| Author |
| Peterson, George E. | 1998 |
| Number of Pages: | 29 |
| The National Framework For Local Credit Markets |
Abstract |
| National governments, local governments, and lenders share an interest in establishing a clear framework for |
| local government borrowing. A successful policy and legal framework both enables the credit market to play a |
| more important role in financing local capital investment and can help control excessive borrowing by local |
| authorities. |
| The importance of the national framework for development of sub-sovereign credit markets is illustrated by a |
| number of developing and re-structuring countries currently creating new framework systems or overhauling |
| old regimes. For example, on July 29, 1998, in response to a growing crisis in the sub-federal credit market, |
| Russia for the first time passed a law entitled “On the Specifics of Issuing State and Municipal Bonds,” which |
| attempts to spell out rules for the local credit market. Further provisions are currently being prepared. Poland |
| is weighing new credit market legislation. In Africa, Morocco and South Africa currently have |
| recommendations before them that would establish a new framework guidelines for the local credit market. |
| Credit markets today are changing at unprecedented speed. The legal and policy frameworks for their |
| operation must keep pace, or be flexible enough to accommodate new developments. Some countries, in |
| response to credit crises, have adopted emergency legislation that has succeed in temporarily shoring up part |
| of the credit system only to trigger new stresses elsewhere. The entire municipal credit market framework |
| must be designed coherently and kept in mind even when attempting to reform specific parts of it. This paper |
| provides the basic intellectual fabric for establishing a National Framework for local borrowing. |