Uruguay

Ratings for the Integrated Natural Resources and Biodiversity Management Project for Uruguay were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, Global Environment Objecti... Show More + ve (GEO) outcomes were satisfactory, risk to development outcome was low or negligible, risk to GEO outcome was low or negligible, Bank performance was moderately satisfactory, and Borrower performance was satisfactory. Some lessons learned included: a transparent demand-driven approach is critical to success of Natural Resources Management (NRM) projects. The integration of NRM and biodiversity within the structure and mentality of a traditionally structured, production-oriented ministry of agriculture was a key factor in promoting green growth in the agricultural sector. Ex-post reviews highlighted the importance of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) with outcome-focused indicators and targets, and Intermediate Outcome Indicators (IOIs) with output focused indicators and targets to more effectively measure project impacts. Within a broad-based demand-driven approach, the design and operational aspects of the subproject cycle, as well as the frequency or timing or budget of calls for proposals should be carefully addressed during preparation and validated during the initial stages of project implementation to avoid credibility issues and frustration within the beneficiary community when delays occur or expectations are not met. In non-irrigated areas or production systems, climate variability and beneficiary vulnerability should be taken into consideration at project design, as the benefits accrued by producers from project-financed investments can be easily lost as a result of droughts or other climate related adversities. In order to maximize the dissemination, visibility and perception of project actions and results, the implementation of Integrated Natural Resource and Biodiversity Management Project (PPR) demonstrated the importance of including, within the structure of the Project Executing Unit (PEU), a communications team staffed by specialized professionals, responsible for the design and implementation of a communication plan suited to the features and needs of the project. Show Less -

Ratings for the Transport Infrastructure Maintenance and Rural Access Project for Uruguay were as follows: Outcomes were moderately satisfactory; risk to developmen... Show More + t outcome was moderate; Bank performance was satisfactory; and borrower performance was also satisfactory. Some lessons learned includes: Project Development Objectives (PDOs) and PDO indicators should be commensurable to what a project can realistically attain. Both the PDO and the corresponding PDO indicators were defined too broadly, given the scale and scope of the Project, and with too optimistic targets. A US$70 million specific investment loan can contribute to address road maintenance issues but cannot be expected to impact sector-wide trends. This should be adequately reflected in terms of project design, ensuring that objectives and indicators are coherent with the project's capacity to deliver. If needed, complementary instruments should be adopted to address broader sector-wide issues identified by the borrower. Fast-track preparation projects should include significant flexibility in their design so as to become quickly operational: although the project was prepared rapidly, this implied that some of the preparatory work typically: engineering designs that should have been undertaken prior to project approval were actually carried out in the first years of implementation. An early understanding of the particularities of a market can avoid procurement-related delays further down the road. In the case of this operation, an earlier identification of the specific characteristics of the Uruguayan construction market, and the consequent adaptation of standard Bank qualification criteria applied in bidding documents, could have avoided some of the delays encountered during implementation. Ensuring adequate financing for maintenance remains a challenge and future Bank engagement in the sector should focus on this issue. Sector financing still faces strong restrictions; budget allocations cannot account for sector needs. Show Less -

Ratings for the Public Services Modernization Technical Assistance Project for Uruguay were as follows: outcomes were moderately satisfactory, the risk to developme... Show More + nt outcome was moderate, the Bank performance was satisfactory, and the Borrower performance was moderately satisfactory. Some lessons learned included: projects involving broad based public reform should include inclusive and extensive consultations with stakeholders in the reform process to better explain objectives, design, approach, and benefits. A stakeholder and political analysis during project preparation should help to identify institutional change champions and those opposed to reform, therefore, assisting in the consultation strategies. Sector reform requires flexibility and the ability to not prematurely close any door. The project strategies for sector reform, namely regulatory frameworks and institutions, Private Sector Participation (PSP), yardstick competition, unbundling of sectors, and corporate governance of state owned utilities, reinforced each other and contributed to the transformation of public services. This allowed the Bank to continue to push for sector reform once PSP became off limits for some sectors. Given the likelihood of a shift in the political context during long-term reform projects, it is essential that the strategy to achieve a given objective remain flexible to ensure the project is relevant and palatable to successive administrations and for popular support. The Bank and Government of Uruguay (GoU) gained valuable experience with sector reform. It is essential that projects of this nature include an important knowledge base component, including dissemination of publications and tools to a wider public. The wide dissemination of the project and the creation of a specific knowledge base could have an impact in increasing local ownership and acknowledgement of reform at all levels. Show Less -

