| |
Madagascar
: Rural Water Supply and Sanitation project
The main objective
of the project ( PAEPAR ), with a credit of US$ 17.3 million equivalent,
was to improve the capacity of the government, communities and the private
sector to expand sustainable and cost-effective coverage in eater supply
and sanitation (WSS ). The project components were Policy and Legal
Framework, WSS Sector Capacity Building and Institutional Development,
and Community-based WSS Services; the last component had 2 sub-components,
i.e. Community Needs Assessment, Education and Support, and Extension
of RWSS Services. The project was implemented over the period 1998-2005.
The project design
built on successful experiences in the country and the region. For the
gravity schemes, it replicated the experience of NGOs already active
in the sector; for the hand pump schemes, it sourced the experience
of a Unicef project.
Impact
on the ground
- The government
has successfully developed the legal, institutional and policy framework
to support its rural water supply strategy (developed with the assistance
of the project) to scale up investment in the years ahead.
- A new Water
Law was adopted in 19999 and all related by-laws by 2004. in 2005,
the government endorsed the national WSS program Program National
d’Acces a l’Eau Potable et a l’Assainissement –
PNAEPA) aimed at reaching the MDG for the water and sanitation sector
- The project has
raised awareness of the benefits and high demand for safe water –
as of mid-2005, more than 3,000 requests for water points were pending
at the Directorate of Water and Sanitation (DEA). This is a remarkable
figure for a sector that has been historically neglected and underfunded.
- The government
has also developed, with the assistance of the project, a number of
tools to facilitate a smooth transition from a pilot project to a
programmatic and budget support approach. Total financing for the
RWSS national program increased from US$10.6 million in 2004 to $
14.6 million in 2005 (of which about 40% was provided from internal
resources). This permitted the provision of safe water to about 148,000
people in 2004 and 222,000 people in 2005, compared to less than 50,000
people served in 2001.
- Two new RWSS
projects based on the model developed under the project were launched
in 2005 – the AfDB finances them for a total amount of $100
million equivalent.
- The government
has successfully tested, with the support of communities, NGOs and
the private sector, the service delivery arrangements to expand sustainable
and cost-effective water supply.
- More water systems
than originally planned were built and about 400,000 people (compared
to 280,000 targeted at appraisal) have access to safe water through
the construction of 627 boreholes with hand pumps and 320 gravity
schemes.
- An innovative
delivery mechanism for developing water services in small towns was
tested by the project. This provided about 50% ( about $10 per capita
) to local governments of the financing needed to build the systems
or expand the service. Private operators and communities/local government
provide the remaining 50% and sign a medium-term leasing contract
for the water service. By the end of the project, 18 contracts were
signed, 4 systems were completed and 6 were under construction. It
is estimated that 115,000 people will have access to safe water when
all the 24 small town piped systems are completed.
- A survey taken
some 3 years after works completion found that all the 200 concerned
communities were managing their water systems in a satisfactory manner
with the support of the village caretakers trained by the project
and that spare parts were available at local small distributors supported
by the project. All the gravity piped water systems and over 95% of
the hand pumps were properly functioning at the time of the survey.
Some 320 water committees which collect user charges to replenish
the village treasury have been trained by the 2 NGOs coordinating
implementation.
- The average cost
per capita is $36 per borehole equipped with a hand pump and $19 per
gravity piped system – these are low compared to similar projects
in Africa. For boreholes, communities contributed about $270 –
mainly in labor - towards the total construction cost of $8,300 per
borehole; for gravity systems costing an average of $15,000, communities
contributed an average of $3,800 – in both cash and through
labor.
- Sector delivery
capacity has increased from less than 100 to about 300 new gravity
systems per year ( 8 new NGOs had emerged during the project ) and
to about 350 boreholes per year s international drilling companies
are currently strengthening their capacity in Madagascar.
- The impact survey
referred to earlier found that : the distance for fetching water has
decreased from about 3 km to less than 500 m; the average time spent
on fetching water has been reduced by 40 minutes per trip; water consumption
has almost doubled, from an average of 9lpcd to 17 lcpd; while the
following cannot be attributed solely to the RWSS, waterborne diseases
have been reduced ( cholera by 100%, bilharzia by 43% and diarrhea
by 8% - these data were collected from 28 Health Centers located in
the project area, and covers the period 20002-2004; the cost of medication
has been reduced by 37%, equivalent to about $9 per household per
year.
- The project successfully
tested the promotion of household latrines and set up the framework
for developing a large-scale hand washing campaign supported by a
Public Private Partnership for Hand Washing with Soap Initiative,
launched by the government in 2002.
- Vegetable gardens
have been developed around most water points and these generate an
average revenue of about $20 per household per year.
- Information,
Education and Communication (IEC) will continue to be an important
tool for the dissemination of appropriate practices – DEA plans
to expand current IEC activities to cover the entire country and has
budgeted $ 300,000 per year for that purpose.
Lessons
learned
- Professional
NGOs can be instrumental in supporting rural communities to formulate
the project, keep capital costs low and for providing assistance to
communities after the facilities have been built, thus improving the
sustainability of assets.
- Rural communities
can contribute significantly towards the capital costs of the project,
mostly in kind, as well as 100% of O&M cash costs.
- Economies of
scale can be achieved by grouping construction activities to be carried
out in small rural communities under large multi-year umbrella contracts.
- It is necessary
to include sanitation and improved hygiene behavior in the design
of a rural WSS project from the very beginning.
- Hand washing
with soap should be part of any RWSS national strategy as it is key
to reducing the risk of contracting intestinal diseases, and consequently
improving health outcomes.
- Regular water
quality testing and measures to improve and maintain drinking water
quality, especially bacteriological standards, are necessary and must
be closely monitored.
- A pilot project
is a good instrument to help design sector development policy, build
institutional sector capacity, test service delivery mechanisms and
strengthen sector coordination.
This Infobrief
has been excerpted from ICR No. 34060. For more information, please
e-mail Christophe Prevost, Senior Water and Sanitation Specialist, at
Cprevost@worldbank.org
|
|