worked on an assessment looking at the, uh, environmental and health impacts of, of light industries in the developing countries. Uh, do you have something to say about this, uh, this linkage between circular economy practices and social impact? This question came from Rebecca Klube from the Imperial College. Yeah, so we, um, we did a quite an extensive literature review, sort of looking at the, um, the role that the textiles manufacturing industry, uh, took in terms of producing various different types of pollutants. Um, so we've had them mentioned here, the sort of blind. The dyes, the bleachers, the heavy metals that are all used in, in the production of, um, textiles and then how they're released into the environment. Um, largely, we tend to talk about water and water pollution, but there's also, um, you know, uh, effects on contaminating soil as well. Um, and I think there were, there were sort of two important aspects that came out of this. The first was the people actually working in the factories, as the sort of occupational health and the impacts on those people. Um, As, uh, as Jessica, I think said, you know, that they, they also tend to be sort of more vulnerable, um, employees potentially, um, sort of often low skilled. Uh, there can sometimes be a gender dimension as well that there might be, you know, more women being affected by, by some of these pollutants. Um, and there are various different ways in which you might be able to overcome those impacts, but they would require resources being put in by, by the textile manufacturer. So, you know, keep it. As we all know a lot about now. Um, and then also we, we also looked at the sort of local communities and how the pollution, which does get into the soil and the, and the watercours was then affecting, um, local communities. And again, they may be more vulnerable communities. And I think Khalid in our panel session was talking about this, this, um, sort of a new move towards industrial zoning, where you might be bringing together a whole host of different manufacturing. Industries into a single location to try to benefit from the economies of scale of, uh, some of the, the, um, effluent pollutant treatment plants, for example. Um, and I think there were, there was some sort of, it would be interesting to explore that further as to how effective those sorts of implementations are. Can you really scale up those things? Are we really identifying and tackling the pollutants that are causing most damage to human health and to occupational, um, health as well? Um, and, and, you know, be thinking a little bit more about the regulation and the policy to really target those pollutants that are causing the, the cancers and the neurotoxic effects, and so on. Thank you, Lisa. It's uh, of course, important to imagine a transition to a circular textiles and fashion industry that has a lower, uh, the pollution effects on the air, soils, and water. Uh, Khalid, I have a question for you from, um, Raja Daniel, who asks about non-fashion textiles such as carpets, curtains, and bed linen. What are your views on these products to become circular? Because I know that Master tax is also involved in uh non-fashion products. It's a very interesting, uh, frankly speaking, so far the circularity of, uh, the economy is more focused on the export-driven, uh, business areas, which is, of course, textiles and apparel, home textiles and the whole host of products. Uh, and the other, uh, business area that is basically leather-based products, kind of a leather industry and leather-based product that is also the export-driven business in Pakistan. So, uh, that is one of the Very largest polluters in so many senses, along with the textiles, so the government and I have been focusing more on that. Other than that, like curtains are. Car seats or for the domestic market, frankly speaking, that level of awareness has not come. And I think it is required as uh during this whole discussion, we could see that in European Union, in your ATA and World Bank, they are now trying to create the awareness and so on and so forth. So from the buyer side and the manufacturing side, things have already started moving in. So I think as far as the other non-textile industry is concerned other than the leather, I think it's it's it's awareness is required. I understand that, for example, in food, in the rice exports, the European Union have imposed certain strict kind of rules and regulation, and ultimately people are obliged to follow that. So I think in, in that way, at least the process and the awareness in the industry has started. Business models have started emerging, which need to be sustainable, which need to be uh uh circular in its nature. uh, but as far as the domestic market is concerned, I think it's a long way to go. Thank, thanks a lot, Khalid. It's really interesting to know because those are also large markets, uh, even though fashion is about 60% of textiles worldwide, there's still 40%. There are many other things. So, uh, question goes to, um, to Sarah. Uh, Sarah, I have a tough question for you here. Um, uh, even if, uh, from deskta Nebratu, even if most of the corporate companies talk about their commitment to sustainability and sustainable production, Uh, uh, most of their textile and garments facilities in developing countries are largely operating in a linear structure of production. How to change that? Hm, yeah, good question. I mean, Yeah, really we are on a transition towards a circular model, towards a circular system. We're not there yet. We're not even close. And yeah, so a large part of how we do business, it is still linear and we're learning as we go. And yes, but also I think to touch back on what we talked about a little bit in the panel, and this really takes collaboration as well, and we need to shift. We need a shift across our entire ecosystem. Uh, we can't just change one part of the business, um, and there we have to work together and also learn together, um, as we move towards scaling new business models, also as we're trying to adapt circular design principles, it is a learning curve there and that we're working on together with the supply chain, um, because I mean they are also the experts in what they do. And so I think the key is really to learn together on this transition. Absolutely. And, uh, one final question before we go to the closing remarks by the World Bank is to Marx. Uh, Marx, uh, do you think that uh blockchain technology could be of help in a more circular production system and what further advancements, uh, would be needed for it to be effective? I ask you because your company has this, uh, uh, traceability return system that is quite innovative. Yeah, um, uh, yeah, blockchain's interesting. I, I, I'm