|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Framework of evaluation
- Progress in trade liberalization
- World Bank Trade assistance
- Definitions
- Bank strategies on trade
- Portfolio and implementation
- Outcomes and impacts (project level; cross-country level)
- Lessons from country case studies
- Main findings
- Conclusions
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Study objective: evaluate the Bank’s assistance to client countries
on trade between 1987 and 2004 and derive lessons to improve the
relevance, efficiency, sustainability and institutional development
impact of that assistance.
- Relevance of Bank Assistance: Was the Bank’s trade-related assistance
relevant to promoting improved trade and economic outcomes? Did
the Bank “do the right things”?
- Effectiveness of Bank Assistance: Were Bank-supported interventions
effective and efficient in achieving their stated objectives? Did
the Bank “do things right”?
|
|
7
|
- Trade encompasses trade policy reforms, export promotion, trade
financing (public and private), trade facilitation (institutional
and infrastructure), TA for WTO accession and negotiations.
- Includes lending and non-lending assistance
- Economic and sector work (ESW)
- Research
- Advocacy
- Trade capacity building (including non-lending TA)
|
|
8
|
- 1987-2000: Implied Strategy
- 1987 WDR
- OD 8.60
- Board papers
- DEC publication
- 2001-04: 2001/02 Development Committee paper
- Research
- Advocacy
- Capacity building
- Mainstreaming trade
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Six case studies: India, Indonesia, Morocco, Mozambique, Senegal
and Zambia
- Desk studies of Argentina, Chile, China, Peru, Vietnam
- Crises can precipitate reform but broad ownership sustains it
- Appropriate sequencing of macroeconomic policies is critical for
outcomes
- High-quality analytical work can contribute to good outcomes
- The Bank underestimated the need for complementary policies
- Institutions matter and underpin sustainability
|
|
15
|
- Conditionality appeared to be neither necessary nor sufficient
to ensure good trade policy/outcomes
- External factors were largely understudied
- Distributional factors received too little attention.
|
|
16
|
- The Bank’s objectives were relevant but the strategy was too narrow
in terms of its focus on what matters for trade and growth.
- It underestimated the complexity of complementary policies and
the political constraints in undertaking them and understudied/anticipated
the role of external factors.
- Consequently the Bank was too optimistic about trade’s ultimate
benefits.
- The Bank often had more success in meeting immediate objectives than in improving long-term export performance
or diversifying exports (in Africa).
|
|
17
|
- Bank assistance on trade achieved better results when linked to
prior ESW, low conditionality and good institutional frameworks.
- Unsatisfactory outcomes were associated most frequently with poor
project design, unrealistic assumptions, weak ownership and unstable
macro environments.
- Poverty and distributional outcomes, and associated political
economy dynamics received too little attention.
|
|
18
|
- The Bank’s focus on advocacy was perceived positively by most
WTO delegates.
- Bank research on trade is perceived as innovative, as having made
an intellectual contribution, and of high quality, though gaps exist
in areas of focus.
- But the Bank’s advocacy strategy was not nuanced enough initially
to distinguish between different groups of developing countries
and less attention was paid to other relevant aspects of the negotiations.
- And the Bank has been slow to translate its extensive work on
development aspects of WTO issues into practical policy advice for
staff.
- The incorporation of trade into country assistance strategies
has been uneven, even in instances where analytical work exists.
|
|
19
|
- #1: Strengthen the micro-level underpinnings of trade.
- #2: Revisit balance between global and country agendas and strengthen
operational links on trade issues.
- #3: Strengthen knowledge management efforts.
|
|
20
|
- Despite increased poverty research and PSIA analysis, links weak
in operations and advice.
- Country-level: More consistent and specific analysis of potential
adjustment costs, institutional framework needed in trade policy
components.
- Institutional-wide: Concrete program of adjustment assistance.
- Research: Micro-level adjustment to trade policies at firm,
individual and household levels.
|
|
21
|
- Given multi-sector nature of current trade agenda, participation
of operational staff, other networks and Trade Department likely
to yield greatest benefits.
- Greater strategic and intellectual guidance from network to
country teams (including upstream CAS assistance).
- More formal set of interactions on (i) agricultural trade and
policies; (ii) services liberalization; (iii) distributional outcomes
associated with trade policies.
- Establish working arrangements between PREM and PSD on trade-related
issues.
|
|
22
|
- Greater cross-fertilization with other networks.
- Better integrate work done in the center with country-level work.
- Establish a mechanism to
obtain regular feedback from
operational staff on most immediate/relevant issues from country
dialogue.
- Enhance country economist knowledge of global and regional trade
agendas.
|