Ratings for the OSE Modernization & Systems Rehabilitation Project of Uruguay were as follows: outcomes were moderately satisfactory, the risk to development outcom... Show More + e was moderate, the Bank performance was satisfactory, and the Borrower performance was moderately satisfactory. Some lessons learned included: 1) Policy and institutional changes must be realistic for the country context and part of a clearly defined reform agenda; 2) Initial experiences suggest that there exist a broad range of external and internal incentives to promote efficiency gains and enhanced competition, which can be used to compliment, or instead of, private sector participation (PSP); 3) Reducing unaccounted for water (UFW) requires a long term, sustained effort; 4) The targets originally set for UFW in this project were largely unrealistic; 5) The demand-driven sewerage strategy pursued under APL-1 achieved lower household connection rates than expected; 6) Projects should support the effective monitoring of results by properly designing protocols, selecting indicators and building benchmarking systems - whilst at the same time acknowledging this is a dynamic task which will require fine-tuning and on-going support; 7) Project financial and monitoring indicators should have meaning not only for Bank reporting purposes, but for the utility itself; 8) In order to maximize the benefits of phased APL Programs, and ensure that implementation in the following APL phase advances rapidly, it is critical to use the preceding phase to undertake a lot of advanced preparation work, particularly regarding procurement; and 8) In order to expand the pumping capacity of Aguas Corrientes, new pumps needed to be acquired and installed.
 Show Less -

Ratings for the Forest Products Transport Project in Uruguay were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, the risk to development outcome was moderate, the Bank per... Show More + formance was satisfactory, and the Borrower performance was moderately satisfactory. Lessons learned included: 1) The impact of funding constraints and fiscal policies should not be underestimated. The lack of fiscal space and/or counterpart funding remains a major risk for fiscally constrained countries; 2) Multiple operations contribute to additional flexibility and long-term sustainability of investment; 3) A multimodal transport project can maximize the development impact but requires flexibility during supervision; 4) Maintaining a strong policy dialogue during supervision can significantly support reforms. This project gave another example of the difficulty of reforming railways, even if all the possible support was assured during preparation; and 5) The design of institutional arrangements and forms of private participation should be adapted to the country's specificities. The concession of operation of forest products in the State Railway Administration (AFE) did not occur despite the need to improve its efficiency and strong initial support. Show Less -

Project ratings convey a satisfactory outcome, likely sustainability, and substantial institutional development impacts. Despite a well designed program, with neces... Show More + sary and feasible policy actions, the project had to be cancelled due to implementation restrictions in areas not expected during preparation. Lessons suggest the following. When cross-linking conditionalities between different development policy loans, it is not only important to evaluate the financial leveraging impact, but also the potential problems that may arise if reforms move at different speeds. Furthermore, the solid prior understanding of the sectors involved in the operation facilitates the preparation and achievements of the Program. Continuous dialogue with official counterparts and independent analysts, simplified the team's work during preparation, as the main sectors and policies to be supported were clearly identified. Finally, the close and frequent supervision increased sustainability of programs, in spite of the crisis period and government changes. Despite the difficult economic and social situation in Uruguay, and the frequent changes of ministers and staff, the proactive supervision and sustained dialogue with the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) and sector authorities facilitated the support of the program by all counterparts. Show Less -

Ratings convey a satisfactory project outcome, highly likely sustainability, though modest institutional development impacts. Following are some factors that condit... Show More + ioned program implementation, and thus become important lessons for future operations. There is an urgent need for the Bank to monitor the economic and financial situation of Uruguay more closely. This was evident given both the 2000 Country Assistance Strategy (CAS), as well as the Bank work in the financial sector early in 2002, failed to perceive the risks threatening the Uruguayan economy, as a result of the financial crisis in Argentina, which hindered the initial preparation of the operation. Had the program been backed by stronger foundation within the CAS, and by the Bank's economic and sector work, there would have been greater information, and closeness with government officials, which no doubt would have led to an improved operation. Notwithstanding, actions implemented by the Bank team helped overcome some serious problems, such as the lack of a unified social policy authority in the country to act as a counterpart, forcing a program design and supervision at preparation with no Government support. As it happened, the Ministry of Economy was just a contact facilitator, with no power to develop the preparation of the program, particularly regarding social protection. Furthermore, there is need to maintain a dialogue with the Government on relevant structural reforms/policy actions with a long-term sustainable impact on the social sectors. A more consistent social development strategy would have helped design a more ambitious reform agenda. In retrospect, the project was effective given the seemingly medium and long term sustainable impact, in areas such as transparency, coherency, safety net, social information, and, monitoring and evaluation of the programs. Show Less -

