Performance-based Contracting for Roads in Peru
| 1. Country |
Peru |
| 2. Year
when the first performance-based contract was awarded |
1996-97 |
3. What organizations
promoted/initiated a PBC approach in the country?
|
World Bank (WB) and Inter-American Development
Bank (IADB) |
| 4. Name of the organization
currently in charge of management of road maintenance |
Municipalities and Provincial Road Institutes |
| 5. Supervision of
the contractors is done by |
Individual consultants |
6. Sources of the
current funding of PBC
(in %) |
During the 1st phase:
External
funding: 30% (WB) + 30% (ADB) to be repaid by the Central Gov’t;
Central government
funding: 30%;
Municipality
funding: 10%;
Now (2nd phase):
Now municipality funds 1/3, but with decentralization, the funding share of municipalities
is increasing and the goal is to achieve 100% funding by the municipalities |
| 7. Cost per km per
year |
USD600-900 (only routine maintenance) |
| 8. Typical contract
cost (USD), size (km) and duration (years) |
The contract cost is USD 24,000-28,000 km.
The contract size is 20–50 km of road (an average of 45 km of road or 3
km per worker).
The contract duration is 1 year. |
| 9. Typical contract
cost (USD) and duration (years) with the supervisor |
The contract cost is USD6,000.
The duration is 1 year. |
| 10. Dispute resolution
mechanism |
Mutual consultation/direct negotiation (site inspection,
progress meetings and collaborative discussions of each party’s
position) |
| 11. Procurement
process |
1st phase of PBCs:
Negotiation with local small-scale contractors
2nd phase of PBCs:
Competition open to the same pool of local contractors |
| 12. Was prequalification
used? |
No |
| 13. Types of services
under lump sum payment |
Only routine maintenance
(Rehabilitation was done by a different contractor under a separate contract
to make the road maintainable; small and micro-enterprises contracted under
PBCs do not possess sophisticated tools and equipment to undertake rehabilitation
and periodic maintenance)
|
| 14. Types of roads
covered under PBC and their pavement type and traffic load |
Rural gravel roads of 3-3.5 m wide,
traffic load – 30 vpd;
Currently, pilots PBCs are implemented on national roads |
| 15. Percentage
of this type of road in the entire road network under PBC |
1/3 or <15,000 km of the known rural network
Some portion of the national network under PBC (micro-enterprises) |
Context
In 1996-97 the Peru Rural Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance Project
(jointly financed by the Inter-American Development Bank, World
Bank, and government of Peru) established a micro-enterprise-based
road maintenance program. Its goal was “not a welfare program
but a cost-effective way of … ensuring the benefits from
improved access [following road rehabilitation]” and generation
of employment among the poor in the poorest provinces.
The National Road Administration developed the
first performance-based contract for micro-enterprises and was initially
responsible for
signing the contracts with them. Within the recent decentralization
process, the National Road Administration has delegated the authority
to sign contracts with micro-enterprises to municipalities or Provincial
Road Institutes (created only in some provinces).
All rehabilitated roads were entered into the routine maintenance
program. Micro-enterprise contractors (with 10–16 employees)
received annual performance-based contracts. In the 1st phase of
this model, the contracts were negotiated and later renewed. Once
micro-enterprises gained technical and business skills and acquired
relevant experience and more people were trained, municipalities
have moved to an open competitive bidding.
In the second phase of the project, which began
in 2002, Provincial Road Institutes were set up to estimate maintenance
costs, prepare
road maintenance plans, and manage contracts. There are now about
40 institutes in the 105 provinces where the project is operating.
The institutes are typically staffed with one engineer, one planner
or technical specialist, and one administrative support person. Contracts
Maintenance contracts cover 20–50 km of road (an average of
45 km of road or 3 km per person). Average maintenance costs fell
from US$1,000 per kilometer of rural road in the late 90s to US$700–US$800
in 2000-2002 once maintenance work was being performed regularly.
The contract is written in a very simple language, as the employees
of the micro-enterprises usually have low reading skills and very
basic education (or no education at all).
Payment and Incentive Mechanisms
Micro-enterprises receive a fixed sum payment each month if performance
indicators set in the contract have been met. Initially, payment
was uniform for maintenance on all types of roads, but gradually
roads were classified according to road conditions, traffic load,
geographic location, and climate impact. Micro-enterprises are
now required to submit at the end of each month brief reports of
types of maintenance activities implemented, expenditures incurred
and amount of materials used. All of this does not affect payment
to micro-enterprises in any way, but helps the Provincial Road
Institutes to estimate maintenance costs more accurately. Technical
assistants who supervise the performance of micro-enterprises use
this type of reports to check the quality of the end results: whether
the present road condition indeed reflects the specified amount
of material that has been used. If the level of the service provided
is lower than the one required, then the payment is reduced.
The pressure of local municipalities and other members of their
communities -- their next door neighbors -- is one of the main driving
forces for micro-enterprises to comply with the level of service
required. The employees of micro-enterprises are members of the local
communities living along the roads they maintain.
The other driving force is a possibility to renew their contract
for another year without bidding subject to continuing compliance
with the performance indicators set in the contract.

Supervision
Monitoring and supervision of micro-enterprises is regularly done
by Technical Assistants. In addition to supervision, their other
responsibilities are to collect the data on road condition, to
provide social assistance (dealing with gender and co-financing
issues, and teaching employees of micro-enterprises to read and
write).
Technical assistants are individual consultants, who just graduated
and got a degree and need to gain some experience in their field.
Some of them have successfully found their career in road agencies
later.
Roughly, one technical assistant is responsible for 6-7 micro-enterprises.
(35 of 87 Technical Assistants are involved in supervision). In addition,
the Provincial Road Institutes sometimes undertake site inspections
to verify the work done by the Technical Assistants and micro-enterprises.
Funding of PBCs
In the first phase of the project, financing was handled through
a maintenance co-financing mechanism under which participating
local governments covered a small part of the cost of routine maintenance
activities in their jurisdictions, and the Ministry of Transport
and Communication financed the greater part through a combination
of grants and international loans. The new Municipal Compensation
Fund allows municipalities to finance recurrent costs associated
with routine road maintenance, and some are already financing 100%
of these.

Key success factors:
strong
commitment of local communities, who see road maintenance
as a means of social and economic development,
use
of local micro-enterprises, which employ people who live alongside
the roads and so have
an incentive to keep the roads in good repair.
Directions for Future:
Spread of PBC approach, due to their cost-effective implementation
on rural roads. The central government tries to use this model
for national highways and want to expand this model to the remaining
2/3 of the rural network, which is not under PBC now. To implement
this plan successfully, the government continues to build and
enhance the rural capacity, and invest in local technical assistants.
Sources:
- Interview with Aurelio Menendez, Former Task Team Leader for the
Peru Rural Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance Project. March 2005.
- Burningham, S. and Stankevich, N. 2005.“Why
Road Maintenance is Important and How to Get It Done.” Transport Note TN-4.
Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Also available at: http://iris37.worldbank.org/domdoc/PRD/Other/PRDDContainer.nsf/
All+Documents/85256D2400766CC785257053006358CC/$File/tr-4_final_08-04-05.pdf
- Please also see Peru’s Contract
Documents.
Back to Case
Studies
 |