1926. Do Budgets Really Matter? Evidence from Public Spending on Education and Health in Uganda

Emmanuel Ablo and Ritva Reinikka
(June 1998)

A survey can provide a useful reality check where institutions are weak. Certainly, budgets and official statistics are inadequate as a guide for policymakers.

Ablo and Reinikka demonstrate that budget allocations alone can be misleading in explaining outcomes and making policy decisions, when institutions are weak. They diagnose the problem, using empirical evidence from primary education and health care in Uganda, but arguing that a similar problem exists in many countries. Adequate public accounts are not available so they carried out a field survey of schools and clinics to collect data on spending. Problems with the flow of public funds have to do largely with governance and a lack of accountability. Among problems with the service delivery system:

Since release of the survey results, there have been changes. Among them, monthly transfers of public funds are reported in the media; school-based procurement has replaced the central supply of construction and other materials; and an effort has been made to institute basic public accounting systems in the public sector, including districts.

This paper—a product of Macroeconomics 2, Africa Region—is part of a larger effort in the region to improve public expenditure management and service delivery. Copies of the paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433. Please contact Kathryn Rivera, room J10-281, telephone 202-473-4141, fax 202-473-8262, Internet address krivera@worldbank.org. The authors may be contacted at eablo@worldbank.org and rreinikka @worldbank.org. (35 pages).


The full report is available in PDF format.