World Bank Group

Search Index Feedback Help 

Independent Evaluation Group
Home > Independent Evaluation > Building Government M&E Systems > Evaluation of Efforts to Institutionalize M&E
Search IEG Evaluations
Advanced Search
Building Government M&E Systems Home
What is M&E?
M&E Tools, Methods and Approaches
Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations Under Budget, Time and Data Constraints
Influential Evaluations
Why is it Important to Institutionalize M&E Systems?
Diagnostic Guides
Developing Action Plans
Lessons from Experience
Country Case Studies
Evaluation of Efforts to Institutionalize M&E
All Publications
Related Websites
Toolkit
Order a Report
Receive IEG alerts
Contact us

 

 

 
 
Evaluation of Efforts to Institutionalize M&E
Overview

Annual Report on Operations Evaluation Just as it is important to evaluate any type of capacity building or public sector reform, it is also important to evaluate efforts to strengthen government M&E systems. Such evaluations are similar in some ways to a diagnosis of an M&E system (see Diagnostic Guides) but would usually be more formal in nature. The World Bank’s Operations Evaluation Department (OED, the predecessor to the Independent Evaluation Group) conducted a self-evaluation in 2004 of its own work to help countries strengthen their M&E systems.

This self-evaluation examined OED’s strategy for its work in this area -- this helped define what “success” looks like, and this in turn helps to provide a benchmark against which progress can be evaluated. OED’s capacity-building activities and budget were discussed, and the actual results against each component of its strategy were analyzed. The analysis included a results chain for country-level M&E capacity-building, which identified activities, outputs, intermediate and final outcomes, as well as desired impact. Key performance indicators were identified for country-level work, and also for other components of OED’s capacity-building work (e.g., preparation of resource materials such as the publications in this website, M&E training, regional and global efforts, etc). Two in-depth case studies of OED’s country-level support were also undertaken, for Uganda and Egypt. Finally, criteria are presented for evaluating donor support for M&E capacity-building.

Evaluation Capacity Development: OED Self-Evaluation - Note that “evaluation capacity development” (or ECD) is an alternate, earlier term for building government M&E systems. The term ECD is still used by other multilateral and some bilateral aid organizations.

The findings and implications of the in-depth case studies on OED’s work to institutionalize M&E in Uganda and Egypt are discussed in greater depth in:

Building Country Capacity for Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector: Selected Lessons of International Experience

The history of IEG’s involvement in the topic of building government M&E systems is discussed in World Bank Operations Evaluation Department: The First 30 Years, Chapter 11. The World Bank’s experience is also discussed by Keith Mackay in D.W. Compton, M. Baizerman and S.H. Stockdill (eds.), The Art, Craft, and Science of Evaluation Capacity Building, American Evaluation Association, New Directions in Evaluation, 93, Spring 2002, pp. 81-99.





The Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is an independent unit within the World Bank; it reports directly to the Bank's Board of Executive Directors. The goals of IEG 's evaluations are to draw lessons from Bank experience, and to provide an objective basis for assessing the results of the Bank's work.

Search | Index | Feedback | Help | WB Home
© 2007 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions