| Author |
| Glasser, Matthew D., Thomas H. Cochran, Michael DeAngelis, Marlene | 1999 |
| Hesketh, Ronald W. Johnson, Christiann Johannes Kapp, John E. |
| Petersen, and K.P.S. Roome |
| Number of Pages: | 117 |
| Full Text |
| Formulation of A Regulatory Framework For Municipal Borrowing in South Africa, Final Report |
Abstract |
| Historically, South Africa’s “white” municipalities could borrow to build infrastructure, though many of them |
| relied on internal cash-flows to finance capital assets. Almost all consumers in these municipalities paid for |
| the services they received, and these municipalities had no particular problems servicing the debt they |
| incurred. Local government was essentially an extension of provincial government, and it was widely believed |
| that provincial and/or national government would intervene to support any municipality that ran into financial |
| trouble. Non-white municipal structures had little or no access to credit, built much less infrastructure, and |
| provided far fewer services. |
| This report is intended as a step toward a future in which capital markets will channel private funds to municipal |
| infrastructure projects. For this future to come to pass, municipalities must be creditworthy, which implies (1) |
| that they will have adequate revenue to support borrowing, (2) that they will have the management and |
| financial capacity and experience to make wise borrowing decisions, and (3) that there will be financial and |
| technical assistance for communities in need. This vision implies market allocation principles—i.e., that |
| municipalities attract private investment based on a projects or a community’s financial viability, not a |
| project’s social desirability. It further implies that the projects or the borrowers must be sufficiently attractive |
| to compete with other alternatives available to private investors. |
| The environment in which South African municipalities operate is changing. The focus of this report is on a set |
| of policies and rules for municipal borrowing. Although they are clearly pertinent to the effective functioning |
| of a municipal credit system, issues involved in securing the financial viability of municipalities are largely |
| beyond the scope of this report. The recommended polices are intended to be robust enough to accommodate |
| various outcomes as regards the current process of municipal restructuring |
| The policy framework described in this report envisions a South Africa in which capital markets channel private |
| funds to municipal infrastructure projects, and in which eligible municipal borrowers are creditworthy. The |
| polices recommended herein will help move South Africa in that direction and will be consistent with the future |
| when it arrives. |