Improving Value-for-Money in Social Protection Systems by Reducing Error, Fraud and Corruption
June 27, 2014
- Error, fraud and corruption (EFC) in social protection systems are a significant drain on public funds, especially in middle-income countries.
- EFC diminish the impact and effectiveness of social protection programs in reducing extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity.
- In Europe and Central Asia, countries such as Albania, Croatia, Moldova and Romania are making strong headway in minimizing waste of public funds and improving social protection systems’ performance.
Untold billions of taxpayer dollars are wasted each year through error, fraud and corruption (EFC) in social protection programs. In countries across Europe and Central Asia, the cost to government revenue is significant, but the real impact is ultimately felt by citizens who are denied the full benefit of pensions, unemployment benefits or social assistance programs.
Even a fraction of loss in the social protection budget caused by EFC can mean that people have less access to vital social services such as healthcare or education. This has tangible costs in the fight to eradicate extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity.
In this challenging post-economic crisis period – when the least fortunate people in the region need more assistance than ever – the loss of precious government revenue not only hampers the delivery of critical public services, but also causes deep-rooted mistrust of public administrations. Governments are consequently under increased scrutiny to minimize EFC and improve the way they manage and run social protection systems.
Responsible for delivering cash payments and benefits to citizens regularly, social protection systems are by their very nature large, complex and bureaucratic – making them susceptible to error and fraud. No country manages to completely avoid some level of misuse or abuse of public funds.
Even in OECD countries, which have some of the strictest control and accountability mechanisms in place, EFC accounts for about 2% to 5% of social protection spending annually. In the United Kingdom alone, fraud against the public sector costs the economy more than £25 billion (about US$42.5 billion) each year – even though it is one of the more successful countries in minimizing waste of public funds.
In middle-income countries with poor EFC controls, the leakage of public funds due to EFC likely represents a higher proportion of social protection spending.
High rates of EFC can be hugely detrimental to an economy’s growth and development considering that, on average, social protection spending represents 15.7% of GDP in developed countries, 7.4% in middle-income countries, and 3.8% in low-income countries. For example, a loss of just 5% of social spending due to EFC in a typical middle-income country adds up to 0.4% of GDP - the same amount that is generally spent on programs targeted for the poor.
In Europe and Central Asia, countries such as Albania, Croatia, Moldova and Romania have started to make significant progress by putting in place effective systems, tools and instruments to combat EFC in their social protection systems. The World Bank is supporting these and other countries in the region through results-based loans, provision of technical assistance and investment in capacity building.
As part of this effort and with financial support from the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, the World Bank organized a workshop in Croatia on 8-12 June 2014 on Reducing Error, Fraud and Corruption in Social Protection Programs. High-level policy makers and social protection practitioners from countries around Europe and Central Asia gathered to discuss how to develop comprehensive and cost-effective systems to combat irregularities in their social protection programs.
Among the many important topics discussed at the workshop, participants heard about the need to develop strategies and action plans in order to put in place comprehensive EFC control systems. Approaches being implemented in the UK and Romania were cited as good examples.
A strategic approach is necessary because it puts the focus on reducing EFC in high-budget, risk-prone programs such as disability pensions, income-replacement programs and means-tested benefits.
Measures should also be put in place to cover both prevention of EFC and detection of EFC. Modern information and communications technologies (ICT), such as data matching, can play an important role here, along with intelligence-based reviews or inspections, to identify overpayments in the system in a cost-effective manner.
The overall objective of any social protection system is to offer adequate assistance and protection to the elderly, the unemployed, the poor and the most vulnerable in societies – fighting poverty and promoting shared prosperity. By seriously addressing error, fraud and corruption – and minimizing waste of public funds – countries can better meet these important objectives and ultimately serve those citizens who need it most.
Read more about the issues discussed at the workshop: Reducing Error, Fraud and Corruption in Social Protection Programs
- Development Partners Support the Creation of Global Financing Facility to Advance Women’s and Children’s Health
- 73 Countries and Over 1,000 Businesses Speak Out in Support of a Price on Carbon
- World Bank Group to Nearly Double Funding in Ebola Crisis to $400 Million
- International Food Prices Hit Four-Year Low
- Speech by World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim at Howard University: “Boosting Shared Prosperity”