When Trade Regime Simplification Isn’t Simple Enough
Discussions on the implementation of an STR at Moyale began in 2021, involving multiple rounds of negotiations on product coverage, operational modalities, and alignment with the broader Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) STR model. While the new regime streamlines border procedures and provides on-site support, several of its rules do not fully reflect traders’ daily practices. This gap has been documented in a series of World Bank supported Horn of Africa Initiative (HoAI) reports, including a dedicated research paper on an STR adapted for the region.
The World Bank Group has prioritized job creation as a pathway out of poverty. Over the next three decades, Africa will experience the fastest increase in working-age population of any region, with a net increase of about 740 million people by 2050. One of the key pillars of job creation is supporting business-friendly environments through fair and predictable policies that can help spur business creation and job growth for countries like Kenya and Ethiopia. Africa’s trade future depends on policies that respond to the realities of traders and small-scale firms, rather than on policy assumptions about how trade should be conducted in theory.
For instance, the regime does not provide customs duty exemptions. Ethiopia is a member of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), but it does not yet participate in its Free Trade Area. As a result, traders cannot access duty-free treatment. Instead, a bilateral 10% tariff reduction applies, but only if traders comply with COMESA rules of origin. For many of them who operate with limited documentation and literacy, meeting these requirements can be challenging.
Other provisions constrain the regime’s potential impact. The STR limits the value of goods to USD $1,000 per month per trader and restricts border crossings to once per week. These rules are designed to prevent larger businesses from exploiting simplified procedures by splitting shipments across multiple traders. In practice, however, they also limit legitimate small-scale commerce.
With modest margins, and most of goods traded at the border being perishable, traders depend on frequent crossings and rapid reinvestment of their earnings. Restricting such crossings slows cash flow and increases the risk of spoilage.
The regime also limits where traders can operate: within 50 kilometers on the Ethiopian side and 100 kilometers on the Kenyan side. While intended to ensure that the STR benefits accrue only to border communities, this restriction can prevent traders from accessing larger markets where they might earn better prices.
Designing Trade Rules Around Actual Traders
Experiences from other African nations suggest that simplified trade regimes work best when they reflect the realities of small-scale trade. Small adjustments can make a significant difference.
Allowing more frequent crossings helps traders maintain cash flow and move perishable goods quickly. Increasing value thresholds can allow them to grow their businesses while still benefiting from simplified procedures. More flexible duty arrangements could make formal trade more competitive than informal trade. Expanding the operating radius could help traders access larger markets and grow their businesses.
These kinds of adjustments have already proven effective in several countries within the COMESA region, where trader-friendly rules have helped increase formal trade volumes.