Complete Report [0.5 mb] |
|
Foreword |
|
Chapter 1: Introduction |
 |
The 2005 AROE focuses on the country and examines the use of information
by Bank managers to improve results and enhance Bank
effectiveness at the country level. |
 |
It examines three elements that are critical to a strong results focus:
strategic planning, performance measurement, and performance
management. |
 |
It reviews the actions taken by the Bank to strengthen the results orientation
in M&E at the country, sector, and product levels. |
 |
It evaluates IEG’s effectiveness. |
|
Chapter 2: Measuring and Managing Performance at the Country Level |
 |
Results-Based CASs allow a better articulation of the contribution
Bank operations make to the achievement of country goals. |
 |
While performance measures are included to track progress, improvement
is needed in developing baselines and targeted performance
measures. |
 |
The Bank will need to deepen its work with clients to strengthen their
monitoring and evaluation systems. |
 |
As the Bank increases its results orientation, the focus of performance management will shift from the Bank to the country and toward shared accountability for results. |
 |
Successful performance management requires creating demand for
performance information in countries. |
|
Chapter 3: Update on Monitoring and Evaluation of Bank Operations |
 |
The Bank continues to integrate a results focus in monitoring and evaluation
systems. |
 |
Country-level monitoring for results is gaining momentum. |
 |
Monitoring of sector-level results is not as far along, but progress is
being made. |
 |
New lending guidelines and templates have been issued that
require more systematic collection of data for monitoring of lending
operations. |
 |
Monitoring of analytic and advisory activity remains a challenge. |
 |
Corporate-level monitoring is gaining ground. |
 |
Country-level evaluation is becoming more developed and progress
in sector-level evaluation needs to be deepened. |
 |
Trust fund and global program evaluation are not fully effective. |
|
Chapter 4: Improving IEG's Effectiveness |
 |
IEG is requiring evaluations at the country, sector, and project levels
to give greater attention to results-oriented M&E. |
 |
IEG’s Outreach and Communications Strategy is aimed at improving
the communication and dissemination of IEG evaluation findings. |
 |
IEG client survey results highlight the need for evaluation findings to
be made more operational. |
|
Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations |
| Recommendations for Management: |
 |
Incorporate a diagnosis of the country’s performance
measurement capacity and recommendations
for action to strengthen that
capacity in the CAS. The diagnosis and actions
should be customized to country capacity and
focused on critical information needed for the
government to implement its program. |
 |
Expand use of the Results-Based CAS as a tool
to manage country programs and strengthen
the link between the Results-Based CAS and the
country program by providing country teams
with guidance designed to increase the results orientation of CPPRs. |
| Recommendations for IEG: |
 |
Review the results of pilot initiatives to promote
more effective outreach and communication of
IEG products and consider lessons learned in
the full implementation of the communication
strategy. |
 |
Subject to CODE/Board endorsement of the
new procedures, institute a formal system for
tracking and managing IEG recommendations. |
|
Appendixes: |
 |
Appendix A: Review of CAS Results Matrices |
 |
Appendix B: Country Director Survey Results on the Use of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems and Information at the Country Level |
 |
Appendix C: Monitoring and Evaluation Framework in the Bank |
 |
Appendix D: IEG Client Surveys |
 |
Appendix E: Management Response |
|
 |
Endnotes |
|
 |
References |
|