Project ratings are as follows: Project outcome is satisfactory, sustainability is likely, institutional development impact is substantial, and Bank and Borrower pe... Show More + rformances are satisfactory. Several lessons can be derived from the implementation of this project. Some are summarized as follows: 1) The experience in Uruguay showed that CREMA contracts (Contracts for Rehabilitation and Maintenance Departments Intendencias) are powerful instruments to carry out road maintenance and rehabilitation in an efficient and effective way even in a situation of great budgetary pressure. 2) In the case of Uruguay, the commitment of the government to maintenance was essential to avoid serious damage to the road assets caused by maintenance neglect, but the current government's pledge to provide adequate funds for road maintenance does not commit succeeding governments. The issue of a more stable funding mechanism cannot be deleted from the agenda. 3) The Ministry of Transport and Public Works (MTOP) ownership of, and commitment to the outsourcing policies supported by the project were critical to their success at a time of unprecedented economic crisis. The project suggests, however, some interesting lessons regarding the overall impact of government funding decisions on the reform process as it exposes the tension between immediate stabilization needs and better fiscal outcomes. The decline in sector funding, and equally important the uncertainties with regard to future levels of funding, forced MTOP to slow down the implementation of various institutional initiatives that were being tested with promissory results. 4) It resulted that the degree of internalization of the technical assistance recommendations varied among the Intendencias according to the level of interest shown by their respective leaders. This suggests that future technical assistance programs should be demand-driven and tailored to the specific priorities of the Intendencias requesting support, even if such an approach may face some political sensitivities. 5) The successful departmental road maintenance program should be fine-tuned to further its impact on institutional building. This program should be supplemented with an incentive framework that leads the Intendencias to greater efficiency and effectiveness. Show Less -

The project's outcome is rated satisfactory. Sustainability of the project is likely, considering that laws have been approved that will maintain the changes suppor... Show More + ted by the project. Overall, The World Bank's performance was satisfacotry during project preparation, appraisal, and implementation. The overall performance of the Borrower was satisfactory. Among the lessons lkearned from the project were the following: Strong and continuous government support is required for even the most gradual phasing of health reforms. It is equally important to have flexibility in project design and a clear exit strategy because of the risks of reforms. Communication strategies should be considered from the very beginning when proposed changes are expected to generate significant resistance and opposition from stakeholders. The concept and importance of monitoring and evaluation has to be introduced right from the beginning of the project. Furthermore, it quickly has to be reflected in functional systems being in place. If not, as project implementation advances and the project's cycle shorten, it will become increasingly difficult to correct this weakness. The project demonstrated that, if an innovative pilot program is implemented well and concides with serious government commitment, it is possible to replicate the program in other hospitals and expand its benefits on a sustainable track. A strong working relationship between the central level staff and the PCU advances implementation. Show Less -

The Financial Sector Adjustment Loan Project's outcome is rated satisfactory. The lessons learned in this second adjustment operation confirm the lessons learned in... Show More + the Contractual Savings Structural Adjustment Loan Project. The lessons are as follows: 1) In preparing complex sector adjustment operations, the Bank should lead with its comparative advantage which is bringing to bear strong technical capacity and ample cross-country experience. The Borrower must be confident that its dialogue with the Bank will be of added value to its own efforts. 2) In designing a sector adjustment loan, political factors and the legislative needs of the client need to be understood and included in the dialogue with the client, particularly in an election year. 3) Rather than risk delays and failure in the achievement of the program's long term aims by locking the client into an overly ambitious and politically sensitive policy agenda, the Bank should choose to negotiate a medium-term reform strategy, and allocate its reform goals over a series of single-tranche adjustment operations - a lending vehicle designed specifically to protect the integrity of lengthy adjustment operations from significant political shifts in borrowing countries. Show Less -