World Bank Group

Search Index Feedback FAQs 

Independent Evaluation Group
Home > Independent Evaluation > Building Government M&E Systems
Search IEG Evaluations
Advanced Search
Building Government M&E Systems Home
What is M&E?
M&E Tools, Methods and Approaches
Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations Under Budget, Time and Data Constraints
Influential Evaluations
Why is it Important to Institutionalize M&E Systems?
Diagnostic Guides
Developing Action Plans
Lessons from Experience
Country Case Studies
Evaluation of Efforts to Institutionalize M&E
All Publications
Related Web sites
Toolkit
Order a Report
Receive IEG alerts
Contact us

 

 
 
Building Government Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Systems
also known as "Evaluation Capacity Development"
Priority for Government M&E Systems

Annual Report on Operations EvaluationAn M&E system can provide a regular flow of information on the performance of government policies, programs and activities. This information can provide invaluable support for policy-making, budget decision-making, ongoing management of government activities, and to underpin accountability relationships.... more »


Featured Publications

Mexico ME
NEW:Mexico's M&E System: Scaling Up from the Sectoral to the National Level NEW: Implementing a Subnational Results-Oriented Management and Budgeting System: Lessons from Medellín, Colombia


Insider Insights: Building a Results-Based Managemenet and Evaluation System in Colombia (revised)
Instituting Impact Evaluation Within the Framework of a Monitoring and Evaluation System
How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government
Website: English |
French
Download Document: English | Spanish |French | Bahasa
Institutionalization of M&E Systems to Improve Public Sector Management

Featured Video

The United States Government’s method for rating the performance of all programs ― the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)

A growing number of developing countries are pursuing efforts to introduce performance budgeting. At the same time, they are keen to develop a broader performance culture within their governments. There is thus a strong interest in the experience of countries that have successfully used monitoring information and evaluation findings to strengthen government performance. The U.S. Government's Performance Assessment Rating Tool (PART) provides a standardized methodology for rating all 1,000 government programs, and for identifying needed improvements to these programs. The PART also provides an information base to assist government decisions on program budgets. learn more »
 
Latest Publications
Insider Insights: Building a Results-Based Managemenet and Evaluation System in Colombia
Instituting Impact Evaluation Within the Framework of a Monitoring and Evaluation System
How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government
A Diagnosis of Colombia's National M&E System, SINERGIA
Impact Evaluation - The Experience of the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank
Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems to Improve Public Sector Management
Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations Under Budget, Time and Data Constraints

Video Presentations

The United States Government’s method for rating the performance of all programs ― the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)

How to Increase the Utilization of Evaluation

Questions and Answers about Government M&E
Answers to your most commonly-asked questions about government M&E

Most Popular Publications
How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government
Monitoring & Evaluation: Tools, Methods and Approaches
Influential Evaluations
Influential Evaluations: Detailed Case Studies


The Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is an independent unit within the World Bank; it reports directly to the Bank's Board of Executive Directors. The goals of IEG 's evaluations are to draw lessons from Bank experience, and to provide an objective basis for assessing the results of the Bank's work.

Search | Index | Feedback | Help | WB Home
© 2009 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions