1481. Corporate Control in Central Europe and Russia: Should Banks Own Shares?

Peter Dittus and Stephen Prowse
(June 1995)
A governance system based on bank ownership and control of firms is not yet feasible, but a good case can be made for allowing banks to gradually gain experience through limited equity ownership---especially for allowing the swapping of bad debt for equity.

Dittus and Prowse review corporate governance arrangements in the West and conclude that for a system based on bank ownership and control of firms to succeed, the banking system must be free of perverse incentives and state interference, as well as subject to adequate supervision by banking authorities and competition from market forces. Admirable progress over the past few years notwithstanding, these conditions do not now exist in the countries of Central Europe and Russia, so a corporate governance system based on bank ownership is not appropriate. That is not to say that such a system would not eventually be appropriate---but not before much more effort is made to create a competitive, private, well-supervised banking system (which is needed in any case).

Changes in the banking system that are prerequisites for any large-scale bank involvement in the ownership and governance of firms are simple to enunciate but less easy to implement:

This paper---a product of the Transition Economics Division, Policy Research Department---is part of a larger effort in the department to explore issues of corporate governance in transition economies. The study was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project "Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia" (RPO 678-42). Copies of this paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Grace Evans, room N11-041, extension 85783 (39 pages).

The full report is available on our FTP server.