Home : Introduction
Transport Note
PBC Globally: Country-Issue Matrix and Case Studies

World Map
Country Matrix
Case Studies

Documents: TORs, Bidding Documents, Contract Documents, Training Materials
Resources: Publications, Links to Websites
List of Resource Persons
Multi-Donor Support: GPOBA, PPIAF
Acknowledgement
Contact information

Print this pagePerformance-based Contracting for Roads in New Zealand

The first long term (10 year), performance-specified maintenance contract (PSMC) was let by Transit New Zealand (Transit NZ) in 1998. Under this contract the maintenance provider was responsible for maintaining the road network to meet a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Two years later, Transit NZ introduced a shorter version, so-called “hybrid” contracts, which incorporate features of traditional method-based and performance-specified maintenance procurement. These contracts typically run for a period of 5 years. Now, The PSMC is used on 15% of the entire road network, predominately on national roads, which are generally sealed. At least one contract includes a mix of national and regional roads, with both sealed and unsealed roads.

Definition of PSMC for roads in New Zealand
The PSMC is a single lump-sum contract, which includes:

Bringing the assets to the contracted standards, with a provision that changes in safety legislation (standards) become contractual;
Provision of all inspections;
Identification, programming, prioritization and delivery of maintenance services necessary to achieve specified performance criteria; and
Management of the integrity of the assets using a cost effective long term maintenance strategy.
Payments are monthly, are independent of actual works and services provided, but may vary subject to meeting performance criteria.

Scope and Assets of Contracts

A. Hybrid Model. The hybrid model utilizes five-year output-based contracting, relying on performance measurement, reporting and self-auditing to ensure supplier performance. The model relies on a co-operative environment between the contracted parties and seeks to maximize the skills, expertise, innovation and systems of the road industry. The scope of work includes rehabilitation, periodic maintenance, routine maintenance, winter maintenance, line marking, resurfacing, lighting maintenance, traffic signs and signals, structure maintenance, and emergency works (limited liability). Improvements such as seal widening, emergency work are paid on a unit rate basis.

Services within the hybrid model are predominantly split between professional services and physical works, but portions of the professional services (specifically, the short-term life of the asset) are the responsibility of the network maintenance contractor. The long-term health of the asset is assigned to the network management consultant. In reality the contractor and consultant work together to develop both short and long-term programs to determine least cost, whole-of-life maintenance options.

B. Performance-specified Maintenance Contracting (PSMC) Model. The PSMC consists of a single ten-year contract for providing all the products or services associated with state highway network maintenance and management. In a similar way to the hybrid model, the PSMC model utilizes output-based contracting, relying on self-compliance by the supplier to ensure performance. It strives to maximize the skills, expertise, innovation and systems of the road industry, expecting higher efficiency and improved value for money.

 

Pre-qualification process
Pre-qualification does not apply to hybrid and PSMC contracts (Transit NZ 2005a).

Risk Transfer
The level of risk taken by to contractor, which is the lowest in the traditional, method-based procurement model, increases significantly in the hybrid procurement model. While Transit NZ retains responsibility for asset consumption, the network contractor takes over risks relating to surface condition such as texture, roughness and skid deficiency. These risks are moderated to some extent by contracting for minimum quantities of pavement and surface treatments.

The most risk transfer occurs in the PSMC procurement model. The contractor is responsible for all aspects of network condition, including asset consumption and road surface condition. This substantial risk transfer is undertaken on the premise that the contractors are in the best position to identify the risks and determine treatments to manage them. They are engaged on the basis that they know and understand the network and will implement proactive management and maintenance programs that aim to minimize threats and enhance opportunities.

In all current procurement models, Transit NZ retains the risk of determining the specified service levels meeting the expectations of the customer.

Contract Tenure
Tenure of traditional and hybrid models beyond five years requires approval from Land Transit New Zealand. Typically, hybrid contracts are let for the period of 5 years, while PSMC for 10 years.

Bidder Selection
To date, Quality-Price Trade-Off (QPTO) method has been used to evaluate tenders for the implementation of PSMCs. QPTO refers to the selection method wherein quality and price of bids are assigned numerical weights, resulting in a unique ranking of bids.

Performance measures
Performance measures used in PSMCs and hybrid contracts are divided into (a) management performance measures, (b) long-term performance measures and (c) operational measures.
Management performance measures drive the planning, management and implementation aspects of the contract. They usually incorporate plans for quality, traffic, health, safety, and reporting requirements.
Long-term (or key) performance measures relate to the overall condition of the pavement, roughness, skid resistance, texture, rutting, surface life, structural conditions, etc. These drive the contractors’ maintenance and rehabilitation interventions.
Operational performance measures apply to daily serviceability of the road network being maintained and include conditions of the pavements and road furniture.


Monitoring
The contractor has the responsibility to design and implement a compliance and performance monitoring system throughout the contract tenure, sufficient to stand scrutiny under review by Transit NZ, or by an independent party commissioned by Transit NZ, annually or otherwise.

Partnership
When PSMC models were first introduced by Transit NZ, partnership between the various parties was recognized as a valuable mechanism to understand each other’s objectives and the benefits of working as a team.

Informal partnering is now introduced in the traditional and hybrid models and involves regular meetings between parties, open lines of communication and identification of joint goals and objectives. Formal partnering is arranged at a higher level involves parties signing up to a Partnering Charter.

Results

Improved maintenance services at lower costs. The General Manager of Transit New Zealand reports that “better services are being delivered at much lower costs.” In New Zealand, there has been a 30% decrease in professional costs and 17% decrease in physical works, while traffic grew by 53% (FHWA 2005).

Replication of the longer-term PSMC model by local authorities and councils. In recent years, a number of local authorities/councils have followed the practice of Transit NZ for longer term contracts with the objective of maintaining an asset for a fixed budget. Typically, these contracts are issued for three-year term with one-two renewal possibilities for one year.

Sources:

  1. FHWA. 2005. "Highway Maintenance Contracting 2004. World State of Practices." Report of the National Highway maintenance Contract Seminar, April 2004. Orlando, Florida.

  2. Porter, T. “Trends in the Procurement Models for Highway Maintenance.” Opus International Consultants Limited. Courtesy of Tony Porter.
    Also available at: http://www.mrutc.org/about/00950.pdf

  3. Transit NZ (Transit New Zealand). 2005a. “Pre-Qualification. Procedure Manual for Trial.” Issue 4. Wellington. Courtesy of Transit NZ.
    Also available at: http://www.transit.govt.nz/projects/tendering/Prequalification-Manual-Iss4.pdf

  4. Transit NZ. 2005b. “Long-Term Procurement Plan. June 2005.” Wellington. Courtesy of Transit NZ.
    Also available at: http://www.transit.govt.nz/content_files/news/Publication19_PDFFile.pdf


  5. Please see New Zealand's Bidding Document

  6. Please see Western Bay and Plenty District's Contract Document

 

Back to Case Studies

 

 

© 2006 The World Bank Group , All Rights Reserved.