not sure if I can comment too much about it, because I'm, I'm, I'm not an expert on it specifically, but certainly, what it does is offer the opportunity to give more credible data to the, uh, source of where things come from, what they're, what they're made, made from. I think what I'd just say is, you know, traceability, like, looking back into the supply chain, is only half of the story. It's not about finding out. Where stuff comes from and talking about it, it's finding out where stuff comes from and actually changing, uh, where it comes from, how it's made and what it's, what it's, what it's made, made from, because we, we, we don't wanna just be transparent about, uh, supply chains. We want to completely redesign them and change the direction. But certainly, what I will say is technology itself has a massive role to play here. Tech by itself doesn't really do anything. It's, uh, amplifies someone's intent. And I would, for anyone who's looking. You know, and hoping for a big change in the fashion industry, I draw everyone's attention to companies like Airbnb or Uber, um, where they've taken a software approach to a large, relatively underutilized bunch of materials in the form of assets, cars and houses, and a massively increased utilization, created a load of value. And, you know, um, Airbnb, for example, was, Uh, you know, built hundreds of thousands of hotel rooms without laying a brick. It's been done in the cloud. So I think that, I think that, you know, technologies like that, which empower people to, um, participate on the supply side using the internet, have got, uh, uh, uh, uh, the question in the right direction. Um, and, and that's certainly why we, we, we're trying to do what we're trying to do. Thank you, Mark. I have so many other questions that I might be able to address here to point to panelists. I'd like to thank the panelists and especially the audience for sending so many questions over. I'll now pass the, the microphone to the World Bank for final conclusions. Enrique for the really great discussion, um, and, uh, yes, welcome Etienne who is the senior specialist and also leading this learning series, uh, Etienne, for your last words, thanks. Yeah, I'll be, I'll be brief because the discussions have been extremely interesting and, and, and helpful. Um, first, I, I want to sincerely thank Z and Henrique for setting this up and also Francois from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation for his insights and help in designing this. A sincere thanks to Isabel for the opening remarks and, and making sure that we do this collaboratively. Um, I'm in general surprised nobody mentioned Bernie Sanders' mittens. Which I think were reminded us all of, of, you know, that, that there are things happening at a very small scale, um, that awareness is, is a key part of this, uh, this, this transition, and it's important that we collaborate and we work together in designing kind of a different vision for the sector. Um, I, I, I personally, I mean, we've been working on the sector for many years. The bank and the IFC have many programs, and the IFC, especially, um, as the Global Partnership for, for Cleaner Textiles, which is, has been running in Bangladesh and other, other countries, that is taking this very comprehensive approach. Looking at the demand and supply side of textiles and trying to see where it can really make a dent in in in the industry. The, the challenge is, uh, for, for me, at least for my, my, this is mostly my personal view is, is that the cost of environmental damage is not included in the final product. Um, and this is a, a significant issue in at least the countries where, where we work, um, because they absorb a lot of that environmental costs and the regulations, and we haven't spoken about the basic regulations right before we even get to the circular economy concept. Ideally these are things is that they are not able to regulate the industry in a way where it doesn't harm the, the country and its ability to grow, and I think this is a, Balance of pricing, it's a very price sensitive industry. Any changes made on the production side are going to be uh accounted for in the product side, um, and making sure you find a balance between those elements in a way that makes industry, entire industry sustainable is going to be critical. It's an extremely complicated industry. Um, it touches upon our more uh inner, innert, uh, you know, desires in terms of looking good, uh, but also comfort and, And warmth and other types of uh of emotions that that that that other products don't really have. So it's hard to compare it to an iPhone or other devices, and therefore, making sure that this is done, um, as was mentioned in a transitional phase. And to me, the question is, what does the transition look like? And how do we work with different parts of value chain to actually enable that transition? And I think we're, as I mentioned, we're not there yet, but at least we understand the parameters of what needs to be done. And there needs to be some kind of a global link to bring these pieces together to really make them, make us move towards a circular economy in the textile industry. But again, I want to thank everyone. This is, this is a journey. This is not a conclusion. This is the 7th session of our learning series between the World Bank and our partners, and we very much look forward to again having you. Um, part of the series and, and learning from, from, as we tackle this issue in, in different uh sectors. Uh, I want to thank again the speakers and the panelists, as well as the participants who stayed up, uh, many hours to work on this, and, um, and yeah, and hope to look, uh, look forward to welcoming you again in the next series on uh the construction industry. So thank you very much to everyone. Thank you, everyone. I'm closing this call. Bye. Have a good day. Bye.
showAllTranscripts
no
duration
PT2H3M12S
scene7File
worldbank/WBGUNCTAD Webinar on Circular Economy and Textiles-20210126 1359-1
scene7Domain
https://worldbank.scene7.com/
scene7FileAvs
worldbank/WBGUNCTAD Webinar on Circular Economy and Textiles-20210126 1359-1-AVS
title
WBGUNCTAD Webinar on Circular Economy and Textiles-20210126 1359-1
description
WBGUNCTAD Webinar on Circular Economy and Textiles-20210126 1359-1
showTimestampAndTranscript
yes
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-3
col-lg-3
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-7
col-lg-7
  • add-style
  • lp-body-content
Global leaders advancing sustainable textiles initiatives explore questions of economic viability, policy, environmental impact and scalability in a new normal.
lp-heading-top-medium
lp-heading-bottom-medium
col-xs-12
col-sm-12
col-md-2
col-lg-2