| ||||||||||||
|
The World Bank Is Not Giving Up
on Middle-Income Countries In a speech given in Berlin in April, World Bank President James D. Wolfensohn confirmed that "the Bank is not turning its back on the middle-income countries." He responded to critics (see box) who would like to see the Bank play a smaller role in international development. How can we further sharpen our focus on poverty and maximize the catalytic role we can play in the development community? In January this year, we discussed with our shareholders a Strategic Framework for how we will carry reform forward over the next few years. Underscoring that agenda are five fundamental ideas that we are operationalizing in all our work: · The Bank must retain a global competence and a global diagnostic capacity. But we want to see more selectivity and a much better division of labor among all the players—international institutions, the United Nations, bilateral donors, NGOs, and the private sector.· We must focus to help achieve the International Development Goals [that envisage] reducing by half the proportion of people living in extreme poverty by 2015; a two-thirds decline in infant and under-five mortality and a three-fourths decline in maternal mortality; universal primary education for all by 2015; gender equality in education by 2005; national strategies for sustainable development by 2005; and ensuring that the current loss of environmental resources is reversed globally and nationally by 2015.· We must focus on two areas in particular: building the climate for investment, jobs, and sustainable growth; and empowering poor people to participate in development. Development must be done by them and with them, not to them.· Development must be country owned and country driven.· We must embrace all the players [in the development world]: civil society, including NGOs, foundations, universities and research institutions, and faith-based community groups; the private sector; bilaterals; the other multilaterals; and governments and their parliaments.Creating an Investment-Friendly Milieu in Low-Income Countries [In low-income countries] the Bank has a crucial role to play in working with governments to put in place good and strong governance, effective legal and judicial systems, and a robust financial system and to assist in the fight against corruption. Without these initiatives it will be impossible for countries to attract foreign and domestic private investment, which are so crucial as engines of growth and poverty reduction. We need to continue our work in the rural sector, home to 70 percent of the poorest. We need to help put in place safety nets for the vulnerable and work with governments to focus on education, health, and nutrition. We need to step up the fight against AIDS, malaria, and TB and work with governments to meet their basic infrastructure needs: clean potable water, sanitation, power, communications, roads, and telecommunications systems. We will push ahead with streamlining conditionality, focusing more on outcomes and less on itemizing what steps a government must take to reach them. We know that no amount of conditions can replace domestic commitment to reform. A new instrument, the Poverty Reduction Support Credit, by focusing on programmatic lending, will reduce conditionality. Remaining Engaged in Middle-Income Countries We need to remain engaged in middle-income countries. Eighty percent of the world’s poor live in middle-income countries. Let there be no mistake: we are not about to turn our back on them. Not only are these countries important for global financial stability, but many of them have yet to put in place crucial structural and social reforms that will move them to the next stage of development. At the request of our Board, we are reviewing our plans dealing with the scope and nature of our support and the principles of costing of services. We do not intend to replace sources of funding available from private markets. The economic well-being of the middle-income countries can translate into trade opportunities for low-income countries; on the other hand, financial instability, environmental degradation, and the proliferation of communicable diseases can have deleterious effects far outside [these countries’] own borders. The Bank’s engagement will be focused on providing secure long-term funding and advisory services, creating the right policy and institutional framework, addressing weaknesses in social, structural, and sectoral policies and institutions. With its global reach, broad sectoral knowledge, and specific engagement with the private sector through the International Finance Corporation and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, the Bank Group has a comparative advantage in advising on overall priorities and actions to improve the investment climate. Will we be crowding out the private sector? I do not believe so. Many of these countries may have a credit rating but do not have continuous access to international capital in the size they need or on terms that are manageable for them. Moreover, as our own research and experience shows, World Bank lending has a catalytic effect: it crowds in private capital, it doesn’t crowd it out. But here again let me stress that we will be selective, focusing on areas where we have a comparative advantage and working closely with partners. President Wolfensohn presented this speech at the Public Discussion Forum held by the Bundestag in Berlin April 2, 2001. |
| ||||||||||