Introduction
Ayurveda and other traditional
systems of health care have been used for over two thousand years
in Sri Lanka. Indigenous systems such as Ayurveda are based on the
country’s cultural, social, economic, and religious characteristics.
In addition, Sri Lankans utilizing knowledge of these indigenous
systems of medicine were the first in the world to develop the concept
of a hospital and established a highly scientific public healthcare
system . Over the last two centuries, colonialism and industrialization
have undermined the value and use of traditional medicine in Sri
Lanka. The Sri Lankan healthcare system has since been largely based
on Western medicine and this has become popularized as the primary
source of medicine and treatment through both the public and private
healthcare systems. Despite this trend, traditional medicine continues
to be popular among local Sri Lankan citizens for treating and curing
illnesses. Traditional medicine is generally practiced informally
without the national healthcare system’s support.
Considering the recognition
and value that traditional medicine still receives in Sri Lanka,
a Ministry of Indigenous Systems of Medicine was established in
Sri Lanka to validate traditional medicinal practices and facilitate
access to traditional medicines alongside modern medical treatments.
Sri Lanka presents a unique case study since it is the first country
to create an Ministry entirely devoted to the indigenous systems
of medicine.
Ministry of Indigenous
Systems of Medicine
The Sri Lankan government,
recognizing the value of these traditional medicines agreed that
a section on indigenous medicine should be included in its National
Health Policy – consequently, a National Policy on Sri Lankan
Systems of Indigenous Medicines was developed by the Ministry of
Indigenous Medicine.
The Ministry maintains
that the “Sri Lankan Traditional System of Medicine, Ayurveda,
Siddha, Unani or similar therapeutic techniques, healing systems,
healthcare procedures practiced with proper approval in Sri Lanka
and recognized by another country or at (the)international level
are (sic) accepted as an alternate or complementary system of medicine
based on natural and holistic theories .”
The national policy on
indigenous medicines cites its vision to be:
Objectives of
the Ministry
The objectives include
expanding, restructuring, and strengthening both government and
private health care services to include traditional medicines in
their health programs. In addition, they plan to enhance community
and society participation in the healthcare process so that local
citizens have a voice and can contribute ideas to the healthcare
system. It also plans to strengthen research activities to ensure
the quality of service and products pertaining to indigenous systems
of medicine. The last point above also reflects the Ministry’s
effort to validate the safety and effectiveness of traditional medicines
using modern medical guidelines .
Policies of the
Ministry
The Ministry has written
30 policies to implement its objectives and accomplish its mission.
These cover all areas including the use of technology, creating
databases, legal protection, and addressing issues of preservation
and conservation related to traditional medicines. The government
has established these policies to align with international IPR guidelines
and to protect the country’s indigenous systems of medicines.
This section details select policies set out by the Ministry and
is followed by a brief discussion of each policy.
Policy 3.1
The Ministry plans to
create a flag and song depicting the “historical pride, heritage,
haughtiness (sic) and respect ” regarding indigenous systems
of medicines. The Ministry in doing this is attempting to create
national pride in the use of traditional medicines and hopes to
give citizens morale, self-respect, and trust for their country’s
medicines.
Policies 3.4, 3.18,
3.23, 3.24
The Ministry presents
four policies with regard to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).
First, it notes that a National Council for Indigenous Systems of
Medicine will be established and include advisory, investigatory
and supervisory groups to monitor legal activities with indigenous
systems of medicine. Second, it is developing legal mechanisms to
obtain benefits from the commercialization of traditional medicines.
Third, institutional structures will be strengthened, through legal
reforms, for the conservation, management, development, and regulation
of indigenous systems of medicine. Finally, a social security system
will be created to protect the social, economic and personal welfare
of traditional medical practitioners and communities where indigenous
systems of medicine are practiced.
Policy 3.7
In the area of education,
the Ministry is planning to launch a joint program with the Ministry
of Education to include indigenous knowledge systems and practices
in the formal school curriculum. The purpose of this integration
is to popularize Sri Lankan human values, lifestyle, and life vision
associated with traditional medicines to school children and the
community.
Introducing indigenous
knowledge into the school curriculum is extremely important. When
Sri Lankan children attend formal schools they may feel a cultural
disconnect, with regard to indigenous knowledge, from the material
taught in the curriculum. As stated in the policy, Sri Lankan indigenous
systems of medicine should be valued and reinforced in school as
“scientific .” When indigenous knowledge is taught alongside
material in school curriculum, students respect their indigenous
knowledge and tend to utilize and disseminate it later in their
lives.
Indigenous knowledge
can also help increase attendance and retention in schools. It can
be equated to the prior knowledge students bring with them to the
classroom and can help students connect to the content taught through
the formal school curriculum and standards. Sri Lankan students,
who may frequently use indigenous systems of medicine at home, are
more likely to relate to and understand the relevance of school
material when this practice is publicly acknowledged. In addition,
students may better identify with the education they are receiving
and this may lead to higher student retention in school.
Policy 3.14
Lastly, with regard
to quality assurance a systematic method will be institutionalized
for the quality assurance of indigenous systems of medicine’s
products and processes aligned with national and global requirements.
The World Health Organization
(WHO) has set global guidelines towards evaluating the safety and
efficacy of traditional medicines. These guidelines are quite extensive
and include the evaluation of traditional medicines according to
their environment and the contexts in which they are being used.
They have also published numerous research documents from 1989-2004
covering areas of clinical research in traditional medicine, the
conservation of medicinal plants, and creating collaborations between
traditional healers and modern medical doctors. For instance, the
WHO guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional
medicine (2000) articulates a strategy to improve and promote the
proper use and development of traditional medicine. The Sri Lankan
Ministry of Indigenous Systems of Medicine is planning to follow
similar guidelines.
The way forward
Sri Lanka has taken
an important local and global step with the establishment of a Ministry
of Indigenous Systems of Medicine and has set up a model from which
other countries can hopefully learn and possibly adapt similar strategies
into their own health systems. Many other countries, such as Ethiopia,
Uganda, and Tanzania, have valuable knowledge of traditional medicines.
Many of the communities in these countries have also participated
in scientific and clinical trials regarding the use of traditional
medicine to help treat infectious diseases such as HIV-AIDS. A South-South
knowledge exchange program can facilitate other countries to develop
their own Ministry of Indigenous Systems of Medicine.
The Africa Region Knowledge
and Learning unit of the World Bank has created such opportunities
for knowledge exchanges between countries to take place. For instance,
the division has hosted two East Africa – South Asia study
tours. In these study tours, 20 development practitioners from Ethiopia,
Kenya, and Uganda, along with Bank staff, visited development projects
in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. The 20 development practitioners
visited successful projects in the areas of health, agriculture,
and informatics. The knowledge exchange between the development
practitioners has resulted in African development practitioners
beginning to implement similar projects in their respective countries.