| |
Europe & Central Asia |
Introduction | |
![]() |
Progress in the transition to market-based economies varies considerably across the countries of Europe and Central Asia, as do countries' policy priorities and
resulting economic growth. The objective of eventual membership in the European Union
(EU) unifies the challenges of many of the Central and Eastern Europe
(CEE) countries, and in fiscal 1997 the Bank's assistance strategy for
CEE countries focused on supporting them in their preparation. Because these countries benefit from large private
financial flows, the Bank's attention is focusing on systemic economic issues, increasingly through nonlending services. For the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS) the challenges, and thus the assistance strategy, are different. Here the emphasis is to help countries make their fiscal adjustment more sustainable and
efficient, strengthen law enforcement, basic social services, and safety nets, and accelerate implementation of the numerous market-oriented reforms that remain.
Progress toward creating market economies varies widely across countries in the Europe and Central Asia region (ECA). In 1996 the CEE countries, including the Baltics, experienced a third consecutive year of output growth and a fourth year of declining inflation. Strong advances in creditworthiness in international capital markets and a continued appeal to foreign direct investors enabled the CEE countries to attract external private financing. Fiscal deficits were generally kept under control, although at the price of high tax rates. These positive results, together with the prospect of membership in the EU, continue to encourage the CEE countries to keep up the reform momentum. Progress in Albania, Bulgaria, and Romania has been much more patchy. Continued stalling on enterprise and banking reforms in Bulgaria contributed to deterioration of the economy in 1996, leading to hyperinflation and macroeconomic crisis. The caretaker government, which took office in April 1997, has begun to implement a program to stabilize the situation and start long-overdue structural reforms. In Albania--after considerable success in implementing reform in the early years--lax fiscal policies and inattention to the danger of pyramid schemes caused a major political and economic crisis that has dominated 1997. And the Romanian situation was typified by some growth but little structural reform until a reform-minded government, elected in November 1996, proceeded quickly to take many previously neglected actions. Economic performance also differed widely among the CIS (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan) in 1996. Armenia experienced its third consecutive year of recovery from a deep recession and Georgia and Kyrgyz Republic their second year. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan recorded positive, albeit low growth for the first time. Elsewhere, however, expectations that the recession would bottom out in 1996 proved premature. In Russia and Ukraine, output shrank by an estimated 6 percent and 8.5 percent, respectively. Policy and legal reforms continued to be implemented at a slow pace--particularly in Ukraine--resulting in a climate unfriendly to private investors and businesses. It is against this backdrop and to meet the challenges ahead that the Bank set its assistance strategy for the region in fiscal 1997. The ECA region serves twenty-seven active borrowing countries, including Turkey and all European and Central Asian transition economies except the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). New operations increased from sixty-one, totaling $4,395 million, in fiscal 1996 to sixty-seven, totaling $5,055 million, in fiscal 1997, led by a rapid expansion of reconstruction projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Table 3-10 shows the sectoral distribution of lending to the region for the 1988-97 period. In Ukraine, new lending commitments in fiscal 1997 tripled to just under $1 billion, as the government began implementing reforms across a wide front. Disbursements increased to $4,453 million in fiscal 1997, compared to $3,736 million in fiscal 1996. Table 3-11 compares commitments, disbursements and net transfers to the region for fiscal years 1992-97. Table 3-12 shows operations in the ECA region approved by the Executive Board during fiscal 1997 by country. In addition to Bank and IDA operations, the Bank's private sector affiliate, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), invested in fifty-seven operations during the year for a total of $1,214 million, compared to the forty-two investments totaling $835 million in fiscal 1996. The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) issued ten guarantee contracts for almost $90 million, including first guarantees to Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Romania. MIGA also created the special Investment Guarantee Fund for Bosnia and Herzegovina, sponsored by the EU, to further facilitate the flow of small- and medium-size investments into the country. The Economic Development Institute's (EDI) activities in the region helped strengthen training and capacity building in many critical areas of reform. |
| Top | |
| Contents |
World Bank Group |
Publications |
IBRD |
IDA |
IFC |
MIGA |
ICSID |