Performance-based Contracting for Roads in Estonia
In the nineties, Estonia went through a privatization reform that
also affected the road sector. The Estonian National Road Administration
(ENRA) was encouraged to promote the creation of contracting firms
and outsource road works to contractors. Private firms established
at that time recruited mostly former government employees who were
experienced in the execution of road works. The privatization process
going in the road sector led in 1995 to a pilot experience of performance-based
procurement of road management and maintenance. From 1995 through
2000, the ENRA tested several one-year and two-year performance-based
contracts (PBCs).
Satisfied with the results of these experiments, the ENRA moved
in 2000 to using longer-term PBCs on a regular basis. At present,
63% of the national road network, specifically 10,288 km of paved
and gravel roads, is covered under five-year PBCs. These contracts
are fully funded from the central government budget.
PBCs are awarded only for those road corridors where rehabilitation
is not warranted, only maintenance. These contracts typically cover
routine maintenance and winter maintenance (snow removal, snow blowing,
ice cleaning).
As of February 2005, 5 private contractors were commissioned to
execute 12 PBCs. These contracts may not be renewed. At the end of
the fifth year, the contractors that have completed their obligations,
and are interested in continuing for another 5-year term, have to
participate in an open competitive bidding again. The legislative
framework actually permits to extend contracts for up to additional
two years, but contractors in Estonia are interested in longer terms
and prefer going through a competition again.
Monitoring
In 1995, a consulting company was hired to supervise one-year and
two-year pilot PBCs. After analyzing this experience, the ENRA
and its regional offices concluded that the supervision of PBCs
required fewer personnel and fewer resources than with the traditional
method of procurement, and could be done by in-house staff. At
present, the supervision of contractors executing PBCs is arranged
through periodic informal and regular monthly inspections. Typically,
periodic inspections are typically done by a single supervisor
from the road agency. Other agency staff can be engaged if their
assistance is needed to resolve emerging problems.
Regular monthly inspections are conducted by an official commission,
appointed by decree of the head of the respective road region. The
Commission usually consists of 3 supervisors, 1 traffic person and
2 representatives from the ENRA. Contractors are not official members
of the Commission, but the decree indicates that it is the Contractor’s
responsibility to assign the appropriate people to represent their
interests during the Commission’s inspections. Though the contractors
are not obliged to attend monthly inspections, they receive invitations
from the ENRA (or its regional offices) to participate, and they
always do. The ENRA is interested in the physical presence of the
contractor, as this helps discuss identified defects and resolve
possible disputes on the site. To avoid corruption among the parties
concerned and achieve better contractor accountability, one of the
regions (Kagu) has initiated the rotation of its three Commissions
from county to county when they are to conduct monthly site inspections.
Road users are also encouraged to participate in monitoring and
evaluation of the contractors’ work. Billboards with contact
information are established along the contracted road corridors to
report any deficiencies. Since the deployment of a PBC approach,
the ENRA has noticed a decrease in the number of complains from road
users about road conditions.
 Workforce reduction in the National Road Administration

In 2003, the number of personnel at the ENRA and regional offices
was reduced by 283 people (29%) as a result of the road management
organization reform. At the end of 2003 the ENRA and its subordinate
state agencies had totally 692 employees (administration staff – 343,
workers – 349) (see the chart ).
One of the reasons
was the outsourcing of routine maintenance works under PBCs, which
lead to the need in fewer workers to continue executing other kinds
of road works and fewer administration staff to administer and
supervise PBCs.
Partnership
The ENRA and its state agencies have established strong partnership
relations with their contractors. The Administration arranges bi-annual
workshops to bring together representatives of the contractors
and road agencies involved in PBC. The main objective of such events
is to share experiences of different counties, collaboratively
discuss
lessons learnt and find innovative solutions for future implementation
of PBCs.
Appendix: Requirements for the State of Roads
(Provided and translated from Estonian into English by the ENRA.
Performance requirements are set for 4 levels of roads).
The state of road shall enable safe traffic and shall conform to
environmental protection requirements and the technical requirements
established for the corresponding class of road. Requirements for
the state of roads are obligatory for all the owners of the roads.
A road owner can impose the obligation of fulfilling of the requirements
for the state of road on the contractor by concluding relevant agreement.
If it is not possible to meet the required state of road and therefore
if it is not possible to drive safely, this stretch of road should
be designated with relevant road signs. According to the road class,
type and traffic volume there are four levels of road states, from
1 to 4, 4 being the highest level at which the condition of road
is the best and 1 being the lowest level.
The requirements for road are divided as follows:
Requirements
for the state of paved roads.
Levels of state and indicators that describe every state are given
for the evenness of road surface and the amount of defects on
surface, for shoulders, for road signs and road marking, for side
visibility
distance, for general appearance and for manhole covers.
Requirements for the state of gravel roads.
Levels of the state and indicators of describing the road state
are given for evenness and cross section of road surface, for
side visibility
distance and for general appearance of road.
Requirements for the state of bridges.
A bridge is a construction along which the road crosses the obstacles
and which has one or more spans with the length of at least 3
meters.
The accordance of bridge to the requirements of the state is
determined by the state of every single structural element of
the bridge.
The following structural elements of bridge are evaluated to
determine the state of the bridge:
Pavement
and its width, evenness and profile;
Road
signs;
Sidewalks;
Hand-rails;
Hydro
sealant and deformation joint;
Underneath
surface of bridge construction;
Bearings;
Drainage
system;
Bearing construction for cement concrete, steel bridge and
wooden bridge;
General span construction;
Piers;
Embankment end;
River bed beneath the bridge.
Requirements for the state of road in winter conditions.
Requirements for winter maintenance are valid in weather conditions
typical to winter like snow, ice and slipperiness, blizzard
etc. States of road in winter conditions are described with slipperiness,
amount of snow and evenness and are given in the following
table.
| Indicators |
States of roads and their description |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| Slipperness |
|
|
|
|
| |
Road surface is allowed to
be covered with snow or ice, anti-skid treatment only in dangerous
places. |
Surface is allowed to be covered
snow or ice, anti-skid treatment is required. |
Wheel tracks must be clear |
Whole road surface must be
clear from snow and ice |
| Snowiness |
|
|
|
|
| Dry and light snow |
up to 10 cm |
5 cm |
3 cm between tracks |
-- |
| Wet thaw snow, sleet, salt-snow mix |
up to 6 cm |
3 cm |
2 cm between wheel tracks |
-- |
| Space between road side snow-drifts at
least |
6 cm or at least width of road |
8 cm or at least width of road |
9 cm |
10 cm |
| Evenness |
|
|
|
|
| Ruts or unevenness on snowy road surface
up to |
4 cm |
3 cm |
There can be squeezed snow between wheel
tracks up to 2 cm |
Road surface must be clear, at temperature
lower than – 12 C squeezed snow between wheel tracks
up to 1 cm is allowed |
Sources:
- ENRA (Estonian National Road Administration). 2004. “Annual
Report 2003.” Tallinn.
- Interview of the Estonian National Road Administration staff
and private contractors, February 2005, Tallinn.
Back to Case
Studies

|