Kyrgyz Republic: Supporting Stability and Social Protection

April 8, 2013


The program helped the Kyrgyz government implement policies to strengthen governance, particularly in the energy and financial sectors, and support families affected by the June 2010 social unrest. The government helped improve the transparency and accountability of the energy sector by establishing a Supervisory Council, with private sector and civil society participation. The financial sector was stabilized through support to the central bank. Financial support was also provided to conflict-affected families, and the targeting of social protection was improved.

 

Challenge
In April 2010, antigovernment demonstrations in the Kyrgyz Republic culminated in the removal of the president and the formation of a provisional administration. Political and social tensions in the south of the country escalated, resulting two months later in three days of social unrest. According to official data, over 300 people were killed and at least 2,500 injured, with many more internally displaced persons. Damage to infrastructure was estimated at about US$350 million, equivalent to 7 percent of GDP. Subsequently, after years of steady decline, poverty increased to 37 percent in 2011.

By October 2010, the provisional administration had drawn up a new constitution, laying the groundwork for a parliamentary democracy by shifting the balance of power to an elected prime minister. Addressing governance failures and perceptions of widespread corruption were seen as essential to avoid further unrest. The events of 2010 left the government weak and fragmented. 

Solution
The World Bank Group quickly responded to the new government’s request for support through the Economic Recovery Support Operation (ERSO).  The operation was designed to tackle both short- and medium-term concerns. In the short term, the operation bolstered government efforts to restore stability and safeguard social protection. The ERSO was also aligned with the government’s medium-term strategy of strengthening transparency and governance, restoring private sector confidence, and reviving the economy. In addition to the government’s draft strategy, the Bank drew upon analysis in the Joint Economic Assessment (JEA), prepared six months earlier by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the World Bank Group. During implementation, the World Bank provided technical assistance in several areas, including the financial and energy sectors and capacity building for economic management.

Results
Key outcomes include:

  • in public financial management, annual budgets are consolidated and now publicly available online;
  • in state property management, a parliamentary-debated, 2012–14 privatization plan for national assets was submitted in April 2012;
  • losses in the provision of domestic energy declined from 29.3 percent in 2009 to 24.3 percent in 2011, collection rates increased from 0.81 soms per kWh in 2009 to 0.94 soms per kWh in 2011, and transparency improved in revenue distribution and strategic decision making;
  • in mining, compliance with the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) was attained: 46 and 57 companies reported under EITI in 2011 and 2012, respectively;
  • the financial sector was stabilized through support for the central bank’s takeover of the country’s main — and financially distressed — bank (AUB), preventing contagion;
  • in social protection, 497 families affected by the 2010 violence received a compensatory payment of 1 million soms (US$20,000); the number of “rights-based” categorical benefits was reduced from 35 to 29, improving the targeting of benefits to the poor; and the guaranteed monthly allowance for poor families with children was increased from 240 soms in 2009 to 350 soms in 2011. More than 120,000 families received this payment in 2012.

 


" Without the government supporting us through the increase of this benefit, it would be really hard because the food prices have gone up and my husband doesn’t always have work. "
Buraeema Abdulaeva

Buraeema Abdullaeva

Project beneficiary

Bank Group Contribution
The ERSO was a one-year budget support program amounting to US$30 million of International Development Association (IDA) in 2011. It built on an earlier World Bank Group response to the crisis that included the US$70 million Emergency Recovery Program (ERP) approved in 2010. The ERSO provided essential budget support and helped rehabilitate the emergency energy infrastructure and the financing of high-priority emergency expenditures.

Partners
The ERSO was a solely World Bank-funded program. As the first development partner to actively engage with the new government, the World Bank also helped leverage other funds for the 2011 budget, including from the ADB (US$40 million), the IMF (US$30 million), and the European Union (€12 million). In addition, the World Bank was integral in convening the July 2010 multi-development partner conference, at which US$1.1 billion was pledged, including funding for the balance of the 2010 budget.

Moving Forward
The ERSO was designed as a one-year program, addressing short-term and immediate needs alongside medium-term structural reform policies. While the project did not commit to additional funding given the high-risk environment, future budget support programs were possible, should the momentum behind the reform agenda continue. Indeed, progress to date has led to a multi-year budget support operation due to be submitted to the Work Bank Board in mid-2013.

 


" When I got the one million I cried because I was in such a desperate situation, having to pay the mortgage, and I cried even more remembering my husband, who used to take care of us. "
Kairinisa Askarova

Kairinisa Askarova

Project beneficiary

Image

While ensuring the Kyrgyz government has resources to fulfill its social obligations, the World Bank's budgetary aid also supported reforms aimed at improving the management of state property as well as of the energy sector.

 


Beneficiaries
“Without the government supporting us through the increase of this benefit, it would be really hard because the food prices have gone up and my husband doesn’t always have work,” says Buraeema Abdulaeva, a stay-at-home mother with seven daughters who lives with her family in Ak-Bosogo settlement in Bishkek. Buraeema’s husband pushes carts at the local bazaar, barely making US$7.00 a day. As a low-income family, the Abdulaevs receive a monthly benefit from the government of about US$66, up from US$43 in 2010.

“When I got the one million I cried because I was in such a desperate situation, having to pay the mortgage, and I cried even more remembering my husband, who used to take care of us,” says Kairinisa Askarova, whose husband was shot dead on his way to work in Osh during the 2010 social unrest. The government paid her family 1 million soms as compensation, which she used to pay off the loan on her family’s apartment.

 


1,000,000
497 families affected by the 2010 violence received a compensatory payment of 1 million soms (US$20,000).


PROJECT MAP



Welcome